Oh no! The classic Hollywood style!! posted by j-urb at 10:10 AM on February 9, 2007
Hey, look! A blog! posted by squirrel at 10:27 AM on February 9, 2007
I thought it was cool. Bookmarked. posted by serazin at 10:34 AM on February 9, 2007
Is there a film school in the world that doesn't use Bordwell and Thompson in at least one class? I had to read them in my bachelor's and master's programs, and that's 20 years long gone by.
It's neat that they have a blog to appeal to the modern sensibility that shuns things like textbooks in favor of online info, but is it really any different? posted by briank at 10:48 AM on February 9, 2007
Is there a film school in the world that doesn't use Bordwell and Thompson in at least one class?
Basic text on the Film Studies class I did back in 1982. posted by PeterMcDermott at 11:04 AM on February 9, 2007
Haha. I just started reading their book for my class on Visual Expression in the 20th Century. Good stuff! posted by klangklangston at 1:49 PM on February 9, 2007
He's married to Thompson? Awww!
He's like the Leonard Maltin of Film Academy, always there to keep things on an even keel, generally approving, helpful. I'm not at all surprised there's a blog, but it's a great bookmark! posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 2:50 PM on February 9, 2007
Briank -- perhaps it isn't but I'd say they're the nuts and bolts people and the blog hightlights the new thinking on material. Lately there was an astounding post about a new style of shot which is becoming prevalent which is bound to become important in the next couple of years.
jonp72: there was bloke in my film class who said, and I think he thought we were all going to agree, that he much preferred dubbed films because they allowed him to play more attention to the mis-en-scene. Hmm... no .... posted by feelinglistless at 3:39 PM on February 9, 2007
posted by j-urb at 10:10 AM on February 9, 2007