<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 5856</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 5856</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 5856</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/03/lester.htm"&gt;The Privacy Space&lt;/a&gt; In every MeFi thread about personal privacy in the digital age, the comment inevitably arises:  &quot;You already have zero privacy.  Get over it.&quot;  The article even quotes it.  But someone else in the article says, &quot;The idea that technology and privacy are intrinsically opposed is false.&quot;  Great article (from a non-techie standpoint) on the coming promises of privacy tech.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5856</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skot</dc:creator>		<category>technology</category>		<category>privacy</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: SilentSalamander</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856/#50334</link>	
		<description>You already have zero privacy. Get over it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5856-50334</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SilentSalamander</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Skot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856/#50342</link>	
		<description>How did I know that was coming?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5856-50342</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skot</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: greyscale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856/#50379</link>	
		<description>we&apos;ve got an adversarial system. if you want privacy provide false info.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5856-50379</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greyscale</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. skullhead</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5856/#50381</link>	
		<description>The problem is that encryption isn&apos;t universal and transparent (from a software standpoint). If everyone used encryption, Carnivore etc.  disappears in a puff of logic. *POOF* The average person needs to be educated about such matters (most don&apos;t even know what encryption is).Spread the word, folks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5856-50381</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:44:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. skullhead</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
