Comments on: WTFCNN?

WTFCNN?

chunking express — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:10:19 -0800

WTFCNN?

By: Optamystic

Optamystic — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:13:19 -0800

WTFCE?

By: MaxVonCretin

MaxVonCretin — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:15:22 -0800

OMG TEH MSM IZ TEH SUXXOR!!!

By: edjo

edjo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:21:14 -0800

That's not news!

By: inconsequentialist

inconsequentialist — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:22:04 -0800

That's not news! That's what they should call the blog.

By: katillathehun

katillathehun — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:25:08 -0800

At first I thought it would be awesome because CNN has some doozies of headlines. But the WTFCNN blogger is just sort of highlighting anything. "Charging Moose Brings Down Helicopter" isn't really a WTF headline because... well, that's what happened. Unlike one I saw recently, which said, "Fire Spares Children From 1 of 2 Wives".

By: psmealey

psmealey — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:27:45 -0800

Pat O'Brien fond of hookers, cocaine.

By: smackfu

smackfu — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:29:02 -0800

Trying too hard. Whoever writes those does have some fun though. Here are two from right now: # China's got an extra $1,000,000,000,000 # Sparks fly off SUV, bumper falls in icy wrecks

By: phaedon

phaedon — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:26 -0800

i totally had this idea first. bonus points for the cnn type.

By: psmealey

psmealey — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:31 -0800

You can do that all day long, pretty much. Since at any given moment, about 4 of the 10 stories covered in their breaking news box are either sensational tripe or celebrity 'news', it would imagine that it's almost impossible not to have such headlines appear ludicrous or comedic

By: bru

bru — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:57 -0800

Excellent blog idea. It could be widened to include more than CCN online's titles (like nytimes and a few others) but I like how it just registers observation. Thanks for the link, chunking express.

By: Terminal Verbosity

Terminal Verbosity — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:37:19 -0800

I just wish they weren't screen caps, but actual links. I really need to know how that mother was using her baby as a weapon. Club or projectile?

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:38:28 -0800

"(...)isn't really a WTF headline because... well, that's what happened. posted by katillathehun at 10:25 AM on March 19 Exactly. "Mom Pleads Guilty To Using Baby As A Weapon" really happened-- a mom used her very young baby as a baseball bat and swung it at her boyfriend. I remember that occurred on a day when there were plenty of "WTF were you thinking mom/dad?" stories in the paper. Maybe his blog should be called WTFAmerica? WTFHuman Beings? WTFZombie Overlords?

By: delmoi

delmoi — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:42:13 -0800

Could be better if they were posting links with comments, ala fark

By: chunking express

chunking express — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:45:01 -0800

delmoi, I think the point is the stories themselves aren't as interesting as the headlines. It'd be nice to know what the deal is with the gaping hole in San Fransisco, but I imagine once you found out you'd be disappointed.

By: YoBananaBoy

YoBananaBoy — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:45:27 -0800

Could be better if they were posting links with comments, ala fark and more youtube, ala mefi.

By: cortex

cortex — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:49:38 -0800

Eerie. Some friends of mine have started using the abbreviation "wtfiwwp" [what the fuck is wrong with people?] as shorthand in IRC. Started with one friend who has a habit of linking awful or idiotic or at least highly questionable news items, and who would, unironically and unselfconsciously, usually prefix the link with some variation of "what the fuck is wrong with [foo]?" Eventually, we condensed that into wtfiwwp as general code. He even started to start a blog on the subject, wtfiwwp.com, but it has all of one post so far. Boh.

By: ninebelow

ninebelow — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:51:42 -0800

God, I hate the American editorial comma.

By: Dizzy

Dizzy — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:59:08 -0800

I hate it's best friend, the misplaced apostrophe, more.

By: rubyeyo

rubyeyo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:01:53 -0800

This was a great idea when it was created and thanks to CNN there is never a shortage of material. Good job Fidgets. Now that you have been FPP'd I will bear your interweb warrior childrenz!

By: bru

bru — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:05:52 -0800

chunking express: "the point is the stories themselves aren't as interesting as the headlines." Exactly. Writing headlines is a kind of sport. I once wrote headlines for a daily newspaper. We had fun. I understand how some people can think that this blog is mocking CNN's headlines writers, but I wouldn't be so sure: it's a way of acknowledging the funny side of their craft.

By: nathancaswell

nathancaswell — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:08:17 -0800

"Scabby lip promo, hitting mom make meth ugly" reads like randomly generated porn spam text.

By: Jay Reimenschneider

Jay Reimenschneider — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:10:26 -0800

19 yr old CNN Interns Write Blurbs- Cause Confusion

By: dammitjim

dammitjim — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:12:23 -0800

Hey, this was my idea, too. Well, I'm glad somebody had the time to do it. I think the point is the stories themselves aren't as interesting as the headlines. No, the point is that these headlines, and the stories that go with them, are very NY Post. Trashy. CNN is catering to the People magazine trend of running whatever gets the interest of the slavering masses for a second.

By: meta_eli

meta_eli — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:13:56 -0800

But isn't that the "most viewed" feed? So of course it's going to be the fluff that gets forwarded around the office. The headlines are kinda cheesy, but they aren't so bad for a story that wasn't intended for the front page.

By: nathancaswell

nathancaswell — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:18:23 -0800

dammitjim has it.

By: kimota

kimota — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:38:21 -0800

Gaping hole in San Francisco.

By: Parannoyed

Parannoyed — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:47:09 -0800

Metafilter: WTF CNN?

By: hal9k

hal9k — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:59:14 -0800

Writing headlines is a kind of sport. I once wrote headlines for a daily newspaper. I nailed one a year or two ago. Wished I still worked for Gannett. Snapple froze a huge tower of liquid product and billed it as the largest popsicle ever. But the crane broke and it ended up as slush all over the Manhattan streets. My headline? "Crack Snapple Pop"

By: kneelconqueso

kneelconqueso — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:13:18 -0800

when i saw the 'gaping hole in san francisco' headline i was hoping it was going to be about goatse.

By: R. Mutt

R. Mutt — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:13:23 -0800

I bet Ted Turner can't bear to turn his tv on.

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:20:35 -0800

Gaping hole in San Francisco. That's not news, darling.

By: diastematic

diastematic — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:21:51 -0800

Could be better if they were posting links with comments, ala fark And done via audio. I'd tune in to that podcast.

By: simonemarie

simonemarie — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:31:15 -0800

Bread, pizza can threaten lives of mom, son.

By: The Straightener

The Straightener — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:32:15 -0800

If they followed their cut up style headlines with gonzo stories written by journalists high on DMT I might actually read their site.

By: rkent

rkent — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:37:37 -0800

Alternately, you could just read the continuously updated version posted top dead center on CNN.com. But that would require applying your own sense of humor, which is... not for everyone.

By: now i'm piste

now i'm piste — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:41:13 -0800

Flagged as Newsfilter.

By: availablelight

availablelight — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:50:12 -0800

"Charging Moose Brings Down Helicopter" isn't really a WTF headline because... well, that's what happened. Unlike one I saw recently, which said, "Fire Spares Children From 1 of 2 Wives". posted by katillathehun Actually, that headline referred to a fire in NYC that got an enormous amount of publicity on the East Coast (9 children died, one of the deadliest fires in the city not including the WTC). The headline spells out exactly, well, what happened: the victims were African immigrants from Mali, and polygamists....the children of one of the landlord's wives survived, the children of his wife #2, didn't.

By: availablelight

availablelight — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:52:43 -0800

That being said, yeah, lol, wtf, etc....CNN said that children were spared from only one wife, but the second one got 'em!

By: Jay Reimenschneider

Jay Reimenschneider — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:03:32 -0800

"That bread & pizza can threaten the life of mom, son." "Sorry, dad."

By: wolftrouble

wolftrouble — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:04:34 -0800

As much as I think they're a little harsh on some of the headlines (like the ones that are crazy, but only because the story is crazy), I'm happy someone is pointing out how fucking ridiculous cnn.com is as a news source. If it's not the batshit insane headlines, it's the pop-up ad that Firefox thankfully blocks every time, or the 50% articles on celebrities, or it's "What's our insane commentators are saying now". I pretty much ditched CNN in favor of Reuters.com awhile ago, specifically because of this tripe. CNN *does* tend to actually carry all of the same articles, but they're buried so far down underneath mountains of sensationalist crap I'd rather go elsewhere.

By: ken_zoan

ken_zoan — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:21:18 -0800

Some of these are better than anything The Onion could dream up. Truth really is more hilarious than fiction.

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:25:05 -0800

Flagged as Newsfilterfilter.

By: The Card Cheat

The Card Cheat — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:45:32 -0800

I'd like to see a version of this for Variety.

By: JHarris

JHarris — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:46:48 -0800

"Charging Moose Brings Down Helicopter" isn't a WTF headline, it's a WTF story. I lost faith in CNN myself a few weeks ago when I saw a story entitled "Date With A Vampire" on their primary channel. They had an artist's rendering that looked like promo art for Buffy. It was exquisitely awful.

By: languagehat

languagehat — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:16:27 -0800

God, I hate the American editorial comma. You mean the Oxford comma?

By: Ynoxas

Ynoxas — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:20:29 -0800

Why the hate for CNN? cnn.com has been, for all practical purposes, my only home page since as long as I remember. 1997? Maybe 1998? Yes, they tend to have lots of extraneous stuff, but it's not like the big news stories are being hidden by the celebrity/odd stories. They get "above the fold" when there are no other big stories (granted, that's an editorial decision we're not privy to). They are usually very quick in the "breaking news" arena as well. I tried using google news as my homepage for a while, but it just didn't work for me. As far as the headlines go, I'm firmly in the "it's an art" camp, and from print newspaper people I know, the fanciful headlines are rarely accidents. In general, I'm particularly fond of the heavy alliteration headlines: "Barack bashes Bush's base" and the like.

By: CitrusFreak12

CitrusFreak12 — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:26:23 -0800

I support this blog. My dorm has a television in the lobby that shows campus-related things, but at the bottom is a CNN headline ticker. My friends and I often ask "WTF CNN?" when walking past and seeing things like "Charging Moose Brings Down Helicopter." That one was a favorite.

By: fidgets

fidgets — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:29:49 -0800

Well, Ive been blushing like a schoolgirl all morning.

By: nathancaswell

nathancaswell — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:38:09 -0800

and it takes a lot to make that schoolgirl blush, if you know what i mean.

By: apodo

apodo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:49:22 -0800

You mean the Oxford comma? No - that's a comma as well as the word 'and'. Ninebelow surely meant the use of a comma instead of 'and', which seems very inelegant to me as well.

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:52:10 -0800

Some of those headlines are beautiful. I might get a tattoo of Grandma, said to hear geese, not guilty in tot death. You mean the Oxford comma? Eh? The 'American editorial comma' is nothing at all like the Oxford comma, which invariably precedes the word 'and', while the editorial comma replaces the word 'and'. Or seems to - sometimes I think American subs are just really, really into commas, and like to sprinkle them about the shop for kicks.

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:53:31 -0800

I should've previewed, eh?

By: goo

goo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:54:26 -0800

You mean the Oxford comma? No, the one instead of 'and': Thongs, fishnets called harmful to young girls Bread, pizza can threaten lives of mom, son

By: goo

goo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:55:46 -0800

hahaha! jinx

By: Ynoxas

Ynoxas — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:55:52 -0800

Well, Ive been blushing like a schoolgirl all morning. posted by fidgets at 1:29 PM on March 19 and it takes a lot to make that schoolgirl blush, if you know what i mean. posted by nathancaswell at 1:38 PM on March 19 Fidgets finds faux fawning flattering. Nathan nixes notion of needless notoriety.

By: apodo

apodo — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:58:35 -0800

Three replies in a row - have we been trolled?

By: ninebelow

ninebelow — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:21:19 -0800

Others have explained what I meant: the comma that appears in American headlines that is usually used to mean "and" but can apparently stand for any sort of conjunctive the subeditor feels like and so produces utterly impenetrable headlines. I'll just add I hate the bloody Oxford comma too.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:29:28 -0800

Mom Uses Baby As Weapon To Beat Man

By: Ynoxas

Ynoxas — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:30:37 -0800

Consensus: contractionary commas cause chaos, confusion. I'm done. Sorry.

By: R. Mutt

R. Mutt — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:30:45 -0800

Why the hate for CNN? CNN, once real news, now real crap.

By: languagehat

languagehat — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:32:55 -0800

The 'American editorial comma' is nothing at all like the Oxford comma, which invariably precedes the word 'and', while the editorial comma replaces the word 'and'. That would be compelling if there were in fact such a term as "American editorial comma." But Your search - "American editorial comma - did not match any documents. I have seen plenty of complaints about serial commas from Brits who seem to think they're an American thing, so that's what I assumed ninebelow meant. And since ninebelow says "I hate the bloody Oxford comma too," I don't feel my misunderstanding of the target of his attack made much difference.

By: languagehat

languagehat — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:35:03 -0800

And having read the story about the mother using her baby as a weapon, I feel compelled to add, as a warning to prospective parents, "See? This is what happens when you name a child Chytoria."

By: stopgap

stopgap — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:44:05 -0800

I'll just add I hate the bloody Oxford comma too. How is this even possible? The serial comma serves a useful purpose and reduces confusion.

By: ninebelow

ninebelow — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:20:31 -0800

That would be compelling if there were in fact such a term as "American editorial comma." Did you really think that was a technical term? I used it because it seemed like a straightforward description of the phenomena (and I guess I was right because everyone else seemed to grasp what I was talking about.) I doubt there is a technical term for this practice but if there is I would be delighted to be informed of it so I can correctly label the source of my ire. I don't feel my misunderstanding of the target of his attack made much difference. ! I'm sorry I can't fathom what you mean here. I dislike the "editorial comma" because it causes confusion. I dislike the serial comma on the much weaker ground that it is inelegant and extraneous.

By: Cranberry

Cranberry — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:22:02 -0800

I occasionally use the Oxford comma, but I do not inhale.

By: phaedon

phaedon — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:49:36 -0800

the other day, i spent an hour building a FPP about cnn's coverage of midge potts. i accidentally closed the browser window at the very end. im still kind of pissed.

By: kirkaracha

kirkaracha — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:29:52 -0800

The Washington Post: High Court [heh] Takes "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" Case, Toke Two

By: nogudnik

nogudnik — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:43:26 -0800

This # Sparks fly off SUV, bumper falls in icy wrecks is the worst haiku I have ever read. It's like they're not even trying.

By: spiderwire

spiderwire — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:44:00 -0800

Why the hate for CNN? They use Vladimir Zhirinovsky as their Russia pundit.

By: rob511

rob511 — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:29:53 -0800

As with your quotidian fortune cookie, rare is the CNN headline that can't be enlivened by appending "in bed": - A380 makes big statement - Zoo's bear cub "better off dead" - Naomi Campbell cleans up

By: five fresh fish

five fresh fish — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:20:25 -0800

Fark does better headlines.

By: tehloki

tehloki — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:36:26 -0800

Yet another example of why it is safe to believe that most local news is generated by some supercomputer in a church basement, pulling words from dictionaries and "I Love Lucy" scripts.

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:29:36 -0800

I dislike the serial comma on the much weaker ground that it is inelegant and extraneous. I love the serial comma on the grounds that it is elegant, and never extraneous. (Well, maybe it is extraneous sometimes, but even when the meaning is clear without its presence, it provides a slight pause, a moment to reflect on the list as it is ending, and a rhythmic coda to the sentence. Then again, I like lists of three things in short phrases separated by commas without a final 'and' too, for similar reasons.)