<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Freedom of Sights and Sounds</title>
      <link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaFilter post Freedom of Sights and Sounds</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:10:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Freedom of Sights and Sounds</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds</link>	
    <description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalfreedom.org/&quot; title=&quot;Freedom of Sights and Sounds&quot;&gt;Digital Freedom Campaign&lt;/a&gt; believes that new technologies are essential to the creativity and innovation, and that digital technology enables anyone and everyone to be an artist and an innovator.  The DFC is dedicated to defending the rights of artists, innovators, creators and consumers to use lawful technology free of unreasonable government restrictions and without fear of costly lawsuits. </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>terrapin</dc:creator>
	
	<category>music</category>
	
	<category>video</category>
	
	<category>photography</category>
	
	<category>consumers</category>
	
	<category>technology</category>
	
	<category>rights</category>
	
	<category>digitalrights</category>
	
	<category>RIAA</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: doctor_negative</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635605</link>	
    <description>Don&apos;t we already have an EFF?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635605</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>doctor_negative</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: delmoi</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635622</link>	
    <description>Yeah, I was about to ask, what&apos;s wrong with the EFF? Do these guys have some complaint about how the EFF works?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635622</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:32:43 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: drjimmy11</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635643</link>	
    <description>I like the EFF. 

They don&apos;t make patently false claims Like:

&lt;em&gt;digital technology enables anyone and everyone to be an artist and an innovator&lt;/em&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635643</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>drjimmy11</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: brundlefly</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635647</link>	
    <description>At first glance this seems more focused on the creative arts than the EFF. Nothing about privacy issues or E-voting.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635647</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635656</link>	
    <description>&lt;i&gt;They don&apos;t make patently false claims Like:
&quot;digital technology enables anyone and everyone to be an artist and an innovator&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Yeah. I guess pencils are too hard to master. Filtering someone else&apos;s work through Photoshop is much easier.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635656</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: phaedon</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635683</link>	
    <description>I thought I liked the EFF.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=op0y-qhwO7g&quot;&gt;Then I saw this cavalier effort at an interview and I was seriously disappointed.&lt;/a&gt;  

&lt;small&gt;I&apos;m not that familiar with the MoveOn situation, by the way.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635683</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:54:18 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>phaedon</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: spiderwire</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635691</link>	
    <description>Weak post. Besides the EFF, CC, the ACLU&apos;s tech division, etc., there&apos;s scores of advocates for this particular issue. Why are these guys special again? Why is this different from linking to Lawrence Lessig&apos;s blog or a Cory Doctorow screed?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635691</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>spiderwire</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Mayor West</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635711</link>	
    <description>You may have rounded corners, candy colors, and aquafied, dropshadowed, outer-glowed, gradiated fonts, but you, sir, are no Web 2.0.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635711</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Mayor West</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: gurple</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1635714</link>	
    <description>The DFC?  But the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dfc.furr.org/&quot;&gt;Dysfunctional Family Circus&lt;/a&gt; is all &lt;em&gt;about&lt;/em&gt; fear of costly lawsuits.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1635714</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:50:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>gurple</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: terrapin</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom-of-Sights-and-Sounds#1646382</link>	
    <description>I am not sure anyone visited the site before commenting, but that&apos;s your right too.  The EFF (among others) are &lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalfreedom.org/partners/index.html&quot;&gt;partners&lt;/a&gt; with this group.  Other partners include the &lt;a href=&quot;cea.org&quot;&gt;Consumer Electronics Association&lt;/a&gt; who believe that the RIAA, et al, are trying to suppress innovation in consumer electronics.

Personally, I think the more people fighting for artist and consumer rights the better, but that&apos;s just me.

As for labeling this a weak post?  We can&apos;t all post about saving all caps day.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.59818-1646382</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 11:51:39 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>terrapin</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
