<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Open Medicine Journal</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Open Medicine Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:29:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Open Medicine Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal</link>	
		<description>The inaugural edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openmedicine.ca/&quot;&gt;Open Medicine&lt;/a&gt;, a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access medical journal is now available online. 

The online medical journal launched in the aftermath of &lt;a href=&quot;http://cjnr.mcgill.ca/archive/38/edit38_2_Gottlieb.htm&quot;&gt;a rift last year between some editors and the publisher&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cma.ca/cmaj/&quot;&gt;Canadian Medical Association Journal&lt;/a&gt;.  

Among the first interesting articles?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/8&quot;&gt;a review of studies which suggests that health outcomes may be superior in patients cared for in Canada versus the United States&lt;/a&gt; (but differences are not consistent), even though &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/04/18/health-canada-us.html&quot;&gt;spending is higher south of the border&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:22:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>furtive</dc:creator>		<category>open</category>		<category>medicine</category>		<category>openMedicine</category>		<category>journal</category>		<category>cmaj</category>		<category>canadian</category>		<category>association</category>		<category>cc</category>		<category>creativeCommons</category>		<category>medical</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: furtive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1658738</link>	
		<description>This is a pretty big deal for several reasons:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openmedicine.ca/index.php/om/about/editorialPolicies#custom5&quot;&gt;Editorialy independant&lt;/a&gt;
No publication delay
Reprints are free
The journal uses a &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/&quot;&gt;Creative Commons license&lt;/a&gt;
They &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openmedicine.ca/index.php/om/about/editorialPolicies#custom4&quot;&gt;refuse advertisements from the pharmaceutical and medical device industry&lt;/a&gt;.

P.S.  I&apos;m at work, did I beat BoingBoing?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1658738</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>furtive</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rxrfrx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1658772</link>	
		<description>You beat BB, but Open Medicine didn&apos;t beat &lt;a href=&quot;http://medicine.plosjournals.org/&quot;&gt;PLoS Medicine&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1658772</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:38:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rxrfrx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Flashman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1658819</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;...in the United States, they&apos;re currently spending a little over $7,100 per individual on health care annually, whereas in Canada we&apos;re spending a little over $2,900 per individual annually...&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1658819</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:02:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flashman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Staggering Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1658972</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not really familiar with them, but there&apos;s also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/&quot;&gt;Hindawi Publishing&apos;s open access journal collection&lt;/a&gt;, which (I believe) are all peer-reviewed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1658972</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:29:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staggering Jack</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: amberglow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1659876</link>	
		<description>of course they&apos;re better outcomes--we have almost 50 million who don&apos;t get any early detection or care at all for anything, let alone preventative care.

Businesses are now speaking up for universal care here, too--they know it&apos;s cheaper for them. We&apos;ll be seeing action soon, i bet.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1659876</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:19:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: misanthropicsarah</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60395/Open-Medicine-Journal#1660400</link>	
		<description>I actually found it very useful because it&apos;s OPEN SOURCE and uses creative commons. This blew my mind when I found out about it a few weeks ago.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.60395-1660400</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:22:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicsarah</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
