The basic lie detection technique goes like this: You ask your friend a question on where he was or what he did, that he can not possibly know if he is lying.So let' see , you don't know what happened at the Bar, make up a story that could be true (bar fights aren't that impossible) ..and if you are not pleased with some kind of response you like, you can destroy the house...without knowing if that really happened. How frigging lunatic is that ? Even more lunatic, trusting him because he managed to utter wtf ? Even MORE lunatic.
If he did, stay all night long at theBar, then probably you should ask him something like: ‘I heard there was a big fight in that bar yesterday and the bar man got really hit. Police was there and everything’.Now you watch carefully for his reactions.
If he delays to respond visually or agrees with your little story then the bastard is lying, feel free and break down the house. If, on the other hand, he looks at you and tells you, ‘what are you talking about I was there all night long. There was no fight’. Then you are the psychopath. Because you are not trusting him enough.
We may write in English but no one in this site is a native English speaker.Let's guess they're Chinese. Could you write that well in Chinese?
« Older Putins spy war on the West... | Learn Spanish with podcasts fr... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Hildegarde at 5:15 AM on May 20, 2007