<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Future House Now</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Future House Now</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:55 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Future House Now</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.futurehousenow.com/"&gt;&quot;Future House Now&lt;/a&gt; is dedicated to exploring ideas about better living in family homes that are affordable, modern, efficient, healthy, environmentally responsible and available today.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:56:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>		<category>houses</category>		<category>homes</category>		<category>environment</category>		<category>architecture</category>		<category>design</category>		<category>smallhomes</category>		<category>blog</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1716956</link>	
		<description>Cool stuff. Great designs. 
However, I have this funny feeling that their definition of &quot;affordable&quot; is not one I am familiar with. Just a hunch.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1716956</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: boo_radley</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1716972</link>	
		<description>Neat stuff, dobbs. My first reaction was &quot;man, there&apos;s a bunch of great articles here. I should post this to metafilter.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1716972</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:53:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boo_radley</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mortimer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1716988</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m really surprised that there isn&apos;t more mention these days about earth-sheltered homes. My ultimate goal is to build one for retirement. My understanding is that it&apos;s a rather reasonable cost, and climate-control is essentially taken care of. Plus it&apos;s like living in Hobbiton!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1716988</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:05:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mortimer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: papakwanz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1717092</link>	
		<description>Family love future house!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1717092</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>papakwanz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BrotherCaine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1717145</link>	
		<description>Mortimer, I think rammed earth construction has taken over the niche that earth-sheltered used to occupy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1717145</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrotherCaine</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mortimer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1717216</link>	
		<description>I agree with you in part, BrotherCaine, but I still like the earth-sheltered idea a lot more. And living in Ohio, I think the R-value of a hill of earth would pay off over freestanding rammed-earth. Both in Summer and Winter.

I have no evidence to back that up, so you know.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1717216</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mortimer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: serazin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1717306</link>	
		<description>Bookmarked the site. Thanks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1717306</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:33:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>serazin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: flapjax at midnite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61771/Future-House-Now#1717789</link>	
		<description>I bookmarked it too. Thanks, dobbs.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.61771-1717789</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flapjax at midnite</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
