<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 623</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/623//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 623</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 22:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 22:33:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 623</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/623/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/000129/0129sale.html"&gt;The San Francisco Examiner is up for sale?&lt;/a&gt; I didn&apos;t even know this. I&apos;m surprised no dotcoms have swooped in to buy the dead trees media. Apparently, they need a buyer very soon, or the paper will merge with the SF Chronicle. Will SF become yet another one-newspaper city? Sad...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.623</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>sanfrancisco</category>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>newspapers</category>		<category>media</category>		<category>communications</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/623/#412</link>	
		<description>Well, it seems like most newspapers are owned by one company now anyway. Along with television news channels...and that Time Warner AOL merger didn&apos;t help.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.623-412</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 22:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
