Fair and balanced....
June 24, 2007 8:48 PM   Subscribe

How does one acknowledge the 900 lb. gorilla in the room without accusations of antisemitism?
posted by Huplescat (33 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: How does one delete a terrible post without accusations of antiterriblepostism? -- cortex



 
Not in this manner, I suspect.
posted by churl at 8:52 PM on June 24, 2007


I found you another source!
posted by nasreddin at 8:53 PM on June 24, 2007


I do not understand this post.
posted by Justinian at 8:56 PM on June 24, 2007


So you're saying that the assertions of the second link (a Jewish/Zionist/baby-eating cabal pulls the strings behind the scenes on the world stage) are supported by arguments found at the first link, the mad ravings of a Nazi?

Yeah, I can confirm it: you're anti-Semitic. Go back to Stormfront.
posted by KokuRyu at 8:58 PM on June 24, 2007


I confess, I don't either. Is it about the Jay-Oh-Oh's?
posted by jonson at 8:58 PM on June 24, 2007


GYOASBFW
posted by grouse at 9:00 PM on June 24, 2007


Last post.
posted by The Bellman at 9:00 PM on June 24, 2007


Can we get a moderator to step in here? I think posts like this are exactly why I paid my 5 bucks.
posted by Ironmouth at 9:00 PM on June 24, 2007


Oh dear.
posted by Arturus at 9:02 PM on June 24, 2007


This post is terrible, sugartits.
posted by CRM114 at 9:03 PM on June 24, 2007 [2 favorites]


I'm not being snarky. Really. I just don't understand the post. Why is the word "acknowledge" linked to Nazi recollections? What does it have to do with the idea that Israel has a big influence on U.S. foreign policy? Is the post implying that Israel is like Nazis? Is the post implying that we give Israel a pass because of past anti-semitism? Is it something else entirely?

I just don't understand it.
posted by Justinian at 9:03 PM on June 24, 2007


So you're saying that the assertions of the second link (a Jewish/Zionist/baby-eating cabal pulls the strings behind the scenes on the world stage)

Huh? The strong influence of AIPAC on the U.S. government is not exactly unknown or a novel idea. In the last Iraq Appropriation bill that the democrats wrote originally contained a provision that would have made an attack on Iran without congressional approval illegal. But, that section actually came out of the bill, in part because AIPAC lobbied against it.

In any event, I don't think this post is long to live.
posted by delmoi at 9:04 PM on June 24, 2007


Hmm. It's probably fair to say that the average Americans understanding of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is deeply flawed and hopelessly skewed towards the Israeli side, in part becuase the Israelis understand PR and the arabs don't.

It's also true that a lot of Americans treat the word "antisemitic" as if it was synonymous with "critical of Israel".

This, however, probably does not help.
posted by Artw at 9:05 PM on June 24, 2007


Shall we talk about the influence of the Saudis, while we're at it?

I don't "acknowledge" this, not because it's anti-semitic, but because it's wrong.
posted by Steven C. Den Beste at 9:06 PM on June 24, 2007


¿WTF?
posted by taosbat at 9:08 PM on June 24, 2007


The first link is kind of fascinating though. I just wish it wasn't tied into such a nutjob post.
posted by svenni at 9:09 PM on June 24, 2007


Huh? The strong influence of AIPAC on the U.S. government is not exactly unknown or a novel idea.

Yeah, but in my experience, however limited it may be, the Left tends discuss the pro-Israel lobby in the US in purely racial terms, which, as a former Lefty, I find reprehensible. Still, not sure what band of the political spectrum Huplescat hails from...
posted by KokuRyu at 9:09 PM on June 24, 2007


What rhetoric flair!
posted by Falconetti at 9:10 PM on June 24, 2007


Hey, where's the atheism link? What? No atheism link?
posted by flapjax at midnite at 9:11 PM on June 24, 2007


huplescat, take your head out of your ass
posted by docpops at 9:12 PM on June 24, 2007


If the j'accuse fits, wear it.
posted by melissa may at 9:12 PM on June 24, 2007


The first link really is pretty interesting, actually. I haven't the patience right now, and there's still no indication of any link between them.

This is actually pretty sad, because there's almost a passable post in here, if you'd taken a bit more time on developing it.
posted by Arturus at 9:16 PM on June 24, 2007


Personally, I find it disturbing that the holocaust has gone from being a thing where 12 million people were killed to a thing where 6 million Jews were killed.

Somebody should do a coherent post on the subject.
posted by Kid Charlemagne at 9:16 PM on June 24, 2007


You know who else had a problem with the Jews?

Adolf Hitler.
posted by infinitywaltz at 9:17 PM on June 24, 2007


You could have just posted about the Mearsheimer and Walt paper if that's what you wanted to talk about. Then someone could have said something like, "Of course there's an Israel lobby, but if they're so effective at stifling all criticism, how is it that Mearsheimer and Walt are getting coverage for their article everywhere?"

Then you could say...well I'm not sure what you would say next, but I'm sure you'd say something interesting.

Then again, I guess there's no need to bother, considering how many times it's been done here before.
posted by Partial Law at 9:18 PM on June 24, 2007


i think it's terrible that people are concerned about 900 lb gorillas when it's much smaller primates that are causing all the problems
posted by pyramid termite at 9:18 PM on June 24, 2007 [2 favorites]


Somebody should do a coherent post on the subject.

Yeah, a coherent Metafilter post will make all those 12 million deaths all right.
posted by KokuRyu at 9:18 PM on June 24, 2007


ps - this is an awful post
posted by pyramid termite at 9:19 PM on June 24, 2007


Personally, I find it disturbing that the holocaust has gone from being a thing where 12 million people were killed to a thing where 6 million Jews were killed.

I'm sad that happened for you. It never went that way for me.
posted by taosbat at 9:22 PM on June 24, 2007


Where "GTF" means "Go the fuck" and "BTSF" means "back to Stormfront", GTFBTSF.
posted by Pope Guilty at 9:26 PM on June 24, 2007


Personally, I find it disturbing that the holocaust has gone from being a thing where 12 million people were killed to a thing where 6 million Jews were killed.

Good point, there was nothing special, unique, or significant about the Shoah, so why should it have a special denomination? I find it disturbing we refer to Bataan death march and don't include the people who died on D-Day.
posted by Falconetti at 9:26 PM on June 24, 2007 [1 favorite]


i think it's terrible that people are concerned about 900 lb gorillas when it's much smaller primates that are causing all the problems

Poo-flinging primates are ruining Metafilter.
posted by darkstar at 9:27 PM on June 24, 2007


First link is to part of Rudolph Hoess' memoir; wikipedia tells me he was commandant of Auschwitz. The extract tells of the compulsion to obey authority.

Second link is to an article on a controversial study of US foreign policy

The relation to the second link is tenuous at best. I can't quite connect it. I think Huplescat is saying something like how Allies couldn't understand why the SS compulsively obeyed authority and noone shot Himmler to save millions of Jewish lives, we don't understand why the US continues to slant its foreign policy to the benefit of a powerful lobby, and any attempts to do so claims anti-semitism.

This is a really poor post; I've seen it better covered previously, in an editorial about how too much attention is paid to the Middle East. And Mearsheimer is well known.

Still the memoirs snippet was interesting.
posted by Deconstruct Now! at 9:27 PM on June 24, 2007


« Older "I could call them Labori, but that strikes me as...   |   1000 Science Lecture Videos Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments