A wonderful post! The "bear" made me squeal with delight, for instance.
I used to do sparkler "drawings" (I guess some of those involve sparklers of some sort, judging by this photo), but after setting fire to a rug I left that area to the pros. posted by soundofsuburbia at 2:59 AM on June 28, 2007
Hey that was pretty cool. posted by gomichild at 3:42 AM on June 28, 2007
Not sure what this is exactly, but it isn't graffiti. Even though graffiti is, by it's nature, ephemeral and semi-permanent, it surely has to last long enough to get *some* viewers. It also, IMO, has to exist in a public or semi-public arena (thus transforming all those graffiti 'artists' into plain old 'artists' and graphic designers.
I mean, if this stuff counts, why can't we have conceptual graffiti, where I exhibit 'We don't need another anti-hero': a postcard describing my idea of a dipper, rifling through the purses and handbags of Women of World War II
Also, where are the classics of the canon? His knob and two balls with a single globule of jism spurting from the tip? The quadraplegic nude, urinating into a handle-less chamberpot?
Guy needs to learn to walk before he can run. posted by PeterMcDermott at 3:44 AM on June 28, 2007
(the bear is pretty awesome, but I like the arrow... they must have had a roller of some sort to keep it that straight...) posted by chuckdarwin at 3:59 AM on June 28, 2007
totally geil. the bear was great! posted by Etta Hollis at 4:23 AM on June 28, 2007
they must have had a roller of some sort to keep it that straight...
I was thinking that maybe he held his arm out or at an angle using the railing as support to keep it straight. posted by chillmost at 4:36 AM on June 28, 2007
Seems like you could do the same thing with a lot less effort using Photoshop. posted by DU at 4:48 AM on June 28, 2007
Awesome. I liked the guy walking the dog/monster. posted by desjardins at 4:55 AM on June 28, 2007
Some of those are just stunning. posted by empath at 5:23 AM on June 28, 2007
Great idea, superbly executed. I love it. posted by Acey at 5:47 AM on June 28, 2007
Can someone explain to me how this is done? Is it just a long exposure? I've always been curious but I've never learned the specifics. posted by Nedroid at 6:11 AM on June 28, 2007
Seems like you could do the same thing with a lot less effort using Photoshop.
Oh my God - someone please tell them right away! We can save them some future embarrassment. Imagine, all this time wasted! posted by ORthey at 7:15 AM on June 28, 2007
Awesome find! I've been doing a lot of night shots lately (a few of them in this flickr slide show - self link obviously) and have been considering adding some light-painting to them.
Although this style is more quirky than what I want to do, it's excellent, and challenges me to see what I can come up with.
Thanks, From Bklyn! posted by The Deej at 7:44 AM on June 28, 2007
Nedroid: Time exposure. Camera fixed, as on a tripod. Must be done in semi-darkness so as not to overexpose the background. You can also carry around a flash and light up various parts of the scene, including multiple exposures of yourself. posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 8:45 AM on June 28, 2007 [1 favorite]
The Picasso pics were done in darkness with a flash or two to illuminate and "freeze" the master artist. posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 8:47 AM on June 28, 2007 [1 favorite]
We used to do this in college but with acid instead of cameras.
Finally, now I know why they were all so eerily familiar... posted by From Bklyn at 9:23 AM on June 28, 2007
I tried this once, long ago, on film with a flashlight, but never got anything close to this ... truly amazing. posted by Kadin2048 at 7:10 PM on June 28, 2007
« Older The Best Laid Plans: The Story of How the Governme... | Not without some controversy, ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
I used to do sparkler "drawings" (I guess some of those involve sparklers of some sort, judging by this photo), but after setting fire to a rug I left that area to the pros.
posted by soundofsuburbia at 2:59 AM on June 28, 2007