The question of technique is more interesting. In the New York Times article, Heffernan notices film techniques designed for small screens:
The ingenious response by "Satacracy 88" has been to give screen time to tactile objects shown in actual size. Watch for star turns by an imperfectly peeled hardboiled egg, base makeup on a triangular sponge and unsmooth hair in a ponytail holder.
When the "Satacracy 88" camera is turned on faces, they often appear in extreme close-up, which means that viewers get the experience of life-size body parts again -- a single, wary eye; a trembling thumb; brown and broken teeth. posted by honest knave at 7:15 PM on June 30, 2007
...your disclaimer is.... unsettling.
And here in the states, we already have such a thing. In fact, it's wildly popular. posted by Baby_Balrog at 8:15 PM on June 30, 2007
The question of technique is more interesting. In the New York Times article, Heffernan notices film techniques designed for small screens:
The ingenious response by "Satacracy 88" has been to give screen time to tactile objects shown in actual size. Watch for star turns by an imperfectly peeled hardboiled egg, base makeup on a triangular sponge and unsmooth hair in a ponytail holder.
When the "Satacracy 88" camera is turned on faces, they often appear in extreme close-up, which means that viewers get the experience of life-size body parts again -- a single, wary eye; a trembling thumb; brown and broken teeth.
posted by honest knave at 7:15 PM on June 30, 2007