So do you think this constitutes medical malpractise?
July 10, 2007 1:21 PM   Subscribe

Do you believe this is medical malpractise? Simply a one link post. The GMC (OK 2 links) still has to find in the case mentioned. What do Mefites think, whether you've experienced agonal breathing or not in a neonate. Where do you fall on this issue?
posted by Wilder (6 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: Basically asking for an opinion poll about a news article probably isn't a good idea. -- cortex



 
The GMC (OK 2 links) still has to find in the case mentioned.

Not according to the article. They have found that it was NOT malpractice.

What they have yet to determine, however, is "whether Dr Munro's misleading of the inquiry into his use of pancuronium and inadequate note-taking constitute impairment."

In other words, whether he impeded the due process of the inquiry.

Oh, and

Do you believe this is medical malpractise?

No.
posted by dersins at 1:27 PM on July 10, 2007


-Where do you fall on this issue?-

On the side that favours less editorialising and polling in posts.
posted by peacay at 1:38 PM on July 10, 2007


Is this a questions-only thread?
posted by empath at 1:38 PM on July 10, 2007


Simply a one link post.

With a heapin' helping of editorial framing.
posted by OmieWise at 1:42 PM on July 10, 2007


I AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED...

...to editorializing and rhetorical questions in FPPs.
posted by Faint of Butt at 1:43 PM on July 10, 2007




« Older Iraq Vets Bear Witness   |   The N-word is dead Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments