This is far more disgusting and terrifying than anything she could possibly have said. Thought Cops!
posted by aaron at 11:09 AM on March 11, 2001
Keep in mind that in the US, anyone can sue anybody for any reason, and the plaintiff does not have to pay everyone's court costs if they lose. As a result, the American legal system is used as a convenient tool by all sorts of money-hungry individuals and special-interest groups for utterly meritless reasons. And it works. Even if the lawsuit is completely baseless, many companies will settle and pay off the extortionists because fighting on principle could take years and cost much much more than any settlement. And this lawsuit was indeed baseless. Nobody in America has a right to tell somebody else they can't use certain words. The lawsuit was claiming that "welsher" and "to welsh" are "fighting words," and the Supreme Court has said that it's unconstitutional to try to ban fighting words.
But all these companies settled just to get the damn thing over with ... and because there's nothing worse you can accuse someone of in America than racism. Murderer, rapist, child molester? Those are compliments compared to "racist." Even better, those accused of racism are usually treated by society as guilty until proven innocent, if they ever can be proven innocent; after all, if an organization dedicated to And I'm not sure how much else in this PR puff piece is real, since the little bit you quoted is quite off-base: ...which generated more national publicity about Wales and the Welsh than anyone could remember, the media generally ignoring matters WelshTwo times zero is still zero. This has never gotten a notable level attention in the past, and it didn't in this case either. settlements were reached in which the Los Angeles Times, Times-Mirror Company, National Broadcasting Company (NBC), KNBC, Universal Press Syndicate, and other defendants, agreed to change their "style books" to treat "to welsh" and "welsher" equally with comparable slurs... There is no proof that the etymology of the verb "to welsh" has anything to do with Welsh people. The only people that "know" it's a slur are those with a vested political and/or monetary interest in making the claim. And the average American doesn't have any idea that the verb could even possibly be linked to a certain nationality. "The Welsh? Who are they?" This isn't a word like "redneck" or "nigger;" anyone who uses those terms knows exactly what they refer to and how disparaging they are. But "welsh" is nothing to them but a word, and not one that's even used very often; in this country the term is a bit archaic. Ditto on "paddy wagon." I'd guess 95 out of 100 Americans you asked about that term wouldn't make the connection between "paddy" and the Irish in a million years. It's just a word to them, and calling a police van a "paddy wagon" would carry no more negative connotation than calling that thing under your fingers a "keyboard." NBC broadcast an apology on 300 stations across the nation to "Americans of Welsh descent and the people of Wales." Bullshit. NBC only has ~220 affiliates in the first place. And only 13 of those are actually owned by NBC and thus have to do what it says. Where was this "apology" broadcast? In a 5-second ad at 2 am Saturday morning?
posted by aaron at 12:26 PM on March 11, 2001
Robinson was asked by Paul Merton whether her remarks were actually fuelled by envy, to which she said 'yes'.
There's been a remarkable week-long hoo-haa over this in the UK, providing great publicity for Ms. Robinson - and not so great publicity for the Welsh... as we come off as a nation of over-sensitive whingers, instead of the stoic warrior-poet-sages we know we are ;-)
posted by blackbeltjones at 12:02 AM on March 12, 2001
« Older Project 'IT'... | Shareholders are shocked... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by m.polo at 7:28 AM on March 11, 2001