<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The 52 Most Influential Photographs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The 52 Most Influential Photographs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:54:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The 52 Most Influential Photographs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lukeprog.com/52-influential-photographs/"&gt;52 Influential Photographs:&lt;/a&gt; From the oldest survivng photograph, to images of &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukeprog.com/uploads/influential/1960%20Che%20Guevara.jpg&quot;&gt;revolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukeprog.com/uploads/influential/1868%20Glasgow,%20Close%20No.%2080,%20High%20Street.jpg&quot;&gt;misery&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukeprog.com/uploads/influential/1942%20The%20Tetons,%20Snake%20River.jpg&quot;&gt;beauty&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukeprog.com/uploads/influential/1946%20Gandhi.jpg&quot;&gt;humility&lt;/a&gt;, to...goatse and LOLCAT?  You win some, you lose some, I guess.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:36:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>		<category>history</category>		<category>photography</category>		<category>photos</category>		<category>list</category>		<category>LOLCAT</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: grouse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788393</link>	
		<description>Lolcats were well underway before the &lt;em&gt;I Can Has Cheezburger?&lt;/em&gt; image showed up.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788393</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blacklite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788395</link>	
		<description>The featured cat, Happycat, is older than time itself, however. Some say Happycat &lt;i&gt;created&lt;/i&gt; time.

But before I get carried away: this was a beautiful and impressive set of photographs. I am sure people will want to debate some of the choices, but I hadn&apos;t seen most of these before, and it&apos;s really amazing to see how far we&apos;ve come. It&apos;s so easy to forget that we have pictures of the 19th century. It&apos;s so easy to forget a lot of things. Visuals are so evocative.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788395</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blacklite</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Poolio</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788399</link>	
		<description>O RLY?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788399</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:03:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poolio</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: googly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788402</link>	
		<description>goatse is &quot;emblematic of the Internet underground and the revolution against corporate control enabled by the democratization of the Internet&quot;? Really? I just thought it was some asshole.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788402</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:30:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>googly</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homodigitalis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788405</link>	
		<description>Excellent collection - thanks for sharing!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788405</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:40:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homodigitalis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sciurus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788412</link>	
		<description>Would&apos;ve liked to see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smithsonianmagazine.com/issues/2001/december/indelible.php&quot;&gt;1000-yard stare&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallerym.com/work.cfm?ID=176&quot;&gt;The Photojournalist&lt;/a&gt;, but I enjoyed the list. Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788412</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:56:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sciurus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TedW</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788413</link>	
		<description>Interesting post; I have always enjoyed photography but never considered myself an expert; I was surprised at how many of these images I was familiar with.  I have even been to the Tetons where I attempted to duplicate Ansel Adams&apos;s photograph, but mine didn&apos;t turn out as nice.  I was surprised that the Gursky photo (which I wasn&apos;t familiar with) was the most expensive, but wikipedia confirms it, along with the fact that the Steichen photo in the list is the second most expensive.  Unfortunately some of his other facts are in error; along with some noted in the comments I noted that Nilsson&apos;s fetus picture was not captured with an endoscope as noted in the caption (although many of Nilsson&apos;s images are), kwashiorkor (the Biafra photograh) is more properly described as protein-calorie malnutrition than &quot;a muscle-wasting disease&quot;, and the Lenna image was cropped from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~chuck/lennapg/&quot;&gt;centerfold&lt;/a&gt;, not the cover (and as such it shouldn&apos;t be too hard to find out who the photographer is rather than &quot;unknown&quot;).  Still, aside from the standard criticism that these lists are subjective and arbitrary it is nice to see and discuss some important photographs (I notice he didn&apos;t describe them as the &lt;strong&gt;most &lt;/strong&gt;important in his blog).  One interesting bit of trivia I noticed-Robert Capa is in there twice.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788413</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:56:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TedW</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TedW</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788415</link>	
		<description>Ha! it took me all of 5 minutes to find out &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lena_Soderberg&quot;&gt;Dwight Hooker &lt;/a&gt;photographed Lenna.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788415</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TedW</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Gnostic Novelist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788421</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Andreas Gursky - 99 Cent II Diptychon (2001)&lt;/i&gt;

Seems like something out of a Don Delillo novel. Perhaps &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Noise_%28novel%29&quot;&gt;White Noise&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788421</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:17:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gnostic Novelist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eriko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788425</link>	
		<description>FAIL</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788425</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:34:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CitrusFreak12</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788427</link>	
		<description>Pretty cool. 

&lt;i&gt;FAIL&lt;/i&gt;

Stimulating. Tell me more.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788427</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CitrusFreak12</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Cyrano</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788432</link>	
		<description>Is a still frame from a film considered a photograph?

And some of those captions are just middle school-esque painful.

Still, there were a few pics I haven&apos;t seen before.  Especially the first few.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788432</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:52:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyrano</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788436</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m surprised Kevin Carter&apos;s picture didn&apos;t make the cut.

&quot;The sound of soft, high-pitched whimpering near the village of Ayod attracted Carter to a young emaciated Sudanese toddler. The girl had stopped to rest while struggling to a feeding center, wherein a seemingly well-fed vulture had landed nearby. He said that he waited about 20 minutes, hoping that the vulture would spread its wings. It didn&apos;t. Carter snapped the haunting photograph and chased the vulture away.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788436</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:58:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: null terminated</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788446</link>	
		<description>The &quot;I Can Has Cheezburger&quot; image is the least inspired and most inane of all the LOLCATs. The launch of icanhascheezburger.com, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.noisebot.com&quot;&gt;capitalizing&lt;/a&gt; on what is not theirs and butchering the beautiful LOLCAT syntax, would have killed the meme if not for the wondrous power of the kitten. 


AMIRITE?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788446</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:19:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>null terminated</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Armitage Shanks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788451</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And some of those captions are just middle school-esque painful.&lt;/i&gt;

The blacks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788451</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:26:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Armitage Shanks</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TedW</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788452</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;m surprised Kevin Carter&apos;s picture didn&apos;t make the cut.&lt;/em&gt;

It was probably number 53.

I would have included &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/patc/twins/&quot;&gt;Diane Arbus&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artphotogallery.org/02/artphotogallery/photographers/diane_arbus_01.html&quot;&gt;Twins&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788452</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TedW</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Cyclopsis Raptor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788460</link>	
		<description>Not Even Doom Music could convince me that Happycat deserves to be on that list.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788460</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:37:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyclopsis Raptor</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nax</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788465</link>	
		<description>sciurus I would like to see the 1000-yard stare too.  Google search turns up hundreds.  Can you post the original?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788465</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:48:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nax</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: photoslob</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788470</link>	
		<description>LOLCATS and Goatse up there with Capa, Curtis, Steichen, Hine, Lang, etc....

Please kill me now. If that&apos;s what the internet age is going to be represented by I&apos;d rather just forget it ever happened.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788470</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photoslob</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788472</link>	
		<description>The list seems rather capricious - some were genuinely influential in effecting social or political change, some were merely memorable as images, and some memorable as photographic achievements. Some, such as LOLCAT, were representative of fads. Interesting but not very well thought out; to say that one photo &quot;turned public opinion against the Vietnam war&quot; is pure distortion.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788472</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788474</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would like to see the 1000-yard stare too. Google search turns up hundreds. Can you post the original?&lt;/i&gt;

Is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobpitch.com/anon/funkstar_thousand%2520yard%2520stare.jpg&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; it?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788474</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:04:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: goodnewsfortheinsane</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788476</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Please kill me now. If that&apos;s what the internet age is going to be represented by I&apos;d rather just forget it ever happened.&lt;/em&gt;

Don&apos;t be dramatic. It&apos;s just recentism. Also, it&apos;s the I CAN HAZ picture because it&apos;s *iconic* for the LOLCAT meme - as well as the name of the best-known website - not because it&apos;s necessarily the best one.

Look, 9/11 is in there, right? In 10 years it will still be, and LOLCAT will have been replaced with that stupid HIBRYD HIBRYD meme of 2016. 

Oh shit I&apos;ve said too much ++++ATH0 NO CARRIER</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788476</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:06:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: elgilito</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788481</link>	
		<description>Goatse is influential? Does it mean that anus enlargement has become a noteworthy occupation for a significant number of the world population? Are there statistics like &quot;&lt;em&gt;According to Pew Research Center, the average diameter of american anuses in 2007 reached 10.3 inches, marking a 90% increase since the last survey from 1989. Chinese anuses, however,  gained a modest 0.2 inches during the same period. Analysts explain the difference by the fact that on-line exposure to Goatse is still too recent in China to have had a significant effect&quot; ?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788481</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elgilito</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: goodnewsfortheinsane</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788483</link>	
		<description>No, it means that it&apos;s iconic.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788483</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:14:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: carsonb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788485</link>	
		<description>Cyrano: &lt;i&gt;Is a still frame from a film considered a photograph?&lt;/i&gt;

I think they dutifully made that connection with &lt;i&gt;The Horse in Motion&lt;/i&gt;.

Nice collection of &apos;graphs. The captions really seal the deal for me though.&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Wright brothers realize the ancient human dream of flight.

Pure joy

This portrait of a hero is now an icon for humility and nonviolence.

Adams&apos; Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph turned public opinion against the Vietnam war.

...earth from the surface of the moon. 

This captioned photo of a cute cat launched an online fad.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788485</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:18:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: samsara</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788490</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The featured cat, Happycat, is older than time itself, however. Some say Happycat created time.&lt;/i&gt;

However, &lt;a href=http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y196/NFCstang/1912794766076767590_rs.jpg&gt;we should not forget that one fateful day...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788490</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:27:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samsara</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ROU_Xenophobe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788491</link>	
		<description>Aren&apos;t they all LOLs of one kind or another?

O HAI I UPGRADED YOUR ANUS
MAH ZEPPELIN!
GOIN TO THE SKY BRB
GOD SPEED MOON MEN
U CAN HAS CLUB</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788491</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:27:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ROU_Xenophobe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ageispolis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788498</link>	
		<description>carsonb, I wouldn&apos;t call &lt;i&gt;A Horse In Motion&lt;/i&gt; a film.

And I believe the two forms are distinct.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788498</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:36:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ageispolis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: barchan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788502</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I have even been to the Tetons where I attempted to duplicate Ansel Adams&apos;s photograph, but mine didn&apos;t turn out as nice.&lt;/em&gt;

TedW: Park lore is that it&apos;s actual impossible to duplicate Ansel&apos;s photograph exactly as Ansel had a rather unusual vantage: he built a large scaffold to take that shot. Since that location is now an Official Scenic Viewpoint, I&apos;m sure the NPS would have a fit if anybody tried the same. So lots of people try from the ground, knowing that&apos;s&lt;em&gt; the&lt;/em&gt; spot where he took it, completely unaware  he actually took it quite higher than their viewpoint.

&lt;small&gt;And the being an amazing photographer probably helped a little too.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788502</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:39:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>barchan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CunningLinguist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788504</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/images/vietnam/anhoa1.jpg&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is Frank Johnson&apos;s 1000-yard stare (kinda small, sorry) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/vietnam/battle.htm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is a great story about it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788504</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:42:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nickyskye</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788506</link>	
		<description>Enjoyed those, particularly the earliest ones. 

Adding to the mix: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm15.html&quot;&gt;Kent State&lt;/a&gt;, 1970, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm27.html&quot;&gt;first X-ray&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm24.html&quot;&gt;Triangle Shirtwaist fire&lt;/a&gt;, Pigeon House and Barn&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm21.html&quot;&gt; 1827&lt;/a&gt;, Hazel Bryant, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm16.html&quot;&gt;desegregation&lt;/a&gt;, the original &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm17.html&quot;&gt;Marlboro man&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm05.html&quot;&gt;Nagasaki 1945&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm01.html&quot;&gt;Anne Frank 1941&lt;/a&gt; all from &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Photos_that_Changed_the_World&quot;&gt;100 photos that changed the world&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788506</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Demogorgon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788510</link>	
		<description>I had no idea &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lukeprog.com/uploads/influential/1918%20Grace.jpg&quot;&gt;Grace&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; was a photograph. I always thought it was a painting.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788510</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:46:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demogorgon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: PHINC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788511</link>	
		<description>How can a photo be worth 2 million dollars?
Weirdness of art world spending?
Some special circumstance?
Someone really liked it?
That&apos;s a stunning amount of money  for a photo.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788511</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:46:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PHINC</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: chuckdarwin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788515</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesnachtwey.com/&quot;&gt;I think that James Nachtwey needs to be mentioned in this thread.&lt;/a&gt;

Thanks for this; I hadn&apos;t seen a few of these in a while.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788515</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:52:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuckdarwin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: empath</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788532</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s the display of the photo.  According to wiki, it&apos;s a large piece, digitally manipulated and hyper=detailed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788532</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:10:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>empath</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CunningLinguist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788535</link>	
		<description>Art theorists love Gursky&apos;s work because he gives them so much to get their teeth into in debates about the representation of reality. In his shots of a discount store, 99 Cent II Diptychon (2001), which this month sold for &#163;1.7million (a record for any photograph sold at auction), he photographed the shelves of goods separately, and then put them back together with digital manipulation in post-production. &apos;The view I created in 99 Cent does exist in reality, but you&apos;d have to destroy the wall of the store to photograph it,&apos; he says.

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wallpaper.com/news/Portfolio:_Andreas_Gursky/1320&quot;&gt;Wallpaper&lt;/a&gt;

Cool. Still, though. That&apos;s a buttload of dough.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788535</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:13:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: chuckdarwin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788538</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://community.livejournal.com/foto_decadent/1572455.html&quot;&gt;Fashion&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788538</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:17:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuckdarwin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonp72</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788558</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would have included Diane Arbus&apos;s Twins.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinecultist.com/archives/shining_twins_1.jpg&quot;&gt;Come play with us, Danny...&lt;/a&gt; Forever and ever and ever and ever...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788558</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonp72</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: delmoi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788577</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m surprised it doesn&apos;t have those Russian 3-color photos.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788577</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:01:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Meatbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788599</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Various - 2001 Terrorist Attacks (2001)&lt;/em&gt;

How does that qualify as a &quot;Best Picture&quot;? Give me a break.  Do we just need to include &quot;OMG HOLY FUCKING SHIT 9/11!&quot; in every list that will ever be made of anything from now on?

It wasn&apos;t a photograph that made 9/11 interesting or important, and there was no particularly iconic photo that has stood out as The One 9/11 Photo. Or, if there is one that I am unaware of, it certainly isn&apos;t that video still taken from CNN.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788599</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:24:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meatbomb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: carsonb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788628</link>	
		<description>ageispolis: &lt;i&gt;carsonb, I wouldn&apos;t call A Horse In Motion a film.&lt;/i&gt;

Then you and I are on the same page. I was making the point that &lt;i&gt;A Horse In Motion&lt;/i&gt; is a good example why a frame of film can be considered an influential photograph.  It is a good reference for noting the relationship between photography and film. 

Meatbomb: &lt;i&gt;How does that qualify as a &quot;Best Picture&quot;?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&apos;t think they made any claims of &quot;Best Picture.&quot; 52 Influential Photographs is the title of the link; the &quot;Most&quot; is an editorial add to the title of this thread. No superlatives there, just a list of some influential pictures.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788628</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CunningLinguist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788631</link>	
		<description>I vote for &lt;a href=&quot;http://static.flickr.com/34/114922407_1b358d5c05_m.jpg&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, along with the collapsing towers, as the iconic 911 photo.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788631</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:45:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: naoko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788635</link>	
		<description>I think Falling Man (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/53779/Falling-Man&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) might qualify as an iconic 9/11 photograph.

Thanks for the Nachtwey link, chuckdarwin - I think he&apos;s amazing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788635</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:47:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naoko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: naoko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788637</link>	
		<description>And CunningLinguist beat me to it.  Damn.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788637</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:47:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naoko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Faint of Butt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788655</link>	
		<description>Damn. Remember when photographs of brutality would actually sway public opinion &lt;i&gt;against&lt;/i&gt; a war?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788655</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:02:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faint of Butt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Meatbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788657</link>	
		<description>OK, but even so, the photos were reportage, and not particularly influential in and of themselves.  Compare to the Biafra, VC execution, and Vietnam napalm photos for what I&apos;m talking about.

&quot;Nobody really cared about 9/11 until these INCREDIBLY INFLUENTIAL PHOTOS shed light on the hidden tragedy&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788657</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meatbomb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CunningLinguist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788665</link>	
		<description>You&apos;re changing the argument. You said there was no iconic photo. I&apos;m disagreeing with that. 

I&apos;m not saying photos made people care about it. Then again, how different would the reaction to 911 have been if there had been no videos and photos?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788665</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:09:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Meatbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788674</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m actually not trying to argue at all, my beloved sister, and I suppose the falling man photo is pretty iconic.  They should have included that one instead, and I would still say that the photo itself wasn&apos;t influential.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788674</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:21:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meatbomb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Meatbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788683</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Then again, how different would the reaction to 911 have been if there had been no videos and photos?&lt;/em&gt;

Well, I guess for there to be no photos / videos, they wouldn&apos;t have been able to conduct the attack in the middle of the most important city in the world.  So yeah, I guess if they did the attack in the middle of the frozen tundra somewhere in Siberia or Northern Canada, the reaction would have been different.

But I guess I&apos;m arguing now, so apologies for that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788683</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:25:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meatbomb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Brian B.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788731</link>	
		<description>Where&apos;s the one of the angry white guy using the flagpole and the American flag as a weapon on a business-suited black guy during a protest?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788731</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian B.</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: daninnj</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788754</link>	
		<description>I think in recent history, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/06/30/svDADGE_wideweb__470x384,0.jpg&quot;&gt;woman in the mask&lt;/a&gt; from the July 2005 London bombings had an impact on me. It&apos;s so surreal.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788754</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daninnj</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: roll truck roll</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788774</link>	
		<description>In &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_%28photograph%29&quot;&gt;Bovey, MN&lt;/a&gt;, there&apos;s a tiny version of &lt;i&gt;Grace&lt;/i&gt; on the street signs. It&apos;s great. There&apos;s also a museum dedicated almost entirely to the photo.

I&apos;m trying to remember, but as I recall, the guy in the picture stopped by the photographer&apos;s house as a shoe salesman or something of the sort. The photographer thought he had an interesting look and asked if he could take some pictures of him.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788774</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:51:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>roll truck roll</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788808</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m going to be a voice of dissent, I thought the list was pretty damn amazing. If I were asked to put something like this together, I would have chosen a lot of the same pictures. 

Though I was unfamiliar with &lt;em&gt;Red Hawk at an Oasis in the Badlands&lt;/em&gt; which I found to be beautiful. 

They might not be the &lt;em&gt;best&lt;/em&gt; pictures (though in some cases, I believe they are) they are images that influenced people.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788808</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:35:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: photoslob</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788860</link>	
		<description>I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://cache.corbis.com/pro/cropff/images/photos/pic_1_TURNLEY_d.jpg&quot;&gt;David Turnley&apos;s image&lt;/a&gt; from Iraq pt I should also be mentioned.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788860</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photoslob</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Devils Rancher</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788883</link>	
		<description>I agree with most of the choices, but of course, would have done it differently. I think 52 is too small of a number really, as it leaves out many equally influential photographers. No &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spa3.k12.sc.us/Pacolet/Student%20Links/Fifth/Great_Depression/Great_Depression.htm&quot;&gt;Oklahoma dustbowl 1936?&lt;/a&gt; (#13 on the page) No Edward Weston? No Fox Talbot? Also, there are other Ansel Adams shots I&apos;d have picked over that one, and Korda&apos;s Ch&#233; Guevara should be much nearer the top. It&apos;s arguable that it is actually the most reproduced photo ever, though nobody knows, since they&apos;re 99% bootlegs.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788883</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devils Rancher</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Devils Rancher</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788890</link>	
		<description>Ah, ignore my comment about Ch&#233; -- I just noticed the list was chronological.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788890</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:19:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devils Rancher</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbob</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788892</link>	
		<description>Disclosure; I know the captions are shitty, but they&apos;re pretty much to the same standard as all the &quot;17 Way To Improve Your Life With A Toilet Plunger&quot; and &quot;21 Things You Never Knew About Jello&quot; sites that turn up on Digg or del.icio.us these days.  I thought the cool photos overcame any deficiencies in the writing. And I couldn&apos;t &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; post something that describes goatse as: &lt;i&gt;emblematic of the Internet underground and the revolution against corporate control enabled by the democratization of the Internet. &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788892</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pater Aletheias</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788948</link>	
		<description>I was born the same day that the photograph was taken of Kim Phuc and the other Vietnamese children fleeing the Napalm attack.  I think about that picture on each birthday.

My father was in the Air Force.  On the same day that I emerged naked into the sterile environment of a U.S. military hospital, a little girl was running naked, fighting for her life. She was surrounded, as was I, by men in the uniform of the American armed forces.  Men not too different from those who were paying such careful attention to my health and welfare were all too indifferent to hers.  It reminds me every year of the pains and tragedies of human existence, but also of the little things that connect us together.  Kim Phuc will never have any idea who I am, but once a year I remember what she went through, and I think again how glad I am that she made it. And then I buckle my own little girl into her car seat.  My wife and I go out to dinner with her, and we celebrate the end of one year of messy human existence, and the start of another.  The food always tastes just fine, and I&apos;m never disappointed in my present. Any food is good food, I think, and a fresh year is the perfect gift.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788948</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:12:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pater Aletheias</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Lucinda</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788969</link>	
		<description>That Steichen photograph is beautiful...is a print of it available for purchase anywhere?  (None of the usual online suspects seem to have it.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1788969</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:36:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucinda</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZachsMind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789005</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluedottheatre.com/images/pale_blue_dot.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789005</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:21:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: itchylick</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789035</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I had no idea Grace was a photograph. I always thought it was a painting.&lt;/em&gt;

Wow, so did I. We had this in our house when I was growing up. I just assumed it was Saint Nick in his street clothes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789035</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:11:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>itchylick</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nickyskye</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789254</link>	
		<description>What a wonderful thread.

chuckdarwin, that fashion link &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788538&quot;&gt;you posted &lt;/a&gt;was astonishing. wow.

cunninglinguist, I&apos;ve missed you. Hope you&apos;re well, nice to see you here in this thread.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789254</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:02:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMcDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789256</link>	
		<description>&lt;b&gt;googly&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1788402&apos;&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;em&gt;&quot;goatse is &apos;emblematic of the Internet underground and the revolution against corporate control enabled by the democratization of the Internet&apos;? Really? I just thought it was some asshole.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

No, no. Goatse has a profound historical and humanist significance. It is emblematic of man&apos;s inhumanity to man&apos;s sphincter.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789256</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:06:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PeterMcDermott</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nickyskye</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789285</link>	
		<description>The&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070803/ap_on_re_us/kissing_sailor&quot;&gt; now elderly man&lt;/a&gt; in the famous Eisenstaedt photograph of the sailor kissing the nurse in Times Square on the day of the end of world War II. &quot;Houston Police Department forensic artist Lois Gibson took up the challenge. And after what she called a detailed investigation, Gibson said she has concluded that McDuffie, 80, is the man in Alfred Eisenstaedt&apos;s Aug. 14, 1945 image.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789285</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bullitt 5</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1789725</link>	
		<description>Great stuff.  Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1789725</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:31:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bullitt 5</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plant</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1790099</link>	
		<description>Kind of ironic that the Lenna image they used has such visible compression artifacts.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1790099</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:54:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plant</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: frobozz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1790173</link>	
		<description>Despite trying to think of myself as a rather hard-nosed person, every time I see the Earthrise from the Moon picture I feel like I&apos;m going to cry.  Every time.  It&apos;s so beautiful and so small...and the idea that there were ever a small group of humans that far away from the rest of us always gives me a little transcendental, completely-not-thinking-of-myself-for-five-seconds moment, no matter what is going on around me.  

The nerd in me is disappointed that &quot;earthrise&quot; isn&apos;t in firefox&apos;s dictionary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1790173</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:13:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frobozz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: davros42</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63532/The-52-Most-Influential-Photographs#1793668</link>	
		<description>Also, while we&apos;re splitting hairs about whether or not the Zapruder film is photography (Yes, it is.), videography like say the still frame from CNN of 9/11 is assuredly not photography.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.63532-1793668</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:42:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davros42</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
