Copyright holders generally, and these plaintiffs specifically, should be deterred from prosecuting infringement claims as plaintiffs did in this case. Plaintiffs exerted a significant amount of control over the course of discovery, repeatedly and successfully seeking the court's assistance through an unusually extended and contentious period of discovery disputes. Nonetheless, after ample opportunity to develop their claims, they dismissed them at the point they were required to
produce evidence for the court's consideration of the merits..... this case provides too little assurance that a prosecuting party won't deem an infringement claim unsupportable until after the prevailing defendant has been forced to mount a considerable defense, and undergo all that entails, including the incurring of substantial attorney fees.
But even a repeated DoD-approved disk wipe does not absolutely destroy the data on the disk. It makes it unusually difficult to retrieve any information, but traces of the prior magnetization patterns will remain. Through various means and specialized equipment, old data can be resurrected.
« Older Irish Magic... | A wiki cataloging common clich... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt