A popular story about "Blue Monday" holds that the single's die-cut sleeve, created by Factory designer Peter Saville, cost so much to produce that Factory Records actually lost money on each copy sold. It is unlikely that Factory Records could have sustained the losses implied, and the sleeve was soon changed to a similar non-die-cut design that would cost no more than a regular sleeve.I've heard the stories about Factory losing money on each and every copy sold, and I've always wondered if it really could be true. Seeing as it's "the highest selling 12-inch single of all time". So, it seems that "only" the die-cut sleeves cost so much to produce that they lost money. Or am I wrong?
« Older Myanmar is apparently using photos sent to website... | New contender for world's wors... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Ed: Blue Monday.
Shaun: That was an original pressing!
posted by Parasite Unseen at 3:08 PM on October 8, 2007 [4 favorites]