<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Disrespectful Cockalorum</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Disrespectful Cockalorum</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Disrespectful Cockalorum</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Blackburn makes manifest &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointnews.com/071008.asp&quot;&gt;a propensity for turgid language&lt;/a&gt;. Not content with foisting &quot;cockalorum&quot; (meaning, boastful talk), &quot;froward&quot; (willfully disobedient) and &quot;mordaciously&quot; (bitingly) on the reader, he may be the first judge to use both &quot;contumelious&quot; (scornful) and &quot;contumacious&quot; (pigheaded) in the same opinion.&lt;/i&gt; Judge Robert E. Blackburn&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointnews.com/docs/cadorna.pdf&quot;&gt;ruling&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; granting a motion for a new trial based on attorney misconduct is an interesting read for those who enjoy the use of uncommon, flowery and &quot;big&quot; words. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The site where I found the above story, is full of interesting legal cases, both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointnews.com/071005.asp&quot;&gt;serious&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointnews.com/070930.asp&quot;&gt;offbeat&lt;/a&gt;, and those that fall somewhere in between, like the case of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointnews.com/071011.asp&quot;&gt;a man who sued 1-800-FLOWERS&lt;/a&gt;, the online florist, for causing him &quot;anguish&quot; by revealing his extramarital affair to his wife.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:46:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>		<category>legal</category>		<category>legalnews</category>		<category>courts</category>		<category>rulings</category>		<category>language</category>		<category>judge</category>		<category>blackburn</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: amyms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873414</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Ugh, there&apos;s at least one superfluous comma in my &quot;more inside.&quot; My apologies to the comma pedants.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873414</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Falconetti</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873416</link>	
		<description>I am pretty sure this guy has been brought up here before.  Regardless, he is a giant asshole and does not have the temperament to be on the bench.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873416</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:52:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Falconetti</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: YoBananaBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873425</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therobingroom.com/Judge.aspx?ID=294&quot;&gt;A pedantic martinet with deep-seated issues and barely-concealed hostility toward plaintiffs. A total disaster as a judge.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

Huh, wonder which side of the ruling that person came out on?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873425</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YoBananaBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: growabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873432</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mixed-up.com/markb/humor/ruin-sorbees/&quot;&gt;yea, language is a virus&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873432</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:33:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>growabrain</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873438</link>	
		<description>6000 holes in blackburn, lancashire...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873438</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:40:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873473</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My apologies to the comma pedants.&lt;/i&gt;

Don&apos;t worry all of their names are on a list of those who&apos;ll be first against the wall when the revolution, comes.

Good site, I&apos;ve sent this to a friend in law school.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873473</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aeschenkarnos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873481</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Huh, wonder which side of the ruling that person came out on?&lt;/i&gt;

Always a problem with feedback systems. :/

AAA +++ FAIR JUDGE, SWIFT TRILE, WOULD LITIGATE AGAIN!!1!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873481</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aeschenkarnos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: robcorr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873511</link>	
		<description>Contumelious and contumacious are not that uncommon in legal writing. They are technical terms that carry technical meanings. And he&apos;s certainly not the first to use both in a single opinion.

Having said that, it doesn&apos;t look like Blackburn J was using them in their technical senses. His thesaurus is certainly well-thumbed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873511</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:07:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robcorr</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rhymer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873515</link>	
		<description>I rather approve: the average Joe is so willfully ignorant these days, they may as well learn something en route to the pen. In fact, I&apos;d offer a six month sentence reduction if they could define any of the words in question.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873515</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:19:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhymer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aeschenkarnos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873537</link>	
		<description>Those seeking further reading of this nature may enjoy Judge Samuel B Kent&apos;s opinion in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalreview.com/document/document073001.shtml&quot;&gt;Bradshaw v Unity&lt;/a&gt; (&quot;But at the end of the day, even if you put a calico dress on it and call it Florence, a pig is still a pig.&quot;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873537</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aeschenkarnos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873540</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My apologies to the comma pedants.

Don&apos;t worry all of their names are on a list....&lt;/i&gt;

The problem with that list is that you can&apos;t tell the last two pedants apart.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873540</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blacklite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873544</link>	
		<description>That was fun to read.

Sometimes I think of doing the law thing, but maybe I&apos;ll just stick to reading the occasional opinion and chuckling at the vocabulary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873544</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:04:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blacklite</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Civil_Disobedient</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873576</link>	
		<description>What they don&apos;t tell you is that for every &lt;i&gt;contumelious&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;contumacious&lt;/i&gt; there are a hundred &lt;i&gt;aforementioned clauses&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;numerous falses&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873576</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Civil_Disobedient</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ambrosia Voyeur</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65553/Disrespectful-Cockalorum#1873813</link>	
		<description>Not enough perspicuity for the perspicacity.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.65553-1873813</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:17:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ambrosia Voyeur</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
