(a) Relatives of the pest are most likely to be attackedOr maybe it's better to leave species in the habitat that's used to them? There are lots more deliberately-introduced species causing problems; I only included insects in North America.
(b) host-specificity testing defines physiological host range, but not ecological range
(c) prediction of ecological consequences requires population data
. . .
(e) information on magnitude of nontarget impact is sparse
(f) attack on rare native species can accelerate their decline
(g) nontarget effects can be indirect
. . .
(i) whole assemblages of species can be perturbed
. . .
The review leads to six recommendations: Avoid using generalists or adventive species; expand host-specificity testing; incorporate more ecological information; consider ecological risk in target selection; prioritize agents; and pursue genetic data on adaptation.
« Older He once stopped a school bus on a busy interstate ... | Dennis Kucinich had a UFO enco... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by dances_with_sneetches at 1:00 PM on October 23, 2007 [1 favorite has favorites]