<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Looky Here</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Looky Here</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:56:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Looky Here</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here</link>	
		<description>Say hello to the newest police method for human identification: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bi2technologies.com/index.html&quot;&gt;iris&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securimetrics.com/solutions/hiide.html#&quot;&gt;scanning.&lt;/a&gt; The Alameda County Sheriff&apos;s Office is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/05/MN2NT4QLR.DTL&quot;&gt;preparing to become the first public agency in the Bay Area to scan the irises of convicted sex offenders.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fandango_matt</dc:creator>		<category>iris</category>		<category>scan</category>		<category>scanning</category>		<category>security</category>		<category>fingerprint</category>		<category>technology</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: exlotuseater</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900366</link>	
		<description>What&apos;s next? 

ATCGATTAGCTA?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900366</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>exlotuseater</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Terminal Verbosity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900370</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pinballrebel.com/game/pins/ij2/shop/Eyeball_files/MovieStill.jpg&quot;&gt;Not secure.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900370</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:57:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terminal Verbosity</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fleetmouse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900375</link>	
		<description>&quot;Hello, John Anderton. Would you like to purchase a Hello Kitty vibrator?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900375</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fleetmouse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: flarbuse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900376</link>	
		<description>CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS MUST BE PRINTED, IRISED, MEASURED, WEIGHED, PHOTOGRAPHED, WASHED, RINSED, BLEACHED, STERILIZED, EUNICHED, CASTRATED, TRACKED, IMPLANTED, BRANDED, BAR-CODED, AND SURVEYED!

&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;When the 8th Amendment was enacted, the Founding Fathers could never have foreseen people having sex with people under the age of seventeen.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900376</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flarbuse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nickyskye</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900378</link>	
		<description>whoa, Seems so science fictionish -and sinister in a Minority Report way. Had to google this. yikes! 
On &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_recognition&quot;&gt;Wiki&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=930&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt; on the topic in general and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invention/2007/02/covert-iris-scanner.html&quot;&gt;covert use&lt;/a&gt;, more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/technology/070206_technovelgy.html&quot;&gt;covert info&lt;/a&gt;. Iris scanners&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060224-6259.html&quot;&gt; enroll in elementary school&lt;/a&gt;.

Iris Scanning,&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/18879/&quot;&gt; Now at JFK&lt;/a&gt;. At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SU/irisscan.html&quot;&gt;Amsterdam airport&lt;/a&gt;. In the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/applying/iris/&quot;&gt; UK&lt;/a&gt;.

Just learned, &lt;em&gt;The iris is the only internal organ normally visible from outside the body.

The correct plural for iris is irides.
&lt;/em&gt;
The other analysis of the iris, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zedweb.co.uk/n16health/listings/95.html&quot;&gt;iridology&lt;/a&gt;.

An innocent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/harold_davis/378819250/&quot;&gt; iris&lt;/a&gt; scan.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900378</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:02:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brain_drain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900380</link>	
		<description>This article is full of puns and double meanings:

&lt;em&gt;Within seconds, the officer would know if the person was a sex offender.  &quot;We&apos;re at the infancy of this whole thing,&quot; Nelson said.

The firm&apos;s scanners have also captured the eyes of children . . .

Robert Melley, the company&apos;s chief operating officer, said he saw a bright future for the scanners . . .&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900380</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:04:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fandango_matt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900381</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;posted by nickyskye&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Just learned, The iris is the only internal organ normally visible from outside the body.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

What about testicles?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900381</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:05:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fandango_matt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tepidmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900385</link>	
		<description>You can see your testicles? I don&apos;t think that word means what you think it means.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900385</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tepidmonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DU</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900396</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When the 8th Amendment was enacted, the Founding Fathers could never have foreseen people having sex with people under the age of seventeen.&lt;/i&gt;

What&apos;s cruel or unusual about taking a picture of someone&apos;s eyeballs?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900396</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DU</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DU</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900399</link>	
		<description>The skin is the only external organ visible from inside the body.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900399</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DU</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nickyskye</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900407</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;What about testicles?&lt;/em&gt;

Are testicles internal? I thought they were external genitalia. huh. Looks &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_organ&quot;&gt;from Wiki &lt;/a&gt;like they are internal genitalia, visible externally. Dang, the things one learns here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900407</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:21:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lord_wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900409</link>	
		<description>Man, I&apos;m all in favor of the Irish being scanned. That&apos;ll put a stop to their schemes to keep their Lucky Charms away from the rest of us.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900409</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:22:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lord_wolf</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: splice</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900421</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The other analysis of the iris, &lt;a href=&quot;http://skepdic.com/iridol.html&quot;&gt;iridology&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;

Which means that, since the iris does not change after birth,  whatever affliction your iridologist diagnosed you with has been with you since the womb.

Or, alternatively, iridology is yet another quack medicine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900421</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>splice</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tepidmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900424</link>	
		<description>I hate to be the guy who can&apos;t stop talking about balls, but the scrotum is the part that&apos;s visible. Testicles are internal, and if you can see them, someone&apos;s either dead or screaming bloody murder.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900424</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:34:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tepidmonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mr_roboto</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900427</link>	
		<description>&lt;b&gt;tepidmonkey&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900424&apos;&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;em&gt;&quot;Testicles are internal, and if you can see them, someone&apos;s either dead or screaming bloody murder.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Or they&apos;ve managed to install a clever little window!  Now that would be a body modification accomplishment worth talking about....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900427</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:37:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_roboto</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GuyZero</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900433</link>	
		<description>Iris scanning is in just about every canadian airport as part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/travel/canpass/canpassair-e.html&quot;&gt;CANPASS&lt;/a&gt; program. Same thing as they have in Amsterdam. Same thing for the NEXUS program that is joint between Canada and the US.

It may not be perfect, but it&apos;s got to be better than those old palm scanners they used for the US &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INSPASS&quot;&gt;INSPASS&lt;/a&gt; lanes in Canadian airports. Those things got thrown off by being a but sweaty or greasy. At least a donut doesn&apos;t throw off your iris scan.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900433</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:41:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GuyZero</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: spiderskull</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900435</link>	
		<description>I think whenever they want to introduce some questionable technology against criminals, they start with sex offenders so that there&apos;s no riots over it -- people are afraid of defending pedophiles, even if it&apos;s an issue that will eventually affect everyone.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900435</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:46:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiderskull</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: oncogenesis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900466</link>	
		<description>IT SEEKS CONTROL</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900466</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:10:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oncogenesis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jamjam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900469</link>	
		<description>If the iris  scanners use blue LED light, as the ones I&apos;ve seen pictures of do, when they come into wide use, they might set off a huge wave of insomnia and other disorders of circadian rhythm (such as messing up rhythm method birth control, perhaps), since blue light is the most efficient at resetting our body clocks, and at the level of the retina, the scanners are very, very bright.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900469</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamjam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pope Guilty</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900495</link>	
		<description>How long until one can get iris alteration surgery to subvert the scanners?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900495</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:27:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pope Guilty</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fandango_matt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900523</link>	
		<description>I was thinking colored contact lenses in the same color as your eyes would do the trick.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900523</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:45:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fandango_matt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BrotherCaine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900540</link>	
		<description>Jamjam, I don&apos;t think a brief blue light exposure time is that significant.  I have one of those blue light arrays designed for treating seasonal affective disorder, and I have to have it on for fifteen to twenty minutes to get any effect out of it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900540</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:56:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrotherCaine</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Smedleyman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900546</link>	
		<description>We already fingerprint upon arrest. Given the technology is harmless I don&apos;t have a problem with it being used the way fingerprints are. Used during a routine traffic stop is a whole other thing. We don&apos;t use fingerprints for that now. If you&apos;re under arrest, iris scanning as part of the booking process, I don&apos;t have a problem with. And certainly greater knowlege of an offender or suspect&apos;s identity would go a long way to establishing their guilt or innocents. Indeed, look at what DNA testing has done for people convicted of capital crimes and sentenced to death.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900546</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Faint of Butt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900649</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How long until one can get iris alteration surgery to subvert the scanners?&lt;/i&gt;

Ask Oedipus Rex.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900649</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:52:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faint of Butt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aeschenkarnos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900681</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think whenever they want to introduce some questionable technology against criminals, they start with sex offenders so that there&apos;s no riots over it -- people are afraid of defending pedophiles, even if it&apos;s an issue that will eventually affect everyone.&lt;/i&gt;

Indeed. Doubtless it will trigger squeaks of &quot;Godwin! Godwin! Mother, he Godwinned!&quot; ... but &quot;first they came for the sex offenders&quot; is distinctly apropos.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900681</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:12:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aeschenkarnos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aeschenkarnos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900697</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How long until one can get iris alteration surgery to subvert the scanners?&lt;/i&gt;

Couple seconds, just let me find a knitting needle. 

Oh, you mean &lt;i&gt;and still see&lt;/i&gt;? Hmm ... probably still doable with lasers, if you don&apos;t mind having slightly impaired vision forever, and seeing black spots for a few weeks until your brain adjusts.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900697</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aeschenkarnos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fandango_matt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900701</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;posted by aeschenkarnos&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;first they came for the sex offenders&quot; is distinctly apropos.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

Technically speaking, it&apos;s the sex offenders who first came.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900701</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fandango_matt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jamjam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900746</link>	
		<description>Good point, BrotherCaine, and if you mean to imply you think the scanners will probably not reset our clocks, I&apos;ll have to agree with you, but I do think anyone who wishes to deploy these devices should be obligated to &lt;em&gt;prove&lt;/em&gt; it. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6T0G-3VV6CM5-1F&amp;_user=10&amp;_coverDate=02%2F19%2F1999&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=bba42760994976350dfc6c7c13921316&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is the abstract of the strongest study that seemed to cast doubt on it  I was able to find in a brief search.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900746</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamjam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mattoxic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900751</link>	
		<description>So now in order to get busted you need to leave your irises at the crime scene?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900751</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:39:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattoxic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tkchrist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1900869</link>	
		<description>I keep my eyes closed all the time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1900869</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tkchrist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BrotherCaine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky-Here#1902192</link>	
		<description>Jamjam, thanks for the cool link.  In addition to clock resetting, the level of intensity mentioned in that study may cause retinal damage.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.66225-1902192</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:50:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrotherCaine</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
