Comments on: Canopus

Canopus

chunking express — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:00:53 -0800

Four scanned pictures of the French nuclear test codenamed Canopus, which was fired on 24th August 1968 in the Fangataufa Atoll. The photographs are amazing.

By: kuujjuarapik

kuujjuarapik — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:08:51 -0800

Having a great time! Got a sunburn! Wish you were here! xoxox K

By: googly

googly — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:11:49 -0800

Canopus: "The device was suspended from a large hydrogen filled balloon. It was detonated at 18:30:00.5 GMT with a 2.6 megaton yield at an altitude of 1800 feet. As a result of the successful detonation, France became the 5th thermonuclear nation." Spectacular - and chilling - photos indeed. Thanks.

By: thewalrusispaul

thewalrusispaul — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:17:06 -0800

...For we grew up tall and proud In the shadow of the mushroom cloud...

By: The Bridge on the River Kai Ryssdal

The Bridge on the River Kai Ryssdal — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:17:32 -0800

God, those are islands, not ships like I thought in the first picture. The scale shifted so much when I realized that. I wish there were some information of the colors - they're so bright and saturated I could think they were put in later, but then I think I'm just so used to seeing the black-and-white footage from American tests (and I guess it is the late 1960s).

By: Skorgu

Skorgu — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:20:09 -0800

One thing that these pictures hint at is the scale. It's hard to get an idea for how far way and thus how unutterably enormous all those features must be. If only someone had recorded them in stereo vision. My other most favorite nuclear explosion pictures.

By: Floydd

Floydd — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:21:38 -0800

"The device was suspended from a large hydrogen filled balloon." Did we learn nothing from the Hindenburg?

By: kirkaracha

kirkaracha — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:31:54 -0800

"All changed, changed utterly: A terrible beauty is born."

By: stinkycheese

stinkycheese — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:36:03 -0800

Very nice pics. Just wish they were bigger (grumble grumble).

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:36:03 -0800

Possible newspaper headline: "French Fry Atoll."

By: popcassady

popcassady — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:39:54 -0800

Pull my finger.

By: delmoi

delmoi — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:44:51 -0800

Very nice pics. Just wish they were bigger (grumble grumble). Did you try clicking "All sizes"? The full sized ones are 1500x1000 px.

By: mattbucher

mattbucher — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:45:34 -0800

Just wish they were bigger Click "different sizes" in the right hand column of each picture page.

By: never used baby shoes

never used baby shoes — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:50:22 -0800

Really drives home the "I am become death" comment from Oppenheimer.

By: Rancid Badger

Rancid Badger — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:57:12 -0800

Sublime

By: schmedeman

schmedeman — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:59:13 -0800

We'll meet again Don't know how Don't know when

By: nosila

nosila — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:59:22 -0800

Insta-desktop. Nothin' like looking at one of many potential apocalypse triggers 8 or 900 times a day. Keep it real, wut wut!

By: stinkycheese

stinkycheese — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:59:30 -0800

Thanks everybody. I feel pretty dumb now.

By: caddis

caddis — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:03:05 -0800

We don't want this to happen here, that is why we have taken away all your rights. - The Central Scrutinizer

By: weapons-grade pandemonium

weapons-grade pandemonium — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:04:28 -0800

Two Hiroshimas per day, 365 days per year, for 36 years. Beautiful.

By: doctor_negative

doctor_negative — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:25:55 -0800

The full sized ones are 1500x1000 px. Suitable for printing a 3"x5" image, unfortunately. This would make a nice poster.

By: cenoxo

cenoxo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:26:53 -0800

Complete and utter annihilation moving towards you at several hundred km/hour would be a fascinating thing to see (assuming that you still have eyes, of course.) Estimated number of France's operational nuclear warheads: 348. France ranks 3rd worldwide, after Russia with 5,670 and the United States with 5,163. China and the UK have less than 200 warheads each. Israel, Pakistan, and India: less than 100 each. North Korea: less than 10. Iraq, 0, Iran, 0, Syria, 0. I've always been terrible at higher math: remind me again where the worldwide threat might be coming from.

By: Mach5

Mach5 — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:43:42 -0800

Thanks, metafilter, for 30 minutes of fascinating youtube nuke test watching, and a new wallpaper.

By: lalochezia

lalochezia — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:50:02 -0800

Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.

By: MiltonRandKalman

MiltonRandKalman — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:50:55 -0800

If beauty could kill. oh...wait...

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:57:56 -0800

"Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf said Monday he'd been prepared to use atomic weapons if Indian forces crossed into its territory earlier this year [2002] when tensions peaked – in an admission of how close the neighbors came to nuclear war."

By: Rangeboy

Rangeboy — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:07:43 -0800

Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. I always preferred the words of Manhattan Project Director Kenneth Bainbridge: "Now we are all sons of bitches."

By: The Light Fantastic

The Light Fantastic — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:09:10 -0800

I've never been able to enjoy looking at photos of nuclear explosions. They always freak me out. These are nice quality, though - but obviously very retouched.

By: Postroad

Postroad — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:13:31 -0800

great photos but it is not like being there in person...you folks missed grand show.

By: gemmy

gemmy — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:21:30 -0800

Terrible, horrifying, and heartrendingly beautiful all at once. It makes me just a little more grateful for being alive. Thanks, chunking.

By: lalochezia

lalochezia — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:51:35 -0800

great photos but it is not like being there in person...you folks missed grand show. I get the feeling that one day in most of our lifetimes, we'll witness another 'grand show'. Only this time, it won't be a test, and aesthetics wil be far from the onlookers minds.

By: Pogo_Fuzzybutt

Pogo_Fuzzybutt — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:09:26 -0800

I used to have a poster of this one. I bought it at the Electric Fetus to decorate my first apartment. It was placed above the head of my bead. I used to have a lot of very drunken sex under it with the girl who lived downstairs from me. I was thinking about her, and also this poster the other day. I always wondered where it was taken and what the story was.

By: HuronBob

HuronBob — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:30:15 -0800

Interesting... last week..... Enola Gay...this week... French bombs... When do we start learning from this... somehow I feel this slow crawl towards annihilation!

By: rlk

rlk — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:58:48 -0800

There's an undeniable beauty in a mushroom cloud. If you can strip away the politics and the history and the suffering and the threat of armageddon, there's just nothing that can similarly express the triumph of science and the beauty of the physics in the extreme. Just look at that first shot. It punched a hole in the sky. I actually have a 36x24" print of that photo, so I've done my share of staring at it.

By: Parannoyed

Parannoyed — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:03:18 -0800

Rasterbated and on my wall very shortly...

By: unknowncommand

unknowncommand — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:36:29 -0800

Gosh those are beautiful.

By: greenskpr

greenskpr — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:07:52 -0800

Nature boy

By: hattifattener

hattifattener — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:24:06 -0800

They are awesome images, and awful. I read somewhere, I think it might have been in a biography of Oppenheimer, an attempt at description by some military man of just how far beyond ordinary ordnance a nuke is. You may have seen a lot of explosions and a lot of destruction and death (I paraphrase) and be expecting just a big bomb, but personally witnessing a test drives home the point that these are truly terrifying devices of a higher order. He went on to worry that, with the ban on aboveground testing, modern leaders don't really understand, viscerally, what they're dealing with.

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:53:01 -0800

So unspeakably horrible and so captivatingly beautiful, at one and the same time. Repugnant and seductive. A thing of horror, a thing of beauty. And that's so excruciatingly weird.

By: Student of Man

Student of Man — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:57:22 -0800

Estimated number of France's operational nuclear warheads: 348. France ranks 3rd worldwide, after Russia with 5,670 and the United States with 5,163... Funny, I've always heard the US "won" the cold war on tv *ducks*. this begs the question; On what grounds are you considered the victor in a "cold" war? I bet the Russians think they've won too. What are the "estimates" of these figures based on? Did the site get their information from Solid Snake?

By: ROU_Xenophobe

ROU_Xenophobe — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:00:04 -0800

On what grounds are you considered the victor in a "cold" war? You still exist and your opponent doesn't?

By: cenoxo

cenoxo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:05:00 -0800

Hattiefattener, due to your mention of the nuclear test ban, General Leslie Groves' Memorandum Describing the First Nuclear Test In New Mexico, July 18, 1945, is probably not the description you're referring to, but it's sobering enough. (It also contains a shorter report by General Thomas Farrell.) Keep in mind that the Trinity Gadget test yield was about 20-22 kilotons (thousands of tons of TNT), Hiroshima's Little Boy bomb yield was about 13 kt, and Nagasaki's Fat Man about 22 kt. Yields of today's deliverable strategic nuclear weapons may vary anywhere from 100 kt to several megatons (millions of tons of TNT). The most powerful bomb tests were Castle Bravo (U.S.A., 35 mt), and Tsar Bomba (U.S.S.R., 50 mt). Up to a certain point, size won't matter very much to those on the receiving end.

By: cenoxo

cenoxo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:30:27 -0800

Student of Man wrote: What are the "estimates" of these figures based on? Did the site get their information from Solid Snake? The estimates are from the Nuclear Information Project. Footnote A on the leading table, Status of World Nuclear Forces 2007, reads as follows:

The estimates are based on work published in the Nuclear Notebook co-authored with Robert Norris in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the nuclear appendix in the SIPRI Yearbook co-authored with Shannon Kile and others, and the FAS Strategic Security Blog. This table is updated continuously as new information becomes available.

More about the Nuclear Information Project (whose sources may have a bit more credibility than Solid Snake.)

By: sexyrobot

sexyrobot — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:46:58 -0800

looking for bigger pix? you might have to buy the book. ('full moon' (and the story behind it) are awesome as well)

By: the cydonian

the cydonian — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:47:32 -0800

Et je devienne Mort, destructeur de mondes. I feel so dirty for liking these pics. _{(Also, just realized that the French word for 'death' is almost the same as the Hindi word for death, mauth.)}

By: caddis

caddis — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:58:20 -0800

I feel so dirty for liking these pics. How do you feel about pictures of la petite mort?

By: Skeptic

Skeptic — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:07:58 -0800

Those French, even their nukes are stylish...

By: the cydonian

the cydonian — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:00:08 -0800

How do you feel about pictures of la petite mort?

Well, what do you think? :-) _{Just discovered this idiom today in French, in addition to the rather elegant L'Esprit d'escalier (dans anglais). Fascinating stuff!}

By: the cydonian

the cydonian — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:01:39 -0800

_{Wait, that should have been en anglais, shouldn't it? Hmmmm.}