<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 6689</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 6689</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:41:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:41:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 6689</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42743,00.html"&gt;View this ad or we shoot this dog:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Forget CNET&apos;s poster-size adverts. The latest trend is a user agreement that requires visitors to view your banners.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What other websites will attempt to adopt this trend?  And what will the backlash be?  I for one won&apos;t go to sites that &quot;require&quot; me to view advertising.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;font size=-3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Story towards bottom of the page&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 08:09:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>da5id</dc:creator>		<category>ads</category>		<category>advertising</category>		<category>marketing</category>		<category>banners</category>		<category>bannerads</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#63982</link>	
		<description>Who cares? Such user agreements are completely unenforceble, and will be ignored.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-63982</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:41:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quarsan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#63986</link>	
		<description>here&apos;s what they said after a complaint in their forums:

Our advertising company contacted us and they have an extra supply of Pop-up ads... which means they&apos;re paying an extra large amount for them!

They only have this extra high paying inventory for today and tomorrow; so we have added an extra popup or two to other pages on the site to help bring in additional revenues

does this make any sense to anyone?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-63986</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:52:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quarsan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: darukaru</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#63998</link>	
		<description>It makes me wonder if the people who run the site understand the difference between physical and electronic inventory. &apos;Extra supply of pop-up ads&apos; my heinie.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-63998</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:41:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darukaru</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pnevares</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#64003</link>	
		<description>&quot;they&apos;re just sitting here NOT popping up! we need to MOVE MOVE MOVE!!&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-64003</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pnevares</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#64037</link>	
		<description>I hurt my back picking up a gross case of pop-up ads once.

Of course, what they mean is that they had oversold ad impressions to their clients. They needed to get extra impressions quickly or they would have to do a buyback. (TV networks have to do the same sort of thing if a show has much lower viewership than expected. Either they refund cash to the advertiser, or more often, they offer a deal for ad time on another show.) Thus they would pay a premium just to get their ads seen by the end of the month.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-64037</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2001 14:02:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quarsan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6689/#64131</link>	
		<description>thanks dhartung for the explanation. that makes sense.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.6689-64131</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2001 04:20:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quarsan</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
