From what rudimentary understanding I can gain of all this at this time in the morning, it's looking to be pretty neat indeed. If I wanted to decorate a wall like this, would I need to hire a mathematician as my interior decorator?
My understanding will be no less rudimentary at 2 in the afternoon. posted by PhatLobley at 5:04 AM on December 4, 2007
Most of those look like variations of a pinwheel pattern.
(This is neat. Thanks for the post!) posted by Balisong at 6:26 AM on December 4, 2007
It's interesting that all of the tilings of squares except 39x39 (at least on the first page - the second wouldn't load for me) have either rotational or reflectional symmetry. Are the "pretty" ones just easier to find? posted by Horselover Fat at 8:06 AM on December 4, 2007
If I wanted to decorate a wall like this, would I need to hire a mathematician as my interior decorator?
You'd probably do well enough with some graph paper and some spare time, if you were mostly concerned with the general look rather than the precise nowhere-neat constraints. posted by cortex at 8:50 AM on December 4, 2007
Grout forgives a lot of mathematical sins. posted by ardgedee at 10:09 AM on December 4, 2007 [1 favorite]
That first link is off the homepage of Joseph DeVincentis, who is a sort of a hero of mine when it comes to recreational mathematics. posted by vacapinta at 10:31 AM on December 4, 2007
Sometimes I think I'm okay at math and then I look at something like this and realize I am practically a moron. posted by autodidact at 12:40 PM on December 4, 2007
Man, that Ramanujan was something special. (Also read about the number 1729.) posted by phliar at 3:22 PM on December 4, 2007
this is really cool posted by es_de_bah at 5:06 PM on December 4, 2007
« Older
PISA results are in....
| On the occasion of the 150th a...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
My understanding will be no less rudimentary at 2 in the afternoon.
posted by PhatLobley at 5:04 AM on December 4, 2007