<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Securing Pakistan&apos;s Nukes</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67746/Securing-Pakistans-Nukes/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Securing Pakistan&apos;s Nukes</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:25:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:25:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Securing Pakistan&apos;s Nukes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67746/Securing-Pakistans-Nukes</link>	
		<description>Given this morning&apos;s news, I figured we could all do with a primer on the state of security regarding Pakistan&apos;s nuclear weapons.  It&apos;s a very murky situation, but here&apos;s a collection of some of the best available data &amp; analysis.  I won&apos;t even try to summarize or characterize the various articles, I think any attempt I&apos;d make would reduce their information past usefulness.  

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So here you go, make of it what you will: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/washington/18nuke.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=asia&amp;pagewanted=print&quot;&gt;U.S. Secretly Aids Pakistan in Guarding Nuclear Arms&lt;/a&gt; (NYT), &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119629674095207239.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&quot;&gt;Inside Pakistan&apos;s Drive
To Guard Its A-Bombs&lt;/a&gt; (WSJ), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/11/10/ST2007111001833.html?hpid=topnews&quot;&gt;Pakistan Nuclear Security Questioned&lt;/a&gt; (WP), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/02/13/060213fa_fact_coll?printable=true&quot;&gt;The Stand-off&lt;/a&gt; (New Yorker), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_timess_threeyear_silence_o.php?page=all&quot;&gt;The Times&apos;s Three-Year Silence on Pakistan&apos;s Nukes&lt;/a&gt; (CJR), &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/11/securing-paks-n.html&quot;&gt;Securing Pakistan&apos;s Nukes&lt;/a&gt; (Danger Room), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TVDJD1RB794SVCR97&quot;&gt;Pak nukes already under US control&lt;/a&gt; (Stratfor Report) &amp; finally a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/nsam-160/pal.html&quot;&gt;Permissive Action Link Primer&lt;/a&gt;.  Enjoy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.67746</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:20:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scalefree</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: psmealey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67746/Securing-Pakistans-Nukes#1957749</link>	
		<description>This would be an excellent comment to post in the Bhutto thread, which is still going strong.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.67746-1957749</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:25:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>psmealey</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: AwkwardPause</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67746/Securing-Pakistans-Nukes#1957775</link>	
		<description>Yeah, thanks for the links, but please post below.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2007:site.67746-1957775</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:51:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AwkwardPause</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
