I did also sometimes make an effort to stretch or shorten my step so that I'd get more than I would with a normal stride.
To clarify, it is not the treatment of bugs, per se, that I object to. That should be clear from my posts if they are read carefully. Killing for sport is wrong. That is the core of my objection. How about, if you want to disagree with me and call me hypocritical, you actually try and counter the part that I am objecting to?
So why is killing for sport wrong?
The taking of a life should require justification. Not in a human sense (it was in my way), but in a 'balance' sense. Killing, as I say, for food is fine. Killing because it makes you laugh/smile/become amused is not.
« Older “Subprime” voted 2007 word of the year... | Meet Billy the kid, an outside... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt