I didn't get the meat reference. posted by mexican at 7:12 PM on January 8, 2008
Yes?
That title is a reference to...
My answer was in reference to your apparently calling me, as my handle here is "Meatbomb" (but you can call me Meat). So, now that our jokes have both been explained into the ground, let's get on to, umm... HEY! LOOK AT THAT SHINY NEW THING!! posted by Meatbomb at 8:50 PM on January 8, 2008
This is a clever idea, but poorly executed. It's unfortunate, since there are definitely some striking images possible with the juxtaposition of internal organs and mannequins. posted by Pyry at 9:30 PM on January 8, 2008
I thought the execution was flawless. I guess I'm biased though, since I'm not a photographer. posted by Citizen Premier at 9:31 PM on January 8, 2008
Looking back at the images, they aren't that bad; I was just disappointed by them. The actual photograph of a mannequin's hand holding a pig's heart just doesn't live up to the promise of the title.
That is, I was imagining a bone-white artificial hand squeezing the life out of a heart so fresh it's still bleeding. I got a beige hand passively supporting a hunk of roast beef. posted by Pyry at 11:20 PM on January 8, 2008
his work seems a litte... labored? the street graffitti shots work better. posted by lapolla at 11:58 PM on January 8, 2008
"little", dammit. sorry, long day. posted by lapolla at 11:59 PM on January 8, 2008
« Older
Comedian Patton Oswalt has gotten a lot of mileage...
| The poll tax caused massive ri...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by klangklangston at 3:02 PM on January 8, 2008