<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 686</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 686</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:54:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 686</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/</link>	
		<description>Personal rant time: I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://haughey.com/resume.htm&quot;&gt;my own resume&lt;/a&gt; a while ago, and have been building onto it for a couple years now. To me, it is copyrighted material, just as anything else I write. So why is it showing up in all sorts of resume databases? I&apos;m getting calls from recruiters saying they got it from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aquent.com&quot;&gt;Aquent&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.passportaccess.com/&quot;&gt;Passport Access&lt;/a&gt;, and various other resume sites. These sites seem to be sucking down resumes, putting them on their site, and making money off them. I can&apos;t see my own resume, since I haven&apos;t paid to look at it. I find PassportAccess to be especially annoying: they offer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.passportaccess.com/removeresume.asp&quot;&gt;an opt-out page&lt;/a&gt;. What the hell? Why should I even have to do this? It&apos;s my resume, not theirs!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:52:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>mathowie</category>		<category>copyright</category>		<category>passportaccess</category>		<category>resumes</category>		<category>intellectualproperty</category>		<category>headhunting</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brig</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#602</link>	
		<description>i&apos;m right there with you. i was receiving tons of calls over the last 3 or 4 weeks. couldn&apos;t figure out why. until one of them said they&apos;d found my resume on passport access. i told them to pull it, and have only heard from 1 since then. i was seriously pissed too!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-602</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brig</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mmanning</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#603</link>	
		<description>from a passportaccess &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.passportaccess.com/ispy.asp&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/A&gt;: &quot;...new Internet Spy (&quot;I-SPY&quot;) technology which hunts for technical resumes on the Internet backbone 24 hours per day, seven days a week. This new technology automatically digs deep into Internet layers to find resumes that are not posted on the major job boards and cannot be easily found using Internet directories.&quot;

oh joy. this is sorta like those great programs that hunt the usenet newsgroups to find those seldomly spammed email addresses...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-603</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 21:24:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmanning</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#604</link>	
		<description>Here&apos;s what I put in the comments area of the opt-out page:
I find your company and its I-SPY bot to be a disgusting misuse of the web. You&apos;re making money off *my* resume, something I *never* explicitly gave you permission to do. Your company makes me sick. I&apos;m getting calls and emails everyday now and they say they got my resume from here. Now I&apos;m going to have to put a copyright disclaimer on my own resume, so this doesn&apos;t happen again. Where do you guys get off thinking you can build a database of resumes you&apos;ve pilfered off the web and reap monetary rewards off it? You have *no* right to do what you&apos;re doing. *No* right.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-604</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 21:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Markb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#607</link>	
		<description>Let&apos;s face it, it&apos;s just another example of corporate greed feeding off the net, these people are at about the same evolutionary level as spammers.
Unfortunately however self policing a medium is, and I believe the internet to be an extremely good example, there will always be unscrupulous people who sieze any opportunity to make money from the unsuspecting.  It&apos;s a sad day when you have to resort to putting a copyright disclaimer on something as personal as your own resume.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-607</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 03:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mikewas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#608</link>	
		<description>On Matt&apos;s note about copyrighted material...

Anyone wanna sue?  =)
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-608</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 05:19:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikewas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: antc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#611</link>	
		<description>I just might fling a lawsuit Aquent&apos;s way.

I&apos;m in the same boat, and I&apos;m wondering if I should consider suing. Every page on my Web site is tagged with a copyright notice at the bottom.

If these companies were sucking down copyrighted content from a company like CNN or ZDNet, they would be drowning in legal bills. Why should what I have online be any different?

I&apos;m not a lawyer, but I doubt that these companies qualify for fair use/non-profit reprinting rights of my original content.

They&apos;re copyright violators, plain and simple.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-611</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 11:48:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>antc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brig</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#612</link>	
		<description>just got another one. geowebinteractive.com somehow harvested my resume. i just got an email saying they&apos;d found my resume there. so i sent one to them threatening a lawsuit if they didn&apos;t remove it immediately. i am so pissed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 11:51:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brig</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mikewas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#620</link>	
		<description>Anyone who is concerned about this, should seriously consider putting a copyright notice IN THE TEXT OF YOUR RESUME, so that when a &apos;bot harvests it and a third party posts it, they are on notice of your claim.

Then watch them backpedal later.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-620</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 16:06:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikewas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: artlung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#633</link>	
		<description>Any idea what the USER_AGENT string on these spiders? Might be interesting to disallow them from resume/cv pages.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-633</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 23:09:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>artlung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#666</link>	
		<description>What would happen if you put your resume under the
GPL? Then anyone who distributed your resume would have to give away free everything they have (?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-666</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curmudgeon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#673</link>	
		<description>Someone asked me if these resume sites were providing links to my resume, or copies of my resume on their site.

I changed the contact phone number on my personal resume back in December, and the recruiter that used PassportAccess contacted me at my old number a few days ago. That would lead me to assume they were storing an old copy of my resume. That would mean that they actually have a copy of resume, taken from my site.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-673</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: delfuego</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#726</link>	
		<description>So, here is the text of the email that I sent to Larry.  I am only dealing with Passport Access on this one; someone else can deal with Aquent.

--

Larry:

Thank you for hearing me out on the phone today.  I wanted to follow up with this email, explaining how it is that your company is violating *major* laws and copyright statutes with the I-Spy Technology, and specifically, that there is absolutely no requirement for a copyright symbol or registration of copyright for a work to be copyrighted -- thus, the mere act of you selling that resume to a client of yours is a violation of U.S. Copyright code, and punishable as such.

So, my basic complaint: Passport Access, by using a webcrawler to search out resumes that have not specifically been entered into their database and entering them, is violating a MAJOR tenet of United States copyright law. Every one of those resumes is protected by copyright, and each time you sell one to a client, you are committing a Federal offense.  And the

Here are two specific, on-point references to copyright law in this situation, and one good reference for you:

How to Secure Copyright, from the US Copyright Office:
   http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/circs/circ1.html#hsc
   Explains that copyright is affixed to a work automatically upon creation; no notification or registration is required.

Copyright Infringement in Cyberspace:
   http://www.wvjolt.wvu.edu/wvjolt/current/issue1/articles/salang/salango.htm
   Explains particular appliations of copyright law on the Internet

Chapter 5 of the U.S. Copyright Code:
   http://www.loc.gov/copyright/title17/chapter5.pdf
   Explains the specifics of copyright infringement, including penalties.  Note that, according to the law, what you are doing is both a Federal civil and a Federal *criminal* offense (see section 506a); that you could have every hard disk and computer that could store the infringed material impounded by Federal marshalls (sections 503, 509); that you could be fined up $100,000 *per violation* (section 504(c)(1)); and that you will be responsible for all civil action legal fees incurred by each person who sues (section 505).

Note that the $100,000 maximum fine is contingent on committing the infringement knowingly; this email takes care of any argument to the contrary.

Please pass this on to the people who you claim would be able to handle this matter.  I expect a reply from you; this is a very serious matter.

Thank you in advance.

Jason Levine
Queso Technologies
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-726</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/686/#727</link>	
		<description>Thanks for posting this Jason, and for contacting Larry and getting back to us here. I&apos;ll be sending out an email to him later today, and I&apos;m working on an article about it for a publication with a much bigger audience than this site.

So they are in fact keeping copies of resumes on their own site? That was something I could never get them to admit.

(by the way, got a call from a recruiter today that had a new copy of my resume emailed to him last week, and claims that I sent the resume to him as an attachment)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.686-727</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
