<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The Washington Indpendent</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The Washington Indpendent</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:27:01 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:27:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The Washington Indpendent</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent</link>	
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonindependent.com/&quot;&gt;Washington Independent&lt;/a&gt; went beta a few weeks ago.  The site employs several reporters to do investigative journalism on topics of national importance. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have no idea what bugs they are hoping to fix before official release.  The site is operated by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newjournalist.org/&quot;&gt;Center for Independent Media&lt;/a&gt;.  The Center has launched alliterative local journalism sites as well focused on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/magFront.do&quot;&gt;Colorado&lt;/a&gt; [Confidential], &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iowaindependent.com/magFront.do&quot;&gt;Iowa&lt;/a&gt; [Independent], &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michiganmessenger.com/magFront.do&quot;&gt;Michigan &lt;/a&gt; [Messenger] and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.minnesotamonitor.com/magFront.do&quot;&gt;Minnesota&lt;/a&gt; [Monitor].    Their independence cannot be verified as they have yet to file their first financial disclosure form.  I was drawn to the Washington Independent because it is new home of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonindependent.com/person/12665-spencer_ackerman&quot;&gt;Spencer Ackerman&lt;/a&gt;, a close observer of national security policy, but all the stories I have read there seem to be high content and skeptical of authority.

Metafilter turned the spotlight of its attention upon investigative journalism &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/66534/The-death-of-the-reporter&quot;&gt;a few months ago.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:05:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shothotbot</dc:creator>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>investigativejournalism</category>		<category>spencerackerman</category>		<category>washingtonindependent</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lkm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006065</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m the managing editor over at The Washington Independent. I&apos;m very interested in hearing what people think. If you&apos;ve got general ideas or specific suggestions on how to improve the site I&apos;d really like to hear. Thanks! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonindependent.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006065</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:27:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lkm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: shothotbot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006092</link>	
		<description>I think separating investigative reporting from print media is a good idea - good enough to try anyway.  There is no reason that people need to get sports news and political news from the same source.  I don&apos;t know who is going to pay for it - the Center is a non profit so are you going to have to hit up corporate big shots every few months?  Or is it all basically funded by George Soros?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006092</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:47:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shothotbot</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cell divide</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006112</link>	
		<description>Interesting, this is exactly the kind of thing I think the web can excel at. Hope it goes well and they really rake the muck, so to speak.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006112</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cell divide</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: capnsue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006175</link>	
		<description>Cool!  Glad to see this on mefi.  I was going to post about The Washington Independent myself but thought it might not be a good idea as Spencer is my ex boyfriend (but we still cool, yo.)  But check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://toohotfortnr.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;his personal blog&lt;/a&gt; too if you want to read more curse words and stories about punk rock.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006175</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:43:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>capnsue</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jamjam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006188</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d like a reasonable, unbiased look at John McCain&apos;s health. If he&apos;s elected, he&apos;ll be older than Reagan was at &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; inauguration, and I remember seeing video of McCain at a podium early in Bush&apos;s first term where his hands were shaking so badly as he paged through his notes I wondered if he was in the early stages of Parkinson&apos;s disease. Maybe three out of the last four presidents have had  brain issues, and I&apos;d like to know if we&apos;re getting ready to make that four out of five.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006188</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:55:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamjam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slap Factory</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006190</link>	
		<description>Yay!  A new collection of blogs!  About politics!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006190</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slap Factory</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homunculus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006262</link>	
		<description>Just saw this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://linkfilter.net/&quot;&gt;linkfilter&lt;/a&gt; this morning: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/cia-largely-in-the3&quot;&gt;CIA Largely in the Dark on Interrogation Tactics&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006262</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:09:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rtha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006294</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll definitely be bookmarking this. Although things have been so depressing lately that I can hardly bring myself to (regularly) read TPM and TPMMuckraker. Still, having another place where actual investigative journalism is practiced is good good good. It&apos;s not like the WaPo or NYT were at the forefront of breaking the US Attorney/DoJ scandal.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006294</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rtha</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Postroad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006295</link>	
		<description>I see a fairly good mount of news and I knew just about all that was on the front page of this new &quot;investigative&quot; paper. Seems at first glance pretty much standard news items with no focus upon investigative reporting.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006295</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:46:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: spasm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006571</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It&apos;s not like the WaPo or NYT were at the forefront of breaking the US Attorney/DoJ scandal.&lt;/em&gt;

The NYT was writing about this in February of 2007; how much earlier could they have been on it?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006571</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spasm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JHarris</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006610</link>	
		<description>lkm, best of luck with the venture!  We certainly need more good investigative journalism.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006610</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JHarris</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rtha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006676</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The NYT was writing about this in February of 2007; how much earlier could they have been on it?&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;m pretty certain that I began reading about it on TPM in January 07. I remember how much attention they gave it, and when the document dumps started happening, they&apos;d post or link to the .pdfs and readers would comb through them and note inconsistencies and the like. I don&apos;t remember it gather much steam in the mainstream press until several weeks later.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006676</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:08:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rtha</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rbs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2006708</link>	
		<description>Both Laura McGann (lkm) and Spencer Ackerman were at TPM Muckraker before. They&apos;ve left to be part of this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2006708</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:17:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rbs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rtha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68916/The-Washington-Indpendent#2018603</link>	
		<description>...And Josh Marshall of TPM wins a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003712141&quot;&gt;George Polk Award&lt;/a&gt; for legal reporting:

&quot;His site, www.talkingpointsmemo.com, led the news media coverage of the politically motivated dismissals of United States attorneys across the country. Noting a similarity between firings in Arkansas and California, Marshall (with staff reporter-bloggers Paul Kiel and Justin Rood) connected the dots and found a pattern of federal prosecutors being forced from office for failing to do the Bush Administration&apos;s bidding.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.68916-2018603</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rtha</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
