<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: 20=>2 20= 20=>28G</title>
      <link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaFilter post 20=>2 20= 20=>28G</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>&#1048;&#1074;&#1072;&#1085;&#1086;&#1074; &#1048;&#1074;&#1072;&#1085; &#1048;&#1074;&#1072;&#1085;&#1086;&#1074;&#1080;&#1095;</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G</link>	
    <description>&quot;John Doe&quot; around the world. </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:59:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mdonley</dc:creator>
	
	<category>johndoe</category>
	
	<category>alias</category>
	
	<category>anonymous</category>
	
	<category>crime</category>
	
	<category>name</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: hjo3</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041200</link>	
    <description>Why not just link to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Doe&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt; they copied?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041200</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>hjo3</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: DU</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041204</link>	
    <description>The wikipedia entry is interesting, but not a copy.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041204</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>DU</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: hjo3</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041208</link>	
    <description>&lt;i&gt;The wikipedia entry is interesting, but not a copy.&lt;/i&gt;

Really? They list that exact URL as their only source. Seems to me their version is just out of date.

BTW, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationmaster&quot;&gt;entry on Nationmaster&lt;/a&gt; has some interesting tidbits, like:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;NationMaster uses the content from Wikipedia along with commercial advertisements. For example see [1] and [2]. The site appears to specify more restrictive terms than (and thus be incompatible with) the GNU Free Document License (GFDL) of the original Wikipedia content. For example, see [3].&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041208</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>hjo3</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: DU</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041215</link>	
    <description>Oh, I just spot-checked some countries.  Just out of date, indeed.

What are the legal ramifications of a GFDL violation?  Presumably none, since AFAIK no GNU stuff has ever been tested in court.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041215</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>DU</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: hjo3</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041227</link>	
    <description>Yeah, I think you&apos;re right. So far offenders have only gotten stern letters.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041227</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:10:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>hjo3</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: languagehat</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041300</link>	
    <description>Interesting stuff (Faroe Islands: Mi&#xf0;alhampama&#xf0;ur&amp;mdash;now there&apos;s a username I&apos;d like to see), but it&apos;s annoying that all the names are lumped together with only occasional attempts to distinguish legal terms (John Doe) from colloquial ones (Joe Blow); it makes the list a lot less useful than it should be.

&lt;em&gt;Why not just link to the Wikipedia entry they copied?&lt;/em&gt;

While morally that would have been the right thing to do, in practice the first half-dozen comments would have been variants on &quot;OMG one link to a Wikipedia entry I&apos;m taking this to MetaTalk!!!&quot;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041300</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:28:34 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: zsazsa</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041310</link>	
    <description>I wonder why variations on Fulano/Folani are so widespread.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041310</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:37:21 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>zsazsa</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: klue</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041324</link>	
    <description>I had to check wikipedia to understand the China entry anyway, as nationmaster.com for some reason chose not to include the characters.

&lt;small&gt;While I know that some people on this site (yes, languagehat, I&apos;m looking at you) are rather pro-pinyin, it was in no way obvious to me that the sh&#xec; of W&#xfa;m&#xed;ng Sh&#xec; (written, correctly I assume, W&#xfa; M&#xed;ngsh&#xec; on the wiki) was referring to &#27663;.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041324</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:47:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>klue</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: benzo8</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041342</link>	
    <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/69789/%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD-%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87#2041310&quot;&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;I wonder why variations on Fulano/Folani are so widespread.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Fulano, mengano y zutano&quot; is, effectively, &quot;Tom, Dick and Harry&quot; in both Spanish and Portuguese - both languages which have a fairly deep penetration in the countries covered in this list...</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041342</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>benzo8</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: languagehat</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041383</link>	
    <description>&lt;em&gt;While I know that some people on this site (yes, languagehat, I&apos;m looking at you) are rather pro-pinyin&lt;/em&gt;

I don&apos;t know where you get that idea; I&apos;m on record as being anti-pinyin&amp;mdash;see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/61470/The-Release-of-Inner-Energy-the-Release-of-Fear#1704176&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (&quot;Reason #61470 why pinyin sucks&quot;) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/61819/though-I-like-the-3-dots-in-Beijing#930642&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;em&gt;
I wonder why variations on Fulano/Folani are so widespread.&lt;/em&gt;

Spanish borrowed Arabic &lt;em&gt;Fulan &lt;/em&gt;(&#1601;&#1604;&#1575;&#1606;), as did a bunch of languages used by people of Islamic culture.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041383</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: klue</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041401</link>	
    <description>As briefly pointed out in the Wikipedia entry, the usage of the &quot;John Does&quot; of different languages differ a bit. While the American term is often used to mean unidentified person (I recall the listing of thirteen Jane Does on the whiteboard in an episode of The Wire), I have only very rearly encountered that kind of usage of the Norwegian equivalent Ola/Kari Nordmann, where it&apos;s much more commonly used to describe an unspecified person, as in the all-too ubiquitous commercials:

&quot;Need a telephone number?

Text Tlf Kari Nordmann to [service provider&apos;s number]&quot;

&lt;small&gt;Languagehat: &lt;em&gt;I don&apos;t know where you get that idea&lt;/em&gt;

I got the impression from reading the discussion following &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.languagehat.com/archives/002734.php&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; post a while ago. Upon re-reading, It seems you&apos;re arguing more against the necessity of Hanzi, rather than being a proponent of pinyin as a particular romanization system to replace it. My apologies for misinterpreting your views.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041401</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>klue</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: languagehat</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041445</link>	
    <description>No problem.  And yeah, I think the Chinese people would be far better off with a romanized writing system, whether pinyin or otherwise, than with the ridiculously complicated characters they&apos;ve got now.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041445</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: DecemberBoy</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69789/20=>2-20=-20=>28G#2041921</link>	
    <description>&lt;em&gt;Jacoby Shaddix of Papa Roach (American rock band) fame used &quot;J. Doe&quot; as his stage name for his side-project band, Fight The Sky.&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;Jacoby Shaddix&quot;? Yeah, I&apos;d want to call myself John Doe too. I&apos;d also want to hide my identity if I was partly responsible for Papa Roach.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.69789-2041921</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>DecemberBoy</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
