<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: ROM CHECK FAIL</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post ROM CHECK FAIL</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:23:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:23:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>ROM CHECK FAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.farbs.org/games.html"&gt;ROM CHECK FAIL&lt;/a&gt; is a goofy little PC game, in the classic 1980&apos;s arcade/home console genre of ... err ...

Use the space bar to fire your blaster.  Or sword.  (Or jump.)  Use the arrow keys to control your ... guy as if you were playing ... that ... classic game.  Eliminate all the enemy, well, things in the expected way, and go on to the next maze/planet/cave/highway.  Look, just play it, OK?  It&apos;s fun!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CrunchyFrog</dc:creator>		<category>ROM</category>		<category>FAIL</category>		<category>game</category>		<category>classic</category>		<category>arcade</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brundlefly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058363</link>	
		<description>grumblegrumbleNOMACVERSIONgrumblegrumble</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058363</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:23:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brundlefly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058364</link>	
		<description>(sounds fun)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058364</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:24:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: painquale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058366</link>	
		<description>This is totally great.  But man, it sucks when you become Space Invaders guy.  Link and Pacman are the best.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058366</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Skwirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058375</link>	
		<description>Okay, that was fun and I see that the ADDness is part of the joke, but it would be about 1000x more fun and 1000x less &quot;they think they&apos;re so smart, har har...&quot; if they gave you some actual time to play around before going all ADD on you... At least on the early levels. At the very least, the time between switching ROMs should occassionally be random and give you some free whomping time when you&apos;re lucky. (Or make you sweat bullets as Space Invaders&apos; ship vs. Qix Sparx) Speeaking of, there&apos;s not equal representation here... Is a little Qix diamond physics too hard to code up? No Octoroks love? Tetris? Bub and Bob?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058375</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:54:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skwirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: juv3nal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058405</link>	
		<description>
&lt;em&gt;grumblegrumbleNOMACVERSIONgrumblegrumble&lt;/em&gt;

grumblegrumblePARALLELS/BOOTCAMPgrumblegrumble?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058405</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juv3nal</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Tzarius</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058410</link>	
		<description>Alt+Enter to go fullscreen, if it&apos;s not already obvious.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058410</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:03:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tzarius</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: painquale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058459</link>	
		<description>Can anyone finish the game a second time through (on &quot;the princess is in another faster&quot; mode)?  I got up to level 12 on the second time around, but it&apos;s really luck dependent.  This is a fun little time waster.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058459</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058482</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m afraid I&apos;m with Skwirl on this one -- actually playing any of those sub-games would be fun if they ran a bit longer, or if there were &quot;switch conditions&quot; or something, but as it is I didn&apos;t really enjoy it. Although I do appreciate the ambition and creativity involved.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058482</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:18:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shepherd</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Uther Bentrazor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058573</link>	
		<description>This is fun, aggravatingly addicting, too.

Although I admit this answers the question of &quot;who would win in a fight between video game characters&quot;, the answer being the Defender ship.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058573</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:12:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uther Bentrazor</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nielm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058597</link>	
		<description>the irony... 2.8 megabytes of compressed executable to emulate a 64k RAM machine...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058597</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:35:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nielm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: acb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058605</link>	
		<description>IS ROM CHECK FAIL an embedded MAME ROM, or a native C/C++ Windows game? If the former, is it possible to get it running with MAME on a non-Windows machine?

 -- another person who&apos;s to cheap to buy a copy of Windows</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058605</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:43:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: King Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058658</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;grumblegrumblePARALLELS/BOOTCAMPgrumblegrumble?&lt;/i&gt;

grumblegrumblePOWERPCgrumblegrumble</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058658</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>King Bee</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: acb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058662</link>	
		<description>Actually, looking at it, it appears to be largely written in Python (though the source is not included). I wonder whether the author could be persuaded to make it available for non-Windows users.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058662</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:33:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: LogicalDash</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058744</link>	
		<description>Seems to run fine in WINE. Ha, I&apos;m going to try out some of the other entries in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tigsource.com/features/vgng/&quot;&gt;VGNG competition&lt;/a&gt;. Corporate Moped Horde! It&apos;s an actual game!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058744</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LogicalDash</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ogre Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2058891</link>	
		<description>Huh.  Kind of interesting, but some of the levels make play kind of hit or miss with various game/enemy combinations.  The Space Invaders base is worthless in anything but a clear field, likewise the Spy Hunter car is kind of limited.  And what the hell is Mario&apos;s attack supposed to be.  Kind of cute for the download and five spare minutes...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2058891</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ogre Lawless</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JHarris</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70226/ROM-CHECK-FAIL#2059576</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Although I admit this answers the question of &quot;who would win in a fight between video game characters&quot;, the answer being the Defender ship.&lt;/i&gt;

What, was this ever in doubt?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.70226-2059576</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:42:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JHarris</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
