Comments on: he consumes their ghost costume but not their eyeballs. it's roughage

he consumes their ghost costume but not their eyeballs. it's roughage

juv3nal — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:16:59 -0800

By: The Michael The

The Michael The — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:22:17 -0800

posted by juv3nal Homophonically eponysterical.

By: Justinian

Justinian — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:26:09 -0800

This is ridiculous. They're making their estimates based on the idea that the dots are solid food with lots of waste. The dots are clearly energy-based dots. It's like calculating how much poop you'd make from eating a ton of sugar-cubes by doing the calculations assuming the sugar cubes are fiber instead of sugar. Pac man dots are not fiber dots!

By: jammy

jammy — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:28:27 -0800

oh, very eponysterical i dunno if this is what they call the best of teh intarwebs but i laughed (not lmao, definitely not rotflmao, maybe just mmcsgab = made me chuckle, snort, giggle a bit)

By: Roman Graves

Roman Graves — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:28:38 -0800

Sigh.

By: Mcable

Mcable — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:37:44 -0800

Nothing like a poo thread for a rainy weekend. I shall sit back with my beverage and enjoy, until the inevitable deletion.

By: Pope Guilty

Pope Guilty — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:41:45 -0800

This is why we have an internets.

By: kaemaril

kaemaril — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:42:48 -0800

This is easily - easily - the most asinine thing I have read in a long, long time. And yet, nonetheless, I find myself mildly impressed by the thought that went into it.

By: ten pounds of inedita

ten pounds of inedita — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:45:19 -0800

I couldn't read any further past the improper use of "beg the question". I assume that it was full of fail.

By: not_on_display

not_on_display — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:02:58 -0800

I suck at Pac Man. Maybe I should eat more fiber.

By: blue_beetle

blue_beetle — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:06:07 -0800

I think this thread about pacman fecal volume makes some seriously wrong assumptions about the density of pixel representations of real-world objects.

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:18:15 -0800

If I wanted pixels of poop, I'd download a 2G1C video. Do not want. Although it would be more challenging if Donkey Kong standing on the top of the scaffolding occasionally pooped or peed on Mario...

By: loquacious

loquacious — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:39:48 -0800

Two Pac Mans, one cu.. uhhh.. Oh, hi wendell!

By: delmoi

delmoi — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:58:27 -0800

Yeah that was pretty dumb.

By: Artw

Artw — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:49:14 -0800

Are we assuming pacman extends into the third dimension?

By: ColdChef

ColdChef — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:07:30 -0800

Pac Men.

By: Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America

Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:08:45 -0800

Are we assuming pacman extends into the third dimension? If he doesn't, presumably he has to poop out of his mouth. A two dimensional organism can't have a two-orifice digestive tract.

By: empath

empath — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:37:44 -0800

I enjoyed it, so there.

By: Justinian

Justinian — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:38:50 -0800

I'm not sure about that, actually. Couldn't Pac-Man be permeable like an amoeba? The food could be absorbed into Pac-Man at his mouth, move around inside him in some kind of vitreous gel (like inside your eye) and then be excreted on his opposite, two dimensional, side. Technically he wouldn't even have a "digestive tract", but there's no reason he has to have one.

By: Eideteker

Eideteker — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:11:15 -0800

"People checking their power pellets for fiber content—you have too many freaking free cycles on your hands."

By: DecemberBoy

DecemberBoy — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:27:21 -0800

10:06:18 AM Fletch: do we assume Pac's GI tract is reg'lar? Getting enuf dietery fiber? 10:06:22 AM Owen: this is for mature, healthy, nonsmoking male pac-adult I don't care what you say. That's damn funny.

By: mazola

mazola — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:30:49 -0800

Do they give a Nobel Prize for dumb?

By: Freon

Freon — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:01:53 -0800

Do they give a Nobel Prize for dumb? Yes.

By: Kiablokirk

Kiablokirk — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:14:03 -0800

The real question is, how do you give the Heimlich to a perfect circle?

By: fearfulsymmetry

fearfulsymmetry — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:35:41 -0800

Next they'll be saying 'wakka wakka wakka' is some sort of language

By: randomination

randomination — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:42:53 -0800

By: kaemaril

kaemaril — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:21:51 -0800

>Next they'll be saying 'wakka wakka wakka' is some sort of language Fozzie seems to comprehend it ...

By: pixxie

pixxie — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:23:17 -0800

It's cute, but not really Metafilter-post-worthy.