Comments on: Žižek!

Žižek!

homunculus — Mon, 12 May 2008 14:00:20 -0800

"Žižek!" is a feature documentary exploring the eccentric personality and esoteric work of the "wild man of theory": the eminent Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek. Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7.

Democracy Now! did a two-part interview with Žižek which concluded today: Part 1, Part 2. His latest book is "In Defense of Lost Causes". Žižek was previsouly discussed here and here.

By: delmoi

delmoi — Mon, 12 May 2008 14:26:02 -0800

Weird synchronicity, The content in my clipboard in that clipboard thread three days ago was "Slavoj Zizek"

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Mon, 12 May 2008 14:38:42 -0800

Zizek. You know how this will wend.

By: Termite

Termite — Mon, 12 May 2008 14:52:00 -0800

Slavoj "give Iranian nukes a chance" Zizek is everywhere. I was just going to read what Terry Eagleton wrote about him in Times.

By: spiderwire

spiderwire — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:04:29 -0800

He was pretty sweet in Children of Men. Breakout performance.

By: spiderwire

spiderwire — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:13:38 -0800

Did anyone else think that was a mistake at first? Like, "Wait, WTF is Slavoj Zizek doing here?" ... I thought I returned Debbie Does Critical Theory last night

By: muckster

muckster — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:25:18 -0800

I really enjoyed his Pervert's Guide to Cinema. Here's a clip.

By: Kinbote

Kinbote — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:48:09 -0800

I saw Žižek speak about a year ago, in a relatively intimate setting, right here in New London, a place where dreams go not so much to die as to never be born. He was brilliant, a friendly but challenging intellectual giant. Damn, he talked purdy. Thanks for the links, and sign me up for the Koolaid.

By: ornate insect

ornate insect — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:56:07 -0800

Met the filmmaker briefly at a party once (in the Verso offices that are briefly in the film, when Zizek visits his NY publisher). Looks like she has a new film on philosophy due out next month? It features, somewhat surprisingly, more Zizek? I would have thought the Zizek film exhausted that guy as a topic, since the man talks non-stop (i.e. he talks almost as much as Phil Schapp does). I forget who it was who said about Solzhenitsyn that if you take away the beard he loses much of his gravitas (beards being an intellectual identifier since at least the 19th Century), but I think w/Zizek if one removes the beard, the accent, the Stalinist quasi-apologetics, and the endless otiose digressions and Lacanian theorizing, the aura wears thin (he seems to admit as much himself in the film). One has the distinct impression w/SZ (and how appropriate that his initials mimic a Barthes book!) of a man talking just fast and frequently enough so as not to be pinned down. Cerebral documentarians have naturally gravitated towards Zizek and Derrida, but one will wait in vain to see a documentary on, oh I don't know, say, John McDowell. In other words, the academic chicness of a philosopher is often in inverse proportion to his or her lasting philosophical merit. I don't wholly dislike Zizek, but his attempts to remain relevant by prattling on about Hitchcock, the Matrix, Pepsi, what have you, ring a bit hollow and seem a bit forced.

By: Falconetti

Falconetti — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:55:27 -0800

I've never enjoyed someone I disagree with as much as Slavoj (and I love reading him when he talks about cinema).

By: dyoneo

dyoneo — Mon, 12 May 2008 17:23:13 -0800

the academic chicness of a philosopher is often in inverse proportion to his or her lasting philosophical merit You're hurting Zombie Sartre's feelings.

By: auralcoral

auralcoral — Mon, 12 May 2008 17:23:20 -0800

awesome! missed him when he spoke at my school recently so this will be a good catchup.

By: Baby_Balrog

Baby_Balrog — Mon, 12 May 2008 18:27:05 -0800

Excellent! A good friend of mine just published a wonderful book about him, Zizek and Theology. Both Zizek and Derrida have deeply wounded my personal soteriology in ways that I believe may never fully heal. Which may or may not be a bad thing. In both cases. All the time, and never. time for whiskey.

By: the quidnunc kid

the quidnunc kid — Tue, 13 May 2008 01:52:06 -0800

The Lion of Ljubljana doesn't have enough diacritical marks to be taken seriously as a philosopher. If he was called Śľãvðý Żĩžĕķ I'd be a lot more open to his ideas.

By: Gull City

Gull City — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:37:52 -0800

Zizek is also an urban beats club in Buenos Aires specializing in cumbia-based mixes. The name is no accident.

By: Ljubljana

Ljubljana — Tue, 13 May 2008 06:29:40 -0800

Interestingly, if you leave off the diacritic marks you get something close to the Slovenian words for "tits." (zize) Another interesting bit of trivia: Most Slovenes have no idea how famous he is abroad. He went into self-imposed exile after the current government came to power, and he kind of dropped off the local radar. I've talked to numerous Slovenes who can't believe that Americans know who he is, or that he can fill buildings to capacity.

By: ornate insect

ornate insect — Tue, 13 May 2008 07:57:58 -0800

I really wish the documentary on Zizek had included some biographical information, such as: when was he born, who are his parents (are they still alive), what was his upbringing like, does he have any siblings (and if so, might they like the parents, have been available to briefly comment), what was he like as a child, when did he become interested in philosophy, what was his life like up to his early books, it appears he was married but is now seperated, what happened, etc? Even spending 20 minutes on these basic questions might have made for a much better picture (as it is, it's the least biographical film one can imagine, lacking all context, which is ironic given Zizek's obsession with Freud, Lacan and psychoanalysis). Also, the decision to have endless scenes w/Zizek in cabs, walking, buying DVDs at Kim's Video in NYC, what have you, ends up being tedious and not especially insightful into Zizek the person.

By: SoftRain

SoftRain — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:21:23 -0800

I saw him speak last year in a small theatre at my school -- the place was packed and people who couldn't get in actually snuck in to the loft, causing the lights to go out halfway through the lecture. He couldn't read his notes so he just started digressing on Lacan.

By: ornate insect

ornate insect — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:08:29 -0800

Is it just me or does it seem like Zizek is on cocaine in some of his lectures? He incessantly plays with his "sniffy" nose like a lot of people I've met who are on coke, and it would help explain his wired, manic energy. Of course, Freud liked him some nose candy too, so there you go.