<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Government spending and tax levels</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Government spending and tax levels</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:28:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Government spending and tax levels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels</link>	
		<description>Want to know how government spending and taxation levels have gone up or down over the last 20 years, and how they compare with other countries? The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has a handy set of tables (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/51/2483816.xls&quot;&gt;Excel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:aFu4K0Lvia4J:www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/51/2483816.xls&quot;&gt;HTML-ized&lt;/a&gt; by Google): total spending, total revenues, fiscal surplus or deficit (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Petroleum_Fund_of_Norway&quot;&gt;Norway&apos;s surplus&lt;/a&gt; is 17% of GDP). Part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_201185_2483901_1_1_1_1,00.html&quot;&gt;statistical tables&lt;/a&gt; for the semi-annual &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,3343,en_2649_201185_20347538_1_1_1_1,00.html&quot;&gt;OECD Outlook&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>		<category>taxes</category>		<category>spending</category>		<category>oecd</category>		<category>statistics</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GuyZero</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2130874</link>	
		<description>I loves me some numbers. If only you could have written the post in a dry, detached, slightly-less-than-serious tone while still being very straitlaced you might have the beginnings of an excellent magazine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2130874</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GuyZero</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2131031</link>	
		<description>Why does Norway consistently show such a large surplus?  I suppose I don&apos;t understand the policy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2131031</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:57:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blue_beetle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2131050</link>	
		<description>Mr. President: They reinvest it, and provide social services with the extra interest income, reducing the tax burden while increasing benefits over the long term.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2131050</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:25:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2131069</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Mr. President: They reinvest it, and provide social services with the extra interest income, reducing the tax burden while increasing benefits over the long term.&lt;/i&gt;

Is the surplus mostly from taxes on oil, then?  The post implied that, but the Wikipedia didn&apos;t really make it clear.  

That would actually make a lot of sense--taxing the depletion of a natural resource and reinvesting the proceeds seems like a decent way to derive a long-term benefit from it.  The policy justification is a little less clear when applied to tax proceeds from non-depleting activities, but I guess Norway believes they can invest at a rate higher than the growth in Norwegian GDP (well, tax base, really), and Norwegians don&apos;t object to a little intergenerational wealth transfer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2131069</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: flippant</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2131167</link>	
		<description>A few days ago, I read an article that said one in every hundred stock on the European markets is owned by the &quot;&lt;strike&gt;Norwegian&lt;/strike&gt; Oil Fund&quot; (popular name for the investment fund up here).

We live comfortably enough without needing to spend it as we make it. My pension&apos;s coming out of that fund ;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2131167</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:19:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flippant</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: romanb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72118/Government-spending-and-tax-levels#2131175</link>	
		<description>&apos;All but 4 per cent of Norway&apos;s oil earnings must be placed in the fund for savings; nothing can be withdrawn from the fund until the oil is gone, decades from now; and &#8211; most crucially &#8211; absolutely none of the money can be invested inside Norway. Mr. Slyngstad and his traders spend their days funnelling the oil wealth into foreign stocks and bonds, so none of it will touch the Norwegian economy.&apos;

 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080130.w-OS-main-31/BNStory/oilsands&quot;&gt;Frugal Norway saves for life after the boom&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.72118-2131175</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:49:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>romanb</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
