<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:21:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:21:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</link>	
		<description>Don&apos;t want to hassle with going to an amusement park? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.offbeatearth.com/blue-flash-homemade-roller-coaster/&quot;&gt;Build your own rollercoaster!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:43:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy Skinner</dc:creator>		<category>rollercoaster</category>		<category>amusementpark</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jayCampbell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172699</link>	
		<description>This guy read Fitzgerald&apos;s The Great Brain series once too many times.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172699</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:21:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jayCampbell</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crapmatic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172706</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Blue Flash isn&apos;t some run-of-the-mill roller coaster either, it&apos;s perfectly safe&lt;/i&gt;
According to who -- a blogger?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172706</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:40:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crapmatic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Fizz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172708</link>	
		<description>That looks like fun, but I would demand a helmet just to be safe.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172708</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:44:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fizz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172710</link>	
		<description>This guy couldn&apos;t be more of a hero if he made that thing out of bacon.

Want.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172710</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Tube</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172717</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;*Obligatory and predictable comment*&lt;/em&gt;

You know who else had an amusement park in their backyard...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172717</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tube</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ryanrs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172718</link>	
		<description>&quot;Easily the scariest amusement ride I&apos;ve ever seen!&quot; &amp;mdash; area lawyer</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172718</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryanrs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pyry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172719</link>	
		<description>I think I would have named it something like the &lt;em&gt;Liability Nightmare&lt;/em&gt; or maybe &lt;em&gt;Insurance Mutilator&lt;/em&gt;. Kidding aside, I do wonder about the legal requirements to build  a contraption like this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172719</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:01:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pyry</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: not_on_display</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172720</link>	
		<description>Meet John Ivers&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lionel_Hutz&quot;&gt;attorney&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172720</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>not_on_display</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: peppito</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172722</link>	
		<description>That loop looks like it&apos;s liable to cause whiplash injuries.   Still, nice effort though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172722</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:15:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peppito</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ryanrs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172723</link>	
		<description>Winner 2008 &lt;i&gt;Most Attractive Nuisance&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172723</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:15:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryanrs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grimp0teuthis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172726</link>	
		<description>&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;Kidding aside, I do wonder about the legal requirements to build a contraption like this.&lt;/em&gt;

As long as he doesn&apos;t hold it open to the public, he&apos;s probably allowed to build it and use it without much legal trouble, though there might be some zoning or other construction ordinance that applies. It&apos;s not a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/nuisance.htm&quot;&gt;public nuisance&lt;/a&gt; (like a factory that makes the air all smoggy, etc)

If it&apos;s not open to the public, but one of his friends is hurt on it, he could be liable if the state doesn&apos;t say that someone who rides it assumes the risk of doing so (which I would think is perfectly reasonable to say). Even if they do assume the risk, he&apos;s likely to still be required to keep the thing in proper maintenance (though he might not be responsible for a design defect if he is not a professional/expert). Still, state laws vary and it&apos;s kind of tough to figure out what constitutes &quot;reasonable care,&quot; since we can&apos;t use common experience as a guideline... you&apos;d have to extrapolate from what is required of professionals and work from there.

I&apos;m not a lawyer, but I am a law student. I&apos;m too tired for a full IRAC, but there&apos;s a couple of quick thoughts on it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172726</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grimp0teuthis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Burhanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172729</link>	
		<description>This one is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/15530/&quot;&gt;really old double&lt;/a&gt;.  These photos get recycled on dozens of blogs looking to make a bit of advertising change by recycling old photos.  Let&apos;s not reward this particular blog with another uncredited, uncited grab of old material.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172729</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:27:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Burhanistan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Burhanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172731</link>	
		<description>Also, StumbleUpon is full of redundant spammy crap nowadays...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172731</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Burhanistan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZachsMind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172749</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;This one is a really old double.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

So? 

It&apos;s still entertaining. I thought it looked vaguely familiar, but it was like six years ago. I think there should be a point where if enough time has passed, if it gets linked again in the Blue it&apos;s no big deal. A lot of people have joined and left MeFi since 2002. 

I liked seeing this again. So, thanks Fuzzy Skinner.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172749</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:33:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey-San</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172751</link>	
		<description>The last girl in the video got whipped around like a fucking rag doll. I guess what I&apos;m saying here is, &quot;Count me in.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172751</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:46:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mikey-San</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tellurian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172774</link>	
		<description>Tacky. Lame and tacky. Dangerous, lame and tacky. Double, dangerous, lame and tacky. And tacky.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172774</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tellurian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: spoobnooble</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172787</link>	
		<description>Some of you people are no fun at all.  I&apos;d drop fifteen pounds just to get under the 200lb max. requirement so I can ride this thing.  (What the hell - I need to lose weight anyway...)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172787</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:24:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spoobnooble</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Goofyy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172800</link>	
		<description>I think it&apos;s awesome that someone built their own steel coaster. However, it makes me wonder how much more effort, and what sort of effort, would be needed to make it ride smooth. I like smooth coasters, not bumpy/jerky ones. I&apos;ve enjoyed smooth rides in both wood and steel. 

Having been on lots of coasters, I can give kudos to this guy for building a real loop, instead of one of the fake loops so many inferior coasters are offering these days.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172800</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goofyy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Talent</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172805</link>	
		<description>Good for him for persevering and making a full 360 degree loop, opposed to just half assing it and going with a more dangerous 180 degree one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172805</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:34:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Talent</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Tbola</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172810</link>	
		<description>Goofyy:: what is a fake loop?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172810</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tbola</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: weapons-grade pandemonium</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172825</link>	
		<description>The fake loop involves a dismount and a somersault.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172825</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>weapons-grade pandemonium</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: seanmpuckett</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172842</link>	
		<description>Oh, well.   As long as it&apos;s safe, then.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172842</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:05:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanmpuckett</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Encyclopedia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172855</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Let&apos;s not reward this particular blog with another uncredited, uncited grab of old material.&lt;/em&gt;

Considering none of the links in the original post work anymore I think it&apos;s fine. Should no one ever republish photos if the original site with the photos goes away?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172855</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:21:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Encyclopedia</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: maxwelton</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172872</link>	
		<description>I haven&apos;t been under 200 since 1985. Drat. Guess I&apos;ll have to make my own Obe-coaster.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172872</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:31:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maxwelton</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzzy Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172942</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d need to drop a few to get under the 200 lb. limit myself. Maybe we can plan a rollercoaster meetup in a year to give us weight loss incentive. Oh wait. No matter what I weigh, there&apos;s no way I&apos;m getting on that thing.

&lt;small&gt;Note about the old double: I figured there was &lt;em&gt;no way&lt;/em&gt; this hadn&apos;t shown up on MeFi before, but I must not have dug deep enough to find it. The double is old enough to make me wonder how the thing is holding up.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172942</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy Skinner</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: doctorschlock</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2172973</link>	
		<description>That&apos;s gonna be one FUN death by amusement.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2172973</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:34:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorschlock</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Skwirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2173060</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While he&apos;s pretty sure everything will work out, the big question is: Will he be able to generate enough speed to complete the 360 degree loop?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I can maybe forgive the guy for not doing the math, but he couldn&apos;t spend a few extra days and a few extra bucks on some sand bags to run it through a few tests? Better yet: Borrow Buster and buy a few of those G-force stickies. But, hey, at least he was &quot;pretty sure&quot; before testing it on himself, his friends, extended family and daughters.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2173060</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:17:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skwirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzzy Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2173127</link>	
		<description>I think the whole &quot;first ride&quot; statement was a media creation. It&apos;s surely one of the very few instances where reporters (or &quot;reporters&quot;) didn&apos;t accurately portray what was being presented.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2173127</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:35:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy Skinner</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dgbellak</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2173696</link>	
		<description>Perhaps the gentler &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.negative-g.com/BlueFlash/Blue2/Blue-Two-3-10-2006-1.htm&quot;&gt;Blue&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slr1UKMa_Cw&quot;&gt;Two&lt;/a&gt; is 200+ friendly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2173696</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:27:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dgbellak</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Spatch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73052/Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee#2173773</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Goofyy:: what is a fake loop?&lt;/i&gt;

I think he&apos;s referring to the teardrop-shaped clothoid loop, which is what most &quot;loop&quot; inversions are these days, as opposed to an actual circular loop, which you only see on older rides designed by Anton Schwarzlopf.  Examples include Revolution at Magic Mountain and Sooperdooperlooper (what is it with ill-used double Os? Oh, I get it, they&apos;re lOOps) at Hersheypark. 

However, starting in the late 1970s, designers like those at Arrow Dynamics turned to the clothoid loop, as the teardrop shape helps reduce the g-forces you feel when entering and exiting the inversion.  It&apos;s a bit safer than the circular loop.  I&apos;m not sure why Goofyy feels the clothoid loop is inferior to the circular loop, unless he enjoys the feeling of risking whiplash with every ride (I said &quot;feeling&quot; here because while I&apos;ll grant that the ride sensation is different, you&apos;re not &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; courting whiplash on it.) Then again, everybody on the Internet has their own personal sore spot.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.73052-2173773</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:50:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spatch</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
