SubscribeSeptember 2003 marked a turning point in the development of Western civilization. It was the month that Adbusters magazine started accepting orders for the Black Spot Sneaker, its own signature brand of "subversive" running shoes. After that day, no rational person could possibly believe that there is any tension between "mainstream" and "alternative" culture. After that day, it became obvious to everyone that cultural rebellion, of the type epitomized by Adbusters magazine, is not a threat to the system-it is the system.
Founded in 1989, Adbusters is the flagship publication of the culture-jamming movement. In their view, society has become so thoroughly permeated with propaganda and lies, largely as a consequence of advertising, that the culture as a whole has become an enormous system of ideology-all designed to reproduce faith in "the system." The goal of the culture jammers is quite literally to "jam" the culture, by subverting the messages used to reproduce this faith and blocking the channels through which it is propagated. This in turn is thought to have radical political consequences. In 1999, Adbusters editor Kalle Lasn argued that culture jamming "will become to our era what civil rights was to the '60s, what feminism was to the '70s, what environmental activism was to the '80s."
Five years later, he's using the Adbusters brand to flog his own trademark line of running shoes. What happened? Did Adbusters sell out?
Absolutely not. It is essential that we all see and understand this. Adbusters did not sell out, because there was nothing to sell out in the first place. Adbusters never had a revolutionary doctrine. What they had was simply a warmed-over version of the countercultural thinking that has dominated leftist politics since the '60s. And this type of countercultural politics, far from being a revolutionary doctrine, has been one of the primary forces driving consumer capitalism for the past forty years.
Aren't privy to our discussion?Are you fucking kidding me? (And I believe you are misunderstanding Ironmouth's argument, which I read as being not as that you are arrogant for disapproving of unconscious consumer choices, but for thinking that anyone making consumer choices different than your own must be doing so unconsciously because of course were these right-thinking people they'd be making the same choices you make.)
Preferences toward popular music appear to reflect tastes acquired during late adolescence or early adulthood. In an empirical investigation of this parsimonious inductive proposition, both the aggregate results (R = 0.84) and the disaggregated findings (R = 0.46) suggest that the development of tastes for popular music follows an inverted U-shaped pattern that reaches a peak in about the 24th year.
The folks at Adbusters think that everything is the ultimate sign of the decline of Western civilization.The worst part is, they're probably right.
What club, on what street, in what city? I want to call bullshit on this guy so bad my dick hurts, but I can't even. Why is he intentionally obfuscating these kinds of identifying details throughout the whole article? I mean, come on: Standing outside an art-party next to a neat row of locked-up fixed-gear bikes, I come across a couple girls who exemplify hipster homogeneity.No, as someone pointed out correctly, the giveaway here is not that there is a geared bike in the mix somewhere. Of course there is. Hipsters aren't homogenous, and there's always someone on a geared bike while they are in the process of "building up" their first fixed.
Really? There was an entire row of exclusively fixed gear bikes outside this supposed party? There wasn't one bike that wasn't fixed gear?
Do they look hot because hot people are tending towards hipsterism?They look hot because, at least when I first started observing what I'll call the "hipster aesthetic" it meant that girls (at least) were given a green light to dress down. Shaggy or simple haircut, simple outfit, often a not-extravagant dress or tank/jeans combo did, at that time, directly answer the popular notion of Hollywood/Heiress beauty with a refreshing "meh."
Do they look hot because hipster is the latest trendy fashion and therefore what you consider hot?
Do they look hot because with a fondness of the subculture you've grown to view members as more often desireable?
Do they look hot because their attire is often more sexualized than other subculture's?
I‘m sipping a scummy pint of cloudy beer in the back of a trendy dive bar turned nightclub in the heart of the city’s heroin district.What club, on what street, in what city?
Ryan Kelley, a mild-mannered guy who actually arranged the first P.B.R. sponsorship, allowed that the beer's newfound popularity was slightly annoying. ''But basically,'' he said, ''we're going to drink whatever beer costs a dollar.''Got that? Cool hipsters are savvy consumers. who have probably never spent mega$ to buy slick copies of adbusters
Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena, Jacksonville, FL Fri, Aug 15, 2008 07:30 PM Order for: Man from Dirigible Seat location: section 108, row U, seat haha! I'm going to see Bruce, you whores!BRUUUUUUUCE!!!
« Older "One of the largest and most beguiling works ... | Spy music! Whether it's Lalo S... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by DU at 7:05 AM on August 1, 2008 [97 favorites has favorites]