Lower on the evolutionary scale? If you think there is an evolutionary scale with higher and lower rungs, then you don't understand evolution. If you believe in that scale and still think evolution is true, you are doing it out of faith. Metafilterians rarely fail to disappoint in hard science posts, specially biology/evolution.I think this is disingenuous. Do you not agree that some organisms are more complex than others, and humans specifically are more complex than worms, in terms of the number of processes required to maintain the organism in question? I think that's obviously the metric the rungs are based on in hal_c_on's comment.
« Older The Clarion Fund has been placing DVD advertisemen... | Word Spectrum; SearchClock; Di... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by psmealey at 2:49 PM on September 18, 2008 [9 favorites has favorites]