AreSingleServingSitesReallyUsefulSometimes.Com
September 22, 2008 2:23 PM Subscribe
This post was deleted for the following reason: umbrella two weeks ago. -- cortex
I'm sorry, but the link you are calling is no longer available. Please look through the archives and post a link again.
posted by joelf at 2:26 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by joelf at 2:26 PM on September 22, 2008
You know, it didn't come up on a site-specific Google search OR the dupe checker.
posted by WCityMike at 2:27 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:27 PM on September 22, 2008
strike through an entire paragraph? THAT SAID IT COULDN'T BE DONE!!!!
posted by joelf at 2:27 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by joelf at 2:27 PM on September 22, 2008
I put my postcode in and the little bastard shat itself.
posted by chuckdarwin at 2:28 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by chuckdarwin at 2:28 PM on September 22, 2008
Hm. Perhaps it's because the original excludes the www? If so, it'd be nice if the dupe checker's logic could be upgraded to cover that. And here's what I mean about it not showing up on a site-specific Google search.
posted by WCityMike at 2:28 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:28 PM on September 22, 2008
It's probably just me, but FWIW, I've never, ever seen the link: option work on Google.
posted by niles at 2:31 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by niles at 2:31 PM on September 22, 2008
So, how about Eddie Vedder recording an anthem for the Cubs, huh?
posted by WCityMike at 2:31 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:31 PM on September 22, 2008
niles: "It's probably just me, but FWIW, I've never, ever seen the link: option work on Google."
Hm. Maybe the link: and site: operators don't work in tandem ... just doing "link:metafilter.com" works, for example.
posted by WCityMike at 2:34 PM on September 22, 2008
Hm. Maybe the link: and site: operators don't work in tandem ... just doing "link:metafilter.com" works, for example.
posted by WCityMike at 2:34 PM on September 22, 2008
Fuck and alas.
posted by turgid dahlia at 2:35 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by turgid dahlia at 2:35 PM on September 22, 2008
Kinda funny that the site's own search engine caught the dupe when the dupe checker didn't ...
posted by WCityMike at 2:35 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:35 PM on September 22, 2008
Pretty nice weather here in Western Mass, by the way.
posted by languagehat at 2:37 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by languagehat at 2:37 PM on September 22, 2008
I haven't had to use an umbrella since I don't know when.
posted by languagehat at 2:37 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by languagehat at 2:37 PM on September 22, 2008
Yeah, that might be it. I've never cared to see the whole inverted, reverse link history of the entire internet, just individual sites.
posted by niles at 2:40 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by niles at 2:40 PM on September 22, 2008
Umbrellas are evil.
Your not supposed to open them after they've been inserted. It's a common mistake.
posted by quin at 2:41 PM on September 22, 2008
Your not supposed to open them after they've been inserted. It's a common mistake.
posted by quin at 2:41 PM on September 22, 2008
Recently found FiveThirtyEight.com ... rather cool website ...
posted by WCityMike at 2:41 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:41 PM on September 22, 2008
Well, I think the link-site combo works but only in an extremely loose definition of the word "works." Example.
posted by WCityMike at 2:43 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by WCityMike at 2:43 PM on September 22, 2008
I wish it would tell me what color umbrella to take.
posted by strangeleftydoublethink at 2:44 PM on September 22, 2008
posted by strangeleftydoublethink at 2:44 PM on September 22, 2008
« Older Obama: The Price of Being Black | The New Shock Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by yhbc at 2:26 PM on September 22, 2008