MetaFilter is turning ten! Help us celebrate at one of dozens of meetups.



Advertise here: Contact FM.


Sarah Palin may be a better debater than you think
October 1, 2008 3:34 PM   RSS feed for this thread Subscribe

Sarah Palin may be a better debater than you think... Sarah Palin, much derided for reasons best not gone over again, may be a better debater than people tend to think. Andrew Halcro, a Republican from Alaska says, "I've debated Governor Palin more than two dozen times. And she's a master, not of facts, figures, or insightful policy recommendations, but at the fine art of the nonanswer, the glittering generality. Against such charms there is little Senator Biden, or anyone, can do."
posted by datter (1422 comments total) 36 users marked this as a favorite

We'll see about that.
posted by iamkimiam at 3:36 PM on October 1, 2008


[obligatory master debater joke]
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 3:37 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


That's not debate, that's avoiding debate.

Unfortunately, that won't be how a large chunk of America sees it.

*sigh*
posted by Aquaman at 3:37 PM on October 1, 2008 [15 favorites]


Just for the record, I agree with the FPP: I believe she'll come across better than she does in the Couric interviews. There's a difference, of course, between being a better debater than we think and being a good debater... but I believe that it will not be the horror-show trainwreck that has mefites salivating in glee (me included).
posted by fingers_of_fire at 3:39 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Go back and watch some of George W's debates against Ann Richards, then tell me where the bumbling idiot came from.
posted by waraw at 3:41 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I heard she's a leviathan of forensics.
posted by designbot at 3:42 PM on October 1, 2008


Let's see what Gwen Ifill lets her get away with.
posted by troybob at 3:43 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I'm praying that she'll be overcome by the Spirit and start speaking in tongues.
posted by RussHy at 3:44 PM on October 1, 2008 [16 favorites]


This was already covered in another thread, and my previous thoughts on this stand: Palin is a fraud, attempting lame imitations of people who are actually good at rhetoric, who also happen to have the knowledge and intelligence to back it up. Yes, she'll get anecdotal and hokey. There may even be tears. But this isn't "debating", not by any definition.

That said, I'm grateful for the creation of this thread, because the other Palin thread has become unwieldy, and the VP debate looms hours from now.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 3:45 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


I'm wondering if she will amp up the folksiness or tone it down.

Welcome VP debate thread. May you live long.
posted by strangeleftydoublethink at 3:45 PM on October 1, 2008


Ya know, when John first announced his running mate, I got all excited.. It was the perfect pair, Maverick couldn't have done better..

then, I realized it was "Palin", not "Paladin"...and my perfect cowboy Presidential slate was dashed to pieces..

/have gun, will travel, reads the card of a man.....
posted by HuronBob at 3:45 PM on October 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


I don't think that counts, RussHy. Unless she shows evidence of stigmata, of course.
posted by paddbear at 3:46 PM on October 1, 2008


Let's see what Gwen Ifill lets her get away with.

Likely quite a bit, given the raking over the coals that Ifill's gotten in the past couple of days.
posted by blucevalo at 3:46 PM on October 1, 2008


Unfortunately for her preparers, intelligence is not a fungible commodity.
posted by clearly at 3:47 PM on October 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


My current theory of her reminds of me of a rule of thumb when scouting sports talent, especially high school basketball, and hey, she was a high school basketball star ...

Oftentimes, you see a high school basketball star get flayed at the college level, because up until that time, they've always been the best player on the court, and their game is centered around using their built-in talent advantage only. They have no flexibility in dealing with a challenge outside of their experience.

This is especially true with bigger players -- centers and forwards. It's quite possible that the monster 6-foot-8, 18-year-old player that is torching his town or county has never played against someone their own size. Their game is all about managing their talent within a certain sphere of competition, and their repertoire of moves is suited only to that sphere. When faced with someone their own size for the first time, that nifty drop step and jump hook that's been working for you for 10 years might just get swatted away...

This is Sarah Palin. She charmed Alaska, because the competition wasn't as fierce. She got away with one against Charles Gibson, because she's able to handle a man with a back-handed "Oh, Charlie..."

But up against Katie Couric ... suddenly, none of the tried-and-true tactics work. She can't brush off Katie Couric in the same way as everyone else. Perky doesn't work against perky. Oh shit. Uh, uh. Putin! Yeah. Russia! It's ... it's right next door! He's raising his head ... and we ... and we send those out (fighter planes from Elmendorf AFB?) to ... keep an eye on him ... uhh ... help?
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 3:48 PM on October 1, 2008 [85 favorites]


McCain/Palin 08: Lowered Expectaaaaations.
posted by stavrogin at 3:48 PM on October 1, 2008 [32 favorites]


Have you stopped beating your lover?
posted by elpapacito at 3:49 PM on October 1, 2008


This thread will be deleted by a mod. Previous political threads bear this out.
posted by eyeballkid at 3:50 PM on October 1, 2008


It will not be deleted. I bet some sweet homeade moose stew on it you commie bastard.
posted by eyeballkid at 3:51 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


This thread MUST NOT blink.
posted by mazola at 3:51 PM on October 1, 2008 [20 favorites]


Whether this is the case or not, my hope is that it just won't fly anymore. If this debate were held right after the conventions (and before all these interviews revealing her love of said generalities/non-answers), I think she could have gotten away with it, but folks will be on the lookout for that type of jibba jabba now and will (hopefully) call her out on it. Hopefully.
posted by Mrmuhnrmuh at 3:52 PM on October 1, 2008


When Palin threads are outlawed, only outlaws will have Palin threads.
posted by RussHy at 3:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


This thread will be deleted by a mod. Previous political threads bear this out.
posted by eyeballkid at 3:50 PM on October 1

It will not be deleted. I bet some sweet homeade moose stew on it you commie bastard.
posted by eyeballkid at 3:51 PM on October 1
?
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 3:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


Hey, is this a Democratic meme that was started so that when Palin looks halfway decent, Democrats can claim that they knew that she was okay? As opposed to painting her as an idiot, and when she presents a decent showing it makes the Democrats look like idiots?

I think so.

Man, to be a political strategist. In the last eight years, people have become so polarized that manipulating the base has become child's play. And they get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars and get decent Cabinet level appointments to make people act like idiots pre-election. 5 more weeks! 5 more weeks!
posted by SeizeTheDay at 3:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Experts, Polls and Focus Groups All Confirm That Biden Stomped Palin in Tomorrow Night's Debate"
posted by Class Goat at 3:54 PM on October 1, 2008


Sarah Palin was able to debate well in Alaskan political debates because she's a native Alaskan with a grasp of Alaskan issues. But she has demonstrated over the past month that she was completely ignorant of US and world politics before being tapped for VP, and I don't think you can cram for the potential-leader-of-the-free-world test in a few weeks' time.

It came out recently that she couldn't name a Supreme Court case other than Roe vs Wade. She is not going to dominate Joe Biden, of all people, in a debate about US politics.
posted by showbiz_liz at 3:55 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Being the best debater in Alaska is sort of like being the tannest person in LA.
posted by [NOT HERMITOSIS-IST] at 3:55 PM on October 1, 2008 [13 favorites]


Hey, is this a Democratic meme that was started so that when Palin looks halfway decent, Democrats can claim that they knew that she was okay? As opposed to painting her as an idiot, and when she presents a decent showing it makes the Democrats look like idiots?

What do you mean, "when", Kimosabe?
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 3:55 PM on October 1, 2008


Let's see what Gwen Ifill lets her get away with.

Likely quite a bit, given the raking over the coals that Ifill's gotten in the past couple of days.


It hasn't been so bad...just a weak protest that will help the talk-radio crowd make excuses for Palin, if necessary, after the debate. I don't imagine Ifill would give in to that kind of intimidation.

The press is still pushing the Biden 'gaffe' thing, which isn't as bad as they make it out, considering the amount of stuff he has said, and for how many years. Every non-campaign-controlled Palin exposure has so far been a gaffe riot. It's not as if Biden isn't being rehearsed on what to avoid, and he's starting from the position of actually knowing something about the world. I'm guessing her platform is going to rely more on insults and one-liners, as she did at the convention, which will increase the spectacle factor, but it won't hold much water in post-debate analysis.
posted by troybob at 3:56 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I believe it. Partly because of a political sulking complex I have where every time I get involved in following politics, hoping for an exciting change, I'm always disappointed. And I'm watching the VP debates. Not getting my hopes up.
posted by crapmatic at 3:56 PM on October 1, 2008


She will wear a swimsuit.
posted by A189Nut at 3:56 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Leviathan? Are they saying she's fat?
posted by strangeleftydoublethink at 3:57 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


In a lot of ways she's just a prettier, slightly more coherent, more appealing version of Bush.

Bush 2.0 08!!
posted by moonshine at 4:00 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


So we're lowering our expectations for Biden now? Is this a debate or a limbo competition?
posted by The Card Cheat at 4:00 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]




All Biden has to do is look and speak competent, state the facts, and ignore her. Just let Palin writhe in the discomfort of her own futility. Let her debate her own ignorance.
posted by bukharin at 4:00 PM on October 1, 2008 [19 favorites]


Both sides of the debate are going to be hyperinflated. If Palin says anything even remotely ditzy or vacant it'll be YouTubed as proof of her idiocy. If Biden coughs it'll be declared an example of his inability to restrain his own mouth. Twenty bucks says all three of the major cable nets will have "body language experts" on withing 24 hours of the debate to explain what Palin and Biden "meant" by what they were "saying" that us "intelligent human beings" couldn't "see" with our own "eyes."

Expectations are lowered on both sides. Basically Biden has to not appear like a dick and Palin has to, well, pretty much not fart on camera and both sides will declare victory.

Palin's problem isn't that she's stupid. It's that she does not know how to bullshit. ("I read all of them." Really?) She gives Miss America answers to what she thinks can be cast as Miss America questions and the national stage doesn't swallow it.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 4:00 PM on October 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


gaffe riot, heh.
posted by cortex at 4:01 PM on October 1, 2008


If Biden is smart he will do nothing. Take the Obama approach. State your points and let the other side be the crazies they are. You don't need execute people who are already going to hang themselves.
posted by srboisvert at 4:01 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


So we're lowering our expectations for Biden now? Is this a debate or a limbo competition?

Well, not really, he's just going to be out of his element. He's used to debating qualified people and mocking them when they say something stupid. If he pulls that tomorrow it might be akin to throwing her a life raft so he has to change his entire debate persona
posted by slapshot57 at 4:03 PM on October 1, 2008


I believe it. Partly because of a political sulking complex I have where every time I get involved in following politics, hoping for an exciting change, I'm always disappointed. And I'm watching the VP debates. Not getting my hopes up.

I keep torturing my wife by pointing out that the Obama hype is quite similar to the Tony Blair hype the UK had when he was elected.
posted by srboisvert at 4:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


Marbury's advice to Sarah Palin.
posted by Ritchie at 4:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Go back and watch some of George W's debates against Ann Richards...

Oh, how I miss Ann Richards!

'Poor George. He can't help it. He was born with a silver foot in his mouth.'
posted by ericb at 4:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [24 favorites]


the fine art of the nonanswer

Hmm... the examples we have seen of this have not been so great.
posted by Artw at 4:06 PM on October 1, 2008


I keep torturing my wife by pointing out that the Obama hype is quite similar to the Tony Blair hype the UK had when he was elected.

Oh you fucker.

It kind of is. And I hate that fucker Blair now more than anyone.
posted by Artw at 4:07 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


I'm firmly convinced that Palin is going to exceed expectations for tomorrow's debate. The structure of the VP debates will allow for her to essentially memorize speeches and talking points to sound coherent. With expectations for her so low, it'll seem like a triumph to her supporters and perhaps a few who would otherwise be somewhat on the fence. It won't quite be a political masterstroke, but it won't be a complete disaster. The air surrounding this debate of waiting for a Republican trainwreck might be setting up us trainwreck-lovers for a bit of a disappointment, and the result might make those predicting such a trainwreck look like a bunch of meanies to those who will either eventually support Palin or at least figure she's not so terrible.

It reminds me of the expectations some people had in 2004 that Kerry would trounce Bush in the debates, turning the entire country into a cacophony of Bush-hatred. Didn't happen. Kerry was a better debater in some respects, but he was charmless, and Bush eventually recovered from his initial missteps on the level of pure delivery - after all, "you forgot Poland!" might make us giggle, but it didn't come off as quite so ridiculous to a good chunk of the country. I also remember at least one political cartoon from the time trying to make the point that it was impossible for Cheney to triumph over Edwards, but I feel like Cheney got some surprised credit even from his enemies for how well he handled himself in a debate format, even if they otherwise found his ideas and presence odious. (It didn't help things, at least for myself, that I've always found something unseemly about Edwards, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on, not then and not now.)

We'll see, though. All I need is for Obama/Biden to win, not for the complete and total humiliation of Sarah Palin.
posted by Sticherbeast at 4:09 PM on October 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


It's funny. I watched Bull Durham this afternoon, and at one point, Crash tells the kid something like "Meat, everybody in the Show has a fastball."

Palin is in the Show. She isn't ready.
posted by rtha at 4:11 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


She's burned so much (undeserved) goodwill so far, I hope the moderator stops for a fact check if Palin is asked her name.
posted by Durn Bronzefist at 4:12 PM on October 1, 2008


I'm firmly convinced that Palin is going to exceed expectations for tomorrow's debate.

All Palin has to do is show up to "win", really. Let's be clear: the expectations are so low that simply being alive and breathing is a victory. So long as she doesn't repeat her Couric performance, she'll be fine, unfortunately.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 4:13 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


People seem to predict that she'll either crash and burn, or win with evil genius. My guess is she's a little more savvy than she seems.

I'm expecting to be annoyed, not horrified or entertained.
posted by gesamtkunstwerk at 4:14 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Slightly less than 50 hours for McCain to suspend his campaign again and attempt to cancel the VP debate.
posted by brain cloud at 4:15 PM on October 1, 2008


Slightly less than 50 hours for McCain to suspend his campaign again and attempt to cancel the VP debate.

I was half-expecting Palin to show up in Congress this week to try to grab credit for passage of a bailout bill, the way McCain tried to do last week, when he thought it was a foregone conclusion.
posted by troybob at 4:17 PM on October 1, 2008


[obligatory master debater joke]

That's what she said?
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 4:18 PM on October 1, 2008


Incidentally, this piece by Matt Taibbi about Sarah Palin is fun.
posted by Sticherbeast at 4:21 PM on October 1, 2008 [27 favorites]


Is there a Sarah Palin VP Debate Drinking Game (tm) yet?
posted by afx114 at 4:22 PM on October 1, 2008


I also remember at least one political cartoon from the time trying to make the point that it was impossible for Cheney to triumph over Edwards, but I feel like Cheney got some surprised credit even from his enemies for how well he handled himself in a debate format, even if they otherwise found his ideas and presence odious.

But Cheney and Edwards are both intelligent people. Also, if anything, Edwards came across as a newbie prettyboy compared to encased-in-marble Cheney. And Bush/Kerry? Yeah, I think Biden possesses a bit more charm and personality than Kerry.

As much as I just love thinking about 20034, I'd have to agree with others in this thread that Biden should and probably will go Obama on this one - staying on message, ignoring the opponent. Let her talk about workin' all her life, or being a hockey mom, or Trig. Biden can and should just keep coming back to the issues, all framed within the central important message of McCain = Bush.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 4:23 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Thank you for posting this. Anyone expecting Palin to crash and burn at tomorrow night's debate is going to be sorely disappointed. This analysis over at Daily Kos articulates it much better than I can. Basically, the debate format is a gift to her; without sufficient follow-up opportunity in the debate rules, Palin won't be forced to think on her feet and will be able to throw out the sploosh of generalities that she's so good at without really answering the question. By merely forming complete sentences and not being pressed for more substantive responsive, she will sound like a superstar, and deliver more of that partisan buzzword crap that she was so good at during her RNC speech. At this point, the media is probably more interested in relaying a comeback narrative for her, that it can change the momentum in Obama's direction.
I hope I'm wrong about this, and that maybe being forced to articulate basic foreign policy and economic policy will be beyond her, far more complicated that articulating issues in Alaska politics and local issues.
But with a week of debate prep, I would think that even she could manage to memorize enough basic stock answers to get her through with flying colors if her responses are left unchallenged. Even if I'm wrong, though, and she fails miserably, the wingnuts will portray Gwen Ifill as a one-eyed partisan cacodaemon hellbent on destroying McCain and subverting her with "gotcha" attacks.
So I'm not seeing any winning scenario for the Dems from the debate tomorrow, other than somehow maintaining the status quo.
posted by Dr. Zira at 4:24 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I had this weird dream where Palin shows up for the debate drunk and starts asking Biden things like "do you want to fuck me? John wants to fuck me." And it went downhill from there. Biden just looks slightly appalled.

My fantasy world is much more lively than the real world.
posted by maxwelton at 4:26 PM on October 1, 2008 [45 favorites]


1) the american people will completely fail to deconstruct palin's non-answers and digest her grammatical horrors without complaint.

2) the media will dither about her performance. they'll call an evasion a skillful redirection, a panicked stall a dramatic pause. they'll point to biden's sweaty old-man brow and nod approvingly about how she had him on the run.

3) palin will complain (rightly) about the inane democratic comedy surrounding beauty contestants, teenage pregnancy and moose stew.

4) bump!
posted by klanawa at 4:27 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is there a Sarah Palin VP Debate Drinking Game (tm) yet?

Yes, it's called "the rampant alcoholism in Alaska."
posted by Sticherbeast at 4:28 PM on October 1, 2008 [30 favorites]


Great, and the next day half the country will be marveling at America’s sweetheart and vilifying the press for bullying her
posted by freshundies at 4:30 PM on October 1, 2008


I'm guessing she uses up all three lifelines in the first half hour but then again, I've been watching that Tina Fey video way too much this week.
posted by Ber at 4:34 PM on October 1, 2008


She can turn a 60-second response to a query about her specific solutions to healthcare challenges into a folksy story about how she's met people on the campaign trail who face healthcare challenges. All without uttering a word about her public-policy solutions to healthcare challenges.

Unfortunately, yes. I'm sure there will be lots of this.

Why does Obama hate people with healthcare challenges?
posted by Durn Bronzefist at 4:36 PM on October 1, 2008


Wait...people are painting Gwen Ifill as a liberal partisan? I thought it was pretty common knowledge that she's Condi's special friend.
posted by Biblio at 4:40 PM on October 1, 2008


Dr. Zira pretty much nails it. The debate has been structured as a gimme for Palin. It's a non-debate-debate. More like an extended interview with both candidates. I'm thinking of taking a big ol' pass on this one.
posted by Thorzdad at 4:42 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Sara Palin is Dubya in drag. Why that would help is beyond me, but the Republicans have arcane knowledge about that shit.
posted by Huplescat at 4:42 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think that to a certain degree, the Republicans are relieved by the bad press she's gotten this week. Recall W in 2000. Expectations had be lowered so far, that the mere fact he could string two sentences together was "proof" that he wasn't so dumb.

Unlike the first Obama/McCain debate, the format is about challenge and response. All she has to do is go into "pitbull" mode, a la her convention speech, and attack Obama on some subject remotely related to the question without actually needing to answer.

While I wouldn't go so far as to predict a win for Palin, my guess is that she'll come off relatively unscathed. After all, they do train beauty queens for poise.
posted by CheeseDigestsAll at 4:43 PM on October 1, 2008


Take a look at this debate between Sarkozy and Royal in the last French election. There are moderators, but the candidates are sitting at a table, looking at each other and actually debating.

Think about what passes for "debate" in this country--short speeches, with a bit of spontaneous follow-ups from the moderator and short arguments from the opponents. In the McCain/Obama debate recently, Jim Lehrer at least tried to mix this up, telling both of them to address each other, and Obama was game, but McCain just wanted to speechify.

Palin will do the same, and based on her very well received Repub. convention speech, I suspect she'll do quite well in that sense. It all depends on how hard Gwen Ifil nails her with her many, many inconsistencies, or for that matter Biden. I know the Republicans set some strict guidelines for this debate, in favor of Palin, so it remains to be seen how the format can remove her (or Biden) from the script (though Biden needs no script; that guy would debate himself given the chance). She'll do much better than in formal, sit down interviews; she can't really do any worse than she did with Gibson and Couric.

I think after the debate we'll be hearing how she "did great!" from the right, based solely on her speeches. Remember, debates are a Rorschach test, especially for those of us who have made up our minds.
posted by zardoz at 4:43 PM on October 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


Do they have access to the questions beforehand? I heard they do from someone but cannot see that in the rules anywhere.
posted by H. Roark at 4:44 PM on October 1, 2008


Fellow citizens
In the name of peace, peace on earth
We are committed to war in Iraq.
I'm the person who gets to decide, not you — from Bush of George [remix of Bowie/Eno's My Life in the Bush of Ghosts — "Help Me Somebody". [RHS, Track 01 by Mentalhealth]].

This is what you're talking about RussHy, yeh¿

Hee-Hee. Obfuscation and stonewalling isn't debating. The Moderator hopefully has a gong if S.Palin gets off topic and brings her back to answering the question. Short and sweet like.
posted by alicesshoe at 4:46 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


You know, I was going to vote for Obama becfause I thought he would be good with the economy, and I thought he had a sensible position on foreign affairs, and I thought he was bright and cool. Buit now, after watching Palin, I decided to switch and vote for McCain
posted by Postroad at 4:50 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


MAKE IT GO AWAY
posted by Devils Rancher at 4:52 PM on October 1, 2008


Is there a Sarah Palin VP Debate Drinking Game (tm) yet?
Drink whenever you remember that there's a decent chance that this woman will become the President of the United States of America.

I know I'll need a stiff one whenever that occurs.
posted by Flunkie at 4:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [15 favorites]


Bear in mind that one of the things that tripped her up with Katie C. was her inability to deal with follow-ups - all kudos to KC for being forceful in that regard. Governor Palin is not going to crash and burn tomorrow night, I predict. Unless Joe is able to figure out a way to put her on the spot while remaining within the agreed upon rules.



like the awesome debate scene in the 3rd season of the West Wing. Where have you gone, Aaron Sorkin? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
posted by fingers_of_fire at 4:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I wonder how soon the media will go into self-analysis mode on this. I read that there was some threat to stop covering Palin, given the lack of access, and that's why she did the UN reporter thing. But they're still hyping her like a celebrity. I usually stay away from TV news, but the couple times I've caught CNN this week, Anderson Cooper has been running Palin stories that are teased throughout the whole show, at every commercial break, and then shown in the last few minutes. I'm bothered enough that they've allowed the campaign to lead them around--they blame the press for every screw-up, and then the reporters still eat up every morsel (which is what Bush has done with the press for years, and they're still suckers for it), but at what point are they creating the hype as opposed to just reporting it?
posted by troybob at 4:55 PM on October 1, 2008


And Now... Deep Thoughts (Supreme Court Edition), with Sarah Palin.
posted by scody at 4:59 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


It came out recently that she couldn't name a Supreme Court case other than Roe vs Wade. She is not going to dominate Joe Biden, of all people, in a debate about US politics.
COURIC: What other Supreme Court decisions [than Roe v. Wade] do you disagree with?

PALIN: Well, let's see. There's --of course --in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings, that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are--those issues, again, like Roe v Wade where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know--going through the history of America, there would be others but--

COURIC: Can you think of any?

PALIN: Well, I could think of--of any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a Vice President, if I'm so privileged to serve, wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.
Video.
posted by ericb at 4:59 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I need a widget that beeps every time there's a new election thread that isn't going to get deleted.
posted by Bookhouse at 5:00 PM on October 1, 2008


scody -- jinx, you owe me a Coke.
posted by ericb at 5:00 PM on October 1, 2008


However, according to my calculations, her opponents were all Alaskans.
posted by DU at 5:02 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


> PALIN: Well, I could think of--

Well, there you have it. She *could* have thought of some other court cases, she just didn't feel like it. EAT SHIT LIBIRUL MEDIA
posted by The Card Cheat at 5:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


>I wonder how soon the media will go into self-analysis mode on this... at what point are they creating the hype as opposed to just reporting it?

It won't, and the point at which they create the hype happens the sentence after stating the premise.

Based on, as you pointed out, 8 years of spineless journalism and talking heads occupying hours of not saying much of anything but what the administration wants them to, the media will continue to celebritize Sarah Palin because that's what she is and that's why people watch TV.
posted by blastrid at 5:04 PM on October 1, 2008


After two decades abroad, timezones still make my brain lock up. It's Friday morning here in Korea, which means the debate should be starting relatively soon over there, yeah?
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:04 PM on October 1, 2008


Ifill will absolutely not care about what some bloggers are saying, even if they're violently tweeting it as well.
posted by raysmj at 5:04 PM on October 1, 2008


Goddamn San Francisco values: Palin Syrah Wine Sales Compromised by Sarah Palin.
posted by ericb at 5:05 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


stavros, you still got another 25 hours.

but it's never too early to start drinking.
posted by blastrid at 5:05 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Perky doesn't work against perky.

Ifil isn't perky, but I bet it doesn't work against her either. Her and Lehrer--they have serious game face.
posted by DU at 5:06 PM on October 1, 2008


and the VP debate looms hours from now.

Uh, isn't it tomorrow (Thursday) night?
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 5:06 PM on October 1, 2008


I remember when debates meant two politicans arguing rationally and respectfully with each other directly.

Of course, we had to wear an onion on our belt at the time.
posted by Aquaman at 5:07 PM on October 1, 2008 [10 favorites]


That Supreme Court video... she's a child who finds herself up in front of the class giving a book report on a book she has never cracked open.
posted by Flunkie at 5:08 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


> Perky doesn't work against perky.

In certain other, uh, genres, it works very well indeed.
posted by you just lost the game at 5:11 PM on October 1, 2008


Joe Biden is gruffly charming and dad-like. Gruff trumps perky and perhaps the dad thing will make her confess that she hasn't done her homework. Spankings are optional.
posted by jonmc at 5:11 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


And she's a master, not of facts, figures, or insightful policy recommendations, but at the fine art of the nonanswer, the glittering generality. Against such charms there is little Senator Biden, or anyone, can do."

Unless, of course, everyone is waiting to see her prove she's got the chops to be president, in which case, the non-answer is the worst possible reply. People who think this is about whether or not Joe Biden "beats" Palin don't get it. This is about whether or not people think she is the type of person fit for the job of the Presidency. Right now, she has not sold the country on that.
posted by Ironmouth at 5:12 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


From this link, here's one of her (non-)answers she used in a debate with Andrew Halcro which pretty much sums up her strategy:

"Andrew, I watch you at these debates with no notes, no papers, and yet when asked questions, you spout off facts, figures, and policies, and I'm amazed. But then I look out into the audience and I ask myself, 'Does any of this really matter?'"
posted by symbollocks at 5:13 PM on October 1, 2008 [15 favorites]


BIDEN: Air that has too much coal in it, corn syrup next, then a terrorist attack. But that is not in any way to diminish the fact that a terrorist attack is real, but hundreds of thousands of people die and their lives are shortened because of coal plants, coal-fired plants, and because of corn syrup.


BIDEN: Why is it that Joe Biden is the first in his family ever to go to a university? Is it because I'm the first Biden in a thousand generations to get a college and a graduate degree?



BIDEN: Uh, uh, Chuck Graham, state senator, is here. Stand up, Chuck. Let 'em see you. Oh, God love you. What am I talking about? I tell you what, you're making everybody else stand up, though, pal. I tell you what, stand up for Chuck.



BIDEN: Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let's get that straight. She's a truly close personal friend. She is qualified to be president of the United States of America. She's easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America. And, quite frankly, um, it might have been a better pick than me. (rimshot) But she's first rate.


BIDEN: Part of what a leader does is to instill confidence, to demonstrate that he or she knows what they're talking about and communicates to people. If you listen to me and follow what I'm suggesting, we can fix this. Stock market crash, Franklin Roosevelt got on television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed, he said, "Look, here's what happened."
posted by shockingbluamp at 5:15 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Let's see what Gwen Ifill lets her get away with.
Likely quite a bit, given the raking over the coals that Ifill's gotten in the past couple of days.
I sincerely doubt that Gwen Ifill is going to let any shit fly.

"The big meanies are being mean to me" might impress Palin supporters, but it's not going to faze Gwen Ifill.
posted by Flunkie at 5:18 PM on October 1, 2008


shockingbluamp, I fully expect your psot to vanish soon because MetaFilter is not abou exchange of free ideas but the current mood--biased opinios of the webmaster.
posted by Flunkie at 5:20 PM on October 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


From the Kos piece:

"Andrew, I watch you at these debates with no notes, no papers, and yet when asked questions, you spout off facts, figures, and policies, and I'm amazed. But then I look out into the audience and I ask myself, 'Does any of this really matter?' " Palin said.

My hunch is that she is correct, and that we are fucked.
posted by everichon at 5:26 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


Oh, how I miss Ann Richards!

Can you imagine a debate between Ann Richards and Sarah Palin ... moderated by Barbara Jordan?
posted by ericb at 5:26 PM on October 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


After two decades abroad, timezones still make my brain lock up. It's Friday morning here in Korea, which means the debate should be starting relatively soon over there, yeah?

stavros, you still got another 25 hours.

but it's never too early to start drinking.


Um. Stav. *cough* It's Thursday morning in Korea-- long night?
posted by eyeballkid at 5:28 PM on October 1, 2008


Uh, isn't it tomorrow (Thursday) night?

Yes, less than 20 hours from now. I'm counting the hours. That's just how excited I am.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:28 PM on October 1, 2008


I fully expect your psot to vanish soon...

It'll be a double-secret super-vanishing with a heaping helping of disappearment on top.
posted by Devils Rancher at 5:28 PM on October 1, 2008


Being the best debater in Alaska is sort of like being the tannest person in LA.

Wait... what? Isn't it more like being the tannest person in Alaska?
posted by one_bean at 5:29 PM on October 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


jonmc: why, oh why, did you make the spankings optional?

spankings should always be required...
posted by Crabby Appleton at 5:30 PM on October 1, 2008


Also: Sarah Palin reflects on her relationship with her "First Dude," Todd Palin.
posted by scody at 5:34 PM on October 1, 2008


Ah Palin threads, how soon they grow up into unwieldy beasts and are abandoned by their creators, only to be replaced with fresher, newer, trophy-threads. I place my bookmark upon this newest incarnation, so that I may come back to marvel at it's growth.
posted by dejah420 at 5:35 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Better debater than I think? Maybe. Better flutist? Not quite...
posted by mr.curmudgeon at 5:35 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Probably linked somewhere in tone of the other threads...Palin on Charlie Rose October 2007. In the first 4 minutes, Charlie Rose asks a question about most pressing issues in their respective states. Listen to the differences between Napolitano's answer and Palin's answer.

I'm starting to suspect that she sees her ability to pivot away from a topic she doesn't want to talk about as a feature and not a bug. It would have been totally easy for her to just give her version of whatever Napolitano said about education, but instead, she goes with the energy non-sequitur. I'm guessing she heard Charlie's original question, started preparing her energy answer, didn't listen to Napolitano's answer, and was caught off guard when Charlie turned to her and asked her about education, and not the question she was expecting.

I give her points for the pivot, but she's lacking the basic political skill of reframing the question and not the answer. Bill Clinton was the master of this.

I think her challenge for tomorrow will be not overcoming expectations, but setting new ones. If she tries to prove how smart she is, she'll fail. If she tries to re-establish her image as a pit-bull, she'll succeed.

I think Palin can "win" tomorrow's debate in the eyes of the public, but the Obama campaign is not running a "public opinion" strategy. Whatever their expected outcome is for the night, they'll probably hit their mark.
posted by billyfleetwood at 5:36 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


stavrosthewonderchicken, you can watch the Canadian Political Debate now. Translated into English [they're debating in French - RHS, 'Audio & Video' —Leaders Debate].

Party leaders are all sitting around a table. 5 party's are represented, including the Green Party and Bloc Québecois-really only in Québec.

Some questions were asked by citizens on the street in Québec.
posted by alicesshoe at 5:37 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


If I understand correctly, shockingbluamp is posting those Biden quotes as examples of 'gaffes'.

One of the many things that never ceases to surprise me about the degree to which the faux-conflict mongering doucheballoon media controls the framing of the way politics are done in America, and the way in which so many people seem to lap it up blithely, is this idea of making 'gaffes'.

What I hear when I read those Biden quotes is honesty. I have a great respect for people who say what they think, at least when it is clear that they've actually thought about things a bit before speaking. Think, in other words, being the key idea here. That they actually have considered opinions, not talking points. There is no conceivable reason, to me, to prefer packaged, memorized, content-free scripted responses by politicians on important issues, even if I disagree with the opinion in question.

I think in part it derives from a basic assumption (which may not be entirely incorrect in presidential politics) that politicians lie constantly. That they never speak the unvarnished truth about anything. I also think a major part of why this race and the Democratic candidates are so exciting to me and many others is that in Obama and Biden, we have two politicians who to some degree are basing their campaign on trying, as much as it is possible, to break out of that mold, to think deeply about issues, to be unafraid to display their intelligence, and to be willing to speak off-the-cuff, with all the danger of 'gaffes' that that implies, and to depend on the intelligence of the electorate to see that there is more value to that than stage-management and scripting and spin, and to buy into it philosophically as a game-changer.

There are still many people who are stuck in the old game, clearly.

I don't think Obama and Biden are all that different, but I think they're trying, and after the endless parade of soundbitey, principle-free scumbags in the last few decades-- Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan and their vices and vice-presidents -- it's a goddamn breath of fresh air.

Gaffe away, Joe, but speak from the heart and talk to us as if we're smart and aware and you have respect for us, and you'll win handily.

And if you don't, well, it's probably Second American Revolution time! And that'd be fun, too, at least to watch.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:40 PM on October 1, 2008 [45 favorites]


Um. Stav. *cough* It's Thursday morning in Korea-- long night?

Whoops, you're right. Tomorrow's a holiday here, so it feels like Friday. Carry on.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:41 PM on October 1, 2008


shockingbluamp--thanks for pointing those gaffes out, I'm just shocked, shocked! The thing about Biden's gaffes, what makes them fundamentally different from Palin's, is that no one really thinks Biden is stupid or unqualified. People think he's a windbag and talks way too much, and I agree. But at no point while listening to Biden do you think "Wow...this guy is a complete moron! He's just not knowledgeable enough!" The sheer volume of words that comes out of that man's mouth, his word-to-gaffe ratio, is probably really low. Palin's is sky-freakin'-high, at least at this point. That's what happens when your handlers don't let you speak.

Palin is different. She sounds dumb. Dumb in the sense that she doesn't know what she doesn't know, she just reckons that what she knows is good enough. Like Dubya, she's the kind of person who is so full of herself she can't really see her own failings and deficiencies. She would probably charm the pants off anyone in a face-to-face meeting, again like Bush seems to be able to do, but that should not be good enough to be leader of the free world.

That said, I think she'll probably do ok in the debate. Depends on the questions. Ultimately, though, she'll have to do more interviews and even (egad!) a press conference or two, and that'll be just as entertaining as the Couric interviews. Tina Fey will be busy for the next couple of weeks.
posted by zardoz at 5:44 PM on October 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


But is Joe Biden less of a douchebag than I think?
posted by mattholomew at 5:46 PM on October 1, 2008


All she has to do is show up. That's it. Her just showing up will give McCain a bump. Expectations are set so low that's all it will take.

To her target market she is a genius. Not a genius of intellect, mind you. No. That's for them egg heads who worry about them pesky facts.

Nope. Sarah, see, she's a genius of "Aw-shucks-hope-spun-good-ol' fashioned-common-sense." She don't need to know details or facts. The just needs to stand up, unblinking to problems... and ignore them.

Too bad it takes very uncommon sense to run a country that is on it's way to losing at least one of two fucked up wars and is possibly about to go into a second depression.

Anybody left who doubts my original premise of The American Moron deciding this election and Sarah Palin being their beacon? Yeah. Didn't think so.
posted by tkchrist at 5:48 PM on October 1, 2008


People who think this is about whether or not Joe Biden "beats" Palin don't get it. This is about whether or not people think she is the type of person fit for the job of the Presidency.

Unfortunately, those people also get to decide what "this is about".
posted by Durn Bronzefist at 5:48 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Given all the tiresome hand-wringing from more liberal types, and conservative posting of dumb Biden quotes (like those posted above, one of which just sounded like the introduction of someone and not a dumb quote per se), maybe expectations will be lowered for him as well. Meanwhile, I've been hearing reports from friends and family in the Deep South that Palin nuts didn't even bother the watch the Couric interview. All they've heard is her speech, plus Fox stuff, probably just the speech. They haven't a clue about her otherwise.
posted by raysmj at 5:50 PM on October 1, 2008


"I'd like to give my rebuttal time to Governor Palin. Perhaps she could use it to actually answer the question."

I see anything like that happen tomorrow night, and I'm going to hug my TV to death.
posted by MrVisible at 5:53 PM on October 1, 2008 [49 favorites]


Whenever I hear liberal hand-wringing, I figure the Obama team is either moving ahead or has an even shot. I haven't been proven wrong yet. There's always a first time, but ... How many went on and on about how Obama wasn't angry enough at McCain, how he should've blown up more about the Iraq war. Now he's ahead by either five to nine points in polls, depending on who you want to believe.
posted by raysmj at 5:53 PM on October 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


Here is what I really like about Palin. I miss teaching, something I had done for many many years, and when I hear her asked questions, I am instantly reminded of my dumb broad students--and yes, I can say that now that I am retired--who sounded exactly like her (guys do it too but not so well) and circle round and round and say nothing. Nada. Zip. Any teacher who has been in the game long enough knows this sort of fakery. I will now speak for all those teachers who have to endure such crap: We are not amused.
posted by Postroad at 5:55 PM on October 1, 2008 [13 favorites]


If there is a winning scenario for Obama tomorrow night, this is what it might look like: This is the TPM version of the now infamous "Roe v. Wade" video that ericb posted above. The TPM version includes Biden's response to the question right before Palin. When you have an opportunity to compare Biden's response to Palin's - back to back - the contrast is striking. Even without the Griswold privacy landmine that Katie Couric laid - and Palin stepped right into - the marked contrast between Biden and Palin may win the day if enough independent voters are impressed by the clear difference in knowledge. However, that presupposes that Palin is forced to answer the freaking questions without flipping the answer into an attack back at Obama/Biden. Unfortunately, I think what we're going to see tomorrow night is this formula: Question to Palin > Semi-coherent platitude + talking points + attack > Biden on defense
In that case, if Biden can just stay calm, cool, and collected, and (most importantly) disciplined, then your average independent/undecided voters may find comfort in his projection of resolute statesmanship, in marked contrast to her appearance as a shrill, mudslinging banshee.
Fortunately, few are better than turning a knife with a smile than Biden.
posted by Dr. Zira at 6:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Postroad, your grammer stinks.

Bah. That's one of the most articulate comments I've seen Postroad make in the last 8 years!

For the student's sake.

There ought to be a Rule34-esque shorthand for the truism that whenever someone makes a snide comment on MeFi about another person's grammar or spelling, they inevitably make mistakes themselves. Amusing.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 6:05 PM on October 1, 2008


(like those posted above, one of which just sounded like the introduction of someone and not a dumb quote per se)

Chuck Graham is a parapalegic and can't stand up, is the "dumb" part there.
posted by Karlos the Jackal at 6:06 PM on October 1, 2008


This thread MUST NOT blink.

Oh, but it must.
posted by JaredSeth at 6:06 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


Metafilter sucks these days with every thread going over a hundred comments within hours. Matt is rich, we are poor. (Well, he deserves it, really, ten times over, but I am still sore.) Anyway, I lack the time to read all the comments that came before. We have become what we feared, Slashdot, where conversation is drowned out in the masses. Just look at the 5K Sarah Palin thread. For all this we do not have any better FPPs. The front page has been a wasteland of meh for the past few months. We get about one great post every several days instead of a couple per day. Perhaps it is the blandness of the internets not this site's failings though. Anyway.....

So she will not be a pushover. If Joe fails to come with his A game it will be bloody. She will just be vague and draw on her undeyning cuteness when in trouble. Joe, he will be awesome, until he oversteps and puts his foot in his mouth by telling her not to worry her pretty little head or some other dumb stunt. This is Joe's debate to lose. No one wins a debate, but candidates certainly lose them. Just because Sarah Palin is woefully unqualified to lead the country (go read about Andrew Jackson - dumb as a post, an unabashed redneck hick who prided his little, little brain on his being a sort of Joe Sixpack, and he was impeached due to is total incompetence) does not mean she can not debate effectively. Mastery of facts is secondary to mastery of your base. She may not be able to add double digit numbers in her head, or have actually read a newspaper in the last few decades, but she knows how to fake her way through erudition sufficient to convince the troglodytes who already support her, and perhaps even convince a few guys with woodys to do the same. At the very least I spoke today with a former McCain supporter who has changed sides over Palin's interview with Katie Couric. McCain has made a joke of the presidential election.
posted by caddis at 6:07 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think there's a lot of underestimating Biden going on as well...
posted by billyfleetwood at 6:08 PM on October 1, 2008 [13 favorites]


Dead on with your second paragraph, caddis. I wish we could give qualified favorites.
posted by JaredSeth at 6:11 PM on October 1, 2008


The debate rules were already dumbed down for Palin:
At the insistence of the McCain campaign, the Oct. 2 debate between the Republican nominee for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin, and her Democratic rival, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., will have shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees, the advisers said. There will also be much less opportunity for free-wheeling, direct exchanges between the running mates.

McCain advisers said they had been concerned that a loose format could leave Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive.
...
Commission members wanted a relaxed format that included time for unpredictable questioning and challenges between the two vice-presidential candidates. On Wednesday, the commission unanimously rejected a proposal sought by advisers to Ms. Palin and Senator John McCain of Arizona, the Republican presidential nominee, to have the moderator ask questions and the candidates answer, with no time for unfettered exchanges. Advisers to Mr. Biden say they were comfortable with either format.

posted by kirkaracha at 6:12 PM on October 1, 2008


Any way we could reanimate Spencer Tracy by tomorrow night and get him to "Henry Drummond" her homespun-folksy-yokel ass into ashamed silence on national TV?

No?

:(


Dag yo.
posted by Senor Cardgage at 6:13 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


leader of the free world

Everytime I see this phrase it makes me grind my teeth. For God's sake, the American president is NOT the leader of the free world.
posted by orange swan at 6:16 PM on October 1, 2008 [16 favorites]


Metafilter sucks these days with every thread going over a hundred comments within hours.

This, too, shall pass. It's only, like, the Most Important Election of Our (Mine, and Yours, and Everyone's) Lives', fer cryin' out loud! Even MeFites need to vent about this. MeFi will go back to normal around, say, December-ish, when the dust has settled. for reals, this is a damn important election, so if the "normal" postings are a bit dry for now, at least it's because of a significant reason.
posted by zardoz at 6:18 PM on October 1, 2008


>Hey, is this a Democratic meme that was started so that when Palin looks halfway decent, Democrats can claim that they knew that she was okay?

Almost.
Here's the game:
Democrats try to raise expectations on Palin so that if she doesn't manage to talk the entire audience into getting on a plane and shooting down your family pet, she loses.
Republicans are trying to talk down Palin so that when/if she manages to get onstage and not drool all over Ifill, she wins. This is why we have so many anonymous GOP quotes "OMGshitpants"!
posted by xorry at 6:21 PM on October 1, 2008


In certain other, uh, genres, it works very well indeed.

the dad thing will make her confess that she hasn't done her homework. Spankings are optional.

Wow, when did this thread become SMOKING HOT?!

OK, you be the stern moderator, and I'll be the naughty candidate who's gone over his allotted time.
posted by Horace Rumpole at 6:21 PM on October 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


"Whenever I hear liberal hand-wringing, I figure the Obama team is either moving ahead or has an even shot"

This.

Obama's campaign has been quite stunning up until this point. It's not that they are smarter than the Republicans, they are smarter than the Democrats too.
posted by fullerine at 6:24 PM on October 1, 2008 [16 favorites]


My personal guess is that she's going to come out attacking. Anything to get Biden to respond in kind. If he doesn't rise to the bait, it's going to be a long boring night. And if he fights back, I don't think it will be the disaster everyone is assuming.

But what do I know. I thought McCain was going to dump her after the first week.
posted by Eddie Mars at 6:25 PM on October 1, 2008


Incidentally, this piece by Matt Taibbi about Sarah Palin is fun.

...

After eight years of unprecedented corruption, incompetence, waste and greed, the party of Karl Rove understood that 50 million Americans would not demand solutions to any of these problems so long as they were given a new, new thing to beat their meat over.

...

the most disgusting thing about her is what she says about us: that you can ram us in the ass for eight solid years, and we'll not only thank you for your trouble, we'll sign you up for eight more years, if only you promise to stroke us in the right spot for a few hours around election time.

...

Democracy doesn't require a whole lot of work of its citizens, but it requires some: It requires taking a good look outside once in a while, and considering the bad news and what it might mean, and making the occasional tough choice, and soberly taking stock of what your real interests are.

This is a very different thing from shopping, which involves passively letting sitcoms melt your brain all day long and then jumping straight into the TV screen to buy a Southern-Style Chicken Sandwich because the slob singing "I'm Lovin' It!" during the commercial break looks just like you.


Yes it was. A lovely, unapologetic rant. Thanks.
posted by mrgrimm at 6:26 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]




More highlights from the Couric Interview:

COURIC: I know you're heading to Sedona to work on your debate. What is your coach advising you?

Gov. PALIN: I don't have a debate coach.

COURIC: Well, what are your coaches?

Gov. PALIN: I have quite a few people who are giving us information about the record of Obama and Biden, and at the end of the day, though, it is -- it's so clear, again, what those choices are. Either new ideas, new energy and reform of Washington, DC, or more of the same.


No coach. Just....um...people who ....er...help her. If she is speaking the truth here (Hah! Palin and Truth go together like Mackerel and Doughnuts) she could be in a world of hurt. Maybe she is champing at the bit, anxious to show America who she is. That would be precious, precious gold for the Democrats.

From the NY Times: Concerns About Palin's Readiness as Big Test Nears
I think she has pretty thoroughly — and probably irretrievably — proven that she is not up to the job of being president of the United States,” David Frum, a former speechwriter for President Bush who is now a conservative columnist, said in an interview. “If she doesn’t perform well, then people see it.[...]
Mr. Frum noted the difficulty that Dan Quayle, who was elected vice president in 1988, had in recovering from an early set of mistakes that led him to be ridiculed as an intellectual lightweight. “The story of Dan Quayle is he did probably 1,000 smart things as vice president, but his image was locked in and it was very difficult to turn around,” he said. “And Dan Quayle never in his life has performed as badly as Sarah Palin in the last month.”
"I knew Dan Quayle, and you, Madame, are no Dan Quayle!"
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 6:28 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


Now I'm looking at Biden debate clips, and he's entertaining to say the least. If he cuts loose and has fun with it, he'll win over some voters. Hell, I would pay cash money to see Biden debate Giuliani.
posted by billyfleetwood at 6:31 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


The reason Palin will have an easy time is because Ifill said she's not going to grill anybody. She said it's a debate, not an inquisition, and that the people watching are avid watchers of this type of thing and they'll know when a candidate hasn't answered the question.

Sure, that's nice and all, and indeed it calls out to the best of people, but I think she's being a bit charitable.

I do think it would be delicious if she ruins it on her own in a grand way.
posted by cashman at 6:35 PM on October 1, 2008


MetaFilter: Perky doesn't work against perky.
posted by jimmythefish at 6:36 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]



Being the best debater in Alaska is sort of like being the tannest person in LA.

This might be one of the worst analogies in the history of analogies.

My assumption is that the person making the comment thinks that Sarah Palin is a poor debater. The person then takes into consideration the relatively small and rural population of Alaska and then decides that the best debaters are not likely to hail from that state. So this commenter hears someone say that Palin is the best debater in Alaska and wants to compare it to something to show just how insignificant a claim that is.

So the commenter chooses tanning for his/her silly analogy. Fine. Clearly, the commenter should choose a place where almost no one is tan to properly compare the tanning to the lack of debating wizards in Alaska. Bangor? Minneapolis? Detroit? No. The commenter chooses Los Angeles. Los Angeles, of course, is a coastal city that is known for beach babes and superficiality. As such, it may have the tannest people in the United States. Therefore, being the tannest person in LA might be good enough to be the tannest person in the US. It is really saying something about just how tan that person is. Completing the analogy, it would appear that the commenter is saying that Palin might be the best debater in the country.

Meanwhile, six people so far have favorited that comment. Assuming that they were doing so in a genuine way and not favoriting it because they keep some sort of file of failed analogies, it demonstrates something that is rather interesting. These six people most likely favorited it simply for the structure of the joke. They like the set up, "Saying A is B is like saying X is Y." That's it. They laugh at the joke simply because of its structure. They don't even actually consider what the joke means. They recognize a form of joke that they love, and it makes them laugh even if it is not funny.

I was just talking to a friend yesterday who cannot help herself from laughing hysterically when the "A called and wants its B back" joke is used. It doesn't even matter if the joke makes any sense. On the plus side, it is rather easy to make her laugh.
posted by flarbuse at 6:42 PM on October 1, 2008 [55 favorites]


Mastery of facts is secondary to mastery of your base. She may not be able to add double digit numbers in her head, or have actually read a newspaper in the last few decades, but she knows how to fake her way through erudition sufficient to convince the troglodytes who already support her, and perhaps even convince a few guys with woodys to do the same.

Between the RNC and today, Palin has done nothing but shun attention, and when she gets it, come across as dangerously incompetent for the VP spot. At this point, the only people who are going to be moved by her hokey nonsense are her base already. She would have to lay down a nuclear debate, replete with pie charts, graphs, and a Wagner soundtrack to convince anybody but those already voting McCain that she's ready for the job. So unless Biden takes off his shoe and throws it at her, I don't see this debate really having much impact on undecideds, though it may rev engines for Democrats and Republicans.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 6:46 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


The poetry of Sarah Palin.
posted by msalt at 6:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


Palin: Court 'gutted' Exxon Valdez decision, July 2, 2008:
"I am extremely disappointed with today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court," Palin said.
She would have to lay down a nuclear debate, replete with pie charts, graphs, and a Wagner soundtrack to convince anybody but those already voting McCain that she's ready for the job.

Now, I might have to vote for McCain if she turned to Biden and said, "Well, I'm a mushroom-cloud-layin' motherfucker, motherfucker! I'm Superfly T.N.T., I'm the Guns of the Navarone!"
posted by kirkaracha at 6:58 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Gov. PALIN: I have quite a few people who are giving us information about the record of Obama and Biden, and at the end of the day, though, it is -- it's so clear, again, what those choices are. Either new ideas, new energy and reform of Washington, DC, or more of the same.

Well, she's right about it being about new ideas, energy and reform vs. more of the same. Which is would be valid if she were running with someone that wasn't John McCain.She should DTMFA.
posted by birdherder at 7:05 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


She won't work now even if she crushes in the debate. This election will be decided by women, and the ladies seem to be crushing on Obama. Just now a mellifluous Obama ad ran on my TV, close-up on his face, he's talking about uniting people, health care, fuzzy kittens ... dude knows what he's doing--and who he's talking to.

Sarah Palin was a rush, but the buzz is over as we've gotten to know her. How many American women really identify with moose-shooting and paying for rape kits? Not a whole bunch of them I'd guess. I think Palin was a gamble that lost. It was a very bold try.
posted by Camofrog at 7:06 PM on October 1, 2008


By the way, who would've thought going into this election that the Republicans would be brought low by a Murderer's Row of Larry King, Campbell Brown, the women on The View, and Katie Couric?

This election will be decided by women, and the ladies seem to be crushing on Obama.

All he needs to do is run this picture 24/7.
posted by kirkaracha at 7:12 PM on October 1, 2008 [9 favorites]


Anyone who wants to play along with the debates can download some Palin Bingo cards.
posted by freshwater_pr0n at 7:16 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I miss Ann Richards, yes, but I really wish Shirley Chisolm was here.
posted by ltracey at 7:19 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Thanks, Sticherbeast, for the link to that magnificent Taibbi rant. Dunno how I missed it - I think Taibbi's one of the finest politically bent ranters working in America today, and that thing yields considerable evidence might well be the legitimate heir to the good Doctor's throne at Rolling Stone.

It was like watching Gidget address the Reichstag.

That right there? That's the best one-liner I've yet read on the unprecedented and incomparable vibe that surrounded Palin's acceptance speech. I await tomorrow night's debate with whatever the untranslatable German word is for a strain of nausea that is equal parts glee and dread.
posted by gompa at 7:24 PM on October 1, 2008


To her target market she is a genius. Not a genius of intellect, mind you. No. That's for them egg heads who worry about them pesky facts.

Nope. Sarah, see, she's a genius of "Aw-shucks-hope-spun-good-ol' fashioned-common-sense." She don't need to know details or facts. The just needs to stand up, unblinking to problems... and ignore them.


Well, if that's their target market, they're going to lose. They don't need to convince the know-nothing voter, who will probably go more for McCain anyway, but by now has almost certainly made a decision anyway. They need to convince the independents and the moderates, most of whom are a bit above low-information, particularly this time around. The old games aren't working as well as honesty, or at least sincerity, because people are pissed off. And that's why it's still true that you can't fool all the people all of the time, because eventually people get hit with reality and start paying attention. This is one of those moments.

That's why Obama can win this, because people are willing to be more realistic and vote for the better choice at this point, not just the easiest or most folksy. People don't like to admit they were taken for a ride, but most people eventually figure it out. Then they vote for the realists and the smartypants, at least for one election cycle, sometimes two. But then attention spans are short, and all this will be a very different conversation in two years.

Palin may pull of a good performance and even get in a few zingers, but if she doesn't come across as serious, or that she really doesn't have a grasp on history, the government and the world, then she will not convince the fence sitters, who aren't so much voting from their gut this time. She's pretty good at scripted answers, but she can't even form a coherent sentence on her own, and I think we're in for some choice moments if not exactly a skewering.
posted by krinklyfig at 7:24 PM on October 1, 2008


shockingbluamp: "Postroad, your grammer stinks. I hope you taught Wood Shop and not English. For the student's sake."

Oh SNAP. Postroad just got amped!
posted by lostburner at 7:27 PM on October 1, 2008


I'd prefer it if you held the election first, and then all the campaigning and debates and so forth. That way, safe in the knowledge that Obama won comfortably, I could hearily laugh at all the Republican goings on.

As it is, I want to laugh, but can't shake the cold shiver every time I realise it's still possible that these people will be running your country soon.
posted by twirlypen at 7:33 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


George Lakoff: Even with Palin's inexperience and ignorance of world events, she should not be underestimated. Here's how Biden can win.
posted by homunculus at 7:34 PM on October 1, 2008


Unfortunately, those people also get to decide what "this is about"

The attitude that there are all these dumbasses out there who are cancelling out the votes of smart people has killed Dems for years. They are pretty much as smart as we are but not as interested in politics. One just needs to reach them directly and not run away from distorting attacks and instead respond with brief but accurate responses. Dems ran away from telling the truth about their own positions when challenged. Obama does not. He stands his ground and doesn't try to be someone he's not.
posted by Ironmouth at 7:35 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I am *very* worried. By the time she finishes answering a question the question itself will have been forgotten by most.

We are in deep shit.
posted by whozyerdaddy at 7:35 PM on October 1, 2008


Every time I see the Couric interview with Palin it reminds me of this
posted by photoslob at 7:36 PM on October 1, 2008


Sarah Palin's Greatest Hits Reel.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:36 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Thanks, Sticherbeast, for the link to that magnificent Taibbi rant. Dunno how I missed it - I think Taibbi's one of the finest politically bent ranters working in America today, and that thing yields considerable evidence might well be the legitimate heir to the good Doctor's throne at Rolling Stone.

It's a pretty good rant, but no. HST could put your head into his world of nightmares and make you love every minute of his depraved experience. He had a unique way of putting political characters within that context, the setting of his insane imagination, so he could do with them anything that came to mind. I remember a particular article he wrote about Clarence Thomas, and he made a completely over-the-top, power-mad, rabidly drunk and violent caricature of a judge, all while describing the hits of opium he was inhaling in his front yard in the morning, just a musing over his morning coffee, so to speak. Taibbi can find some interesting and downright brilliant ways to express himself, but he's not capable of doing the same thing.
posted by krinklyfig at 7:39 PM on October 1, 2008


It's a pretty good rant, but no.

Yeah, I'm also underwhelmed by Taibbi, and I think that calling him this generation's HST does Hunter a major disservice.

Taibbi's a fine enough writer, but I don't see much heart behind the anger. Rage is good and important and the rational response these days, but rage that doesn't grow from a bedrock of love and hope and all of that shit is rage that is, ultimately, impotent.

Hunter, for all his failings, was a great writer. For all his over-the-top ranting and chemically-induced aberrations, he had a heart as big as all outdoors. I don't think Taibbi's anywhere near as talented a writer, nor do I get anything from him but a cynical desire to tear shit down.

In that way, he's a poster boy for the younger generation, I suppose. Fucking lawn, get off it, I know.

But it's also unfair to Taibbi to compare him to HST, and it must drive him a little nuts every time people say it, if he's serious about writing as opposed to word-fueled semi-celebrity. I don't think he's consciously emulating Hunter -- I hope not -- and the fact that people insist on doing it must also be somewhat gratifying, on some level.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:52 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


At this point, the only people who are going to be moved by her hokey hockey nonsense are her base already.

FTFY.
posted by piers at 7:54 PM on October 1, 2008


I can't wait until the whole thing unravels to the point where Bible Spice is screaming "DON'T HATE! DON'T HATE!" at Ififll.
posted by The Straightener at 7:55 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


(go read about Andrew Jackson - dumb as a post, an unabashed redneck hick who prided his little, little brain on his being a sort of Joe Sixpack, and he was impeached due to is total incompetence)

It was Andrew Johnson, not Andrew Jackson, who was impeached.
posted by lilacorlavender at 7:56 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


All these videos of her speaking in tongues, and yet on NPR the past two days there are STILL people calling in, and saying they love her, how "fresh" and "new" she is. I don't understand people.
posted by inigo2 at 7:56 PM on October 1, 2008


HST could put your head into his world of nightmares and make you love every minute of his depraved experience.

He's not kidding.
posted by dirigibleman at 7:57 PM on October 1, 2008


Obama Makes McCain Very Uncomfortable
posted by homunculus at 7:58 PM on October 1, 2008


Perhaps the problem is simply that she doesn't know what the word "specific" means.
posted by Flunkie at 8:02 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


It was Andrew Johnson, not Andrew Jackson, who was impeached.

Jackson was also instrumental in expanding suffrage (to all adult white males only, but still a step up from landowners only) and did called for the election of judges. But it is true he did talk the "sticking up for the little guy" game while at the same time advocating the practice of appointing political supporters into office, which benefitted a lot of his buddies who profited from rampaging west in the form of Manifest Destiny (he was positively bloodthirsty when it came to native Americans). A pro-business, cronyiest president of aggressive, war-like character who exploited populist rhetoric. The more things change, ...
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:18 PM on October 1, 2008


I have a good friend who argues that its all right that Sarah McCain is not intelligent in general because she is intelligent enough about the right issues - Iran, Israel, on taxes, on reform. Furthermore, his position is that intellectuals - like Biden and Obama - are better at abstract thinking than dealing with reality. A person of average intellect, like Palin, is, thus, a better choice because she's better at getting down to brass tacks, as it were.

Now, bringing his point of view up is something of a straw man argument on my part, since I can pretty easily argue that most world leaders are above-average people, even above average intellects in some area or another.

Anyhow, my point here - and I do have one - is that Palin does not need to win over the folks who support her - just the people in the middle. If Biden can steer the debate in such a way that rather than looking like an idiot, she looks like "Bush in a skirt," the center (as it were) will not hold for Palin. At least that's my perception.
posted by Joey Michaels at 8:18 PM on October 1, 2008


I've seen no better evidence of Palin's imminent undoing than her own campaign management's behavior. Was it barely a week ago McCain was trying to get his own debate moved into the Oct. 2 spot, with the result that the V.P. debate would be put off? Smelled like panic to me and still does.
posted by skyper at 8:32 PM on October 1, 2008


What does your friend say about the fact that Sarah Palin seems so willing to lie out loud, repeatedly - about thing that are easily shown to be false?

Sorry. On the debate topic: I have the internet. I have seen footage of her debating. She is not good at it. She is bad. She is obviously reading cards (something that has recently been cited as a plus, not sure when this became so public her "colored index cards" became cute.). I have been ranting about this, to everyone I know, for about a month, after seeing some debate footage on PBS.

I mean. Really.

Has no one been on a conference call? We all know this woman. She is poisonous and stupid.

Biden was on the news talking about all the intelligent, qualified women in politics he has debated through the years. Subtext: You stupid anchor, she's not the only woman; I've done this before and they were all better than her.
posted by Lesser Shrew at 8:38 PM on October 1, 2008


Oops.
posted by Lesser Shrew at 8:40 PM on October 1, 2008


Anyhow, my point here - and I do have one - is that Palin does not need to win over the folks who support her - just the people in the middle. If Biden can steer the debate in such a way that rather than looking like an idiot, she looks like "Bush in a skirt," the center (as it were) will not hold for Palin. At least that's my perception.

Yes, exactly, and she was brought onboard to shore up the fundamentalist and NASCAR base, but, ultimately, those aren't the people they need to win, and McCain isn't quite hitting the right notes with voters in the middle, either.

But Bush wasn't really as stupid as people made him out to be, and that was his greatest strength as a politician, to have the opposition underestimate his political abilities, though certainly he was incurious and far from brilliant. And, incidentally, Quayle wasn't really that dumb, either, but he was a terrible politician and lacked common sense at critical times. Palin isn't even in the same league.

I've seen Dan Quayle fail badly many times. I've listened as he mangled logic and highlighted his ignorance. I'm very familiar with Dan Quayle. Governor, you're no Dan Quayle.
(apologies to Bentsen)
posted by krinklyfig at 8:47 PM on October 1, 2008


Is there anywhere I can watch the debate online?
posted by Manhasset at 8:50 PM on October 1, 2008


But Bush wasn't really as stupid as people made him out to be

Well, yes, yes he is. He is quite clearly an imbecile.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 8:51 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Well, yes, yes he is. He is quite clearly an imbecile.

No, but I don't really want to argue on behalf of Bush's intelligence. He isn't that bright, that's for sure. But my point is that he's smarter than Palin, no question, and that's pretty scary.
posted by krinklyfig at 8:54 PM on October 1, 2008


I like that Sara Palin pronounces "didn't" as "dih-ent".
posted by Mental Wimp at 8:57 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Manhasset: cspan.org has live streaming. If it is like the presidential debate, the VP debate will be on CSPAN 2.
posted by jedicus at 8:59 PM on October 1, 2008


Is there anywhere I can watch the debate online?

I suspect that MSNBC.com, CNN.com, etc. will offer live streaming tomorrow evening.

MySpace will host it at their MyDebates website. As well, CurrentTV will stream the debate.
posted by ericb at 9:01 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Well, if that's their target market, they're going to lose. They don't need to convince the know-nothing voter, who will probably go more for McCain anyway, but by now has almost certainly made a decision anyway. They need to convince the independents and the moderates, most of whom are a bit above low-information, particularly this time around.

You have kinda backwards.

Palin is not for the independents and undecideds. Who ever the hell they are. Not at all.

She is for the single issue abortion voters and the far, far, right religious conservatives who were threatening TO STAY HOME as recently as four months ago because they hated McCain.

People seem to forget that Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh threatened to "campaign for Hillary" if McCain got the nomination. Well. He did.

Undecideds will NOT decide this election. Because, like oil reserves, they are horribly and deliberately exaggerated by both sides. Seriously. How stupid or out of touch do you need to be to be undecided at this point?

Just like the LAST three elections it will be the base of the parties that decide this election - if they vote or don't vote specifically. The Base gets disheartened easily when things don't go EXACTLY their way and a share of them stays home or makes an ill-conceived grudge vote for an independent (Perot or Nader). The reason the Dems stand a chance is that the minority, female, and youth "base" might actually vote this time.

Unfortunately, due to demographics and the dense distribution of dipshits in America, there are more GOP base who think Palin is an awesome plain-spoken every-woman. She was brought on to bring them out. And to only initially to capture some pissed of Hillary voters... but that has back-fired.

The GOP base is not George Will. The base is, well... dumbshits.
posted by tkchrist at 9:04 PM on October 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


Does anyone know a reliable place where I can download a MP3 of the debate, immedately after it's over?
posted by zardoz at 9:10 PM on October 1, 2008


shockingbluamp: "Postroad, your grammer stinks. I hope you taught Wood Shop and not English. For the student's sake."

Dude, how are we supposed to take you seriously about grammar when you can't spell?

unless of course you were talking about Postroad's Kelsey Grammer which he keeps poised as an attack dog to rip the throats out of his detractors...
posted by Eekacat at 9:12 PM on October 1, 2008


Bush: imbecile, or actively unwilling to perceive reality? Another way of saying, was he born stupid, or did he earn it?
posted by msalt at 9:12 PM on October 1, 2008


Unfortunately, due to demographics and the dense distribution of dipshits in America, there are more GOP base who think Palin is an awesome plain-spoken every-woman. She was brought on to bring them out. And to only initially to capture some pissed of Hillary voters... but that has back-fired.

Regardless of your read on who decides, the polls are not showing this to be true. Her negatives are very high.

The GOP base is not George Will. The base is, well... dumbshits.

Counting on dumbshits to pull off every election is not a reliable strategy.
posted by krinklyfig at 9:15 PM on October 1, 2008


Ummm, I really hope she's a better debater than I think she is, because I think she's fucking terrible. I wish I could have a good laugh tomorrow night, but I just feel so sorry for her being put in this position. I'm usually pretty cold-hearted about politics, but man, my heart goes out to her. She must be fucking terrified, and there's a good chance that she will come off like Miss Teen South Carolina or whoever that poor blond girl was that kept saying "the Iraq" and "such as."
posted by zekinskia at 9:16 PM on October 1, 2008


What does your friend say about the fact that Sarah Palin seems so willing to lie out loud, repeatedly - about thing that are easily shown to be false?

Lesser Shrew, too right about this. If anything will bring Palin down it is her distressing tendency to bullshit ineptly. This sociopathy is what made her Couric interviews so cringe inducing, e.g., her claim to read all the newspapers put in front of her. Cutesy BS is still BS. Joe Sixpack may not know anything about Plessy v. Ferguson, but he can tell when someone is feeding him a line of shit.

I also expect to see this tendency reinforced by a species of focal dystonia. She is being crammed full of factoids and overprogrammed. When she will attempt to extract a relevant factoid to answer a question, she is just as likely to emit a cluster of irrelevant--but contemporaneously crammed into her--buzz words, just as she has done in all her interviews so far. It is not accidental that her responses have appeared to be MadLib ™ scripts with Republican buzzwords inserted into the blanks. If she does this in the debates, it will be comedy gold.

Folks seem to be expecting that Palin will be able to duplicate her teleprompter-assisted performance at the convention. I do not believe that lightning will strike twice, but we shall see in a few hours.
posted by rdone at 9:23 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


How ironic to bring up George Will's name as a voice of reason in a discussion about presidential election-oriented debates.
posted by raysmj at 9:23 PM on October 1, 2008


"If Sarah Palin were to become President, it would be nice if she had some idea of how our system of government is supposed to work. In that light, consider the bit about whether there is an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution. Palin says yes, which is odd, since as Couric points out, that right is central to Roe v. Wade........

If there is a right to privacy in the US Constitution, then protecting it is a federal issue. It has to be. You just cannot say that there is a right to privacy in the US Constitution, but that what to do about that fact should be up to the states. Not if you understand what the Constitution is, and how our system of government works."
posted by poxuppit at 9:26 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


zekinskia, she took the position gladly. She's said she wants to be President some day, and when this came up, she leapt at it. Problem is that she has the common problem that incompetent people have: they can't judge their own competence. She really believes that she's the greatest thing since sliced bread. Here's a good summary of the phenomenon at Damn Interesting. I have no sympathy for her at all. She walked into this with open eyes, and confident of her abilities.
posted by Eekacat at 9:27 PM on October 1, 2008


Cary Tennis in Salon: The very thing that appalls us about Sarah Palin -- her discomfort in the realm of reason -- is her main selling point. This is so mind-boggling that you have to take a minute to let it in. Take a deep breath. Read that sentence again. Face it: Sarah Palin represents what many people want: a retreat from reason; a regression to childhood.

posted by cybercoitus interruptus at 9:27 PM on October 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


Regardless of your read on who decides, the polls are not showing this to be true. Her negatives are very high.

Okay. You're not groking. Think about what I'm saying here: Her negatives are not high among the GOP base. She is pulling record crowds at her appearances. The Base LOVES her. Three months ago the base was depressed as shit about McCain. These are the people STILL giving Bush high approval ratings. And McCain "the Maverick" had been rejected by the base in 2000 as not conservative enough. They were still rejecting him.

Counting on dumbshits to pull off every election is not a reliable strategy.

Um. Its worked pretty well the last three presidential elections. And it works for BOTH SIDES.

EVERY election? Well that's a silly qualifier. I will say this: Relying on dipshits to win US presidential elections IS likely a winning stratagem for thenext four of five election cycles because the electorate is split and cultural issues motivate the base who decide the split. As a nation we have compromised on everything we can until the the current generation of power elites die off and the culture changes bvy it's own momentum.

Buddy. You have to remember a couple of things. First of all smart people are a minority in this world. Stupid people are much easier to motivate and manipulate than smart people. And lastly "undecideds" are the same people who don't vote.
posted by tkchrist at 9:29 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


When Adlai Stevenson was running for President. A lady told him "All the thinking people are behind you."

Stevenson replied, " I agree. However, I need a majority to win."
posted by Rafaelloello at 9:41 PM on October 1, 2008 [15 favorites]


Sarah Palin represents what many people want: a retreat from reason; a regression to childhood.

That pretty much nails it.
posted by tkchrist at 9:45 PM on October 1, 2008


Cary Tennis nailed Sarah Palin?
posted by mazola at 9:53 PM on October 1, 2008


Buddy. You have to remember a couple of things.

Buddy? OK ...
posted by krinklyfig at 9:56 PM on October 1, 2008


Bush’s Approval Rating Drops to New Low of 27%

G.O.P. Drops in Voting Rolls in Many States:
For more than three years starting in 2005, there has been a reduction in the number of voters who register with the Republican Party and a rise among voters who affiliate with Democrats and, almost as often, with no party at all.
...
Among the 26 states with registration data, the percentage of those who have signed on with Democrats has risen in 15 states since 2004, and the percentage for Republicans has risen in six, according to state data. The number of registered Democrats fell in 11 states, compared with 20 states where Republican registration numbers fell.

posted by kirkaracha at 9:56 PM on October 1, 2008


Thanks for the Slate link, msalt. I love this:

"Befoulers of the Verbiage"

It was an unfair attack on the verbiage
That Senator McCain chose to use,
Because the fundamentals,
As he was having to explain afterwards,
He means our workforce.
He means the ingenuity of the American.
And of course that is strong,
And that is the foundation of our economy.
So that was an unfair attack there,
Again based on verbiage.

(To S. Hannity, Fox News, Sept. 18, 2008)

Her words make so much more sense when they are read as poetry! Let's make her Poet Laureate not because her "poems" are any good, but because that will keep her out of National Office where her actions might have real consequences.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 9:58 PM on October 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Okay. You're not groking. Think about what I'm saying here: Her negatives are not high among the GOP base.

I grok, pal.

In fact, the base is more than just the dumbshits of the party.

I understand perfectly why it's easy to be completely cynical. I don't happen to agree with your take on how it will play out this time, though.
posted by krinklyfig at 9:59 PM on October 1, 2008


Okay, this is just beyond tacky: "barackbook" has me convinced RNC has lost its collective mind. (Via)
posted by skyper at 10:06 PM on October 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Her words make so much more sense when they are read as poetry!

Just like Rumsfeld!

Count me among those who think that Palin will receive a bit of a bump in polls no matter how poorly she does. The reason is not that she's a good or bad debater, or that she knows or doesn't know things, or that she has the base on her side or doesn't. The reason is that millions of Americans who haven't been following every twitch in the run up the debates have not yet even really seen or heard her. They're going to tune into the debates as relatively blank slates who have heard the buzz, but who haven't read articles, watched YouTube clips, scoured her records, listened to pundits. They may know her name and they may have seen 5- or 10-second clips on the news. They probaby know that she's being made fun of, because it's all over pop culture from the Enquirer to SNL to the water cooler, and they'll know that "everyone says" she's really, really stupid and there's no way she's qualified to be president. But if that's all you know going in, then her performance in a 90-minute debate is honestly not going to look too bad.

"Everyone said she was so dumb, but I liked her! I thought she did fine! I don't understand what people think is so funny."

Remember the initial bump after McCain's nomination of her, before anyone knew anything about her, but a lot of people really liked her style, storyline, and charisma? I'm expecting a diminished echo of that bump among people who will be seeing Palin, and taking her whole image in, for the first time. I don't think it'll last, but I think she'll generate a small bump in the polls that will take a few days to erode.

The same effect Barack Obama enjoyed ("He's not as bad as people were telling me! I kind of like him actually!"), but this time working in her favor.
posted by Miko at 10:24 PM on October 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


don't happen to agree with your take on how it will play out this time, though.

How it "will" play out? I'm not making predictions. It's how and why it has already played out. Plain was for the dumbshits. That's who she is for.

And the base, the base only truly is considered to be about 10-15% of each party. And in the last elections, and this one, the GOP has firmly established their "base" as the far, far, right and the LEAST INFORMED part of their party. The ones who still love Bush who still think 9/11 was an Iraqi plot. You cannot refute this.

These are the people that believe Palin when she says she has foreign policy experience because of Alaska's proximity to Russia. And they are the ones who did not like McCain.

Can Obama win? Maybe. But only if liberals can drop this useless facade of thinking intelligent people decide Presidential elections in the US. Because clearly they do not.

This isn't cynicism. I WISH it was. It's just fact.
posted by tkchrist at 10:34 PM on October 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


She is pulling record crowds at her appearances.

Actually, last I'd heard the numbers out of the McCain camp on this were outright fabrications, with local police giving much smaller numbers than they were.

On the other hand, if she comes to Minneapolis, I'd go. I'd like to see her say that crazy bullshit in person.
posted by graventy at 10:40 PM on October 1, 2008


On the other hand, if she comes to Minneapolis, I'd go. I'd like to see her say that crazy bullshit in person.

This definitely accounts for some non-zero percentage of her turnout, because I would do the same if she were speaking near me, and I can't imagine I'm alone in wanting to witness the spectacle and gather firsthand impressions.
posted by Miko at 10:52 PM on October 1, 2008


Think about what I'm saying here: Her negatives are not high among the GOP base.

OTOH, they seem to be high enough among Democrats to actually increase Democratic turnout as well as Republican.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 10:56 PM on October 1, 2008


Perky doesn't work against perky

I just had the greatest vision of Palin and Couric facing off against each other in Dragon Ball Z style in some distant desert. Each surrounded by a faint pink glow as their smiles get wider, their teeth become whiter and their hair styles become more and more professional yet surprisingly stylish.

And crouching behind a rock Chris Matthews looks into his teleprompter, "Their perky levels are over 9000!"
posted by afu at 11:33 PM on October 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


I'd like to see her say that crazy bullshit in person.

I'd prefer not to relive my third grade teacher.
posted by ryoshu at 11:42 PM on October 1, 2008


I just had the greatest vision of Palin and Couric facing off against each other in Dragon Ball Z style in some distant desert.

If we're going with an anime theme, I'd go with the first "fight" scene between Yuki Nagato and Mikuru Asahina - one armed with a cardboard magic wand, the other with a pair of toy guns, facing off with poorly rehearsed lines, breaking down into an actual fistfight, until the cameraman comes in to break it up.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 1:53 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


It's on! Pyu pyu pyu!

That's actually one of the major components of my drinking game this time around: any onomatopoeia from either debater is worth a shot. I'm skipping work so I can bang! zoom! get plowed for democracy.
posted by milquetoast at 2:02 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


hassarahpalindestroyedtheearth.com ...?
posted by malevolent at 2:13 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I keep torturing my wife by pointing out that the Obama hype is quite similar to the Tony Blair hype the UK had when he was elected.

My thoughts exactly. I pretty much became cynical about Obama as soon as I found out Zbigniew Brzezinski is one of his foreign policy advisors. I'd still vote for him over McCain if I was American, but it's just another "lesser of two evils" choice like always with politicians.
posted by L.P. Hatecraft at 2:43 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


From The Times:

Tim Bell, Margaret Thatcher's adviser, devoted his evenings to coaching the first female leader of the Conservative Party. He taught her to lower her voice and to wear her hair in a helmet but he says he couldn't achieve the same for Mrs Palin. “She doesn't have the intellectual grasp. I didn't have to spell out Margaret Thatcher's own policies to her, I just had to encourage her to use humour and the right amount of aggression. I don't think any amount of preparation could help Palin; it's going to be bloody.”

And that, to me, is it in a nutshell. You can only polish a turd so far. However bright and shiny it might look, you can't disguise the fact that it's full of shit.
posted by essexjan at 2:57 AM on October 2, 2008 [8 favorites]


I just hope Palin does better at the debate than McCain last week. I swear to god some parts of that debate were really just confusing and inappropriate.
posted by dgaicun at 3:15 AM on October 2, 2008


I think someone should ask her to spell "verbiage."

Wanna bet she thinks it is "verbage"?
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:03 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Man is there a lot of cynicism and fear in this thread!

The idea that Palin has been withholding her evil genius until this debate is laughable. No campaign would have chosen the public drubbing McCain has gotten for her gaffes to date.

Biden, gaffes aside, is a very informed, very intelligent, very *folksy* guy.

This is going to be brutal, and Palin will not win.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:06 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Gay Wasillans -- "Coming Out Against Sarah Palin." (YouTube)

This was remarkably good. Gay and lesbian Wasillans describe the climate of oppression that enveloped Wasilla with the rise of the fundy churches and Mayor Palin. Chilling and important, in my opinion.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:25 AM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


This thread is nothing without cash gambling.
posted by WPW at 4:27 AM on October 2, 2008


In what respect, WPW?
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:46 AM on October 2, 2008


This thread is nothing without cash gambling.

I'll book.

2:1 - Palin holds up her index finger woodenly while speaking.
3:1 - Biden barely restrains smirking.
4:1 - Populist pandering (either candidate)
5:1 - Palin starts five sentences, finishes none.
6:1 - Fightin' Blue Hens reference used for first time in the history of US political debates.
7:1 - Sweet Alaskan crocodile tears.
8:1 - A snort-laugh.

BONUS ROUND (High-rollers only)

50:1 - "Back when man fought the dinosaurs ... "
100:1 - "LOOK at her, people! She's dumb as a stump!"
1000:1 - "Oh, hear it comes, the Holy Ghost is gonna talk through me! Habala hafnala grabafabala-foobala!"
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 4:47 AM on October 2, 2008 [22 favorites]


Ordinarily, VP debates don't budge the polling a bit. I don't know that this one will be any different. The people who Palin plays well to are hardcore Christian conservatives, and they're pretty much already sold. I suspect that for most independents, Palin's performance tonight is going to be seen in the light of that SNL interview sketch. She might get a small bump out of this, but likely the most she can do is try to stop the bleeding.
posted by EarBucket at 4:53 AM on October 2, 2008


Slate, Kitty Florey -- "The Sentences of Sarah Palin, Diagrammed" Good laffs.
posted by fourcheesemac at 5:02 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Obama crossed over into enemy territory.

He walked over to where McCain was chatting with Republican Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida and Independent Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut. And he stretched out his arm and offered his hand to McCain.

McCain shook it, but with a "go away" look that no one could miss. He tried his best not to even look at Obama.


CBS poll: Obama 49, McCain 40

Pollster's Brian Schaffner on why a comeback is going to be difficult for McCain.
posted by EarBucket at 5:06 AM on October 2, 2008


And also in Slate, Timothy Noah tracks Sarah Palin's strange college career in "Sarah Palin's College Daze."

Reminds me of her snotty answer about kids who get "sent off to see the world" with a passport and a backpack by their rich families. Wonder who paid for her year in Hawai'i?
posted by fourcheesemac at 5:08 AM on October 2, 2008


McCain shook it, but with a "go away" look that no one could miss. He tried his best not to even look at Obama.


There is only one phrase that fits here.

"Christ, what an asshole."

Sums up McCain in a nutshell.
posted by fourcheesemac at 5:10 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


McCain shook it, but with a "go away" look that no one could miss. He tried his best not to even look at Obama.

It really makes me sick that someone could still be that racist in this day and age.
posted by orange swan at 5:29 AM on October 2, 2008


As the 21st century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest, reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits. Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction. A dumbing down. How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most, and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.
posted by kcds at 5:42 AM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


I don't know that refusing to acknowledge Obama means McCain is racist. If this campaign continues it's present course, then McCain is going to get his head handed to him in the election. It can't be a good feeling to have a whole nation reject you.
posted by rdr at 5:45 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Palin-Drome: Two candidates enter. Both will emerge victorious, in the eyes of their camps.
posted by educatedslacker at 5:54 AM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Sara Palin is Dubya in drag.

I'm not sure if this shows more misunderstanding of Dubya or Palin. Dubya is a fraud, plain and simple. The cowboy act, the feigned born-again christianity, its all bull shit to cover a little Yalie frat boy and big business operator. Palin on the other hand is genuinely a fundamentalist twit who is fully qualified to run a town the size of Wassilla or even be stretched to run a state with less people than DC. Not that those aren't important things, really, but she is out of her depth beyond local issues.
posted by Pollomacho at 5:55 AM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Washington Post: Skepticism of Palin Growing, Poll Finds
"In the new Post-ABC poll, Palin matches the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., on empathy, one of McCain's clear deficits against Obama, while fewer than half of voters think she understands 'complex issues.'

But it is the experience question that may prove her highest hurdle, particularly when paired with widespread public concern about McCain's age. About half of all voters said they were uncomfortable with the idea of McCain taking office at age 72, and 85 percent of those voters said Palin does not have the requisite experience to be president.

The 60 percent who now see Palin as insufficiently experienced to step into the presidency is steeply higher than in a Post-ABC poll after her nomination early last month. Democrats and Republicans alike are now more apt to doubt her qualifications, but the biggest shift has come among independents.

In early September, independents offered a divided verdict on Palin's experience; now they take the negative view by about 2 to 1. Nearly two-thirds of both independent men and women in the new poll said Palin has insufficient experience to run the White House."

posted by ericb at 5:58 AM on October 2, 2008


I don't buy that McCain is a racist, if for no other reason that I haven't seen any other indications of his leaning that way, whether in personal or public life.

McCain refusing to acknowledge Obama is, however, dishonorable, unbecoming, insulting, and flat-out tacky. It makes him look like a petty asshole, and someone who is unfit to navigate the delicate protocols that are a key part of international relations.
posted by shiu mai baby at 5:58 AM on October 2, 2008


I don't know that refusing to acknowledge Obama means McCain is racist.
Yeah. John McCain may very well be racist -- I wouldn't be surprised -- but what he's showing is merely that he's a small, petty, bitter man.
posted by Flunkie at 6:03 AM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


The Palin-Drome: Two candidates enter. Both will emerge victorious, in the eyes of their camps.
That's true of more or less every presidential debate ever, specifically including even the McCain-Obama one from last week.

But only one of them emerged victorious in the eyes of people outside of their camps. And he did so by convincing margins.
posted by Flunkie at 6:05 AM on October 2, 2008


We don't know that racism is why he won't even look at Obama, true. He may just be a really poor sport.

But google "McCain racist" and you'll come up with some disturbing shit.

A retired Naval officer who says he served with McCain in the Navy says he treated black sailors with disrespect and scorn. McCain refuses to release his detailed military record and some sources say that record includes incidents that include issues with black sailors.

But I also came up with this:

“In no way do I think that John McCain's campaign was being racist,” Mr. Obama said in his first meeting with reporters since predicting that Mr. McCain and other Republicans would try to scare voters because Mr. Obama looks unlike “all those other presidents on the dollar bills” – most of them older white men.

“I think they're cynical,” he said. “And I think they want to distract people from talking about the real issues.”


Mr. Obama, you are coming across as a truly fine human being in this campaign. If you are even half as good at being American President as you are at being a Presidential candidate, the U.S. will be in good hands.
posted by orange swan at 6:05 AM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


I have a good friend who argues that its all right that Sarah McCain is not intelligent in general because she is intelligent enough about the right issues - Iran, Israel, on taxes, on reform.

She's a country mile away from that, too--even with the bar at mid-ankle level, it's still apparently not low enough. Palin on Hamas
posted by Mayor West at 6:17 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I don't buy that McCain is a racist, if for no other reason that I haven't seen any other indications of his leaning that way, whether in personal or public life.

He opposed a federal MLK holiday and voted against it in 83. He was perhaps appeasing his state constituency, which opposed it (on racist grounds). But once again, McCain blew with the wind and reveals no core of principle.

Now he says he "regrets" that vote. Sure he does.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:33 AM on October 2, 2008


Palin on Hamas

Oh, my!
posted by ericb at 6:35 AM on October 2, 2008


Mayor West, it is true that she appears to be a firm supporter, at least, of a federally guaranteed right to privacy.

Seriously, in her answer to Couric's SCOTUS question, she blithely shot the legal foundation for the anti-abortion movement out from underneath her own legs. And the bullet passed through her foot.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:35 AM on October 2, 2008


I think it was clear she had no idea what Hamas was in that answer. Democracy=good. Keep it simple, stupid.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:36 AM on October 2, 2008


I work for a draconian company that blocks all streaming media -- Mayor West, is there a transcript on the Hamas discussion anywhere?
posted by shiu mai baby at 6:39 AM on October 2, 2008


He opposed a federal MLK holiday and voted against it in 83.

Oh man, that's right. I forgot about the infamous MLK Day vote. Good lord.
posted by shiu mai baby at 6:40 AM on October 2, 2008


Bill Schneider, on CNN, is usually a complete and total tool, and a master of stating the blaringly obvious as if it were a profound insight.

But he just nailed an analysis this morning. He said -- implicitly praising Obama's strategy -- that the state polls are now moving Obama's way more forcefully in key battlegrounds (Obama by 9 in Virginia in the new CNN, whereas Bush won Va by 9 in 04, an 18 point swing) because Obama is not running a national campaign, but a very state-focused campaign.

Once again, we're watching the Muhammad Ali of American politics at work. The opponent is defending his face from dummy punches and leaving his gut wide open for the heaviest stuff.

Look at the way Obama is using radio to reach under the radar of national media with his most negative stuff.

Man, it makes the Kerry and Gore teams seem a little more than incompetent; I realize this is a favorable environment, and that we had to learn a lot from 2000 and 2004. But the sheer skill and professionalism of Axelrod and Plouffe is something to behold.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:41 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Mayor West, it is true that she appears to be a firm supporter, at least, of a federally guaranteed right to privacy.

She seems to be in principle, yes, but I find it really disconcerting that her position is completely up for grabs the moment it interferes with one of her weird bits of morality. The hallmark of a competent leader is someone who understands nuance, and is willing to sacrifice a pet issue to support a broader ethos. Palin, on the other hand, wants Roe v. Wade overturned because it should be state's-rights (that old canard...), even when that demand comes in the same sentence as her affirmation that the constitution does, in fact, guarantee a right to privacy.

shiu mai baby, the transcript is here. This might just be another case of her pathologically refusing to answer specific questions in favor of sticking to scripted talking points, but in the interview, you see a momentary flash of panic in her eyes when Couric drills into a specific case, which suggests that she's in way over her head.
posted by Mayor West at 6:45 AM on October 2, 2008


it is true that she appears to be a firm supporter, at least, of a federally guaranteed right to privacy.

And this is why someone as ignorant as Palin is dangerous to her own party. There have been several incidents where she's been asked a question, she hasn't known the answer, so she's decided to bluff her way through with good old common sense.

Her biggest screwup so far has been on the Pakistan issue. She was asked a reasonable question about what they would do about al-Qaeda in Pakistan. She didn't know John McCain's position, but common sense told her what it would tell anybody--if we know where bin Laden is, of course we'd cross the border to get him. It'd be silly not to. Turns out, though, that's one of Barack Obama's positions, and the opposite of what she's supposed to be saying.

This question on a right to privacy in the Constitution is, if anything, a bigger mistake. She clearly has never been exposed to the argument about privacy and how it relates to the abortion question. So she heard the word privacy and, like any reasonable person would, said "Oh, privacy! That's a good thing!" Unfortunately, what she didn't realize is that she's the VP nominee of a party explicitly opposed to a right to privacy. If I were a pro-life conservative, this would give me serious pause.
posted by EarBucket at 6:46 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Couric: What happens if the goal of democracy doesn't produce the desired outcome? In Gaza, the U.S. pushed hard for elections and Hamas won.

Palin: Yeah, well especially in that region, though, we have to protect those who do seek democracy and support those who seek protections for the people who live there. What we're seeing in the last couple of days here in New York is a President of Iran, Ahmadinejad, who would come on our soil and express such disdain for one of our closest allies and friends, Israel ... and we're hearing the evil that he speaks and if hearing him doesn't allow Americans to commit more solidly to protecting the friends and allies that we need, especially there in the Mideast, then nothing will.

And SMB, to be clear, I am not saying I think McCain is a "real" racist -- in his heart -- either. I actually think he lacks principle to the extent that even evil principles are cynical tools for him politically. Also, he's ex-military, and the combat vets I know are usually remarkably cured -- vocally so -- of their pre-service racist attitudes, if they had them. But I also think we do "racism" a disservice as a concept if we fail to acknowledge that structural enablers of racist policies are "racists" just as much as people who won't shake the hand of a black man
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:47 AM on October 2, 2008


Ugh, meant to italciize the quoted transcript.

EarBucket, agreed. I don't think she understands what Couric meant by "right to privacy" as a technical concept in US constitutional law. It sounded good to her, sure, I'm for privacy rights! But no, I'm not for killing little babies, Katie.

She's unprincipled for reasons that differ from McCain's lack of character. She's too poorly educated to grasp the abstract principles of her gut feelings.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:50 AM on October 2, 2008


fourcheesemac: "Seriously, in her answer to Couric's SCOTUS question, she blithely shot the legal foundation for the anti-abortion movement out from underneath her own legs. And the bullet passed through her foot."

Best mixed metaphor since I heard "beating my head against a dead horse." Seriously, how does one shoot a metaphorical foundation...with a gun.
posted by iamkimiam at 6:51 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Is this the official VP thread? Cause I already waded through all that bullshit upstream.(place holder.) (Go Biden!)
posted by Balisong at 6:51 AM on October 2, 2008


Palin on Hamas

Good lord! The woman isn't even qualified to be first lady, let alone VP.
posted by educatedslacker at 6:52 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


By the way, if we're betting on the election, the fun bet is how many times Joe Biden will interrupt himself with "Look..."

I'm guessing... 14.
posted by John Kenneth Fisher at 6:52 AM on October 2, 2008


"By the way, if we're betting on the election"..
erm, debate.
posted by John Kenneth Fisher at 6:53 AM on October 2, 2008


Look at the way Obama is using radio to reach under the radar of national media with his most negative stuff.

Man, it makes the Kerry and Gore teams seem a little more than incompetent; I realize this is a favorable environment, and that we had to learn a lot from 2000 and 2004. But the sheer skill and professionalism of Axelrod and Plouffe is something to behold.


You know, this kind of talk, accurate and descriptive as it may be, makes me a little sick to my stomach. It makes me realize that this new shit is the same old same old shit, much as I'd like it not to be, and that my stupid wishful hopes that there's actually something different and new going on here, finally, after all these years, yeah right I know, are just that: hopes.

Which are worth precisely jack shit.

Hold me. I'm all sensitive and stuff.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 6:57 AM on October 2, 2008


iamkimiam, good one. But remember, Palin carries a really big gun. (YouTube, appalling)

And so does Jesus.

If that won elections, this guy would have been president.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:02 AM on October 2, 2008


Obama live in Grand Rapids right now, FYI. On CNN.

Streaming on BarackObama.com
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:03 AM on October 2, 2008


I find it really disconcerting that her position is completely up for grabs the moment it interferes with one of her weird bits of morality.

Palin hasn't given any of her so-called principles two minutes' real thought in her life. She reminds me of a friend's brother. He is Canadian-born and raised and so long as he lived here he was anti-American, making tired jokes about guns and military aggression and all that. But then he moved to the States (Alabama or Arkansas, I can't remember which), married an American woman, and had a daughter (whom they've named "Liberty"). He supports Bush and talks about getting a gun because "a man has to protect his family". He's not doing any real thinking about anything he supposely thinks. He's just going with the societal tide, because that's the easiest and most immediately rewarding course of action.

Palin's the same way. If she'd grown up in a family and environment where she was rewarded (in terms of money and power, since that's what seems to be what she cares about) for endorsing legal abortions and travelling the world, then she would have done it. (Though her positions would still be no better thought out than they are now.) If she'd been plain and not able to coast on her looks, she might have had to develop other facets of herself, but she was good looking and rewarded for parading about in a bathing suit, so that's what she did. She's an opportunist and she's limited, and she's un-self-aware, and she'll take the easiest and first route to get what she wants.
posted by orange swan at 7:09 AM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


You know, this kind of talk, accurate and descriptive as it may be, makes me a little sick to my stomach. It makes me realize that this new shit is the same old same old shit, much as I'd like it not to be, and that my stupid wishful hopes that there's actually something different and new going on here, finally, after all these years, yeah right I know, are just that: hopes.

Which are worth precisely jack shit.

Hold me. I'm all sensitive and stuff.


Stav, you sound exactly like a embittered divorced man who's Afraid to Love Again.
posted by orange swan at 7:12 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


This, by the way, is why I've thought for a while that the Democrats should push for a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a right to privacy. Make the Republicans stand up in front of the country and say "No, we don't think you should have this right." Make them explain why.
posted by EarBucket at 7:16 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Stav, you sound exactly like a embittered divorced man who's Afraid to Love Again.

I am neither bitter nor divorced.

But politically, yeah. Spot on, pretty much.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:17 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


re: Obama using radio for negative ads- I feel like the difference between that and the shit McCain is pulling is that Obama doesn't need to lie. The VP pick is dumb as a stump, the Presidential nominee is a crazy old man. If they're slinging shit, it's gonna be true shit.
posted by 235w103 at 7:18 AM on October 2, 2008


[wraps wings affectionately around stav]
posted by orange swan at 7:18 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Rasmussen this morning: Obama up 51-44. Leading by 3 points in North Carolina.
posted by EarBucket at 7:20 AM on October 2, 2008


:steps in looks around:
Okay guys, I'll see you later tonight.
posted by kimdog at 7:23 AM on October 2, 2008


Aww, stav.


And 235w, that's where I am. Obama's negative ads (with a couple of exceptions) don't exaggerate or mislead. They tell the truth, which is negative enough to sound pretty harsh.

I am deeply committed to the idea that winning clean is the only way to win that's worth shit. But I have also been deeply disappointed at the dem's inability or unwillingness to *fight* for something so important, and to fight hard and smart.

Obama gained my confidence as a potential president in large part because his leadership of his campaign has been stunningly impressive to this long time observer of and cynic about American politics.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:26 AM on October 2, 2008


Couric's question [to Palin and Biden] regarding the separation of church and state.
"Katie Couric: Thomas Jefferson wrote about the First Amendment, building a wall of separation between church and state. Why do you think that's so important?

Sarah Palin: His intention in expressing that was so that government did not mandate a religion on people. And Thomas Jefferson also said never underestimate the wisdom of the people. And the wisdom of the people, I think in this issue is that people have the right and the ability and the desire to express their own religious views, be it a very personal level, which is why I choose to express my faith, or in a more public forum.

And the wisdom of the people, thankfully, engrained in the foundation of our country, is so extremely important. And Thomas Jefferson wanted to protect that.
Not only does Palin get so twisted up in herself that it's tough to remember what the question was in the first place, but I went hunting for the Jefferson quote she references and couldn't find it. I did dig up this:
'It is not wisdom alone but public confidence in that wisdom which can support an administration.'

--Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1824.
If this is what Palin was going for, she not only took it out of context, but she wasn't even close.

Then I found this interaction amongst chatters in the Sean Hannity forum, and they came to the same conclusion. There is no Jefferson quote.

You know you're in trouble when the Fox peeps call your bluff."

CBS video.
posted by ericb at 7:42 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin Says She's Eager To Debate Since Media Has Been "Censoring" Her
"Getting to speak directly to Americans without that filter of mainstream media trying to I think maybe censor some of my comments as we lay out those contrasts between these two different tickets."
LOL!
posted by ericb at 7:45 AM on October 2, 2008


Holy crap. Someone is writing this script for us. It's better than the best reality TV or HBO drama you could imagine. Make it stop!
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:46 AM on October 2, 2008


...how many times Joe Biden will interrupt himself with "Look..."...

That's something that generally drives me crazy about TV interviews and commentary. It strikes me as some kind of NLP-type technique.
posted by troybob at 7:47 AM on October 2, 2008


Palin's small town snobbery

And here's the folks chewing on the red meat that is SP: How long will Palin put up with McCain?
Subject: How long will Sarah tolerate McCain?
Comment: Following in the footsteps of the other failed Rino leader, McCain could care less about a fair and honest moderator in the Palin/Biden debate. Sarah not being part of a path being broken by family privilege may not appreciate being thrown overboard by another Bush look a like. All she needs to do is look to John Bolton or any other true conservative abandoned by another weak Rino screaming put me in Dad. These new age Rino's have no interest in conservative causes or defending their own, a Democrap named Sandy Berger is all the proof needed here. Ask Scooter Libby or our jailed border agents how well this has gone. Sarah must realize the only reason McCain is even in the race is conservative support of her. The polls show conservative support dropping daily for McCain as he heaps praise on the Liberal Lion and screams for no accountability for Dodd, Schumer, Frank and Raines. Sarah is much smarter than these children and time will tell if she will be another emasculated Cheney sitting in the corner looking at his watch waiting to go home in defeat.

Livermore, California
I can't seem to link to individual posts.

side note: talk radio is all about 'BBUT HE'S A MUSLIM!!!111'. For hours at a time.
posted by lysdexic at 7:47 AM on October 2, 2008


"Getting to speak directly to Americans without that filter of mainstream media trying to I think maybe censor some of my comments as we lay out those contrasts between these two different tickets."

YOU'RE KILLING WORDS.
posted by 235w103 at 7:48 AM on October 2, 2008 [21 favorites]


"The San Francisco Chronicle says tonight's debate is 'must-see TV - even if you loathe politics - for its sheer unpredictability.' Both candidates 'display a marked tendency to set off America's collective gaffe-o-meter,' the Hartford Courant writes, producing a 'ghoulish fascination -- like waiting for a crash at a NASCAR race -- with tonight's debate.' Politico notes that media figures expect it to be a ratings juggernaut, likely overtaking those of the first presidential debate." *

posted by ericb at 7:48 AM on October 2, 2008


Palin was chosen to make McCain palatable to the Republicans' locked-in base of motivated voters while McCain was supposed to be the one who brought folks in from across the aisle, he is not doing that. Tonight Palin will perceived as doing well thanks to the subterranean expectations, but unless Biden uses a chainsaw rather than an épée , I wouldn't be surprised if the Republicans' inevitable bump turns out to be insubstantial or very fleeting.

And there's still two more rounds of Obama/McCain to come.

Also, I doubt Ifill gives a shit if people think she's mean to Palin; she works for PBS, for pete's sake.
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 7:49 AM on October 2, 2008


This, by the way, is why I've thought for a while that the Democrats should push for a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a right to privacy. Make the Republicans stand up in front of the country and say "No, we don't think you should have this right." Make them explain why.
posted by EarBucket at 9:16 AM on October 2 [+] [!]


Here's what they'd say: "We believe that this is an issue that should be decided at the State level". It's what they always say when they defend the indefensible.
posted by interrobang at 7:50 AM on October 2, 2008


David Letterman: Top Ten "Things Overheard At Palin Debate Camp"
posted by ericb at 7:53 AM on October 2, 2008


Someone is writing this script for us. It's better than the best reality TV or HBO drama you could imagine.

The SNL writers might as well take the next month as paid vacation.
posted by orange swan at 7:55 AM on October 2, 2008


The Letterman list:

10. "Let's practice your bewildered silence."
9. "Can you try saying 'yes' instead of 'you betcha'?"

8. "Hey, I can see Mexico from here!"

7. "Maybe we'll get lucky and there won't be any questions about Iraq, taxes or healthcare."

6. "We're screwed!"

5. "Can I just use that lipstick-pit bull thing again?"

4. "We have to wrap it up for the day -- McCain eats dinner at 4:30."

3. "Can we get Congress to bail us out of this debate?"

2. "John Edwards wants to know if you'd like some private tutoring in his van."

1. "Any way we can just get Tina Fey to do it?"


Shrieking with laughter here. SHRIEKING. And pounding the top of my desk with my fists. I may need medical assistance to recover.
posted by orange swan at 7:58 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Can we get some more tags up in this? Vp? Biden?

Paln's Hamas bumble makes me angry. She doesn't know what the hell is going on. I hope she is exposed tonight. I thought she would attack Biden and would wear some color that contrasts with the stage/carpet, because I believe that really helped her in the past. Call me stupid, but biden should wear some color that lets him stand out, without looking crazy. Else he'll fade into the background. 'Such as Sarah' is going to be smiling gigantic and in pageant mode appearance-wise. I still think she can try to outbiden biden and get away with it. Honestly, if she makes that joke mentioned upthread about biden having been around since dinosaurs roamed the earth, what can biden do but grin and laugh? And the pit bullshit will be heralded by the numbskulls.

The only saving grace, since I've given up on Ifill cornering her with good questions, is that with all this cramming, one mistake, one thing that doesn't go according to plan, and it'll knock off the program in her head. I can't think of a subject, but if there was some subject they could mention that will make Palin think of something else, that'll have a chance at shorting her out, as it were. Some unexpected thing she knows about but has to call on memory to answer.

But anyway, she's going to be suzy smile-brite this evening.
posted by cashman at 8:01 AM on October 2, 2008


Public Policy (pdf): Obama holds double-digit lead in Michigan, 51-41.
posted by EarBucket at 8:01 AM on October 2, 2008


Ya know Letterman's gonna keep having a field day with Palin and McCain. Too bad he tapes at 5:00 p.m. ET. We'll have to wait for tomorrow's show for his reaction to this evening's debate
posted by ericb at 8:02 AM on October 2, 2008


Honestly, if she makes that joke mentioned upthread about biden having been around since dinosaurs roamed the earth, what can biden do but grin and laugh?

He can say, "Hey, John McCain must have told you how he used to be my babysitter back then."
posted by orange swan at 8:08 AM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Leading by 3 points in North Carolina. Whooo-Hoooooooooo!!!!!

My husband (a Tar Heel) just turned 40 and registered to vote for the first time. I begged and pleaded with him to get involved in 2000 and 2004, but he believed that politics, while fun to read about and discuss, was meaningless; it's more or less the same old bullshit. This year he voluntarily registered without any prodding from me. It's all thanks to Sarah Palin. Moreover, he is not just content with voting-- he is trying to reach out to friends and family and sway their votes. He has plenty of ammunition to fight the good fight-- since Aug 29 we have talked about little else. At the moment there is 3000 miles between us, but we keep busy swapping links.

Palin Mangles Thomas Jefferson
:
Katie Couric: Thomas Jefferson wrote about the First Amendment, building a wall of separation between church and state. Why do you think that's so important?

Sarah Palin: His intention in expressing that was so that government did not mandate a religion on people. And Thomas Jefferson also said never underestimate the wisdom of the people. And the wisdom of the people, I think in this issue is that people have the right and the ability and the desire to express their own religious views, be it a very personal level, which is why I choose to express my faith, or in a more public forum.

And the wisdom of the people, thankfully, engrained in the foundation of our country, is so extremely important. And Thomas Jefferson wanted to protect that.

posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 8:11 AM on October 2, 2008


"Once again, we're watching the Muhammad Ali of American politics at work"


OMG, your so racist
posted by staggering termagant at 8:12 AM on October 2, 2008


Debate or no debate, her matronly hair-do bugs me.
posted by dasheekeejones at 8:15 AM on October 2, 2008


2. "John Edwards wants to know if you'd like some private tutoring in his van."

Great, John Edwards is the new Gary Heart.
posted by cimbrog at 8:15 AM on October 2, 2008


Caught this on dKos (I know, I know) but it was amazing and inspiring. 440 West Virginia miners declined to be enlisted into an NRA publicity stunt and stayed home, shutting down Blacksville #2.

If we see Appalachia turn, this thing is a blowout.

Here is the link for the full story, but it's crashing right now.

For those who missed it in earlier threads, Richard Trumka of AFL-CIO makes the case for union voters to get the fuck over any lingering racism. (Amazing.) (Youtube)

And UFCW has a new ad out for Obama on the subject of equal pay for women. Hits Wal-Mart hard. (Youtube)

I am thrilled to see labor rising as a force for Obama.
posted by fourcheesemac at 8:19 AM on October 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


In 2004, MeFites were pretty horrified at Gwen Ifill's moderation of the Cheney/Edwards VP debate. (cf. 1 2).

"Ifill is sucking at keeping things on track." -- amberglow
"Ifill is just doing a hideous job. She's a pretty good reporter, but she's horrible at this." -- Sidhedevil
"Ifill's questions are terrible (did she write them?), her delivery is terrible, her moderation ("You just said Kerry's name!") is terrible, and -- oh, god, did she really just screw up whose turn it was to speak?" -- rafter
"There actually was a clear loser in this debate, folks, and it was Gwen Ifill. What a hideous job she did." -- Sidhedevil

If you're watching for major gaffes, there's three people, not two, to pay attention to tonight.
posted by DevilsAdvocate at 8:28 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


From the letter to the editor that 4CM links to above:

McCain has not said one word about the outrageous lack of enforcement of mine safety and health laws in the Bush administration, while Barack Obama has consistently promised to appoint someone to be in charge of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration who will put miners' health and safety first.

I was thinking about this the other day, about how easy its going to be for Obama to turn this country around (in some ways). All he's going to have to do is hire qualified people instead of party hacks. Mind-blowing, huh?
posted by Bookhouse at 8:30 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'm convinced that Aaron Sorkin has been writing real life the last few months.
posted by educatedslacker at 8:33 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


That is a good comeback. I did think of some otherr things Palin could try to do (the mother card), and it seems there are good comebacks biden could give. So hopefully Sarah gets revealed as the fraud she is, just like in her interviews.

Thanks for the links, fcm. And thanks for the story, slog.
posted by cashman at 8:34 AM on October 2, 2008


If Sorkin was writing this, Palin would have better banter.
posted by cortex at 8:36 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


fourcheesemac - that's a hell of a speech!
posted by Jofus at 8:42 AM on October 2, 2008


Could Palin somehow not remember "The Wall Street Journal" or the "Washingont Post" when Couric asked her what newspapers she read. I mean ferchrissakes just throw out one name!
posted by PenDevil at 8:47 AM on October 2, 2008


HEH! French press uses Tina Fey pic in Palin article
The English translation of caption under it says that during interviews, Palin is hesitant, troubled and clumsy but didn’t offer more on where the picture was taken and who was on the right.

This just goes to show that In Palin’s case, it’s difficult to separate fact from fiction!
This would all be so much more fun if only I knew for sure there would be a happy ending.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 8:50 AM on October 2, 2008


She was fighting down the urge to shout "Highlights! Weekly Reader!"
posted by cortex at 8:50 AM on October 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


Palin Says She's Eager To Debate Since Media Has Been 'Censoring' Her

Katie Couric's just been giving her tons of rope and letting her hang herself. She'd be much better off if they had been censoring her.

For example, they could've cut off her weird out-of-the-blue defensive tangent about Alaska not being a foreign country when Couric asked her about newspapers. Couric's been doing a great job of maintaining her composure in the face of Palin's inanities, but that tangent provoked a yucky face from Couric, almost as if Palin had farted. In fact, Palin would've come off better if she had farted.
posted by kirkaracha at 8:50 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.
posted by dhruva at 8:50 AM on October 2, 2008


I mean ferchrissakes just throw out one name!

"C-coffee News?"
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 8:55 AM on October 2, 2008


I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.

Yeah. You can't say the Washington Post or the New York Times; those are elitist liberal papers. But, geez, what about the Wall Street Journal? Surely that would be a safe answer.
posted by EarBucket at 8:57 AM on October 2, 2008


She should have said: Anchorage Daily News and her hometown newspaper, The Frontiersman.
posted by ericb at 8:57 AM on October 2, 2008


I'm beginning to think that almost any question to Sarah Palin is a trap.

Also, since we were talking odds, what are the odds that Palin has hubby Todd try to break Biden's knee so he won't be able to make it to the debate? That Tonya Harding was pretty feisty too...
posted by Eekacat at 9:00 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


In fact, Palin would've come off better if she had farted.

I will write in Sarah Palin for President if she lets one rip in the debates. Especially if she responds to the shocked stares of Biden and Ifill with a total "fuck you" look and a shrug.

I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.

Indeed. My feeling is that she'd screwed up so many questions that she probably began suspecting that she'd be pounced on with a "gotcha" for citing even a relatively safe, obvious answer like the Washington Post. Hence the weird tangent about Alaska not being a foreign country: she figured that the line of questioning was going to lead to some, in her mind, snobby conclusion about her reading habits, which surely was connected somehow to city slickers thinking rural people are dumb, but it only revealed her as defensive and wormy when cornered. It also implied, weirdly, that perhaps there WAS something about Alaska that she regards as provincial - after all, she was the one who brought it up, not Ms. Couric.

Y'know, Presidents (and even Vice Presidents) do have to actually have neutral-to-antagonistic meetings with important people. I don't think for a second that Sarah Palin is literally illiterate or whatever, but she handles even easy questions with such untrusting terror, confusion, and spite that she would probably be quite dangerous if she ever had to meet with Medvedev or whomever for anything except an out-and-out meet-and-greet.
posted by Sticherbeast at 9:01 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Palin has hubby Todd try to break Biden's knee so he won't be able to make it to the debate? That Tonya Harding was pretty feisty too.

How do you think Gwen Ifill's ankle got broken?

(Also, count me among those unimpressed with Ifill's prior debate moderation. She's good on WWR, but she did not control the debate in 2004.)
posted by fourcheesemac at 9:08 AM on October 2, 2008


It also implied, weirdly, that perhaps there WAS something about Alaska that she regards as provincial - after all, she was the one who brought it up, not Ms. Couric.

You mean Republicans might be the kind of people that would claim to be "(wo)men of the people" and then disdain the rough crowds outside the gates of their gated community or country club? I would never pegged them as such! I'm Shocked!
posted by Pollomacho at 9:08 AM on October 2, 2008


The roof is on fire:

Florida Republican leaders hastily convened a top secret meeting this week to grapple with Sen. John McCain's sagging performance in this must-win state.

Their fears were confirmed Wednesday when four new polls showed Sen. Barack Obama leading, a reversal from just a few weeks ago when McCain was opening up an advantage.

The polls come amid a cascade of bad news about the economy, an issue that McCain has struggled with in recent days.

With some grass roots organizers complaining about coordination problems with the campaign, Republican Party chairman Jim Greer gathered top officials at the state headquarters in Tallahassee on Tuesday afternoon. He swore the group to secrecy.

posted by EarBucket at 9:27 AM on October 2, 2008


My Obama campaign donation pledge after debate is as follows, if anybody else wants to join in:

- $5 for each time Sarah Palin says she put the Governor's plane on Ebay;
- $5 for each time Sarah Palin says she was against the "bridge to nowhere";
- $5 for each time Sarah Palin says she has foreign policy experience because she can see Russia from Alaska;
- $5 for each time Sarah Palin says she has executive experience/ability to lead because she was the mayor of a podunk Alaska town for 2 terms and governor of a welfare state for less than two;
- $5 for each time Sarah Palin refers to herself as a "Maverick", a "Reformer", or a "Washington Outsider";
- $5 for each time Gwen Ifill has to prompt Sarah Palin to "be more specific";
- $5 for each accusation of sexism Sarah Palin makes against her rivals or the media.

I expect to be broke by tomorrow.
posted by contessa at 9:34 AM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


contessa, you forgot the most important one:

- $10 for each time Sarah Palin uses that creepy catch-a-falling-star-and-toss-it-in-the-wastebasket gesture she used to illustrate the rearing of Putin's head in the Couric interview, which looked like the kind of gesture you'd program into a crude cyborg to demonstrate an "animated" speaking style (0:58-1:02 on this clip)
posted by gompa at 9:52 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


"In one part of the interview, I asked her what newspapers and magazines she read before being asked to be John McCain's running mate," Couric said. "And she couldn't name any. So again, I turned to the crew and I said, 'Hold it, guys,' and I went to the Governor privately and said, 'Governor Palin, did you not understand the question? I'm asking you to name some newspapers or magazines you read. You can't come up with any? I'm just trying to make sure you're clear and to give you a fair shake here.' And she said, 'Okay. Nightline? Is that a magazine?' I said, 'No, that's a television show.' She said, 'What about Lou Dobbs? Isn't that a newspaper?' And I said, 'No, that's a man. Lou Dobbs is a man.' And there wasn't much more I could do. I'm not a miracle worker."
posted by EarBucket at 10:06 AM on October 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


Sarah Palin has been silenced all her life!
posted by Artw at 10:11 AM on October 2, 2008


Jesus. It's 23/6, so I assume it's satire, EarBucket. But the hell of it is I find it entirely believable.
posted by fourcheesemac at 10:11 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


EarBucket, you do know that is fictional, right? It is from The National Protrusion "Political Satire Disguised as News."
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 10:13 AM on October 2, 2008


So I shouldn't be wrapping my fish in Lou Dobbs?
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 10:15 AM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Yeah, sorry, I assumed it was obvious that it was satire. I guess it's telling that people had to ask.
posted by EarBucket at 10:16 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


So I shouldn't be wrapping my fish in Lou Dobbs?

Buy him a drink first.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:17 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Depends on whether or not your fish has worms in it.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 10:18 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


$5 for each time Sarah Palin refers to herself as a "Maverick", a "Reformer", or a "Washington Outsider"

This is the big one.
posted by dirtdirt at 10:23 AM on October 2, 2008


contessa - $5 for each time Gwen Ifill has to prompt Sarah Palin to "be more specific";

I think this is the one that's gonna kill you. Palin's entire style is predicated on hearing a question, and just rambling off in a completely different direction. At this point, I think the people who have been allowed to interview her are so stunned by the incoherence that when they try to press for more details, they eventually just have to let it go because there aren't getting anything close to a rational, on topic response.

I hope to all that is good and right in the universe, that they don't let her get away with that shit tonight. The first time she slides off topic, I want someone to hold her feet in the fire and demand specifics.
posted by quin at 10:50 AM on October 2, 2008


Ralph Stanley cuts radio ad for Obama:

“Howdy, friends. This is Ralph Stanley, and I think I know a little something about the families around here. Barack’ll cut taxes for everyday folks — not big business — so you’ll have a little more money in your pocket at the end of the year. I also know Barack is a good man. A father and devoted husband, he values personal responsibility and family first.”
posted by EarBucket at 10:54 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.

I believe this was exactly the excuse, I mean, explanation, Kathryn Lopez on the Corner (National Review) gave. She's so smart not to fall for the liberal media's gotcha journalism! The crazed base will never admit SP is anything but fantastic.
posted by Mavri at 10:56 AM on October 2, 2008


Unfortunately, what she didn't realize is that she's the VP nominee of a party explicitly opposed to a right to privacy. If I were a pro-life conservative, this would give me serious pause.

Conservatives don't equate being anti-choice with anti-privacy. Abortion is not a privacy issue to them.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 11:06 AM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


That Ralph Stanley clip had me shaking with joy.
posted by notsnot at 11:08 AM on October 2, 2008


Alvy Ampersand: So I shouldn't be wrapping my fish in Lou Dobbs?

Bookhouse: Buy him a drink first.

DO NOT WANT.
posted by LMGM at 11:08 AM on October 2, 2008


Conservatives don't equate being anti-choice with anti-privacy. Abortion is not a privacy issue to them.

Not for rank-and-file conservatives in the pew, no. But if you argue the legal merits of Roe with a conservative, you'll get an argument that the Court read a right into the Constitution that doesn't exist there naturally, in order to get the result that they wanted. Your more thoughtful pro-life conservatives are going to be bothered by this.
posted by EarBucket at 11:19 AM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


That Ralph Stanley clip had me shaking with joy.

I think it's a remarkably good move by the Obama campaign. Stanley's well-respected by an awful lot of people in SW Virginia and western North Carolina, which is an area Obama's had some trouble with. If the ad (listen here) moves even a small percentage of older white Appalachian voters to give Obama another look, the impact could be significant.
posted by EarBucket at 11:23 AM on October 2, 2008


Palin Bingo.
posted by contessa at 11:25 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain pulling out of Michigan!
posted by EarBucket at 11:27 AM on October 2, 2008


EarBucket: Holy shit. That is big, big, BIG news.
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:29 AM on October 2, 2008


Yeah. McCain's offensive line is folding. Without Michigan, his options are very limited. The polling's also narrowing sharply in Georgia in the past few days. Not that I think Obama's terribly likely to win there, but McCain's got to make that call now--does he ignore it and hope Obama doesn't close any further, or put resources in that have to come out of his defenses in Ohio and Florida?
posted by EarBucket at 11:34 AM on October 2, 2008


Wait, and wasn't it in Michigan that the GOP was planning on challenging voters whose names appear on the foreclosure lists? So... they're just going to desert their state party faithful and hope like hell the odious foreclosure plan works? I mean, at this point, why even bother?

NB: Is it too much to hope that they really are giving up on the foreclosure thing? I mean, if you're going to go through the trouble of filing a defamation lawsuit, I can't imagine that you could then turn around and do exactly what you're decrying:

A Macomb County GOP official has filed a defamation suit against The Michigan Messenger, saying he never told a reporter for the Web site that Republicans were planning to challenge homeowners on foreclosure lists to keep them from voting.

The Web site quotes Macomb County Republican Party Chairman James Carabelli in a Sept. 10 article as saying that "we will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren't voting from those addresses."

Carabelli says again in the suit that he never made the comment and asks for monetary damages and attorney fees.

Jefferson Morley of the Messenger's Washington-based parent organization, The Center for Independent Media, has said repeatedly that the center and The Michigan Messenger stand by the story.

posted by shiu mai baby at 11:42 AM on October 2, 2008


Holy cow, and I thought I loved Ralph Stanley before!
posted by scody at 11:47 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I mean, if you're going to go through the trouble of filing a defamation lawsuit, I can't imagine that you could then turn around and do exactly what you're decrying

You're right, the Republicans could never get away with hypocrisy or dishonesty.
posted by lostburner at 11:48 AM on October 2, 2008


McCain will go off TV in Michigan, stop dropping mail there and send most of his staff to more competitive states, including Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida.

Obama's lead in Wisconsin is only slightly smaller than his lead in Michigan, so I'm not sure how much sense that move makes. Florida and Ohio are both very close; Pollster shows Obama with a slight lead in both states. McCain must win both Florida and Ohio to win the election; Obama can win without either one of them.
posted by kirkaracha at 11:51 AM on October 2, 2008


I'm torn. I don't know if I want Obama to pull too far ahead, because it will leave McCain in a more desperate position, and we've seen how crazy he'll get already; or if I want Obama to keep pulling ahead to overcome the potential effects of whatever crazy shit they're already planning to do...
posted by troybob at 11:52 AM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Seriously, how does one shoot a metaphorical foundation...with a gun.

If the foundation is "turtles all the way down" then a gun would, indeed, be quite effective.
posted by Rumple at 11:53 AM on October 2, 2008


She's so smart not to fall for the liberal media's gotcha journalism!

I am so sick of hearing the Republican excuse for Palin's inane babbling as being the result of "gotcha journalism." Current Google News count for "gotcha journalism" is 753 -- and climbing.
posted by ericb at 11:54 AM on October 2, 2008


McCain pulling out of Michigan!

I wonder if he told the campaign workers there that their jobs weren't coming back?
posted by Pollomacho at 11:55 AM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Lostburner, I don't deny that the Republicans -- especially those who would challenge the Scary Black Voters -- aren't above pulling any hypocritical or dishonest trick to get things to break their way.

But to have a bone fide lawsuit filed, have it on actual court records that you object to someone saying you're going to use foreclosure records to deny a person the opportunity to vote, well, it seems to me that the last thing you could do is, you know, use foreclosure records to deny a person the opportunity to vote.

In other words, if that was the GOP plan, then why bother to file a lawsuit? Why not just deny and sidestep in the press, which would make executing your plan far less complicated?
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:58 AM on October 2, 2008


McCain pulling out of Michigan!
Its the catholic thing to do. (lame joke is really just a place holder)
posted by Sailormom at 12:04 PM on October 2, 2008


Anybody can file a lawsuit and then quietly dismiss it. Actually filing makes it newsworthy. It's like those tired new stories OMG A man sued the police for not returning his weed after they arrested him? Just means his court appointed lawyer likes to get in the newspaper.

Look, dirty tricks to block votes are already started (fake pro-Obama calls saying "Vote on Nov. 11th!" reported today in Oregon; stupid since we vote by mail.)

The best prevention: Get everyone you know to vote early, NOW, wherever it is legal. NOW.
posted by msalt at 12:06 PM on October 2, 2008


I'm torn. I don't know if I want Obama to pull too far ahead, because it will leave McCain in a more desperate position, and we've seen how crazy he'll get already; or if I want Obama to keep pulling ahead to overcome the potential effects of whatever crazy shit they're already planning to do...

There's that unsubstantiated Michelle Obama videotape that Rove is rumored to have his claws on to until just before election day. I wouldn't be surprised to see desperate conservatives do desperate things a few days beforehand. Building as much of a lead as possible would be a good insurance policy.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:07 PM on October 2, 2008


That Ralph Stanley clip is AWESOME


I would also like to remind any Bay Area MeFites that you can SEE Ralph Stanley (and many many other big names) for free this weekend at Golden Gate Park for this years HARDLY STRICTLY BLUEGRASS FESTIVAL!

http://www.strictlybluegrass.com/



/no, you get your own blog. ;)
posted by Senor Cardgage at 12:11 PM on October 2, 2008


I want Obama to keep pulling ahead to overcome the potential effects of whatever crazy shit they're already planning to do...

Military incursions into Northern Pakistan are on the rise. You do the math. (or, if mat is not your strong suit, NPR has done it for you)
posted by Pollomacho at 12:19 PM on October 2, 2008


McCain pulling out of Michigan!

. . . AND STAY OUT!

Now, who's got a firehose so we can give this place a good thorough rinsedown? But seriously, I do hope this doesn't cause my fellow Michiganders to get complacent and stop the canvassing and getting-out-the-vote efforts. I'll be digging in even harder -- especially since people know you're not kidding when you'll come out in the cold, cold rain.
posted by FelliniBlank at 12:22 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Joe Biden learns how to not make girls cry. I cracked up about six times reading this ...
posted by WCityMike at 12:33 PM on October 2, 2008 [18 favorites]


Get out of my secret Christmas place Sarah Palin!
posted by contessa at 12:42 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


It appears that NBC has forced YouTube to take down the Obama campaign's eerie "Bad News" ad, which portrays a hypothetical McCain win through a mock clip of MSNBC's election day coverage.

You can still see it in all its parallel universe creepiness at Liveleak, though.
posted by Rhaomi at 12:42 PM on October 2, 2008


Thanks for that link, WCityMike, that was great.
posted by RussHy at 12:43 PM on October 2, 2008


The picture of Biden in that 23/6 article brings to mind Jeff Dunham's scowling old man ventriloquist dummy Walter.

Walter for President.
posted by ericb at 12:43 PM on October 2, 2008


> a hypothetical McCain win

That ad was so weird...
posted by dhruva at 12:46 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Susie Bright: Why Sarah’s Sex Life Matters
posted by homunculus at 12:52 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Where: Somewhere in Pakistan high in the Hindu Kush. Deep in a cave.

When: 6.5 minutes after Plain/Biden Debate.

BIN LADEN: (Talking on phone in front of TV)
Hey, hey, hey! Yeah. It's me. YEAH. I just watched it. The boys and me in the cave here were in stitches. STITCHES! YEAH! Oh my Allah, praise be to him, that was so fucking awesome. That Palin chick thought Damascus was a WWF wrestler! Oh. Allah. So many good quotes in there. Yeah...what? Oh. No. Don't worry. I'm sure cell phones are totally safe at this point. That's why I'm calling. Look. Put me on speaker. PUT ME ON SPEAKER! (Tucks phone under chin) (Aside) He's putting me on speaker... so get ready... (back on phone) HEY! We on speaker? Great. (Aside to giggling cadre of AQ fighters) 1... 2... 3...

Everybody yells into phone:
...MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, BITCHES!!!! (cave erupts in laughter)

BIN LADEN:
...shhhh... shhhh.... (back into phone) Okay. Okay. But seriously. Take me off speaker. Okay. So, tell the boys to pack her up and head home. Yes. I'm serious. The Evil Satan is Cooked, Sliced, and Served, bro! We won this motherfucker, praise be to his name. Yeah. 'President Palin' Woooh-hoo! No shit. Right on schedule. So tell the boys it's back to booze, porn, and bitches. Oh. And tell them they can shave their bears if they want. Nice work everybody.
posted by tkchrist at 12:54 PM on October 2, 2008 [17 favorites]


ericb: "The picture of Biden in that 23/6 article brings to mind Jeff Dunham's scowling old man ventriloquist dummy Walter."

You're not the first to notice. ;-)
posted by WCityMike at 12:55 PM on October 2, 2008


And tell them they can shave their bears if they want.

I know that was a typo, but it's an interesting one none the less!
posted by Pollomacho at 1:00 PM on October 2, 2008



I know that was a typo, but it's an interesting one none the less!


Was it, Pollomacho? Was it.
posted by tkchrist at 1:14 PM on October 2, 2008


Jon Stewart's opening monologue was pretty good.
posted by RussHy at 1:15 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I know that was a typo, but it's an interesting one none the less!

Was it, Pollomacho? Was it.


It certainly gave me paws.
posted by troybob at 1:21 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


McCain Camp's Pre-Debate Spin: Palin Doesn't Need To Pass IQ Test
Listening to surrogates and aides to John McCain on Thursday, one is left with the impression that there is no great need for Gov. Sarah Palin to actually answer questions during tonight's vice presidential debate.

Indeed, the spin coming from McCain surrogates and strategists is that all Palin has to do is pass a sort of artificial personality test, in which she strikes an emotional thread with the average voter -- question, answers, or intellectual capacity be damned.

Such were the talking points mere hours before the debate in St. Louis, which peaked with Sen. Joe Lieberman - a man not unaccustomed to the pressures of such a forum - actually proclaiming that Palin's relative ignorance helped her relate to ‘regular people.’

‘She's not lived in the world of Washington, so she doesn't know every detail of all the questions senators deal with,’ Lieberman told NBC's Andrea Mitchell. ‘But, frankly, that's her strength. I think that's why a lot of regular people out across America think she's going to be their voice.’

Mitchell interjected, ‘Senator, she wants to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. You know, that doesn't mean just being an average mom, it means bringing other skills.’

But Lieberman stayed on the point, stating later, ‘I think tonight is not a kind of final college exam. I think the point is who is she as a person... Whether she can answer every detailed question, I don't think that ultimately matters to the American people so long as they think she passes those other personal thresholds.’”

posted by ericb at 1:41 PM on October 2, 2008


You're not the first to notice. ;-)

Heh!
posted by ericb at 1:42 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh, this should be hilarious: Palin’s new plan: Go after Biden
Sarah Palin plans to go on the attack in tonight’s debate, hitting Joe Biden for what she will call his foreign policy blunders and penchant for adopting liberal positions on taxes and other issues, according to campaign officials involved in prepping her for tonight’s showdown.

The Palin camp is projecting surprising self-confidence in the pre-debate hours, despite the vice presidential nominee’s uneven — and, at some points, peculiar — performances in recent television interviews, the officials say. Top advisers to John McCain privately say Palin’s recent CBS interview was a borderline disaster, especially since it played out in several segments over several days. Tonight will be different, they say.

“This is going to finally put her back into a position where we see her like we saw her the first couple weeks,” a McCain official said. “She was herself. She was authentic, and people related to that. ... Tonight, she’ll get into a rhythm. You’re going to see her in a way that you haven’t seen her yet.”

By contrast, Biden plans what an aide calls "a just-the-facts, prosecutorial approach laying out the case against McCain and defending Obama." The aide said Biden will be "keeping the eye on the target, which is McCain."
Biden's got the right idea, and so does the Palin camp. Keep building up those expectations, guys. Next they'll tell us she's been up all night watching Thumbsucker and has a PowerPoint presentation ready.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 1:42 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Does Rove have pictures of Lieberman with a 14-year-old boy, or what?
posted by troybob at 1:43 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Whether she can answer every detailed question, I don't think that ultimately matters to the American people so long as they think she passes those other personal thresholds.

That instills me with so much confidence that should McCain not complete everything on his 'Bucket List' she'd be in charge of our military, guide us through dicey world affairs and an incredibly complex economic debacle, etc.
posted by ericb at 1:45 PM on October 2, 2008


adopting liberal positions
Oh how dare he! The scoundrel!

put her back into a position
You’re going to see her in a way that you haven’t seen her yet.”

Wait. Are we talking about a debate or a yoga class?
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 2:16 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


tkchrist writes "Can Obama win? Maybe. But only if liberals can drop this useless facade of thinking intelligent people decide Presidential elections in the US. Because clearly they do not."

How would the liberals do this, then? What dumb people should liberals start appealing to, and how? Should they try to go for a Southern Strategy, or perhaps court the fundamentalists by creating an anti-abortion plank? Who among liberals is appealing to dumb people right now? Is that the Michael Moore faction, or what?

Not trying to be snide, but I'm not sure how to accomplish what you're talking about without compromising principles. OTOH, get out the vote drives, community organizing, that sort of thing still works, and this is the first time it's been done on this scale.

Go ahead and believe that Obama will lose based on the dumb vote, but I know even dumb people tend to vote based on the money in their pocket, and even dumb people sometimes figure out that the people in power probably contributed to that. The Democratic Party in the past was able to get the middle-lower information vote through the labor movement, which isn't dumb, per se, but does focus on class issues, income, "kitchen table" economics, that sort of thing. The Republicans have been able to win through waging a culture war for some time, but culture is not static, and this tactic won't work forever. Maybe they'll find another Southern Strategy, but the Democrats don't have to, and if they do, well, forget about my support ever again.
posted by krinklyfig at 2:19 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


krinklyfig the dem's don't need to adopt their own dummies... thought they do with single issue voters on the left, by race bating etc. No. What then need to do is dishearten the OTHER guys dummies.
posted by tkchrist at 2:32 PM on October 2, 2008


I know even dumb people tend to vote based on the money in their pocket, and even dumb people sometimes figure out that the people in power probably contributed to that. The Democratic Party in the past was able to get the middle-lower information vote through the labor movement, which isn't dumb, per se, but does focus on class issues, income, "kitchen table" economics, that sort of thing. The Republicans have been able to win through waging a culture war for some time, but culture is not static, and this tactic won't work forever.

This is quite true. Americans have demonstrated the uncanny knack for overlooking just about everything else if their back accounts come into play. I have to say I also find the whole "holy crap we have to pander to idiots" argument a little tiresome, too. What does this even mean? Racism? Pushing terrorist fear buttons? No thanks. Obama has demonstrated that it's possible to convey progressive ideas in simple language (something neither Kerry or Gore were able to do, even though their "defeats" were by hair bredths) and with charisma. Simple talking and charm - there, there's your appeal to the "dumb" vote, the undecideds and the independents. Beyond adopting actual neo-con platforms, there's not a whole lot else we can do ... apart from motivating our own base, staying on message, and letting McCain fall on their faces over and over.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 2:34 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


bank accounts
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 2:35 PM on October 2, 2008


I am soliciting genuine drinking game suggestions. I have only played a political drinking game once in my life, and it was before the 2003 State of the Union address. A friend of mine and I were stuck in a hotel room in southern Brazil at a conference, and begged off for the night so we could watch the speech. We ordered up a nice bottle of Argentine wine (I don't remember if it was a cabernet or a merlot, probably merlot), and resolved to drink every time the president got both sides of the floor to stand and applaud. We were drunk and the bottle was gone before he even got to the axis of evil part of the evening. I don't want to get that drunk, I want to be able to follow the speech coherently. That said, I think we could spice things up if we have a good, cogent and easy to follow set of drinking rules. Rules that would not leave us heaving for having drunk too much, too quickly. Rather, rules that require us to pay close attention, and sip in moderation, so that we are pleasantly buzzed, not munted, by the end of (what I hope to be) the spectacle.
Barring all that. This post serves as my own place holder in this second thread of all threads.
posted by msali at 2:37 PM on October 2, 2008


Does Rove have pictures of Lieberman with a 14-year-old boy, or what?

Remember, Lieberman was gunning for the VP slot throughout the race. Were it not for Sarah Palin, Joe Lieberman could very well have been debating Biden tonight. Unfortunately, McCain didn't want to deal with the threat of a floor fight at the RNC over the selection of Lieberman, so the "Maverick" went with Mrs. Joe Six Pack.
posted by Dr. Zira at 2:40 PM on October 2, 2008


"I think the point is who is she as a person... Whether she can answer every detailed question, I don't think that ultimately matters to the American people so long as they think she passes those other personal thresholds."

Shorter Lieberman: "Well, yes, of course she's not very bright; but we don't think most Americans are very bright, either."
posted by scody at 2:47 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Dr. Ralph endorsed Obama a few weeks ago. His ad rocks!

Hello Virginia.
posted by fourcheesemac at 2:57 PM on October 2, 2008


I can't watch the debate (Canadian without any American TV access) but I'll be keeping up on this thread; I hope there'll be a fair bit of live commenting going on.
posted by Shepherd at 3:08 PM on October 2, 2008


Lesser Shrew: What does your friend say about the fact that Sarah Palin seems so willing to lie out loud, repeatedly - about thing that are easily shown to be false?

Well, it appears that true information actually seems to reinforce misinformation for a certain segment of society. Pointing out her lies to this gentleman tends to make him believe her all the more.

Mayor West: She's a country mile away from that, too--even with the bar at mid-ankle level, it's still apparently not low enough. Palin on Hamas.

Yeah, I've linked that to this dude. His position is that what she says isn't what she means, so what she is saying is not actually relevant to the discussion.
posted by Joey Michaels at 3:12 PM on October 2, 2008


Shepherd, the debate is streaming live on the BBC website.
posted by Pallas Athena at 3:26 PM on October 2, 2008


Yeah, I've linked that to this dude. His position is that what she says isn't what she means, so what she is saying is not actually relevant to the discussion.

This isn't the first time I hear this. Why are all these telepathic people voting Republican? We could use them. Especially in diplomatic relations - you could sit one of these Republican telepaths next to a UN rep, who would lean over occasionally and say things like, "Uh, Algeria said they understand you're concerns, but really, he wasn't listening - he's weighing the pros and cons between thin crust and deep dish."
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 3:28 PM on October 2, 2008


VA General Assembly names Dr. Ralph Stanley "Outstanding Virginian 2008".
posted by ormondsacker at 3:29 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Skepticism of Palin Growing, Poll Finds:
...public assessments of Sarah Palin's readiness have plummeted, and she may now be a drag on the Republican ticket among key voter groups, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
...
Six in 10 voters see her as lacking the experience to be an effective president, and a third are now less likely to vote for McCain because of her.
...
In early September, independents offered a divided verdict on Palin's experience; now they take the negative view by about 2 to 1. Nearly two-thirds of both independent men and women in the new poll said Palin has insufficient experience to run the White House.

posted by kirkaracha at 3:31 PM on October 2, 2008


Republicans used to be masters at sending out multi-tier multi-level messages. By which I mean they could tell the mouth-breathers that Saddam was behind 9/11 and then wink to the George Wills of the party like "We know you know this is bullshit... but you got oil futures, right?"

The problem is the neo-con agenda was hard to sell to both the base and the establishment money conservatives AND have competent people managing both messages.

In order to get elected the GOP had to make so many deals to edge ahead of that 50/50 electoral split that they threw one too many bones to the far right Christians and mouth breathers that we ended up Liberty U morons in charge of the Justice department.

So i order to get an agenda accomplished (which they failed at, BTW) they had to go overboard with the cronyism. And you end up with Brownie at FEMA.

All this and the constant lies pissed of the 'elite" establishment conservatives that understood how to do things... and they all quit or put up roadblocks. Before the GOP knew it they had all these incompetent true believers running things and a clueless a base convinced everything was going hunky dory.

All this has created this distillation of an ever increasing reliance on the stupidest least informed parts of the GOP to get elected. Which makes governing harder and harder. Leading to and more winks and nods and harder to find money deals to the old school Conservatives, a group that the base no longer identifies with becuase the base now believes GOP propaganda about "elites."

So yeah. Of course there has to be a reckoning. But it may not happen yet. That's what I'm trying to warn you all about. Because the Democrats are still giving the GOP base way too much credit for brains. They can talk to us like we're smart but we have to NOT be put off by treating the plebes like they are dumb. It's not condesending. It's reality.

It's crucial we accept that the Democrats will have to do that multi-level messaging thing, too. The best course of action would be to not attempt to convert the GOP mouth breather base but to alienate them from the GOP and get as many of them as possible to not vote. And that takes some nasty, nasty shit.
posted by tkchrist at 3:33 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


tkchrist writes "krinklyfig the dem's don't need to adopt their own dummies... thought they do with single issue voters on the left, by race bating etc. No. What then need to do is dishearten the OTHER guys dummies."

OK, assuming you're correct, again, I'm just trying to figure out what that means. How would you go about doing that this election cycle, for instance?
posted by krinklyfig at 3:34 PM on October 2, 2008


Where can I find an on-demand stream of the debate which will be up quickly (as opposed to live)? I can't watch it until I get home at about eight.
posted by lostburner at 3:45 PM on October 2, 2008


I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.
Yeah. You can't say the Washington Post or the New York Times; those are elitist liberal papers. But, geez, what about the Wall Street Journal? Surely that would be a safe answer.
Well... she probably knows that the NYT is viewed by her fellow crazies as communist propaganda. And maybe WaPo too.

But I have serious doubts that she knows that the Wall Street Journal is not viewed that way.

It's a big media paper, ain't it? Ergo, liberal.

Which, by the way, reminds me that Couric used the word "ergo" in one of her questions to Palin. My immediate reaction, without having thought about it or anything, was "I wonder if Palin knows what that means."

This whole situation would be laughable if it weren't dangerous.
posted by Flunkie at 4:08 PM on October 2, 2008


Yeah, well, someone should ask her about her medical records, eh?
posted by bitter-girl.com at 4:36 PM on October 2, 2008


I know there are a bunch of Asheville MeFites. Obama will be doing his next debate prep in Asheville. He's also doing a rally on Sunday, just announced.

Change We Need Rally with Barack Obama
Asheville High School
Memorial Stadium
419 McDowell St.
Asheville, NC
Sunday, October 5th
Gates Open: 12:00 p.m.
Program Begins: 2:00 p.m.

posted by fourcheesemac at 4:39 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


How would you go about doing that this election cycle, for instance?

Again it's not so much what democratic strategists need to do specifically, becuase they are doing what I'm saying, but how we liberal individual voters respond to what they do. WE need to remember who we are dealing with and not let politics distract us from the larger goal.

The right wing, for instance, doesn't completely fall apart when McCain apparatchiks use dirty tactics or purely partisan politics to manipulate a segment of the electorate. Where as, and I use MeFi threads as a barometer here, I have heard numerous times of how people will vote independent or for Nader if Obama does X.
posted by tkchrist at 4:43 PM on October 2, 2008


How would you go about doing that this election cycle, for instance?


Make sure they hear stuff like this - that Palin picked liberal dem Ferraro as her favorite veep. That's the kind of thing that could keep one-time Palin fans home on election day.
posted by poxuppit at 4:45 PM on October 2, 2008


Skepticism of Palin Growing, Poll Finds

Skeptical of Palin growing as well, I am.
posted by roombythelake at 4:47 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Fear not Nader. Nearly every single poll that has included Barr and Nader has shown that *both* draw votes from McCain. It's been one of the quiet stories of this year, but it's quite an impressive body of data.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:49 PM on October 2, 2008


My pre-debate predictions (not to terribly hard to call, given what we already know):

1 - Sarah Palin will attempt to play the victim in very sly ways that will enliven her already-enamored base by alleging that her so-far cruel treatment by the "librul media" (er, actually, pretty fair and expected treatment, given the office she's going for and how carefully her own campaign is controlling all but the most benign information about her and her record) and disrespect by Democratic Washington (even though they've hardly said a peep about her, other than the glaringly obvious) -- and this criticism will "prove," beyond a shadow of a doubt, that people are running scared in the face of a maverick reformer such as Sarah "The Pen" Palin -- WHICH IS WHY SHE McCAIN WILL WIN!

2 - Sarah Palin will work the "mom" card harder than she ever has before, despite the fact that her firstborn is by many accounts an Oxy abuser who had to join the military to stay out of trouble at home; her eldest daughter is knocked up by, and soon to be shotgun-married to, a guy who would be a top contender for the "Dude-I-have-nightmares-about-impregnating-my-teenaged-daughter" awards among 99% of responsible parents; and her youngest at a mere 6 months is a special needs kid who -- no matter where you lay on the feminism spectrum -- you have to wonder, is she really going to be all the parent he needs her to be during his developmental years, if she has a high pressure job like the one she claims she's qualified to do? Does she even really care at this point? Among her already-convinced base of supporters, having 5 kids = Sarah Palin is the supermom we all aspire to be! Among anybody who has more than two brain cells to rub together, all five kids means is that she and Todd still get it on regularly and she has healthy ovaries and enough kids to use as political playing cards.

3 - Sarah Palin will talk about Oil. A lot. And drilling. A lot. And how foreign oil = terrorism = another 9/11!!!one!! Being that it is perhaps the one topic that she knows more about than the standard McCain index-card cram-night talking points, I expect her to go on about this extensively, even when it's not even germane to the questions she's being asked.

4 - Dollars to donuts, all of Sarah Palin's barbs will be directed at Barack Obama, not Joe Biden. The McCain campagin has successfully convinced themselves that Sarah is running against Barack, and their followers have fallen right into line on that one. Joe Biden need only make gentle reminders to her about who is at the top of her party's ticket and knock that shit right back down where it belongs.

Godspeed, Ole Joe. Do us Proud.
posted by brain cloud at 4:52 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


TPMtv, John McCain: "Life isn't fair"

My favorite moment: [6:02] ... cockamamey
posted by clearly at 4:55 PM on October 2, 2008


Where as, and I use MeFi threads as a barometer here, I have heard numerous times of how people will vote independent or for Nader if Obama does X.

I think this may be your mistake. The folks in Mefi's political threads are a self-selected group of folks who tend to tilt in a fairly specific direction, even among liberals/progressives. If declarations of intent in Mefi threads translated into mass activity in real life, half of the U.S. would have moved to Canada by now.

And yeah, Nader's position in this race -- both by virtue of how he's actively running his campaign, and how it's being received -- is quite different than it was in 2000.
posted by scody at 4:58 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


COURIC (to Biden): What do you think is the best and worst thing that Dick Cheney has done as Vice President?

PALIN: Worst thing I guess that would have been the duck hunting accident--where you know, that was an accident. And I think that was made into a caricature of him. And that was kind of unfortunate. So the best thing though, he's shown support, along with George W. Bush, of our troops. And I've been there when George Bush has spoken to families of those who have suffered greatly, those who are serving in the military. I've been there when President Bush has embraced those families and expressed the concern and the sympathy speaking for all of America in those times. And for Dick Cheney to have supported that effort of George Bush's, I respect that.

(BIDEN: I'm not being a wise guy here about I don't know what he's done. I mean, there's not many things I'd pick that I thought he's done that have been good. But I admire his strength. I admire his willingness to take positions that are completely contrary to popular opinion. But I think that what he's done has been just--I don't think Dick Cheney trusts that the American people can make judgments that are in the interest of the country. But I think the thing I think he's really really think he's done. I think he's done more harm than any other single elected official in memory in terms of shredding the constitution. You know --condoning torture. Pushing torture as a policy. This idea of a unitary executive. Meaning the Congress and the people have no power in a time of war. And the President controls everything//I don't have any animus toward Dick Cheney but I really do think his attitude about the constitution and the prosecution of this war has been absolutely wrong.)

posted by fourcheesemac at 5:05 PM on October 2, 2008


Remember, you can't spell "Nader" without "nad."
posted by Joey Michaels at 5:05 PM on October 2, 2008


Please someone ask Sarah Palin what she thinks of the "unitary executive" theory. Please?
posted by fourcheesemac at 5:06 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Here's to hoping tonight will be legendary.
posted by Bookhouse at 5:10 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin Imagines the Vice Presidential Debate

GI (serious): Governor Palin, Senator Biden, thank you for joining us this evening. Governor, the first question is to you: Many people are saying that blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Given that blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, what are your opinions on the matter of blah blah blah blah blah blah blah?

SP (bright and chipper): Well first Gwen, I just want to say how great it is that a nice lady like you could grow up to be on the teevee! And ya know all those big words too. That's just great! Good for you! It just goes to show ya, only in America, dontcha know!

GI (serious): Thank you governor. Senator Biden, do you have a response?

JB (grumpy and with a Droopy Dog voice): Sarah Palin, you're stooooooooooooo-pid.

SP (disappointed, but still bright, chipper, and strong): Aw. That's mean, Joe Biden. You're a meanie. Why are you a big meanie, Joe Biden?

JB (sad, Droopy Dog): Because nobody loves me.

SP (sympathetic, bright, and chipper): Aw. That's sad, Joe Biden. But cheer up, Joe Biden! It's not your fault that you're ugly!

JB (happy, but still Droopy Dog): You're right, Sarah Palin!

SP (bright and chipper): That's the spirit, Joe Biden!

JB (happy, pathetic, Droopy Dog): I love you, Sarah Palin!

SP (kind, bright, and chipper): Aw. That's cute, Joe Biden! But I'm just a teensy weensy little itty bit out of your league! You should ask that weird ugly girl who's always accidentally snorting her milk out her nose during lunch hour if she would go on a date with you! You guys would look just super cute together, Joe Biden!

JB (happy, Droopy Dog): Thank you, Sarah Palin! You're the greatest!

SP (bright and chipper): Yaaaaaaaaaaaaay!

GI (serious): And there you have it, America: Yay; yay indeed. No truer words have ever been spoken.
posted by Flunkie at 5:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [14 favorites]


the vice presidential nominee’s uneven — and, at some points, peculiar — performances in recent television interviews

That's an incredibly kind way to describe those television interviews.
posted by orange swan at 5:13 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Please someone ask Sarah Palin what she thinks of the "unitary executive" theory.

"Well, you know, gosh! I'm a mom, I've got five kids -- and oh my golly, a grandkid on the way, and we're just so excited about it, just like anyone who really loves their family and chooses life, and wants to change our energy policy with new ideas for the job transformation and, you know, the health care, and the trade not being so scary -- so I know all about being a urinary executive. There's diapers to change, potty training to be done, and you know, you betcha, it's a lotta work, but I think it's made me super-prepared for the major challenges that we'll face with John McCain as commander in chief!"
posted by scody at 5:17 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


So when does this thing start? 9 p.m. CT?
posted by jokeefe at 5:19 PM on October 2, 2008


OK, I've got CSpan's Debate Cam linked up. Right now there's just a bunch of milling about and crosstalk. It's kind of surreal actually - parts of sentences flow into each other ... "... saw you were in a wheelchair there ... she's got to nail this ... you know, and when you go on vacation ... you're just doing your job". Bill Burroughs could take dictation from this and have a novel.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:21 PM on October 2, 2008


8 pm Central
posted by jaronson at 5:21 PM on October 2, 2008


9:00 Eastern time, jokeefe, so in just under 40 minutes.
posted by orange swan at 5:21 PM on October 2, 2008


Thanks!
posted by jokeefe at 5:24 PM on October 2, 2008


I keep trying to stay out of these threads but I just can't help it.

This campaign has destroyed my ability to detect irony and I have no idea what to think anymore. Please help me, Metafilter. Is this:
Her fellow bartender, Crystal Porter, chimed in. “I know [Obama's] wife runs a liberalist camp for teenagers, and when he gets elected, he wants to make it mandatory for all teenagers to go there. I also heard as a hobby he makes flags, like home made flags, one for each race. He has one for black people and one for white people and one for Indians.”

As I headed east on a long stretch of Interstate 80 toward Utah, I kept imaging Mr. Obama, his head bent over a Butterick pattern for race-based flags, sewing in his spare time.

Road to November: Lamoille, Nev.
...somebody having a laugh at the expense of the big-city Eastern reporter who'll believe anything about rural Nevadans, or a serious expression of concern that Obama is a secret vexillographer?
posted by enn at 5:26 PM on October 2, 2008 [8 favorites]


Ok, this is a longshot, but are there any live streams out there with closed captioning? I'm sneaking watching this debate at the workplace and can't listen to it, darn it all.
posted by zardoz at 5:26 PM on October 2, 2008


Heads-up: we're liveblogging the VP debate here over on Politicalfilter.
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 5:28 PM on October 2, 2008


McCain now wishes ‘they hadn’t picked’ Gwen Ifill to moderate VP debate.
posted by homunculus at 5:30 PM on October 2, 2008


The Canadian leader's debate starts at the EXACT SAME TIME and I can't watch both. Aaaarrrgghh!!!!
posted by orange swan at 5:37 PM on October 2, 2008


Where can I watch the Canadian leader's debate online? Any chance it will be on youtube or something later on? I'll be stuck at work for a while...
posted by blithely at 5:42 PM on October 2, 2008


"...somebody having a laugh at the expense of the big-city Eastern reporter who'll believe anything about rural Nevadans, or a serious expression of concern that Obama is a secret vexillographer?"

Even growing up in rural Nevada, I honestly have no idea. My honors chemistry lab partner was from about 20 miles west of there, so I am taking it with a grain of salt. All I know is that Lamoille Canyon is beautiful

Also, Elko county voted 70% for W. in 2004.
posted by clearly at 5:42 PM on October 2, 2008


I hope this goes smoothly. I'm growing quite tired of people using the word 'gaffe.'
posted by polyhedron at 5:44 PM on October 2, 2008


"I also heard as a hobby he makes flags, like home made flags, one for each race. He has one for black people and one for white people and one for Indians."

Jesus Christ ... where do people get this shit from??
posted by brain cloud at 5:44 PM on October 2, 2008


enn, also read the previous article about Elko County for some more context.

Road to November: Canvassing for Obama in Elko, Nev.

...and remember that some of us Nevadans know how to use the internets and shit.
posted by clearly at 5:53 PM on October 2, 2008


Jesus Christ ... where do people get this shit from??

You didn't get your flag? I did. I display it proudly on a shrine featuring a photo of Michael Moore, a copy of Bullworth, and a votive candle in the likeness of Howard Zinn.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:55 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Also, I don't care what Ifill said; she was pushed. You totally know she's covering for someone.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:57 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh dear Christ, CNN's "Perception Analyzer"™ is now just vomiting itself all over the screen.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 5:57 PM on October 2, 2008


shameless self link: Several of us are liveblogging over at politicalfilter.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 5:58 PM on October 2, 2008


Fuck me, I actually have vicarious stage fright going.
posted by FelliniBlank at 5:59 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


place holder
posted by pearlybob at 6:02 PM on October 2, 2008


"Can I call you Joe?"

Done.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:03 PM on October 2, 2008


AH HA HA H A HA this is incredible already
posted by arcanecrowbar at 6:03 PM on October 2, 2008


I step away from the mic to cough.

/Chocolate Biden
posted by educatedslacker at 6:04 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


SOCCER MOM!
posted by FelliniBlank at 6:05 PM on October 2, 2008


Decent first response from Biden.

1 "betcha" so far from Palin.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:06 PM on October 2, 2008


Soccer moms [x]
posted by topynate at 6:06 PM on October 2, 2008


I assume others are also playing Palin BINGO
posted by MrBobaFett at 6:06 PM on October 2, 2008


He gets to respond. She's toast.
posted by educatedslacker at 6:07 PM on October 2, 2008


Yay Biden!
posted by liquorice at 6:08 PM on October 2, 2008


that was a nice memorized speech, there. now maybe gwen can ask some questions we didn't completely anticipate?
posted by almostmanda at 6:08 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh dear god.

Oh dear.
posted by jokeefe at 6:08 PM on October 2, 2008


Did she just WINK at the camera?
posted by liquorice at 6:08 PM on October 2, 2008


Did she just wink at me?
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:08 PM on October 2, 2008


"maverick"!
posted by jokeefe at 6:09 PM on October 2, 2008


Get down to gettin' business done!
posted by porn in the woods at 6:09 PM on October 2, 2008


*|o
posted by sciurus at 6:09 PM on October 2, 2008


Nice wink.
posted by Floydd at 6:10 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh dear, Joe is looking a little annoyed.

Also; Hockey Mom
posted by dejah420 at 6:10 PM on October 2, 2008


Can someone please kill me? This is like watching the guy who does sports debate the woman who does the recipe bit on the local morning show.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:10 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Hockey moms and Joe Six Pack.

I can't even watch this. Mother of god.
posted by jokeefe at 6:10 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wow, the CNN trendline just freaked out at "Joe Sixpack".
posted by Rhaomi at 6:11 PM on October 2, 2008


I would like to join this team of Mavericks.
posted by clearly at 6:11 PM on October 2, 2008


AH AH AH MY GOD
Financial crisis?
"Don't live outside of our means! We can learn a heckuva lesson!"
posted by arcanecrowbar at 6:11 PM on October 2, 2008


What's with Biden's eyebrows?
posted by Floydd at 6:11 PM on October 2, 2008


Ten minutes in, and my mind is blown already.

I bet "Joe Sixpack" is eating this stuff up, though.
posted by greenie2600 at 6:11 PM on October 2, 2008


interesting-- she's demanding "strict oversight" of (I think) the mortgage market by the federal government (whom she also just accused of failing the economy). Wonder how that'll sit with free-market conservatives?
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:12 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden has too many facts and citations.
posted by smackfu at 6:12 PM on October 2, 2008


Rhaomi, freaked out for good or ill? I'm watching through the NYT site...
posted by jokeefe at 6:12 PM on October 2, 2008


If she says "Darn right" one more time, I'm going to develop an embolism.
posted by FelliniBlank at 6:13 PM on October 2, 2008


So far (a few questions in), I think she's pulling it off. Where she's talking about what can be done, and the opportunities presented... Biden just talks about things McCain said or did about things in the past. She's talking forward, Biden is talking backward. If she keeps this up she'll do well.

I'm surprised to say that, and thinking I may have to look for my train wreck elsewhere.
posted by datter at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Go Joe!
posted by dejah420 at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008


For crazy. It jagged diagonally down under itself, like a "Z". She must be a maverick!
posted by Rhaomi at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008


94 times.
posted by Floydd at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008


The Governor did not answer the question!
posted by topynate at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008


Shoot me.
posted by dirtdirt at 6:14 PM on October 2, 2008


MY BRAIN IS MELTING

Please don't let this woman become vice president.
posted by greenie2600 at 6:15 PM on October 2, 2008


"....let's talk about taxes." Yay Gwen!
posted by Floydd at 6:16 PM on October 2, 2008


Joe needs to look lovingly into the camera.
posted by birdherder at 6:16 PM on October 2, 2008


Gawd! Her bangs are in her eyes!
posted by Floydd at 6:18 PM on October 2, 2008


I can't get on to mydebates.org - does someone have a link to another stream which isn't CNN and doesn't need additional plugins?
posted by jb at 6:18 PM on October 2, 2008


She's yet to mention taxing employer health benefits, which was the question.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:18 PM on October 2, 2008


THIS FUCKING HURTS. FUCKING. HURTS.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:18 PM on October 2, 2008


What exactly constitutes this middle class she's supposed to be a part of, last I heard she and her hubby are worth 1.2 million... I must be lower, lower class when all this time I thought I was just lower class.
posted by datter at 6:19 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


They could have coached an eighth grader for two weeks and gotten the same results. She seems so disconnected from what she's saying. She looks absolutely terrified.
posted by arcanecrowbar at 6:19 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden needs more coherence, fewer teeth-flashes.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:20 PM on October 2, 2008


myspace has a stream that doesn't seem to require a plugin
posted by flaterik at 6:20 PM on October 2, 2008


Eye roll. Government jab. Was the question about health insurance or what? I'm lost here.
posted by Floydd at 6:20 PM on October 2, 2008


Does it count if Joe says "Bridge to Nowhere"?
posted by MrBobaFett at 6:21 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden nicely exploiting the debate structure to get a zinger in there.
posted by topynate at 6:21 PM on October 2, 2008


huh, on the CNN trendline, women spike for Biden and men spike for Palin.
posted by stavrogin at 6:22 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden is good. I cannot believe Palin just said not to nationalize health care if you don't like how things have been run the past eight years.

MSNBC didn't require me to download something unique.
posted by salvia at 6:22 PM on October 2, 2008


I have really tried to avoid mocking Palin for her accent and folksy talk, but it's positively cringe-inducing. This woman's rhetoric causes diabetes.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:22 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


er, sorry, I didn't realize mydebates.org just redirected to myspace
posted by flaterik at 6:23 PM on October 2, 2008


Does Biden have the most boring speaking voice ever? Even when he emphasizes things it's still the same level but just slower.
posted by smackfu at 6:23 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh, man. Biden may have good information to convey, but verbally he's flailing. Palin is, so far, looking far more telegenic. It revolts me, but I'm not the target demographic.

On the other hand, she did just wink again.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008


I thought her area of expertise was
pumpin' out retarded-named children
posted by notsnot at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Her expertise is energy? Really? They teach that in sports broadcasting school, do they?
posted by dejah420 at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


It's the Kobyashi Maru scenario all over again. Palin can't win by playing the game as written so she's changing the rules. No "debate" for her, just a bunch of 30-second opportunities for sound bites.

Listen, I ask you, what fucking good is a moderator if he/she doesn't have a shock buzzer to keep the candidates in line?

Frankly, that the republican candidates don't want to play by the given rules for a simple debate should be a fucking huge clue that they're not going to play by the rules when given the golden key to the country on a velvet pillow.

Kisses and goodnight.
posted by seanmpuckett at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Wow, that was bad.
posted by sciurus at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008


I have really tried to avoid mocking Palin for her accent and folksy talk, but it's positively cringe-inducing.

Agreed. She sounds like an offensive parody of everybody she's attempting to rope in (many people even in central Michigan and northward have a similar accent), and I just hope they can hear it.
posted by FelliniBlank at 6:25 PM on October 2, 2008


These debates always feel like watching a couple of grade school kids stuck in the principles office and trying to get each other in trouble.

"Well he..."
"Yeah but she..."
"Oh yeah well your friends..."
"NO it was YOUR friends..."

I'd love it if the moderator broke out a switch.
posted by datter at 6:26 PM on October 2, 2008


I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees how differently she speaks when she strays from the cards right?
posted by JakeEXTREME at 6:26 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


She's all about the "rearing heads."
posted by Floydd at 6:27 PM on October 2, 2008


Watching this debate is just depressing.
posted by lullaby at 6:27 PM on October 2, 2008


Palin is performing very well, at the same level she did during her convention speech. The base will eat this up, and I suspect a lot of people who are still undecided will be impressed. I think this is going to give the McCain campaign a big boost.
posted by homunculus at 6:28 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Uh, oh, I think she's starting to lose it.
posted by jaronson at 6:28 PM on October 2, 2008


It is the mess on Main Street that is fucking up Wall Street?
posted by birdherder at 6:28 PM on October 2, 2008


I switched over to CNN to watch the dial group lines - it's hilarious: they always go flat when she is talking because no one can figure out what she's saying.
posted by poxuppit at 6:28 PM on October 2, 2008


Datter, I agree. Debating...that's a paddlin'. Debating in a monotone...that's a paddlin'. Debating with zero clue and only your cue cards to hold you up....oh...you better believe that's a paddlin!
posted by dejah420 at 6:28 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is "rears its/his head" on the bingo card?
posted by Morrigan at 6:29 PM on October 2, 2008


According to CNN's magic line thingy, apparently women like it whenever someone is talking on camera and all the men are asleep.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:29 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Energy? WTF is she on about? Total non-sequitur.
posted by Rhaomi at 6:30 PM on October 2, 2008


WILL SHE EVER ANSWER A FUCKING QUESTION?

Stay tuned to find out....
posted by educatedslacker at 6:30 PM on October 2, 2008


Energy energy energy.

I get abortion energy.

Energy.

The question is about health care? I want to talk about energy.
posted by Eekacat at 6:30 PM on October 2, 2008


Every single goddamn question, Palin says "I wanna talk about..." and talks about something totally fucking unrelated to the question.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:30 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is that so, Governor Palin?
That's not so. (Talks about something else entirely).

Gah!
posted by topynate at 6:30 PM on October 2, 2008


Okay, so where's the CNN stream that has the trend lines? Or is that just on the cable-TV version?
posted by greenie2600 at 6:31 PM on October 2, 2008


Wait how is Palin performing well? She comes off as talking without saying anything relevant. Random talking points. Joe sounds far more reliable and factual.
posted by MrBobaFett at 6:31 PM on October 2, 2008


Is her voice shaking??
posted by lullaby at 6:31 PM on October 2, 2008


Heck. Heckuva. Heck Heck Heck. Heckuva. Heck.
posted by Serial Killer Slumber Party at 6:32 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Probably just TV, bottom of screen.
posted by datter at 6:32 PM on October 2, 2008


She just talks and talks until she thinks of something to say.
posted by Floydd at 6:32 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh man, she's in full-on Couric mode with this climate-change question.

Tina Fey has material for at least another year.
posted by greenie2600 at 6:32 PM on October 2, 2008


It seems like the trendline for independents always likes it when Palin speaks.
posted by sciurus at 6:33 PM on October 2, 2008


She's very nervous, but she's sticking to the script so far. I still have hope for some sort of deviation.
posted by topynate at 6:33 PM on October 2, 2008


The trendline is available on the stream, it's the box called "Voters rate debate performances"
posted by DiscourseMarker at 6:33 PM on October 2, 2008


Interesting how much she stumbled on this question. (Is climate change caused by humans?) I do hope they have more questions that rattle her like that.
posted by salvia at 6:33 PM on October 2, 2008


OK, Biden seems to be doing better on the energy question: greater clarity, simpler sentence structure.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:34 PM on October 2, 2008


Her answers are nonsensical and irrelevant, but I think we all agree she's crushing Biden, right? The pundits are going to call it a massive home run.
posted by The Bellman at 6:34 PM on October 2, 2008


I am not sure if I can last through this whole thing.
posted by lumensimus at 6:34 PM on October 2, 2008


Am I crazy or did she just call him Senator O'Biden?
posted by datter at 6:35 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Thanks, DiscourseMarker!
posted by greenie2600 at 6:35 PM on October 2, 2008


She said nucular! I'm back on board!
posted by lumensimus at 6:35 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I'm not one to attribute all the changes in the planet to mankind...drill drill drill...domestic solution to the energy problem...it is safe to drill, we need to do more of that...

Dear God.
posted by ArkhanJG at 6:35 PM on October 2, 2008


NUCULAR

**chug**
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:35 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Did she say Senator O'Biden?
posted by Morrigan at 6:36 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


"The chant is 'Drill, baby, drill'."

Oh, snap! Joe Biden forgot Poland!
posted by Flunkie at 6:36 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


She did!
posted by datter at 6:37 PM on October 2, 2008


"...I am tolerant.. some of my best friends are.....bigots."
posted by Floydd at 6:38 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Ooo, gay rights. This should be interesting...

Again with the claim to have gay friends! Hasn't this been debunked already?!

"Straight-up" LOL.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:38 PM on October 2, 2008


Uncommitted Ohio voters love it when Governor Palin talks about lesbians.
posted by stavrogin at 6:39 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


We have an exit strategy?
posted by birdherder at 6:39 PM on October 2, 2008


It's official; I despise her. She's the high school cheerleader running for student council who gets up in front of the school and talks about shorter class times, longer lunch periods and more pep rallies but has absolutely no clue of how to provide that.
posted by Ugh at 6:40 PM on October 2, 2008 [23 favorites]


Disgusting that they share the position on making marriage unavailable to same-sex couples.
posted by salvia at 6:40 PM on October 2, 2008 [13 favorites]


lame, can't we just say gay, straight whatever, if it involves law we call it a civil union. Leave marriage to be religious ceremony.
posted by MrBobaFett at 6:41 PM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


"Gwen, with all due respect, I didn't hear a plan."

He should continue to use that line throughout the remaining 45 minutes.
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:42 PM on October 2, 2008


"Obama voted against our troops."
posted by Floydd at 6:42 PM on October 2, 2008


Dear Joe Biden:

We know that 2 comes after 1.

Thank you,

Everyone
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:42 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


White flag?
posted by birdherder at 6:43 PM on October 2, 2008


She called Biden/Obama's plan for pulling out of Iraq "white flag of surrender". We may be getting close to someone getting a rap in the mouth here.
posted by datter at 6:43 PM on October 2, 2008


OH SNAP
posted by sciurus at 6:43 PM on October 2, 2008


"The building had thirteen floors, but that's another storey."
posted by Floydd at 6:44 PM on October 2, 2008


As disappointing as that was, I did see Biden attempting to draw a distinction between the civil and religious dimensions of committed relationships. I think it would be awesome if the only legal option available to any couple, regardless of composition, was registering for a civil union.

On preview: what MrBobaFett said.
posted by lumensimus at 6:44 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Disgusting that they share the position on making marriage unavailable to same-sex couples.
This is true of Obama and Biden in terms of the religious sense of marriage. In terms of the civil sense of marriage, they're all for it.

And frankly, this is as it should be. Just as the government has no business telling Catholics that the Catholic church must allow divorcees to marry, the government also has no business telling assholes that the asshole church must allow gays to marry. Government should not be telling religions about what their sacraments need to conform to.

However, they also believe that, just as the government extends the civil benefits of marriage to divorcees, whether they're Catholic or not, it must extend the civil benefits of marriage to gays, regardless of whether they're assholes or not.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in their position on this matter. Only via oversimplification might it seem that there is.
posted by Flunkie at 6:45 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


HAI GUYZ IS THIS THE DEBATE THREAD?
posted by spiderwire at 6:46 PM on October 2, 2008


That was a nice rationalization.
posted by smackfu at 6:46 PM on October 2, 2008


Nukular!
posted by birdherder at 6:47 PM on October 2, 2008


psssst. Joe. STOP BEING A FREAKING SENATOR FOR FIVE MINUTES! Regular people have instant narcolepsy when they hear the words "subcommittee" and "amendment."
posted by poxuppit at 6:47 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


it isn't nucular, it is new-clear.
posted by clearly at 6:48 PM on October 2, 2008


Is it wrong that I want to buzz Biden's head with a #1 clipper? I think he would look more dignified if he wasn't pretending.
posted by ninjew at 6:48 PM on October 2, 2008


NUCULAR NUCULAR NUCULAR
posted by Rhaomi at 6:48 PM on October 2, 2008


Are you not allowed to be a Republican if you don't pronounce nuclear wrong?
posted by potch at 6:48 PM on October 2, 2008


Heh, the Castro brothers. Sounds like a folk singing group.
posted by smackfu at 6:48 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


I make that 6 "nucular"s. And she's recycling her spiel about Ahmedinajad.
posted by Pallas Athena at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008


new-clear. Why is that so hard?
posted by poxuppit at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008


She can pronounce Ahmadinejād but not new-clear?!
posted by ijoshua at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


*SNORE*
posted by sciurus at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008


Holy shit! They hate us for our freedom!
posted by birdherder at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


OH NOES! THEY ARE TAKING OUR FREEDOMS!
posted by Serial Killer Slumber Party at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


They HATE what we STAND FOR!

With our FREEDOMS!
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Tolerance! Women's rights! Hahahahaha!
posted by lumensimus at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008


"that is beyond bad judgment, that is dangerous"

Now she's just quoting John McCain verbatim.
posted by datter at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008


Diplomacy is Serious Business
posted by arcanecrowbar at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008


"Our freedom, our tolerance, our respect for women's rights" LOLOLOLOL
posted by bunnytricks at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008


I don't think they hate America's freedoms as much as the hate America fucking around with foreign governments constantly.
posted by MrBobaFett at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Look at you over there. With your freedoms.

You dirty whore.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:50 PM on October 2, 2008 [8 favorites]


Palin's obstinate and stupid, and McCain and never gives the same answer twice. So, I propose we rename their campaign MOOSE AND SQUIRREL.
posted by seanmpuckett at 6:51 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Spain-nnnn!
posted by notsnot at 6:51 PM on October 2, 2008


This is horrible / will work. She's rattling off the pre-recorded talking points with ease.
posted by Artw at 6:51 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Godwinned!
posted by educatedslacker at 6:52 PM on October 2, 2008


Flunkie: Here is the official Obama/Biden position (from their website):
Barack Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples equal legal rights and privileges as married couples. Obama also believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognized unions. These rights and benefits include the right to assist a loved one in times of emergency, the right to equal health insurance and other employment benefits, and property rights.

The problem I have with this (and what I heard Joe Biden just say) is that it perpetuates that separate but equal bullshit that ghettoizes LGBT people-- there should be ONE license granted by the state for ALL couples, not a "civil union" for same-sex couples and a "marriage license" for hetero couples. I'm glad they want civil unions to be equal to marriage, but then why not just get rid of legal marriage altogether, and truly leave that term to religious organizations if they want it so badly. I don't get the sense that that is what they are proposing with their support for civil unions.
posted by DiscourseMarker at 6:55 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Maverick! *ding*
posted by ArkhanJG at 6:55 PM on October 2, 2008


MAVERICK!
posted by Eekacat at 6:55 PM on October 2, 2008


wtf? what kind of logic is that? the dems can't want change because they're pointing out error with current policy? isn't that what CHANGE MEANS? TO BE DIFFERENT?
posted by ninjew at 6:56 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Thanks for the longer religious / civil distinction explanation. I still think it sucks for him to clearly say [not positive I got this quote exactly right:] "we oppose same-sex marriage." I don't say "I oppose allowing women to drive" as a way of communicating that I understand certain religions may have that position and want people to be free to practice whatever religion they choose.
posted by salvia at 6:56 PM on October 2, 2008


Shit. I have to take a shot every time she drops a "g" and I'm fixin' to pass out.
posted by kirkaracha at 6:56 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


SPAINNNNNN!
posted by exlotuseater at 6:57 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Nuculur weapons are the be-all, end-all.
posted by vibrotronica at 6:57 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I guess if "feathers" is a euphemism for Dubya's ball hair, then McCain has certainly and eagerly ruffled a lot of feathers over the past eight years.
posted by bunnytricks at 6:57 PM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


"secretary rice, meeting with one side or the other..."


you know, israelis, palestinians, jews, arabs - it's just soooo tough to keep them all straight!
posted by fingers_of_fire at 6:57 PM on October 2, 2008


I think she just called Kim Jong-il... Kim Jungle. That's better than the earlier Senator O'Biden bit.
posted by datter at 6:58 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


The doomsayers upthread earlier today were right. The Republicans won this when they were able to dictate the terms of the debate. 90 seconds of foggy word salad and buzzwords, with no real opportunity for rebuttal.
posted by arcanecrowbar at 6:58 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


you know, israelis, palestinians, jews, arabs - it's just soooo tough to keep them all straight!

I believe you mean the Zionites and the Porcupinians.
posted by FelliniBlank at 7:00 PM on October 2, 2008


OK, Biden needs to stop referring to himself in the third person. Or I'm going to start referring to myself as "Joe Biden."
posted by Pallas Athena at 7:00 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


The surge won't work - Afghanistan is a Karst topography, for one.
posted by notsnot at 7:00 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wait, there's no NATO allies in Iraq? FU, Palin.
posted by ArkhanJG at 7:01 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


THIS IS NOT A FUCKING PTA MEETING
posted by clearly at 7:01 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Metafilter: foggy word salad and buzzwords, with no real opportunity for rebuttal.
posted by emelenjr at 7:01 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Did Joe Biden just sigh heavily during Palin's response?
posted by DiscourseMarker at 7:01 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


nuclear weapons would be the be-all and end-all of so many people


she's got a point there.
posted by fingers_of_fire at 7:01 PM on October 2, 2008


(thanks to the geologist wife for that one)
posted by notsnot at 7:02 PM on October 2, 2008


did he say "Bosniac's" ?
posted by MrBobaFett at 7:02 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


No one even remembers Bosnia, Joe.
posted by smackfu at 7:02 PM on October 2, 2008


When they show the back shots of Palin, it looks like she's got the transmitter bump on her back like Bush had in '04.
posted by anomie at 7:02 PM on October 2, 2008


I liked how Biden just said "Bosniacs". That's a cool word.
posted by DMan at 7:02 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Joe Biden stands as a friend to the Bosniacs.
posted by Horace Rumpole at 7:03 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


nuclear weapons would be the be-all and end-all of so many people

Especially in communities, like the community of New York.
posted by gatorae at 7:03 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden's not going to win anybody over with all these facts and plans. Palin is doing a heckuva job of being perky and positive and her "aw shucks, folks, how can running this country be, right?"

*sigh*

I was so afraid of this. Fuck.
posted by papercake at 7:04 PM on October 2, 2008


If I weren't already drinking heavily, she would make me hit the bottle. Hard.
posted by poxuppit at 7:04 PM on October 2, 2008


To better explain my drivers license analogy -- I don't think you should say "we don't think women should be allowed to drive" just to pander to religions who forbid it, the separation of church and state notwithstanding (even if you also offer "chaufeuse licenses").
posted by salvia at 7:04 PM on October 2, 2008


Maverick/Outsider 2008!
posted by homunculus at 7:04 PM on October 2, 2008


did he say "Bosniac's" ?
Yes. I was surprised by that, so I looked it up, and according to both the OED and Merriam-Websters, "Bosniacs" is a synonym for "Bosnians".
posted by Flunkie at 7:05 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Both answers to the Darfur question sucked.
posted by sciurus at 7:06 PM on October 2, 2008


I am totally trademarking the word Bosniacs™, Bosniac™ and Bosniacian™
posted by datter at 7:06 PM on October 2, 2008


I for one am a fan of Biden's facts and plans. Isn't that something we need from leaders?
posted by MrBobaFett at 7:06 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


I reckon she thought the question was a trap, and hesitated to commit to a certain newspaper.

She's a journalism major. A journalism major. Not only that, she specifically mentioned the fact that she's a journalism major to Hugh Hewitt as an explanation for why she's OK with "gotcha" questions: "Oh yes Mr. Hugh, I'm a journamalism major, so I've heard lots of those questions before."

But apparently not enough of them to be able to name a newspaper. If you asked me, "Oh hey, you were an English major, what's your favorite book?" and I said, "ALL OF THEM," you wouldn't say, "ooh, tough question, too open-ended," you'd say, "wow, what a moron."

That's not a "gotcha" question, it's a "gimme" question. And if you can't answer it you shouldn't be running for Vice President -- a fairly important position that may occasionally require you to think on your feet in public.

Seriously, I know conservatives hate the lib'rul media, but is Katie Couric alone really that much scarier than a summit of world leaders or a hostile opposition party? Really? Do they expect her to handle the latter situations better than the former?
posted by spiderwire at 7:06 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


POWW!!!!!!!!


(oops, scared the cat)
posted by notsnot at 7:07 PM on October 2, 2008


Heh, John McCain knows how to win a war, but he's never been in a winning war...
posted by Eekacat at 7:07 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


DAMNIT.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosniaks
posted by datter at 7:07 PM on October 2, 2008


wonkette seems to have crashed.
posted by poxuppit at 7:08 PM on October 2, 2008


She just said, "John McCain knows how to win a war; he's been there..."

Hmmmm.... how exactly did he do that?
posted by armoir from antproof case at 7:08 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


No one even remembers Bosnia, Joe.

Not even Hillary Clinton?
posted by spiderwire at 7:08 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


My next band is going to be called Joe Biden and the Bosniacs.
posted by vibrotronica at 7:08 PM on October 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


The Republicans won this when they were able to dictate the terms of the debate. 90 seconds of foggy word salad and buzzwords, with no real opportunity for rebuttal.

Absolutely. Because what's happened, and quite transparently, is that she's memorized a short speech related to each of the likely questions and repeated it smoothly. Palin has not once had to think or explore the depth of any question. She's been armed with strategies for switching the topic of a question to a topic she has studied up on. And she's pretty damn busy with her index cards.

It's transparent that this isn't her brain doing the work. But her image might look pretty good to those who aren't concerned about knowledge, and they may have some success with this strategy of spinning "ignorant" as "outsider."
posted by Miko at 7:09 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Mavericks again???? This is fake.
posted by gatorae at 7:09 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


If she says, "The greed and corruption on Wall Street" one more time...
posted by Locative at 7:10 PM on October 2, 2008


I apologize to all the Bosniacs for being ignorant to their cool alternative name.
posted by MrBobaFett at 7:10 PM on October 2, 2008


How would a Palin administration differ from a McCain administration?

"What do you expect? A team of mavericks."

Huh?
posted by lumensimus at 7:10 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


From Ambinder: Palin gets the name of the commander general in Afghanistan wrong: he's McKiernan, not McClellan.
posted by poxuppit at 7:10 PM on October 2, 2008


MrBobaFett, I'm with you on the plans and ideas. I guess I have a low opinion of those people who are on the fence during this election.

She just winked. I just threw up a little in my mouth.
posted by papercake at 7:11 PM on October 2, 2008


I for one am a fan of Biden's facts and plans. Isn't that something we need from leaders?

I'm reminded of that riff from the Aaron Sorkin - Michael Douglas president flick about how "these are serious times, we have serious challenges, and we need serious people, etc." I'm sure the dimbulb Palin happy-happy-joy-joy-rah-rah-rah routine will go over big, though.
posted by FelliniBlank at 7:11 PM on October 2, 2008


So if it’s a pod of whales and a murder of crows, do you call it a team of mavericks?
posted by ijoshua at 7:11 PM on October 2, 2008


Since when do the working class pay business taxes?

Having a business makes you bourgeoisie.
posted by jb at 7:11 PM on October 2, 2008


oh wow, the wife is even using the c word. Yowza.
posted by notsnot at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


She's completely insufferable.
posted by Flunkie at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008


Ok, I'm just amused by how they try to out-middle class each other.

Although Palin's cutesy-folksy-whatever is just irritating.
posted by lullaby at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008


STOP FUCKING WINKING! YOU'RE RUNNING FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respect the office even if you don't respect yourself.
posted by Horace Rumpole at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


WHAT
posted by ninjew at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008


My brain hurts from watching this. I should have played the drinking game instead of palingo.
posted by dejah420 at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh gosh darn tootin, you betcha FUCKING STAB ME IN THE PENIS IT WILL HURT LESS THAN THIS.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [15 favorites]


BE FOLKSIER I FUCKING DARE YOU BE FOLKSIER RIGHT THIS FUCKING MINUTE
posted by Simon! at 7:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [25 favorites]


She just did a shout-out. Words fail me.
posted by Ugh at 7:13 PM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


But her image might look pretty good to those who aren't concerned about knowledge

The beauty of this strategy is that there's no bad soundbites to take away.
posted by smackfu at 7:13 PM on October 2, 2008


So if it’s a pod of whales and a murder of crows, do you call it a team of mavericks?
I just looked this up in the OED, too. It turns out that the proper term is actually "a coven of mavericks".
posted by Flunkie at 7:14 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


"Say it ain't so, Joe, there you go again, doggone it!" "Extra credit for the third-graders!"

Someone please hit me in the forehead with a mallet until I go into a coma.
posted by FelliniBlank at 7:14 PM on October 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


I've taken to playing that video of her playing the flute in the background whenever she talks. Makes it much more pleasant.
posted by datter at 7:14 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Was that the first Presidential/Vice Presidential debate shout out ever? Inquiring minds want to know...
posted by ltracey at 7:14 PM on October 2, 2008


She completely avoided the economic issue by talking about education.
posted by jb at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


EXTRA CREDIT FUCK YES.
posted by clearly at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


Wait. What additional, not-currently-exercised power does the Constitution allow the VP to have over the Senate? That sounds ominous.
posted by salvia at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Since when do the working class pay business taxes?

Having a business makes you bourgeoisie.


Now that's just commie talk.

*winks folksily*
posted by gompa at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


Are there people somewhere who would be charmed by this? I ask in all seriousness.
posted by poxuppit at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


i've had it. this is intolerable. I'm gonna stab myself in the thigh repeatedly. then soothe the pain by changing the channel and lighting a joint.
posted by ninjew at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


"Shout out"? Really?

She might actually be too folksy for people to take her seriously.
posted by joedan at 7:15 PM on October 2, 2008


I said something about this upthread, but Aaron Sorkin couldn't have written a better character than Palin. Everyone counted her out and knew she was going to get smoked, but then she comes out with this performance, shocking the whole nation. Granted, it's all smoke, mirrors, and a million redirections, but you know that McCain is smiling that stupid Bush smirk right now.

FUCKNUTS.
posted by educatedslacker at 7:16 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Yes - the vice president simply needs more power.
posted by ao4047 at 7:16 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden's not going to win anybody over with all these facts and plans.

Is this seriously how intimidated we are with this bullshit about the average voter preferring relatable ignorance in their leaders?

Lay it down, Biden, if nothing else as a witness to God and/or anybody who will listen that America had a real choice between soundbites with a pretty face and a bible on one hand, and someone who cared enough to think about and discuss policies on the other.

And you know what? Obama's been trusting people to respond to the higher road so far, and the road has certainly not been smooth, but it's worked out well enough. I'll despair just like anybody else if McCain and Palin win at the end of it, but until then, the high road's good enough for me.
posted by namespan at 7:18 PM on October 2, 2008 [11 favorites]


Since when do the working class pay business taxes?

Having a business makes you bourgeoisie.

Now that's just commie talk.


So is talking about a working class.

Back in the day (aka the 17th century), we just called them "the poorer sort" or "the meaner sort" - as opposed to the "better sort".
posted by jb at 7:18 PM on October 2, 2008


Are there people somewhere who would be charmed by this? I ask in all seriousness.

Moreover, if they somehow do find such revolting shallow shameless patronizing faux-flirty pandering charming, could they possibly want the (Vice) President to be behaving that way when meeting foreign leaders? Is she running for Princess Di, or what?
posted by FelliniBlank at 7:19 PM on October 2, 2008


Josh Marshall:

10:17: ...
posted by spiderwire at 7:20 PM on October 2, 2008


MAN, Biden got a huge spike as soon as he ripped into Cheney.
posted by sciurus at 7:20 PM on October 2, 2008


Oh great. The cubs are getting murdered again. Apparently the TV needs to be off tonight.
posted by ninjew at 7:21 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Oh, she had to bring up the "city on a fucking hill" speech! (And attribute it to Reagan of all people!)

Righties just fucking love that speech. What is left about America that other nations want to emulate?
posted by Pallas Athena at 7:22 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden almost cried. JESUS HELP ME.
posted by datter at 7:23 PM on October 2, 2008


Jesus. She's like an flailing animatronic! Like the hokey Maw Bear in the old Country Jamboree show. This whole display is just so fucking insulting.
posted by maryh at 7:23 PM on October 2, 2008


FINALLY someone calls bullshit on the Maverick! Thank you!!!
posted by arcanecrowbar at 7:26 PM on October 2, 2008


namespan, you're a better person than I.
posted by papercake at 7:26 PM on October 2, 2008


I don't think she's doing well at all. Even the "Ohio Swing Voters" have been flatliners for most of her cutesy schtick, and the women trendline has been sloping up for Biden. What this has done has made me a lot more confident in Biden as a VP pick.
posted by potch at 7:27 PM on October 2, 2008


If she doesn't say earmarks I'm gonna be pissed
posted by MrBobaFett at 7:29 PM on October 2, 2008


You mean Reagan didn't invent the idea of "the city on the hill"? That's just crazy talk.
posted by jb at 7:29 PM on October 2, 2008


The filter of the mainstream media? How about the filter of not answering the question at hand?
posted by lumensimus at 7:29 PM on October 2, 2008


Sarah Palin knows what my hurts are.
posted by clearly at 7:30 PM on October 2, 2008


This post is wrong. Turns out that Sarah Palin is not a better debater than I thought.
posted by spiderwire at 7:30 PM on October 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


I almost cried when he almost cried. In a good way.
posted by ersatzkat at 7:30 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Make-Believe Maverick
posted by homunculus at 7:30 PM on October 2, 2008


My assessment of Palin's performance: She didn't say anything but she said it very well.
posted by Manhasset at 7:31 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


JESUS MAWKISH CHRIST
posted by sciurus at 7:31 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


"I really enjoyed not answering questions directly to the American People. MAVERICKOUTSIDERMAVERICKOUTSIDER! Thank you." *wink*
posted by papercake at 7:32 PM on October 2, 2008


"back in the day when the men and women of america were free."

did i hear that right? wtf does that mean?
posted by andywolf at 7:32 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


forget the mike's on please god please god
posted by andywolf at 7:33 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


did i hear that right? wtf does that mean?

I think you've identified the theme of the night.
posted by gatorae at 7:34 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I think she's implying that civilization is going to collapse if we don't vote for John McCain. Nice to see the fear-mongering tactics of the past eight years are going to change.
posted by lumensimus at 7:34 PM on October 2, 2008


"back in the day when the men and women of America were free"

IF YOU DON'T VOTE FOR MCCAIN 'N' ME PUTIN WILL COME OVER ALASKAN AIRSPACE INTO AMERICA AND ENSLAVE US ALL
posted by scody at 7:35 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


God that was depressing
posted by dydecker at 7:36 PM on October 2, 2008


Well guys, we may or may not have subverted MeFi a bit here tonight but that was entertaining just the same.
posted by datter at 7:36 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden almost cried.

That was awesome. It was genuine (which Palin wasn't), it was moving, and it was one of the few things she really couldn't have gotten away with herself.
posted by Miko at 7:38 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


So, does Gwen Ifil have to sit there like that until they leave?
posted by dirigibleman at 7:38 PM on October 2, 2008


How can you change without being to look back at what you are changing from?
posted by Artw at 7:38 PM on October 2, 2008


If McCain and Palin are elected, the entire world will come and raise their heads over Alaskan airspace and into America.

The rest of the world has had to tolerate Dubya and Darth Cheney fo 8 years. Please elect sane individuals this time?

Thanking you.
posted by tomcosgrave at 7:39 PM on October 2, 2008


I don't think this is going to be much of a game-changer, really. Palin basically tossed talking points up that Biden shot down and kept the focus on McCain = Bush. She managed to get a laugh, but then Biden curb-stomped the maverick meme. And the fact that he got the last word, tying in his dad, small town America, God, our troops - an excellent cocktail for undecideds.

In the end, McCain may see a modest bump, but again, so will Obama. As I've said, this should be a vitamin shot to both sides, but not a real serious impact on the direction these campaigns are going.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 7:39 PM on October 2, 2008


Heh, LGF is down. Republicans are going to go ape shit over the fact that Palin didn't drool on herself and fart on camera.
posted by anomie at 7:40 PM on October 2, 2008


Chris Matthews was just freaking out on MSNBC over her comment about expanding the powers of the VP. I was in the car when she said it, and I could hear the guy in the car next to me scream "OH MY GOD, YOU DUMBSHIT FASCIST!" when she started in.
posted by scody at 7:40 PM on October 2, 2008 [53 favorites]


So, does Gwen Ifil have to sit there like that until they leave?

Ifil broke her foot two days ago and is probably in a cast and with crutches at a minimum; so I imagine, yes, might be better to wait until the cameras go off and the crowds disperse to get out of the way.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:41 PM on October 2, 2008


dirigibleman

I'm watching NBC, and they said she hurt her leg very badly and was using a wheelchair this morning.

Republicans REALLY wanted her to go easy on Palin...
posted by educatedslacker at 7:41 PM on October 2, 2008


A draw. Very little chatter in the greater sphere regarding this debate beyond the next 24/48-hours.
posted by ericb at 7:41 PM on October 2, 2008


I just now became aware of why Joe Biden almost cried, and completely retract my non-witty comment above.
posted by datter at 7:42 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Manhasset has it. Biden had all the information at his fingertips, but did not always deliver it coherently. Palin was much more telegenic and came across as more clearly-spoken. He beats her on content-- she beats him on delivery.

How voters will react depends on whether her "folksy" persona makes them feel charmed or condescended to.
posted by Pallas Athena at 7:42 PM on October 2, 2008


So, does Gwen Ifil have to sit there like that until they leave?

She broke her ankle this past weekend!
posted by ericb at 7:43 PM on October 2, 2008


this should be a vitamin shot to both sides, but not a real serious impact


That would be so perfect, given the hyperventilating expectations...
posted by poxuppit at 7:43 PM on October 2, 2008


Linda Wertheimer on NPR just talked about how Biden sometimes looked "bemused" at Palin, "as if appreciating a worthy competitor."

I thought the look contained more of the sentiment from the the classic Samuel Johnson story: surprised - not that it was done well, but that it was done at all.
posted by Miko at 7:44 PM on October 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


she beats him on delivery.

If you consider delivery to be either the same platitudes over and over again or a brazen avoidance of the question...
posted by tomcosgrave at 7:45 PM on October 2, 2008


Sorry! I didn't know!
posted by dirigibleman at 7:45 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden choking up was an amazing, heart-stopping moment in the debate. And everything she said after just sounded so shallow and inconsequential. I predict a spike for Biden on that alone.
posted by shiu mai baby at 7:45 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Manhasset has it. Biden had all the information at his fingertips, but did not always deliver it coherently. Palin was much more telegenic and came across as more clearly-spoken. He beats her on content-- she beats him on delivery.

You know, when the waitress gets my order wrong but has great tits I don't compliment her for her delivery; I ask where my steak is.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:46 PM on October 2, 2008 [24 favorites]


Heh - Kevin Drum: "... a lot of her filibustering ended up sounding like random strings of phrases from the Hockey-Mom-o-Bot 3000."
posted by Flunkie at 7:47 PM on October 2, 2008


You mean Reagan didn't invent the idea of "the city on the hill"? That's just crazy talk.

At the moment, the spider dangling on a thread above the flame hits a bit closer to home as a national metaphor.
posted by enn at 7:48 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


After all the damage she's done over the past weeks in interviews and public appearances, she's really in too deep of a hole for this rather lukewarm DebateLite to make many people decide she's not a blithering idiot after all.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 7:48 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Exactly, XQUZYPHYR. She did a lousy, lousy job of actually answering the question asked. She delivered her talking points rather well, but half the time what she was saying had nothing to do with the topic at hand.
posted by shiu mai baby at 7:49 PM on October 2, 2008


Wow. The CNN group had 10 people raise their hand when Soledad Obrien asked "did tonight's debate solidify who you were voting for?"

One said they were voting for McCain.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Palin did about as well as I thought she would; I never believed she would be the trainwreck a lot of you seem to have been expecting. No, what surprised me is that Biden exceeded my expectations. While a lot of conservatives may be feeling very relieved right now that she didn't make any major screw-ups, I think a lot of undecideds are suddenly a lot more impressed with Biden.

And yeah, the way he executed that momentary choke-up at the end was a performance of Oscar-winning calibre.

In the end, Palin looked like someone very happy to have pulled that off for 90 minutes; Biden looked like he could have happily continued doing it for 5 more hours.
posted by the bricabrac man at 7:49 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


"Palin won because she didn't screw up." God, that thinking just makes me want to vomit.
posted by shiu mai baby at 7:50 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


She delivered her talking points rather well, but half the time what she was saying had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Precisely! When she was asked to name her "Achille's heel" for example, and proceded to ramble on about her governoring. In fairness, that might be because she doesn't know what Achille's heel means.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 7:51 PM on October 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


It all depends on whether or not the majority of people in America are cretinous morons or not.
posted by Artw at 7:52 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


And yeah, the way he executed that momentary choke-up at the end was a performance of Oscar-winning calibre.

Dude, you're talking bout a tough, populist guy from Delaware. That choke-up was not "executed," and it wasn't "a performance." That was straight-up the only authentic moment in the entire 90 minutes.
posted by shiu mai baby at 7:52 PM on October 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


One said they were voting for McCain.

and she didn't even know where she was...holy crap.
posted by clearly at 7:53 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden's choking up revealed a humanity that made Sarah Palin look like a mannequin. I can only hope that the media's coverage of this debate has that moment as a central element of what happened tonight.
posted by interrobang at 7:54 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


It all depends on whether or not the majority of people in America are cretinous morons or not.

Oh, well then.



We're doomed.
posted by Lentrohamsanin at 7:55 PM on October 2, 2008


It all depends on whether or not the majority of people in America are cretinous morons or not.

Eh, I don't know. Biden was especially consistent in speaking very simply, almost to the point of condescension. "Let me repeat that" was probably his most oft-repeated phrase. He kept his points brief, his shots at McCain direct, and wove in a healthy amount of emotion and the ol' hokey appeal.

Compare this to say, John Kerry.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 7:55 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


And yeah, the way he executed that momentary choke-up at the end was a performance of Oscar-winning calibre.
You're suggesting that he was faking emotion about the death of his wife and baby daughter?
posted by Flunkie at 7:56 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Exactly, Marisa. Biden did a great job, for the most part, of staying on message, and framing his response with easily-digestible but accurate bullet points. Very well done.
posted by shiu mai baby at 7:57 PM on October 2, 2008


tomcosgrave: If you consider delivery to be either the same platitudes over and over again or a brazen avoidance of the question...

I'd put both of those under "substance," of which I agree she had almost none. But she was surprisingly adept at wrapping that shit in a shiny package.

XQZPHYR: You know, when the waitress gets my order wrong but has great tits I don't compliment her for her delivery; I ask where my steak is.

"Where's the beef?" is a damn good question at this point.
posted by Pallas Athena at 7:57 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


The whole exchange on the role of the vice-president is going to be incredibly damaging for the McCain ticket.
If there is one person more despised, feared and hated in this country than George Bush, it it Dick Cheney. Palin's tacit endorsement of Cheney's constitutional revisionism of the office of VP, combined with her sunny assertion that she would like to expand the powers of that office in various unspecified ways, will pretty much destroy any hope of McCain winning over a good number of independents who are already suspicious of her popularity among the hard Right. A Sarah Palin who diligently and quietly fulfilled the prescribed role of her office might have been acceptable to these voters; a Sarah Palin, whose true support base (much more ideologically extreme and combative) is decidely not that of her running mate, that is bent on aggrandizing even more power, is truly terrifying to many people. Palin may have solidifed McCain's support among the religious Right, but I suspect an equal number of independents--those folks that McCain must win over if he is to win, will be streaming for the exits of the Republican party this election cycle.
posted by Chrischris at 7:59 PM on October 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


And yeah, the way he executed that momentary choke-up at the end was a performance of Oscar-winning calibre.

You must really think he's a monster.
posted by dirigibleman at 7:59 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


she's really in too deep of a hole for this rather lukewarm DebateLite to make many people decide she's not a blithering idiot after all.

But maybe it'll instill a lot of false confidence in the McCain campaign, and they'll lengthen her leash over the next week so we can have more hilarious hijinks!

But I don't think so. I think they'll keep her scripted and away from the media until Election Day.

I completely agree, though. She did just well enough not to hurt the campaign further, but her performance was too clearly rote and rehearsed to reverse the opinions about her. She had already begun to repeat her themes (maverick, middle class, mom-itude, regularness, Reagan, hero, maverick, confidence, American people, maverick again...) before the 90 minutes were up. It wasn't enough to hurt, but it wasn't enough to impress or to bring in the undecideds...who are this campaign's only hope.
posted by Miko at 7:59 PM on October 2, 2008


:-))
posted by Rafaelloello at 8:00 PM on October 2, 2008


"I thought she came across terrific" - Chris Matthews.

Bleah.
posted by poxuppit at 8:01 PM on October 2, 2008


As somebody who listened to the debate on the radio, I would say that Palin did a pretty poor high school debate level job, let alone the vice presidential level she was actually (laughably, unbelievably) at.

Biden pretty much was swinging her innards around yodeling, but the worst moments for Palin came when she was the one talking. I was sad to hear at the end that this was the only VP debate. I haven't laughed like that in a while.
posted by stinkycheese at 8:02 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Exactly, XQUZYPHYR. She did a lousy, lousy job of actually answering the question asked. She delivered her talking points rather well, but half the time what she was saying had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Well, she basically said at the beginning of the debate that she wasn't going to play by the silly rules given to her and was going to answer the questions "her way." Mrs. Papercake and I both laughed at the blatant Fuck You/Retreat to her 3x5 cards.
posted by papercake at 8:03 PM on October 2, 2008


All hat, no cattle.
posted by Tenuki at 8:04 PM on October 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Wait, she had 3x5 cards? Is that even allowed?
posted by shiu mai baby at 8:04 PM on October 2, 2008


As somebody who listened to the debate on the radio, I would say that Palin did a pretty poor high school debate level job, let alone the vice presidential level she was actually (laughably, unbelievably) at.

It's true that she really needs that camera. I was making exactly the same comment to someone just as I read your post - we listened to the debate partly on the radio, and watched the other part of it streaming online. She sounds far weaker without the visual connection she makes right to the camera - she has this wide, intent gaze and perma-smile that are oddly hypnotizing, in a neotonous sort of way. Without that, the words sound even emptier.
posted by Miko at 8:06 PM on October 2, 2008


"As somebody who listened to the debate on the radio, I would say that Palin did a pretty poor high school debate level job..."

I agree. She will do very poorly with those undecideds huddled around the victrola, mailing in their absentee ballots written with charcoal on parchment.
posted by Rafaelloello at 8:08 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I did find it amusing that Palin co-opted the phrase "Never Again" from the Holocaust and used it in reference to... the credit crisis.
posted by gatorae at 8:08 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Howard Fineman, tool extraordinaire, on CNN, gets one right: Palin's style was "like a wolverine attacking the pant leg of a passerby."
posted by fourcheesemac at 8:09 PM on October 2, 2008


That kitchen table got a serious workout tonight.
posted by louche mustachio at 8:10 PM on October 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


She will do very poorly with those undecideds huddled around the victrola, mailing in their absentee ballots written with charcoal on parchment.

You really think a candidate who just said there's wiggle room in terms of VP power is going to draw independents?
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:11 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


she scares the shit out of me
posted by Bookhouse at 8:12 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Biden choking up was an amazing, heart-stopping moment in the debate.

Video | 01:35. The story behind it all.
posted by ericb at 8:13 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Fun, fun, fun, until Michelle takes the Corolla away.
posted by Rafaelloello at 8:14 PM on October 2, 2008


fun, fun, fun, until Cindy takes the Lear Jet away.
posted by clearly at 8:15 PM on October 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


She will do very poorly with those undecideds huddled around the victrola, mailing in their absentee ballots written with charcoal on parchment.

Come on, now - we all know the Victrola vote was always in the bag for McCain anyway. I think that's what's behind his energy initiative - more power to fuel our Victrolas, streetcars, and Frigidaires!

But the radio? Well, it's a great medium for catching people who had to cancel their cable so they can afford their rent and medical bills, and for people who have to be at work nights. I wonder how many people who had to listen while at work - at the hospital, the police station, the security company, the 7-11, the taxi dispatcher - make over $250,000 a year?
posted by Miko at 8:16 PM on October 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


I hate T. Boone Pickens.
posted by Flunkie at 8:16 PM on October 2, 2008


I'm lagging behind here (DVR) buty we just got past the crying and the de-mavericking, and I have to ssy I am really liking Biden.

Will it impress the hypothetical morons? Probably not, but he is one cool guy.
posted by Artw at 8:17 PM on October 2, 2008


> she scares the shit out of me

Yeah especially when they asked her about nukes...
posted by dhruva at 8:18 PM on October 2, 2008


She will do very poorly with those undecideds huddled around the victrola, mailing in their absentee ballots written with charcoal on parchment.

Or, you know, people like myself driving home from work (or even at work) and listening to it on -- what's that? -- the radio.
posted by scody at 8:18 PM on October 2, 2008


I did find it amusing that Palin co-opted the phrase "Never Again" from the Holocaust and used it in reference to... the credit crisis.
Well dontcha know, gee golly, maybe it's just because I'm a Joe Six Pack Hockey Mom Washington Outsider, but whillikers, dontcha know they really are the same thing, because our Jewish brother and sisters, God bless 'em, dontcha know they were right there in the middle of the Holocaust and the credit crisis, dontcha know.
posted by Flunkie at 8:20 PM on October 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


Yeah especially when they asked her about nukes...

That question was quite clearly off pre-scripted talking point, and should not have been allowed in the debate.
posted by Artw at 8:20 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


As an independent voter in a swing county of a swing state, Palin has done nothing to earn my vote, and if the opposing candidate was similar to recent elections, I might have had to abstain. McCain, to me, is George Bush's Monica Lewinsky. I hate to admit it, but I liked McCain back in the 2000 election. Now he's just pathetic. Palin is Dan Quayle, but just with less substance. If anyone that isn't a blind conservative still has any question about the vote this November, then they can't see through a plain glass window.
posted by Eekacat at 8:20 PM on October 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


It's petty, but her pronunciation of a few words just makes me mental. Example #1: Surge. In Palinspeak: Serrrrrrrrrrge. The Serrrrrrrrrge. She loved that word so much.

#2 NEWKYOULAR. Over and over again until every lobe of my brain was pounding in agony. Honestly, part of me believes that one of her debate coaches made her say it that way just because they know how much it drives thinking folk right up the wall.
posted by shiu mai baby at 8:22 PM on October 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


From 538:
The CBS poll of undecideds had Biden winning the debate 46-21, with 33 percent calling it a tie. But few votes were moved as as result. Among the undecideds, 18 percent committed to Obama, and 10 percent committed to McCain, but 71 percent remained uncommitted.

Biden won the CNN and CBS focus groups. Palin won the Luntz focus group. The candidates tied in the Halperin focus group.

posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:22 PM on October 2, 2008


Biden wins whitest teeth. Or whatever those were in his mouth.
posted by Rafaelloello at 8:23 PM on