Isn't this the dilemma of trying to use interest rates as punishment? posted by smackfu at 12:49 PM on October 31, 2008
Seems like a perfectly rational thing to do, no? And the rate on loan they paid down is 8.5% over Libor, which would currently effectively be around 11%. posted by preparat at 1:00 PM on October 31, 2008
Sure it seems rational on the part of A.I.G., but what about the Fed/Treasury? Did they not anticipate this? Why not exclude A.I.G. from the CP buying program? Or at least put strict terms on the use of Federal funds? Allowing them to participate effectively nullifies the punitive intention of the original bridge loan... posted by jckll at 1:09 PM on October 31, 2008
Not cool. posted by snofoam at 1:29 PM on October 31, 2008
I'm missing the "why didn't they do this or that" part of your post. or is this just another "get of my lawn" FPP? posted by krautland at 3:26 PM on October 31, 2008
what is the 'money link' plz posted by fingerbang at 12:28 AM on November 1, 2008
« Older Every Halloween I think about him... | And the LORD said to Moses, &q... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by smackfu at 12:49 PM on October 31, 2008