The Inauguration -- Up Close
January 26, 2009 10:54 AM   Subscribe

A high-res composite photo of Obama's inauguration, made up of 220 Canon G10 images. The resulting file is 59,783 X 24,658 pixels or 1,474 megapixels.
posted by VicNebulous (14 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: Contrary to popular belief, this does not when combined with the other one yield a 3D stereogram. -- cortex



 
oh no
posted by Optimus Chyme at 10:55 AM on January 26, 2009


I'm honestly sorry to report that this awesome post is a repeat.
posted by dawson at 10:55 AM on January 26, 2009


still on the front page

http://www.metafilter.com/78554/Too-bad-Hillarys-eyes-are-closed
posted by Optimus Chyme at 10:56 AM on January 26, 2009


Okay I give up on this game.

I spent two hours looking for the differences and I can't find any.
posted by rokusan at 10:57 AM on January 26, 2009


If you look closely I'm there holding a copy of the Treaty of Westphalia.
posted by GuyZero at 11:02 AM on January 26, 2009


I'm honestly sorry to report that this awesome post is a repeat.

Crap, my bad.

still on the front page

Ever get the creeping feeling, after posting, that even though you didn't see it here, someone probably already posted it?

Yeah...
posted by VicNebulous at 11:04 AM on January 26, 2009


How many is that in dog pixels?
posted by strangeleftydoublethink at 11:06 AM on January 26, 2009


Calculating dog pixels gets tricky, as they don't see all colors. Beyond that, I can't help ya.
posted by filthy light thief at 11:09 AM on January 26, 2009


There is a difference. Clarence Thomas has been sleeping longer in this one.
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 11:10 AM on January 26, 2009


whoopsie
posted by HyperBlue at 11:10 AM on January 26, 2009


I have a copy of this picture in 1:1 scale. It's rolled up in a tube in the garage.
posted by crapmatic at 11:13 AM on January 26, 2009


Hey look, there I am. I'm the guy waving the flag if you scroll way to the right and then zoom in all the way.
posted by Pollomacho at 11:16 AM on January 26, 2009


Wow.

Y'see, this is the sort of thing you always see in bad spy movies (e.g. "Enemy of the State") and assume is impossible: some camera takes a picture of an event where there are 2 million people in the audience, and then we zoom in on one person and can read the name of the magazine they're holding.

Except no it's no longer science fiction; now it's really happening and it's been done by a civilian.

I'm not a tinfoil-wearing nutjob, but I will confess that this makes me...uneasy. Am I alone on this?
posted by DWRoelands at 11:23 AM on January 26, 2009


Uneasy? Why? Were you reading the New Porker?
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 11:26 AM on January 26, 2009


« Older I can't forget that I'm bereft of all the pleasant...   |   Of Neil Gaiman and Infinite Canvas Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments