<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 7875</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 7875</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 03:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 03:17:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 7875</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.luckedcompany.com"&gt;Has Pud gone soft?&lt;/a&gt; Perhaps all of the money he&apos;s generating from his email lists have given him an alternate reality?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 00:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>		<category>business</category>		<category>dotcom</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ckemp</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#86041</link>	
		<description>The idea isn&apos;t all that bad: perhaps it is indeed refreshening to actually hear good news (or at least news that is not all negative) rather than just getting another confirmation that yes, 90% of all Internet companies are fucked; yes, you won&apos;t find a decent technology-related and high-paying job now; yes, all the shares you invested in are worthless; ...

Perhaps, just perhaps, the bubble burst is over, and the press reverts to just a tiny bit of positive dotcom coverage.

Or perhaps, I&apos;m just reading too much into this news item. :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-86041</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 03:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ckemp</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brucec</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#86082</link>	
		<description>time to get used to the new new new economy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-86082</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 06:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brucec</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: th3ph17</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#86193</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So KBToys bought the festering pile of crap that is eToys.com for like $3.4 million or some ABSOLUTELY FUCKING REDICULOUS number. Hint, you stupid fuckheads at KB: ABORT MISSION and instead hire some high school kid to make that site for you in 2 fucking months. &lt;/i&gt;

i wouldn&apos;t say Soft. 

he has just expanded.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-86193</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 09:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>th3ph17</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sauril</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#86243</link>	
		<description>Looks to me like it&apos;s simply a different url with a new header to get around corporate firewalls and censorware. All the links have a &quot;FuckedCompany&quot; header.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-86243</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 10:43:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sauril</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#86247</link>	
		<description>I saw that, but I wondered if perhaps he was going to split it off at some point.  It makes logical sense of course for him to do that.  Of course I wonder if the happy fun slander boards would be any different.  If not, then Pud will post a &apos;lucked&quot; company and his readers will tear it a new asshole...  That could actually end up generating more business for the other side of Pud&apos;s world.   Hmmmm. 

Of course, you may be right.  It may be firewall circumvention.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-86247</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 10:48:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7875/#90900</link>	
		<description>Ironic.  I post the link, and only two or three weeks later, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idrive.com&quot;&gt;my company&lt;/a&gt; graces the site&apos;s presence...  How weird...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.7875-90900</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2001 23:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
