<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Polaroid Alternative Process Galleries</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Polaroid Alternative Process Galleries</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:32:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:32:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Polaroid Alternative Process Galleries</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.joannewarfieldfineart.com/contents.html"&gt;Joanne Warfield&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; innovative work in Polaroid emulsion and image transfers, time/zero manipulation and corrosion. &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/46065/The-Beauty-of-Afghanistan-Remembered&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt; on MeFi)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:06:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>		<category>joannewarfield</category>		<category>photography</category>		<category>polaroid</category>		<category>emulsion</category>		<category>corrosion</category>		<category>psychedelic</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: barrett caulk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries#2453275</link>	
		<description>i find these short on significant content.  but as someone who has explored (okay, dabbled in) alternative process photography, including polaroid manipulations, i have to say that her technique is impressive.  some of them are really beautiful and/or trippy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184-2453275</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:32:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>barrett caulk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rageagainsttherobots</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries#2453357</link>	
		<description>Yeah I agree. They look pretty sharp for a plastic lens.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184-2453357</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:05:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rageagainsttherobots</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: johngumbo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries#2453419</link>	
		<description>Meh</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184-2453419</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johngumbo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries#2453455</link>	
		<description>I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dareland.com/emulsionalproblems/&quot;&gt;Michael Dare&apos;s &quot;Emulsional Problems&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, but then, I liked it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/31293/Shake-It-Like-a-Paranoid-Picture&quot;&gt;5 years ago&lt;/a&gt; (actually, 25 years ago when I met him in his prime of Celebrity Picture alterations, but I posted it here 4 years and 362 days ago).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184-2453455</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79184/Polaroid-Alternative-Process-Galleries#2453457</link>	
		<description>Gotta side with the mehs on this one.  Twenty or thirty years ago, these effects would be somewhat interesting.  Now?  With Photoshop?   It&apos;s beyond meh, really.

And as much as I will sorely miss Polaroid, I will not be lamenting the death of emulsion transfers any time soon.

&lt;em&gt;They look pretty sharp for a plastic lens.&lt;/em&gt;

Could have been shot on a decent medium-format camera with a Polaroid back, but it seems from the artist&apos;s statement and links that she uses a little Daylab enlarger: Insert negative (shot on a non-Polaroid camera), print onto Polaroid film.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.79184-2453457</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:37:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
