<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 792</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/792//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 792</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:05:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 792</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/792/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bantu.com"&gt;Bantu&lt;/a&gt; is the holy grail of instant messaging apps. The people behind it have been working on this for a while, and they&apos;re now offering a web-based, java client that can talk to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icq.com/&quot;&gt;ICQ&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://messenger.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://messenger.yahoo.com/&quot;&gt;Yahoo instant message&lt;/a&gt; clients. If it were a client side application, I&apos;d probably use it, I&apos;m not a big fan of leaving a browser window open all the time. Another drawback is that it can&apos;t reach AIM users.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.792</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2000 19:37:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>bantu</category>		<category>instantmessaging</category>		<category>yahoo</category>		<category>aim</category>		<category>icq</category>		<category>msn</category>		<category>technology</category>		<category>IM</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kcchip</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/792/#987</link>	
		<description>It would be nice to see a (non web-based) client that could span all the messaging groups.  I wonder if AIM is harder to talk to, for technical or non-technical reasons.  It seems like AOL doesn&apos;t like having its kids play with other instant messagers.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.792-987</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcchip</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/792/#988</link>	
		<description>The think your last sentence is the explanation, based on what we&apos;ve seen from the MSN vs. AOL messengers last summer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.792-988</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:14:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hobbes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/792/#1008</link>	
		<description>&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.jabber.org&quot;&gt;Jabber&lt;/A&gt; is something
in development that seems to have great potential.  The
documentation is a bit sketchy, though. :-\</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.792-1008</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hobbes</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
