<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 794</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 794</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:37:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:37:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 794</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dianadress.com/"&gt;DianaDress.com&lt;/a&gt; is a site that lets you bid on one of Diana&apos;s dresses, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000221/re/britain_diana_1.html&quot;&gt;cut up into millions of tiny pieces and sold off for charity&lt;/a&gt;. Although all the money is supposed to go to a good cause, it&apos;s a creepy way to raise money any way you look at it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>diana</category>		<category>charity</category>		<category>dresses</category>		<category>princessofwales</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: frog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#984</link>	
		<description>What creeps me out is the way they do the math about saving lives. As if it&apos;s some kind of game. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-984</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:37:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: corpse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#989</link>	
		<description>Maybe one day she will run out of dresses.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-989</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 05:14:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>corpse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mattw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#990</link>	
		<description>I can&apos;t believe the wave of Diana mania hasn&apos;t died down yet. At the time, Carl Steadman caused a stir with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dianabear.com&quot;&gt;an account of a teddy bear&lt;/a&gt;, stolen from the tributes. I don&apos;t know whether it was true, but if not it was no doubt inspired by the story of a tourist who was taken to court for stealing a bear. They were freed on appeal, but on the way out of the court, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_649000/649869.stm&quot;&gt;punched in the face by a passer-by&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-990</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:25:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tomcosgrave</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#991</link>	
		<description>I can see how it&apos;s kind of creepy - but what about auctioning off say, a guitar that belonged to Hendrix, or a musical manuscript written by John Lennon or samething?

As I say, I think it&apos;s creepy that all this Diana stuff is still going on, but there are loads of auctions of dead celebrity stuff, and they don&apos;t seem to get quite as much flak.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-991</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:35:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomcosgrave</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: howa2396</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#1001</link>	
		<description>Tom makes a good point.  The selling of stuff owned by other dead celebrities never seems to bring as much attention as Princess Diana &apos;merchandise&apos;.  However, what I find odd is that they are cutting the dress into little pieces and selling it.  It reminds me of when the Berlin Wall went down, and you could buy your own chunk of concrete.  I say sell the dress, not pieces of the dress.  After all, someone wouldn&apos;t smash Jimi Hedrix&apos;s guitar into pieces and sell it like that....   and is it just me, or is there something spooky about the girl&apos;s face on the front page of the site?  cross-eyed maybe?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-1001</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>howa2396</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmacleod</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#1017</link>	
		<description>As weird as it may seem, if selling pieces of someones damn dress helps charity - then great.  

But I wonder if one of the charities might be an organization that helps disturbed people who collect pieces of peoples clothing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-1017</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmacleod</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: grant</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/794/#1021</link>	
		<description>At least the pieces of the dress are cut up and not shredded, as if having been extracted out of a car wreck - just for instance...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.794-1021</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:32:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
