<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 801</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/801//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 801</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:42:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 801</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/801/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/millionaire/millionaire.shtml"&gt;More bad news about Fox&apos;s multimillionaire.&lt;/a&gt; Now &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.thesmokinggun.com&quot;&gt;the smoking gun&lt;/a&gt; says he was abusive to a past fiancee.  i&apos;m willing to bet someone in the research department is sweating today.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.801</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:45:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sugarfish</dc:creator>		<category>RickRockwell</category>		<category>Fox</category>		<category>TV</category>		<category>television</category>		<category>realityTV</category>		<category>millionaire</category>		<category>abuse</category>		<category>TheSmokingGun</category>		<category>SmokingGun</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sapphireblue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/801/#1049</link>	
		<description>Uh oh... looks like Rick and Darva&apos;s next television appearance may be on &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20000222_1475.html&quot;&gt;Divorce Court&lt;/a&gt;. Gosh, what a surprise.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.801-1049</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sapphireblue</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Steven C. Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/801/#1059</link>	
		<description>This was Fox&apos;s attempt at a smash hit during the February &quot;Sweeps&quot;.

What I don&apos;t understand is why the advertisers let them get away with this kind of thing.

Look, the &quot;sweeps&quot; are when the ratings are given a particularly close scrutiny, and based on this the networks get to set their advertising rates for the next few months.

The theory is that this close look gives a particularly accurate measurement of the network&apos;s typical viewership numbers.

But if the networks deliberately schedule special episodes of their regular shows, not to mention one-of specials like this particular piece of shit, then what gets measured is decidedly non-typical.

So just how does it make any sense to set the advertising rates for the next few months when all the networks are busy stacking the deck during the sweeps?

In the mean time, it now seems that he may not even be a millionaire. Reuters just posted an article saying that he may have
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000222/re/fox_millionaire_5.html&quot;&gt;
$600,000 in debts.&lt;/a&gt;

(Sorry, I don&apos;t know how to add a link to my post for sure; I just tried entering HTML directly and it might not work.)

I wonder if what-ser-name can sue Fox? It would be very interesting to know just what kinds of wavers she had to sign in order to get on the show -- let alone exactly what the terms were of the prenup she signed.

Cue the lawyers...
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.801-1059</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven C. Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: delfuego</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/801/#1127</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s also now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poynter.org/medianews/rick.htm&quot;&gt;a good review&lt;/a&gt; of the fact-checking that theSmokingGun went through to get the story...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.801-1127</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:48:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
