Comments on: Not on the good rug!

Not on the good rug!

1f2frfbf — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:30:58 -0800

Danish 70's Interior Design, Porno Style. sorta NSFW-ish?

By: dabitch

dabitch — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:37:55 -0800

Shag carpet huh? sorry For more snickering, see Fart magazine.

By: elwoodwiles

elwoodwiles — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:42:10 -0800

It's probably just the way these are cropped, but I just kept thinking 'these would make awesome backgrounds for banner ads!' And no, I do not shop at American Apparel.

By: crapmatic

crapmatic — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:44:07 -0800

I think this is from the IKEA Porn Caravan.

By: jason's_planet

jason's_planet — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:44:58 -0800

Some music to go with this.

By: swift

swift — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:26:32 -0800

Nice Zeppelin poster.

By: Red58

Red58 — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:29:45 -0800

Isn't it great that we can have sex regardless of how disturbing the surroundings are?

By: Xoebe

Xoebe — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:30:25 -0800

Guys with beards in porn is almost as much a turn off as girls with beards in porn. Unless of course you are into bears. 60's and 70's era modern furniture is a huge plus in porn. American colonial, not so much. Neither is the International Style. Mies van de Rohe clearly never tried to have an orgy on a cold stone floor against a concrete wall, with glass on either side. Bauhaus = boner droopage, and painful knees. Brightly colored and shaggy carpet, as well as carpet on wall, a big big plus. Big fireplaces and carpeted "conversation" pits, oh yeah, big plus. I could go om, but I think you get it.

By: Thorzdad

Thorzdad — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:41:11 -0800

Wow. Rodox scans. Where's Tove?

By: Skot

Skot — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:57:57 -0800

Metafilter: Of course, you are into bears.

By: cazoo

cazoo — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:08:26 -0800

60s Playboy magazines are really great for Mid-Century fetishists.

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:26:38 -0800

Sven, I'm telling you, hang the Led Zepplin poster off kilter. In fact, put all your posters on an angle. It looks more hip, man. Yah sure ok.

By: heathkit

heathkit — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:30:07 -0800

Awesome title

By: gman

gman — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:42:46 -0800

Some safe for work porn to go with this. (NSFW)

By: orme

orme — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:54:51 -0800

It's like all the huge, oily bushes ate away most of the photos and this is all that they could recover.

By: aspo

aspo — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:43:35 -0800

Making him stop staring at me! Please!

By: goodnewsfortheinsane

goodnewsfortheinsane — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:57:37 -0800

This is marvellous, thank you.

By: Forktine

Forktine — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:42:30 -0800

These are really great. I do sort of wish that clicking the photos opened up uncropped versions, though -- not for the nakedness, but for the backgrounds. The cropped photos are like hints of what's there, and not being able to see the rest is irritating.

By: thisjax

thisjax — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:01:46 -0800

It's like all the huge, oily bushes ate away most of the photos and this is all that they could recover. Oily? Oily? I don't even want to know.

By: schoolgirl report

schoolgirl report — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:58:21 -0800

Some music to go with this. No no no. This. (like I could resist)