<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How to avoid being sued</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post How to avoid being sued</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:13:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:13:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>How to avoid being sued</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.citizen.org/litigation/briefs/IntFreeSpch/articles.cfm?ID=18475"&gt;Guide for Bloggers&lt;/a&gt; and Non-Profit Organizations About Writing With Libel in Mind &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A layman&apos;s guide to the current state of libel law, presented by Public Citizen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:34:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Pickle</dc:creator>		<category>libel</category>		<category>bloggers</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: double block and bleed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514025</link>	
		<description>I want to make a joke here, but I don&apos;t want to increase my exposure to litigation.

nice post</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514025</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:13:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>double block and bleed</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate Pickle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514056</link>	
		<description>You &lt;i&gt;better&lt;/i&gt; not! I know a lawyer!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514056</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Pickle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Maias</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514107</link>	
		<description>One principle:  tell the truth and back it up.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514107</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:03:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maias</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate Pickle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514134</link>	
		<description>Actually, two. The second principle is that under the First Amendment, opinions are protected speech. But only if it&apos;s clear to the reader that it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an opinion.

&quot;I think you&apos;re an SOB&quot; is protected speech.
&quot;You are an SOB&quot; may not be; it depends on the context.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514134</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Pickle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: XMLicious</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514191</link>	
		<description>&quot;Writing With Libel in Mind&quot; but it&apos;s not a guide to committing libel?  That&apos;s no fun.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514191</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:39:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>XMLicious</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: girlgenius</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514261</link>	
		<description>Australian bloggers might want to check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2009/04/defamation-for-dummies/&quot;&gt;Skeptic Lawyer&apos;s guide to defamation law&lt;/a&gt; for bloggers</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514261</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 03:49:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>girlgenius</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: applemeat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80584/How-to-avoid-being-sued#2514642</link>	
		<description>Chocolate Pickle:  &lt;em&gt;&quot;I think you&apos;re an SOB&quot; is protected speech. &quot;You are an SOB&quot; may not be; it depends on the context.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;

Well, because no dog has ever actually given birth to a human, calling somebody an &quot;SOB&quot; has always constituted  &lt;em&gt;opinion&lt;/em&gt;, i.e. protected speech.   But perhaps it is more important to remember that libel is a tort of public perception*--it constitutes vandalism to a person&apos;s reputation.  The term &quot;SOB&quot; connotes (in our culture, and at this time)  a negative, but imprecise, insult that cannot be proven &quot;true&quot; or &quot;false.&quot;  Exchange &quot;SOB&quot; for &lt;em&gt;thief &lt;/em&gt;(or &lt;em&gt;prostitute&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;counterfeiter&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;child molester&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;drug addict&lt;/em&gt;, etc.)  and Chocolate Pickle&apos;s statement becomes more accurate.

[*For example, the homophobic epithet &quot;fairy&quot;--which, like &quot;SOB,&quot; is not taken literally by the public to mean &quot;a benevolent winged spirit&quot;--has, in previous decades, constituted libel when used to define a heterosexual man.]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.80584-2514642</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>applemeat</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
