When a beauty pageant contestant gets booed for not personally endorsing gay marriage, I think it's safe to say that we're on the cusp of real change. posted by Joe Beese at 6:10 PM on April 22 [12 favorites has favorites]
This guy had a great video auto-tuning the Palin - Biden debate. Does anyone have the link to it? posted by Dia Nomou Nomo Apethanon at 6:17 PM on April 22
Okay, that was borderline brilliant. posted by WinnipegDragon at 6:45 PM on April 22
you just had to put the pedophile video in here, yes?
If by googling to find out what the hell you meant, then yes.
It is possible, however vanishingly small the prospect may seem, to not know a person-on-the-internet's life story when first stumbling upon their relatively humorous video. If I've unwittingly breached some horrid code-of-conduct due to my benighted and repugnant illiteracy, then please, mods, delete all my above comment in this thread forthwith, and with extreme prejudice. I don't want to give even the appearance of sanctioning child molesters in any way. posted by Devils Rancher at 6:45 PM on April 22 [1 favorite has favorites]
Mach5: my favorite part about that video is when it says, "MP3 available on request...LOL" posted by nosila at 7:15 PM on April 22
Actually, now that I think about it, I really hate phase shifters, too. Still. Shaft. Bad muthaf*
Not a phase shifter - an out-of-phase Strat. Like with the 5-way switch on the two or 4 position.
Like the strummy guitar at the beginning of Lucky Star. Worst. Guitar. Sound. Ever. No matter how awful autotune gets, it's not as bad as the mid-to-late-80s trend of the out of phase strat funk strum. It takes the James Brown guitar style and slides all sliders to full "suck" mode.
I actually own a late-80s Roland JC-120, and even that amp is hard to get to sound like that -- it's too warm sounding. They didn't have some easy way to get that horrible tone. They had to work for it. posted by The World Famous at 7:48 PM on April 22 [1 favorite has favorites]
Sex offender, yes. Pedophile, maybe not. posted by emelenjr at 8:01 PM on April 22
Yeah, I was about to post the same thing as CitrusFreak. (The weird thing about the "rehosted" version is that they didn't just put their logo at the end, they actually edited some of the content out.)
Cool, I just linked to the original. posted by mathowie at 8:11 PM on April 22
an out-of-phase Strat. Like with the 5-way switch on the two or 4 position.
Oh man, I've got a lousy Strat clone I rewired (very, very badly) with three in-off-out switches instead of tone controls and a 5-way. I can give you neck and bridge together out-of-phase. It's awesome... when it works. posted by uncleozzy at 8:24 PM on April 22
Dirty. This posted while I was editing mine, so no flags popped up. What's etiquette for something like that? posted by spaceboy86 at 8:28 PM on April 22
I'm with you, uncleozzy. My strat has three three-way mini-toggles in addition to the 5-way, and the 5-way is wired so that the middle position does the neck and bridge like a Nashville Tele instead of soloing the middle pickup like a strat. So I can get all kinds of out-of-phase. posted by The World Famous at 8:29 PM on April 22
Just watched more of his videos. This guy is great. posted by defenestration at 8:59 PM on April 22
Spaceboy86, you had some good links in your post...would you mind posting them here? posted by Ian A.T. at 9:10 PM on April 22
Fuck, I HATE HATE HATE that Strat out of phase sound.
The 5-way switch is an invention of Satan. That is all. posted by unSane at 9:38 PM on April 22
The 5-way switch might be singlehandedly responsible for music sucking for several years after its invention. Hendrix did not have a 5-way switch. David Gilmour would probably have been better off without one.
(But I actually use the out-of-phase positions quite a bit, and they can sound great if used right.)
We need an FPP about the switching and pickup configurations on electric guitars and the corresponding music styles. posted by The World Famous at 10:10 PM on April 22
[Also: how could Couric or her writers use a line like "Without it there could be a snowball effect" when talking about melting icecaps?] posted by pracowity at 11:41 PM on April 22
Does Katie Couric sound anything like that? If she did, I would go out of my way to watch her.
If she doesn't, then the guys who made this are geniuseses. posted by From Bklyn at 12:00 AM on April 23
er, by 'thid' I mean 'this'. posted by delmoi at 3:57 AM on April 23
Normally I'm completely against the entire Autotune phenomenon, but Katie Couric's autotuned voice is incredible and I'd buy an entire album of it. Somehow her voice combines with autotune and produces something magical, unlike the crap it makes of everyone else's voice... posted by mmoncur at 4:00 AM on April 23
I actually kinda like autotune but I say that with the following 3 caveats:
1) Since I don't listen to much commercial radio, I rarely hear it.
2) I love robots.
3) I am well known for having bad taste.
Also, the Churchill thing is brill. He kinda butchered MLK, though. posted by DU at 4:53 AM on April 23
As a result of a strangely growing compulsion to hear Couric auto-tuned, my productivity today is now on very thin ice.
I too love bad taste and have well known robots. posted by rudster at 5:48 AM on April 23
This video, from Vimeo, is great because it highlights the absurdity of the autotune sound (in a relatively "normal" setting). It starts off slow, so bear with it. posted by flippant at 6:06 AM on April 23
The Churchill and MLK things were so gutsy, becase you have the ability to so royally fuck up the beauty of the speeches. Churchill mesmerized me and MLK gave me chills. While I think that what they are doing is a bit one not, the do that one note really, really well. More, please. posted by piratebowling at 6:39 AM on April 23
I'm with Astro Zombie. The MLK one was brilliant. I cried, oh yes I did. posted by shmurley at 7:37 AM on April 23
To be clear, the MLK one is good but not nearly as good as the lyrical delivery of the original. posted by DU at 7:41 AM on April 23
I'm at work so I can't watch these with audio right now, but didn't CNN actually do this in some form at some point?
During the 2008 US primaries, I remember an interview with Ron Paul, and a Hillary Clinton speech, which were both oddly modulated, as if someone had AT'ed the audio with a very slow attack. Subtle yet noticable.
Does anybody know what I'm talking about? Or should I take this up with the Tinfoil Council on Chemtrail Affairs? posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 7:45 AM on April 23
I've just now been reading about the I Have a Dream speech. I had no idea it was partially improvised -- that most of the "I have a dream" lines were spoken extemporaneously, in response to someone, perhaps Mahalia Jackson, calling out "Tell them about the dream, Martin!"
I'm floored by that. Those are the lines that define -- in fact, name -- the speech. posted by Astro Zombie at 10:16 PM on April 23
Why do both the MLK and Churchill songs cut off like that? Has anyone found a full version? I'd love a complete mp3 of the Churchill track. posted by Ian A.T. at 7:17 AM on April 24
Also, goddamn it looks like I can't make it down to New York for the CD release party as I have a kickball game the next day. posted by Kattullus at 1:51 PM on April 26
In honor (?) of Obama's first 100 days, they've posted an Autotuned retrospective of his administration first three months.
(Okay, I mentioned this before, but seriously: why do they intentionally cut off the last few seconds of all their videos?) posted by Ian A.T. at 5:56 PM on May 4
Auto-Tune The News #3, the best yet. Especially the Dick Cheney bit. And the Ron Paul one. And the Karzai/Zardari/Clinton one. And the rest, too. posted by Plutor at 11:06 AM on May 18
Oh, and the twist ending, too. posted by Plutor at 11:08 AM on May 18
« Older
On March 18, 39 licensed amateur radio operators w...
| Yo Joe...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by dersins at 6:05 PM on April 22