Comments on: Guys With iPhones

Guys With iPhones

hermitosis — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:04:46 -0800

Are you a guy with an iPhone? Sent anyone a hot self-pic lately? You might want to check out Guys With iPhones (NSFW) to see if anyone has added you to the pool yet.

By: ColdChef

ColdChef — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:10:04 -0800

There goes my theory that guys with expensive cellphones are trying to compensate for other deficiencies.

By: Afroblanco

Afroblanco — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:11:55 -0800

um, NSFW? I mean, NSFW?! I mean FUCKING NSFW!?!?!?!??! c'mon, dude. totally not cool.

By: The Straightener

The Straightener — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:12:15 -0800

Yeeeeeah, put 'em on the touch screen, gents.

By: Afroblanco

Afroblanco — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:12:23 -0800

ack, ok, i just noticed the NSFW tag. (feels stupid, goes away)

By: furtive

furtive — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:16:40 -0800

Girls with iPhones is a million times better.

By: furtive

furtive — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:17:27 -0800

...err it will be when they get more than a page worth of photos.

By: ericb

ericb — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:17:58 -0800

c'mon, dude. totally cool!

By: HuronBob

HuronBob — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:19:08 -0800

are we fark again.. I thought we were done being fark. fark does fark much better than we do fark. let's let fark do fark, we could do something else... but not fark.

By: mattoxic

mattoxic — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:21:48 -0800

Until they have farm yard animals with iphones I remain nonplussed

By: Horace Rumpole

Horace Rumpole — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:22:27 -0800

Slightly related: The 20 Male Poses of Facebook.

By: The Straightener

The Straightener — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:23:25 -0800

Are we seriously ten comments into this thing without a bucket of cocks joke?

By: dead cousin ted

dead cousin ted — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:29:46 -0800

~~hot chicks~~ iphones with douchebags

By: thatbrunette

thatbrunette — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:30:55 -0800

Oh come on. If I wanted bad self portraits and lots of frat boy penises I could just go to Casual Encounters on Craigslist.

By: delmoi

delmoi — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:39:08 -0800

Where are the hot chicks with iphones?

By: Devils Rancher

Devils Rancher — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:44:48 -0800

Metafilter is becoming a metaphor for the fishing industry. Used to be, we could sail a few miles from shore & pull up huge nets of nice, fat salmon. Now we trawl the web waaay out to sea & all there is when we pull 'er in is a couple of perch and three plastic jugs.

By: sixswitch

sixswitch — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:45:36 -0800

The lady will have two tickets to the gun show. I mean the cock show. Wait, now I understand gun shows.

By: FunkyHelix

FunkyHelix — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:45:38 -0800

I'll be in my bunk.

By: sixswitch

sixswitch — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:46:19 -0800

Also: I fully support the occasional MetaFilter wang post.

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:46:40 -0800

...err it will be when they get more than a page worth of photos. Are you kidding, there are at least twenty-seven pages of photos! erm, I deduced from the archives.

By: mnb64

mnb64 — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:46:49 -0800

Ho hum. Yawn. Straight from the pages of Passion.com. Did I say "yawn"?

By: Stylus Happenstance

Stylus Happenstance — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:48:25 -0800

It is my understanding that iPhone pictures are sometimes embedded with GPS data, which are sometimes used to torment the subjects of said pictures.

By: Bokononist

Bokononist — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:57:09 -0800

Huh? This is totally suitable for wanking.

By: R. Mutt

R. Mutt — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:58:07 -0800

There MUST be an iphone grifter out there, somewhere.

By: Brandon Blatcher

Brandon Blatcher — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:58:59 -0800

How dare ya'll treat me as a piece of meat now that I'm married.

By: Mr. Crowley

Mr. Crowley — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:59:15 -0800

Also, there's EXIF data in IPhone pics with GPS coordinates. Goodbye anonymity.

By: Severian

Severian — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:01:41 -0800

1) I will never in all my years ahead of me ever look remotely as fit as any of those men. This disappoints me. 2) All these men are hot. This also disappoints me for a very different reason.

By: unSane

unSane — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:06:41 -0800

Related Google search

By: rokusan

rokusan — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:07:45 -0800

I mean FUCKING NSFW!?!?!?!??! Blink tags are not acceptable at my workplace. Please stop that. Also, stop reading MeFi at work if you're supposed to be working, jeez.

By: Joe Beese

Joe Beese — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:08:28 -0800

jessamyn: "...err it will be when they get more than a page worth of photos. Are you kidding, there are at least twenty-seven pages of photos! erm, I deduced from the archives." The shade of Melvil Dewey is very disappointed.

By: rokusan

rokusan — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:08:41 -0800

Also: I fully support the occasional MetaFilter wang post. I could use a stiff pdp-11 post myself.

By: double block and bleed

double block and bleed — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:10:17 -0800

Looks like every swinging dick in town has one of these phones now.

By: MaryDellamorte

MaryDellamorte — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:15:10 -0800

Where are all the pics of the skinny dudes?!

By: cjets

cjets — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:16:11 -0800

Now we trawl the web waaay out to sea & all there is when we pull 'er in is a couple of perch and three plastic jugs. Looks like we caught a few dozen cockfish as well.

By: XMLicious

XMLicious — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:39 -0800

Forgive me for not having an iPhone or any friends with iPhones, but what makes it obvious that these photos are from iPhones and not some other camera phone?

By: mediareport

mediareport — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:21:07 -0800

So, like, am I the only one wondering about the privacy issues here? Probably all submitted by strangers who see the pics at Craigslist or some relatively public site, I know, but I can't help thinking there's a big difference between 1) posting a nude pic of yourself for a night at the Craigslist of a city you're visiting and 2) seeing said pic permanently displayed on a non-regional site like that one after someone you don't know sends it in. I'm not saying the nude guys have any *right* to complain, just suggesting that it's kind of a [cough] dick move to submit these pics to another, non-local site without permission. It's almost certain that someone somewhere is going to be hurt by it. But hey, hot pics.

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:21:37 -0800

Color me unimpressed. Most of those guys are showing off sub-par goods, and as a married lady who is allowed to look (but not touch) I demand better for my dollar!

By: hippybear

hippybear — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:25:17 -0800

what makes it obvious that these photos are from iPhones and not some other camera phone? You mean, other than the shiny silver rectangle with an Apple logo each of them are holding as they photograph themselves in their mirrors?

By: Avenger

Avenger — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:25:49 -0800

I just want to say, in total seriousness, that I think I know at least 3 of the guys that I've seen so far.

By: unSane

unSane — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:26:25 -0800

Forgive me for not having an iPhone or any friends with iPhones, but what makes it obvious that these photos are from iPhones and not some other camera phone? THE FACT THAT THEY ARE HOLDING IPHONES?

By: Avenger

Avenger — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:27:39 -0800

Also, ~~Guys With iPhones~~ Gays With iPhones, FTFY.

By: MaryDellamorte

MaryDellamorte — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:29:58 -0800

Color me unimpressed. Most of those guys are showing off sub-par goods, and as a married lady who is allowed to look (but not touch) I demand better for my dollar! Ok, all dudes without huge wangs should fuck off...also all the girls without huge boobs on the female version should fuck off too. Is that what you're saying?

By: eriko

eriko — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:34:21 -0800

The shade of Melvil Dewey is very disappointed. Because the shade of Mrs. Melvil Dewey won't give up the computer.

By: evenson

evenson — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:36:52 -0800

WTF? Really? This is not why I joined mefi.

By: me & my monkey

me & my monkey — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:38:03 -0800

No one would be interested in "Flabby guys with WinMo Phones," would they? Alas, I thought not.

By: XMLicious

XMLicious — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:39:08 -0800

THE FACT THAT THEY ARE HOLDING IPHONES? Duh. Yeah, of course, they must all have the phone in the picture and all of those must be iPhones. Sorry, I deserved the all caps.

By: rdone

rdone — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:41:08 -0800

And somewhere tonight, the shade of Tom of Finland is weeping. . .

By: chowflap

chowflap — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:42:25 -0800

Does what it says on the tin.

By: greekphilosophy

greekphilosophy — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:48:59 -0800

sexting! it's the latest rage! all the kids are doing it! i'm sure I would be too, if I didn't have strict policies about always owning the least technologically advanced phone on the market at any given time.

By: regicide is good for you

regicide is good for you — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:50:24 -0800

guyswithiphones.com is one of the strangest sites I've seen in some time. I have no idea how these people got their guys in their iphones, or why.

By: bradth27

bradth27 — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:51:10 -0800

well, after looking at the pictures..... I feel bad about my belly, but I feel much better about the size of my penis.

By: Big_B

Big_B — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:52:35 -0800

tl:dr

By: davejay

davejay — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:52:50 -0800

well, after looking at the pictures..... I feel bad about my belly, but I feel much better about the size of my penis. I'm with you -- for one of these. I'll let you decide which.

By: jokeefe

jokeefe — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:53:57 -0800

MY HARD ON LET ME SHOW YOU IT

By: ericb

ericb — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:54:03 -0800

WTF? Really? This is not why I joined mefi. Pray tell, my dear ... for what did you join MetaFilter?

By: edrnjevich

edrnjevich — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:56:51 -0800

Well, I liked it.

By: jokeefe

jokeefe — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:58:22 -0800

What's that site where pictures from gay men's personal ads were critiqued in terms of the interior decor evident in the backgrounds of the photographs? My google skill are unable to work around the deluge of results that come from having 'gay' and 'personal ads' in the search terms. Anyone remember that site? I didn't imagine it, right?

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:59:36 -0800

Is that what you're saying? YES.

By: Seekerofsplendor

Seekerofsplendor — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:11:01 -0800

Come on. MetaFilter used to be a place for links of intellectual interest, or cool stuff with some validity of purpose and even novel and/or intelligent exchange. Yes, it still does that, albeit less and less. Best of the web? An FPP like this just adds to the cheapening of MeFi, yet again. And that's not only silly, it's depressing as hell.

By: The Whelk

The Whelk — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:14:08 -0800

What's that site where pictures from gay men's personal ads were critiqued in terms of the interior decor evident in the backgrounds of the photographs? Lurid Digs

By: TypographicalError

TypographicalError — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:21:56 -0800

Girlzone.

By: mediareport

mediareport — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:22:18 -0800

MetaFilter used to be a place for links of intellectual interest, or cool stuff with some validity of purpose and even novel and/or intelligent exchange... ...along with links to goofy sex sites like the one in this post. Check any month from 2000 or 2001 in the archives if you don't believe it.

By: Methylviolet

Methylviolet — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:26:36 -0800

MeFi is generally pretty high-brow, except when the brow falls through the floor. I like that. Thanks for all the penises.

By: nebulawindphone

nebulawindphone — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:26:57 -0800

A couple pages in, there's a guy taking a casual-cell-phone-in-the-mirror pic of himself fucking another guy. It's such a weird combination of intense and nonchalant: "OH GOD OH GOD YES OH hey while I'm in here I may as well take a few snapshots..."

By: nebulawindphone

nebulawindphone — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:29:22 -0800

(Also, yay cocks.)

By: mistersquid

mistersquid — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:29:26 -0800

The guys are hot and the domain's been around since the 2nd of this month. The "girls" site has been going for four days and the pickins are slim and they do not appear to have "mastered" the "art" quite yet. On a different note, I am blown away by the fact that some of the pix do contain GPS data and that in some cases that GPS data is a click away from Google Maps street view. (At least in Preview.app on OS X.) The future is geotagged.

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:30:13 -0800

By: tkchrist

tkchrist — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:31:08 -0800

Banner week for Metafilter. Brain dead babies and guys tea-bagging an iPhone. The circle is now complete. Stay classy Metafilter. Stay classy.

By: jokeefe

jokeefe — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:32:04 -0800

@The Whelk-- thank you!

By: nebulawindphone

nebulawindphone — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:32:09 -0800

guys tea-bagging an iPhone Mine doesn't have the right port for that.

By: paultopia

paultopia — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:37:10 -0800

Wow, this almost makes me want to switch to the android phone.

By: MaryDellamorte

MaryDellamorte — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:41:11 -0800

@ MaryDellamorte: no, but it's interesting that you took it so personal. ;p Just saying that just because they're all rearing to go and show the shaved goods, doesn't mean we're all out here thinking they deserve the appreciation they believe they're entitled to. I didn't take it personally. Criticizing men for the size of their penis is the same as someone criticizing a woman for having small boobs. Think of the shitstorm that would ensue if the genders were switched and everyone was discussing breast size instead of penis size. Not everyone can possess a HUGE HOG!!1!!!! and that's okay. Saying someone has "subpar goods" for not possessing a big dick is the same as saying someone is subpar for not looking like a model or not being thin. It's generally not a cool area to delve into.

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:42:01 -0800

Wow, you're angry.

By: KevinSkomsvold

KevinSkomsvold — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:47:37 -0800

Needs more Tony Danza.

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:50:39 -0800

This totally violates Apple's terms of service. And I'm lovin' every minute of it!

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:53:18 -0800

Yes, can someone get Tony Danza and Momus a couple of iPhones tout de suite?

By: the aloha

the aloha — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:54:47 -0800

though i find it quite hard, i must bid happy trails to this thread.

By: hortense

hortense — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:04:19 -0800

You know LBJ would of loved one of those phones!

By: delmoi

delmoi — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:06:42 -0800

You know, people will recognize their own usernames without putting an at sign in front of them.

By: delmoi

delmoi — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:12:29 -0800

This totally violates Apple's terms of service. And I'm lovin' every minute of it! What?

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:18:56 -0800

@delmoi: It's a joke, nevermind.

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:22:46 -0800

LOL delmoi: Here be a clicky. Untill they beat the horse to death, I stand beside a non-ability to care about the taming of the @. Points at delmoi, derail! Now get thee on your IPhone!

By: erikgrande

erikgrande — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:23:06 -0800

« Older Here are some galleries of amazing sand sculptures...

By: hippybear

hippybear — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:24:07 -0800

did you see that? Blazecock talking AT someone? It's sort of like "talk to the hand", only different.

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:24:12 -0800

*Until

By: hippybear

hippybear — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:00 -0800

eatdonuts: you take my threads far too seriously

By: eatdonuts

eatdonuts — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:27:19 -0800

hippydear: I am bored and can't sleep!

By: hippybear

hippybear — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:29:35 -0800

eatdonuts: well, it's all that sugar in the donut glaze! I've suggested they close that thread, but they don't. Oh well Still! Photos of mostly naked men. It's a good thing, right?

By: Tube

Tube — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0800

The GPS metadata issue is interesting, as it makes me wonder what level of metrological resolution the photos contain. Can it measure down to the optical inch?

By: dead cousin ted

dead cousin ted — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:02:38 -0800

Yeah I was going to ask how accurate the GPS info is, on some of these you can zoom in to houses.

By: PeterMcDermott

PeterMcDermott — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:37:32 -0800

It's nice to know that even hot guys piss in the sink from time to time.

By: LMGM

LMGM — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:58:24 -0800

ya know, there seems to be a lot of curating going on on that site. That, or only young-ish men with flat abs, trimmed pubes and 7.5"-8" uncircumcised cocks can own iPhones. From my own trawling of them thar intarwebs, I know that skinny, chubby, hairy, hairless, old, barely legal, non-white, etc. men take LOTS of nekkid pictures of themselves and post them on the web. Where's the dirty granpa with an iPhone in hand?

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:59:39 -0800

Where's the dirty granpa with an iPhone in hand? Be patient. Let Rule 34 take its course.

By: tellurian

tellurian — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:15:11 -0800

It's nice to know that even hot guys piss in the sink from time to time. Never mind that, one of them looked like he was setting up a 1 guy 1 sink thing.

By: Goofyy

Goofyy — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:43:04 -0800

Tasty and delightful. Would click again! Even gay people can enjoy eye candy. The haters in the thread need to go play with themselves. Because sometimes, you feel like a nut, and sometimes, you feel like two.

By: PeterMcDermott

PeterMcDermott — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:45:15 -0800

This guy is hung like a donkey. And I'm lovin' every minute of it! Wasn't this picture on your profile a while ago?

By: Blazecock Pileon

Blazecock Pileon — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:08:49 -0800

Wasn't this picture on your profile a while ago? Only in your dreams. Nah, that shirt's too butch, anyway.

By: teresci

teresci — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:37:36 -0800

Color me unimpressed. Most of those guys are showing off sub-par goods I saw the pictures, read your comment, and then looked at the pictures again. I think you can only be referring to out-of-date iPhones.

By: sonascope

sonascope — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:23:20 -0800

Are men really that hairless these days? Sheesh, it's like a scientific examination of larvae, to say nothing of how telling the dumb looks, smirky showboating, and gadget-smugness are of what lifeless tragedy will most likely ensue in the actual act of sex. Of course, when I just pondered what would make this sort of thing appeal to me in a prurient way, I effortlessly conjured up a scene of mildly gone-to-seed middle-aged farmers, longshoremen, and UPS drivers with secret, unpublished collections of poetry, posing in the woods with manual typewriters, which probably explains a lot of my own sexual pathologies. P.S. I have a huge Hermes Ambassador and a cabin in the woods. My profile's online at www.be—awww...forget it.

By: doobiedoo

doobiedoo — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:26:49 -0800

god can you imagine guys-with-secret-unpublished-collections-of-poetry-and-iphones.com? millions of pictures of dusty journals under beds, yellowing A4s and legal pads spilling out of wardrobes with a half smoked ciggie smouldering on the bed side table and the lamp turned down low?

By: thinkpiece

thinkpiece — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:51:00 -0800

This confirms my experience -- men make very awkward-looking mirror faces.

By: I Foody

I Foody — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:31:29 -0800

At first I was sort of bummed out about how in shape the dudes were. Then i noticed that some of them were gay. That made me feel much better. Because now I can assume that all of them were gay. So I'm in pretty good shape for a straight guy.

By: octobersurprise

octobersurprise — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:00:55 -0800

can someone get ... Momus a couple of iPhones tout de suite?

Lying in the nude with my Apple G4 cube I am rendering a porcupine in Bryce And in Stratavision Pro I'm designing where to grow Little apples when I build a haybale house ... --"Little Apples" Folktronic.

I imagine he already has a few ...

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:51:03 -0800

The comparisons between the pages is pretty fascinating-- there don't seem to be any rules other than take a hot picture of yourself. Some show heads but no dicks, some show dicks but no heads. Some guys are comfortable enough to be having sex right in front of the camera, some are fully clothed. I especially like the pictures of the naked guys with one hand over the goods-- "Here I am in all my glorious nakedness, but I'm too shy to show everything." Well no, if I 'm being truthful what I really like are the cocks at full attention-- but that's just the hormones talking. I don't think this guy got the memo.

By: ohsoferrety

ohsoferrety — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:54:23 -0800

Now I have plenty of fake n00dz! Thanks!

By: ook

ook — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:44:10 -0800

what makes it obvious that these photos are from iPhones and not some other camera phone? This is like that old Gorilla basketball selective attention study, isn't it?

By: jokeefe

jokeefe — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:52:50 -0800

millions of pictures of dusty journals under beds, yellowing A4s and legal pads spilling out of wardrobes with a half smoked ciggie smouldering on the bed side table and the lamp turned down low? Rawr! *fans self* Add a manual typewriter and I'm yours.

By: greekphilosophy

greekphilosophy — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:39 -0800

So if I get an iPhone, I will become tanned and hairless and muscular and my cock will be 15"? Or did I misread that xkcd cartoon?

By: dirtynumbangelboy

dirtynumbangelboy — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:22 -0800

That, or only young-ish men with flat abs, trimmed pubes and 7.5"-8" uncircumcised cocks can own iPhones. And there's a problem with this? ;) Also, most of them are actually circumcised, dammit. Also also, I know my birthday isn't for several months, but goddamn one of these would be just fine. Or this. Or wow. Also also also, I'm not really sure how anyone here is equating 'subpar' with 'small penix'.. these all seem pretty damn large to me. And I've seen a cock or two in my time.

By: The Whelk

The Whelk — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:06:59 -0800

These sites always remind me of that time in the gym when I realized I was the fattest person in the room. It is not a nice feeling.

By: misha

misha — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:25:43 -0800

When do we get a Mefis with iPhones site?

By: Brandon Blatcher

Brandon Blatcher — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:32:51 -0800

ineedtogotothegym.metafilter.com

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:35:22 -0800

When do we get a Mefis with iPhones site? I'll go first. I sort of think of Flickr generally as a MeFites with iPhones sort of thing.

By: shakespeherian

shakespeherian — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:38:20 -0800

By: Brandon Blatcher

Brandon Blatcher — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:48:08 -0800

Mefite with iPhone.

By: kanewai

kanewai — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:28:49 -0800

So how do I read the geocode to find out if any of them are in my neighborhood? I promise to only use the knowledge for good.

By: desjardins

desjardins — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:39:18 -0800

I promise to only use the knowledge for good. I don't. I mean, if I weren't married. And if I were a gay man.

By: jeanmari

jeanmari — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:28:24 -0800

What's that site where pictures from gay men's personal ads were critiqued in terms of the interior decor evident in the backgrounds of the photographs? No, no, no. Not Lurid Digs. The original one. Obscene Interiors.

By: humannaire

humannaire — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:32:20 -0800

guyPhone

By: Evangeline

Evangeline — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:00 -0800

Think of the shitstorm that would ensue if the genders were switched and everyone was discussing breast size instead of penis size. Not everyone can possess a HUGE HOG!!1!!!! and that's okay. Saying someone has "subpar goods" for not possessing a big dick is the same as saying someone is subpar for not looking like a model or not being thin. It's generally not a cool area to delve into. I think once you start "showcasing" your genitals in a photo, you're pretty much asking for criticism. It's not like this is a site dedicated to artistic black and white photography of the male form, and someone said, "Wow, what a tiny schlong!" These are men who are pulling their underwear down, sometimes in public restrooms, for the purpose of sending a photo of their goods. If I bought a Playgirl and said I wished the centerfold's penis was bigger, I don't think I'd be at fault. When you set out to objectify yourself, don't be surprised when you're objectified.

By: dirtynumbangelboy

dirtynumbangelboy — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:52:36 -0800

Plus, uhh... Like I said, they've all got big dicks. If you think they don't, I'm kind of concerned about how skewed your perceptions are about penis size.

By: fistynuts

fistynuts — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:14:20 -0800

Sites like this are giving men poor body image and making us all want plastic surgery and/or several eating disorders. Alternatively I suppose I could go to the gym more frequently (and get a phone contract)