I'm quite fond of this detail from the icon of The Seventh Ecumenical Council (a.k.a. Nicene Council 2: This Time It's Boogaloo). It's my current desktop wallpaper. posted by Kattullus at 10:53 PM on May 10, 2009 [2 favorites]
I love reading about Saint Alypius and other stylites, but I sometimes get my mental image of them crossed with the Chi-Lites standing on top of their pillars and dancing and singing in unison. posted by pracowity at 1:05 AM on May 11, 2009
That's fascinating - thanks for posting this. posted by patricio at 3:28 AM on May 11, 2009
Reading the links I realize that, man, we really have lost a great art form. No, I'm not talking about icongraphy, I'm talking about the ascribing of nicknames to leaders. Juana la Loca and her beau Felipe el Hermoso have been dead for 400 years and it really shows.
This is why I have taken it upon myself to hereby everafter bestow upon George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, the title of George Copronymus. posted by Pollomacho at 5:21 AM on May 11, 2009
Nice post! I myself prefer Russian icons, but hey, as long as you cross yourself from right to left... posted by languagehat at 6:39 AM on May 11, 2009
languagehat: I myself prefer Russian icons
Second Rome, Third Rome, it's no biggie… either is much better than those Johnny-come-latelies Eighth and Ninth Romes. posted by Kattullus at 7:23 AM on May 11, 2009
Pavel Florensky's book Iconostasis is another great treatise on the theology and doctrine of icons. He argues that the belief in icons—that their material form can be imbued with the ethereal spirit of a saint or other important religious figure—is a direct logical extension of the incarnation, ie. if God is made material in Jesus, the spiritual can be made material as well. Therefore when folks kiss or respect icons, they are directly respecting the spiritual figure "depicted" and not worshiping an idol. He even goes so far as to say that Rublev's Icon of the Trinity is proof of the existence of God, ie. if the trinity didn't exist, Rublev couldn't have painted it. He is literally painting the image of the invisible.
Unlike later Latinate style icons, which index real figures in life (their three dimensionality mimicking the way humans actually look), the two dimensionality of Russian Orthodox icons (and early Byzantine icons from Late Antiquity/early middle ages) are drawn to index the ethereal, otherworldliness of the individuals depicted (be they saints, God, etc.). posted by whimsicalnymph at 8:07 AM on May 11, 2009
posted by Kattullus at 10:53 PM on May 10, 2009 [2 favorites]