<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 8183</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8183//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 8183</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:15:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 8183</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8183/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://info.tbo.com/printversion.cgi?url=http%3A//ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAPZIJLRNC.html&amp;oaspagename=printthispage"&gt;&quot;Ultimately, the system should be offering data that discloses a cell phone user&apos;s geographic location, mood and availability.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Thought this might be something to think about and speculate on. Fascinating/Creepy, as so much is these days. Reminds me of Erik Davis&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedmag.com/templates/printer.php3?a_id=1559&quot;&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt; in the (possibly) late lamented Feed on the erosion of privacy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8183</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 12:34:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>		<category>lps</category>		<category>cellphones</category>		<category>mobile</category>		<category>phones</category>		<category>geography</category>		<category>mapping</category>		<category>location</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8183/#91667</link>	
		<description>As long as the user has control over the information which is given out, I don&apos;t see too much of a privacy problem here. Geographical location is already available to intelligence agencies and the like, so there doesn&apos;t appear to be a huge additional risk in this, provided the phone companies are sensible. Which I think they will be, since users will require it of them before subscribing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8183-91667</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Jordan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dong_resin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8183/#91679</link>	
		<description>I used to get as freaked out by these things as even the most caffeinated Slashdot reader, but I&apos;ve come to realize that once the corporate world over steps a certain level of invasive comfort, all they&apos;ve done is open up the market for &lt;a href=&quot;http://lavasoftusa.com/aaw/aaware.html&quot;&gt;after market devices and hacks to deal with them&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8183-91679</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 15:13:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dong_resin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: clavdivs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8183/#91717</link>	
		<description>the Adware seems cool. But could this program have a ...well valve or by-pass protocol. A back door, open window, dog entry door, loose screen, a Quikset lock, hollow plastic rock, an open garage...sorry, can these programs be by-passed or is that telling.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8183-91717</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clavdivs</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
